Pages:
Author

Topic: WildRig Multi 0.35.1 beta 2 multi-algo miner for AMD & NVIDIA - page 29. (Read 92264 times)

member
Activity: 724
Merit: 49
the cpu is 100% load, intel g4400... so i stick with 0.16.4
Oh, ok, I will try to find a solution here. And what about 0.16.4, what CPU load you can see there?
newbie
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
I found where the problem was, i have a rig with 12 gpu 10 rx 580 8gb and 2 rx 570 4gb, when i run only 7 gpu(--opencl-devices 0...6) the speed is good 23 MH/s per gpu, after add more then 7 gpu the speed is slowing down.
On 0.16.4 i don't have this issuse
What CPU you have and is there high CPU load? Also can you try to run two instances of miner(use parameter --multiple-instance) where first one will 0..5 gpu, and second one - 6..11?
the cpu is 100% load, intel g4400... so i stick with 0.16.4
member
Activity: 724
Merit: 49
I found where the problem was, i have a rig with 12 gpu 10 rx 580 8gb and 2 rx 570 4gb, when i run only 7 gpu(--opencl-devices 0...6) the speed is good 23 MH/s per gpu, after add more then 7 gpu the speed is slowing down.
On 0.16.4 i don't have this issuse
What CPU you have and is there high CPU load? Also can you try to run two instances of miner(use parameter --multiple-instance) where first one will 0..5 gpu, and second one - 6..11?
newbie
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
0.16.5 beta
- should be better stability for wildkeccak using --scratchpad-safe-update on some systems
- improved x16-like(Shavite at start), honeycomb and skunkhash

Hi, the speed is below on 0.16.5 (16 MH/s) then 0.16.4(22 MH/s) why?
i try worksize(256) on start is show me 0/256 and if i put --opencl-launch=17x256 it show me 256/256 and the speed go up 21 MH/s on 0.16.5 but not 22Mh/s like 0.16.4
specify the algo and your gpu's, I'm not a magician Smiley

sorry Smiley).. honeycomb obvious
I have tested on my RX570 all possible variants of clocks, and 0.16.5 is faster around 500kH/s %) I have tried stock 1244/1750, eth-like 1100/2000. And you didn't answer for my question. What kind of GPU do you use? And what clocks? Also what memory type you get and what timings? Maybe some changes to power limit? New version utilize core more, so everything matter.

I found where the problem was, i have a rig with 12 gpu 10 rx 580 8gb and 2 rx 570 4gb, when i run only 7 gpu(--opencl-devices 0...6) the speed is good 23 MH/s per gpu, after add more then 7 gpu the speed is slowing down.
On 0.16.4 i don't have this issuse
member
Activity: 724
Merit: 49
0.16.5 beta
- should be better stability for wildkeccak using --scratchpad-safe-update on some systems
- improved x16-like(Shavite at start), honeycomb and skunkhash

Hi, the speed is below on 0.16.5 (16 MH/s) then 0.16.4(22 MH/s) why?
i try worksize(256) on start is show me 0/256 and if i put --opencl-launch=17x256 it show me 256/256 and the speed go up 21 MH/s on 0.16.5 but not 22Mh/s like 0.16.4
specify the algo and your gpu's, I'm not a magician Smiley

sorry Smiley).. honeycomb obvious
I have tested on my RX570 all possible variants of clocks, and 0.16.5 is faster around 500kH/s %) I have tried stock 1244/1750, eth-like 1100/2000. And you didn't answer for my question. What kind of GPU do you use? And what clocks? Also what memory type you get and what timings? Maybe some changes to power limit? New version utilize core more, so everything matter.
newbie
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
0.16.5 beta
- should be better stability for wildkeccak using --scratchpad-safe-update on some systems
- improved x16-like(Shavite at start), honeycomb and skunkhash

Hi, the speed is below on 0.16.5 (16 MH/s) then 0.16.4(22 MH/s) why?
i try worksize(256) on start is show me 0/256 and if i put --opencl-launch=17x256 it show me 256/256 and the speed go up 21 MH/s on 0.16.5 but not 22Mh/s like 0.16.4
specify the algo and your gpu's, I'm not a magician Smiley

sorry Smiley).. honeycomb obvious
member
Activity: 724
Merit: 49
0.16.5 beta
- should be better stability for wildkeccak using --scratchpad-safe-update on some systems
- improved x16-like(Shavite at start), honeycomb and skunkhash

