For these reasons we must always take something into Consideration , this time it was serious what they were able to violate in the casino , but this casino has security in everything , even so they were able to enter and do that, now in other casinos that are less recognized, that do not They pay so much to have such a high security system, because they can steal anything from money to the data of the players with their balances and having access to everything they can have and do, that is the dangerous thing, they can do a lot of KYC of whales that in other casinos can be compromised, this is something that no one has seen what they can do, however, I am one of those who think that as long as they are in casinos they are considered safe, if there is a hack the impact is Hard but not serious, But in a nascent casino , which has Relatively little security if they can do many other things , that is the fear of Many.
I wonder when the cyber space will be able to combat this notorious hacker called the Lazarus and if there was an insider in this job it certain that the security is not still safe since data could get licked in the future, stake. com and a global leading casino will be the most targeted for hackers and for that, the team need to really step up their games, These hackers are bad and their network is caught across global space and possibly have an insider for any of their job.
It is not an easy task to break through the security wall of a casino unless the hacker is shown the door from the inside, I know others may not have such a conviction-like mind but I am somehow convinced that the stake incident is an inside thing.
It is true, what should be considered is that what they did is a very bad act that should not be done, that should not be repeated and that should be avoided at all costs, I imagine that at stake.com security will have been increased even quadruple, because these types of events are the ones that should be avoided as much as possible, the nice thing is that as I said before, the Suaruiso were not affected, I believe that when all the security of a casino is violated, we must recognize that Not just anyone did it, it was done by someone who knew a lot and who used computer tools, which are the ones that should normally be applied for this type of attacks, but if they weren't looking for money, because they obviously got a lot of money, then what did they do? or what did they want to do? What I am thinking is that they wanted more money, but the wallets where they have all this money must have the most secure ones in the casinos, this place, which is an example of security and trust, received a very strong attack by hackers who They are really at that level because as you say, to overcome the security barriers that this casino has is something quite difficult, I can't explain how they did it, but every person who does evil doesn't know why everything is made easier for them. that they can do these kinds of things successfully.
However, this is so that the other casinos can be put into context and as they say where I live "If you see your neighbor's trash burning, put yours to soak", which means that all the casinos there are must be increasing. their security to the maximum so that they are not the next victims, but in fact in the sense that they carried out the robbery, if they were able to break the codes to enter and hack one of the best casinos, then the other casinos must pay a lot more So that the same thing does not happen to you, this time it was stake.com, which has a great capacity to respond to any thing, but the other casinos have to be very aware of everything so that something similar does not happen to you.