Hi, the speed is below on 0.16.5 (16 MH/s) then 0.16.4(22 MH/s) why?
i try worksize(256) on start is show me 0/256 and if i put --opencl-launch=17x256 it show me 256/256 and the speed go up 21 MH/s on 0.16.5 but not 22Mh/s like 0.16.4
specify the algo and your gpu's, I'm not a magician Smiley
newbie
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
0.16.5 beta
- should be better stability for wildkeccak using --scratchpad-safe-update on some systems
- improved x16-like(Shavite at start), honeycomb and skunkhash

Hi, the speed is below on 0.16.5 (16 MH/s) then 0.16.4(22 MH/s) why?
i try worksize(256) on start is show me 0/256 and if i put --opencl-launch=17x256 it show me 256/256 and the speed go up 21 MH/s on 0.16.5 but not 22Mh/s like 0.16.4
member
Activity: 724
Merit: 49
0.16.5 beta
- should be better stability for wildkeccak using --scratchpad-safe-update on some systems
- improved x16-like(Shavite at start), honeycomb and skunkhash
member
Activity: 724
Merit: 49
Does this miner work on HiveOS with NVIDIA GPUs ?
Right now this is only AMD miner.

GPU temp and fan info is alright in HiveOS ?
You know wildrig wildkeccak has no these options in HiveOS.
I will try it for my AMD card in HiveOS. My all AMD GPUs in Windows now. I m planning to use HiveOS as NVIDIA GPUs.

Yes, but looks like currently it works not stable. Some gpu's going to n/a and I have no idea why.
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 613
Online Security & Investment Corporation
Does this miner work on HiveOS with NVIDIA GPUs ?
Right now this is only AMD miner.

GPU temp and fan info is alright in HiveOS ?
You know wildrig wildkeccak has no these options in HiveOS.
I will try it for my AMD card in HiveOS. My all AMD GPUs in Windows now. I m planning to use HiveOS as NVIDIA GPUs.
jr. member
Activity: 225
Merit: 1
0.16.4 beta
- improved honeycomb
- fixed hex, hmq1725 and some other algorithms hashrate regression
- fixed parameters --scratchpad-safe-update, --scratchpad-full-update, --no-extranonce(they was random if not specified)
- fixed communication with some pools

Damn I'm always at work when updates are releass. Now I have to wonder what the improvement is on honeycomb
member
Activity: 724
Merit: 49
0.16.4 beta
- improved honeycomb
- fixed hex, hmq1725 and some other algorithms hashrate regression
- fixed parameters --scratchpad-safe-update, --scratchpad-full-update, --no-extranonce(they was random if not specified)
- fixed communication with some pools
member
Activity: 724
Merit: 49
Does this miner work on HiveOS with NVIDIA GPUs ?
Right now this is only AMD miner.
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 613
Online Security & Investment Corporation
Does this miner work on HiveOS with NVIDIA GPUs ?
jr. member
Activity: 225
Merit: 1
Any help how to best settings for mining on Algo HoneyComb _BeeNode_ on RX 470 , thanks

I use similar to xmr settings but higher voltage. Need higher voltage for this algo

more info ?

Same core and same memory clock as you would use on xmr but increase voltage.
I started at 950mv and worked down. In the end 920mv for rx cards and 930mv on vega cards.
copper member
Activity: 245
Merit: 26
High quality Design for Cryptocurrency
Any help how to best settings for mining on Algo HoneyComb _BeeNode_ on RX 470 , thanks

I use similar to xmr settings but higher voltage. Need higher voltage for this algo

more info ?
jr. member
Activity: 225
Merit: 1
Nice boost on honeycomb.
Rx570 now 19.5mhs
Vega 64  45mhs

Edit:
Rx570 20mhs
Vega 64  46.5mhs
jr. member
Activity: 225
Merit: 1
Any help how to best settings for mining on Algo HoneyComb _BeeNode_ on RX 470 , thanks

I use similar to xmr settings but higher voltage. Need higher voltage for this algo
newbie
Activity: 123
Merit: 0
anyone know of another amd miner for mbc ?>Huh
Pages:
Jump to: