Topic: Will You Trust a Project Announce BY A Legendary Member - page 17. (Read 4469 times)
I joined many project ICO investment and bounty campaign is not depend with who become bounty manager, I check their ICO trust or not with how many investor give good feed back for their coin, many bounty campaign manager trusted but they failed because an ICO is not success full with low interested by investor.
Yes, I will. because I believe legendary members are more knowledged and will not want to have bad reputation on there position. But in the same vein it doesn't need to necessarily be a lengendary. I have been involved in some project that are handled by members status and it was making sense. And vice versa.
I have seen junior members having more knowledge than legendary members, better ignore rank and research project before investing, after all, your money is at stake here.Same, most of the "interesting" and really "educated" people in the local part of the forum I frequent are neither heroes nor legendaries. Just passionate people who arrived a little later and didn't necessarily race for messages and ranking. They are the ones who should be merit in priority !
The clarification and the reasons you give are entirely sensible in light of the fact that the hero members have a ton of involvement in this forum, all the more definitely, they see all zones, thus the board is simple for them. Plus, the degree of hazard that the project they can give us is extremely low when they comprehend the projects, knowing the technique for checking the validity of a project, setting off to the ship with them will be protected however remember, pick the celebrated amazing members, rather than the individuals who are not very conspicuous
Yes, I will. because I believe legendary members are more knowledged and will not want to have bad reputation on there position. But in the same vein it doesn't need to necessarily be a lengendary. I have been involved in some project that are handled by members status and it was making sense. And vice versa.
I have seen junior members having more knowledge than legendary members, better ignore rank and research project before investing, after all, your money is at stake here. 
No because a Legendary account might be use for promotion to attract investors by those so-called scam projects, much better to make your own research for the project itself before investing any hard earned money.
I don't think that the rank of the participant is so important in the choice of a project. Usually I choose a project based on information such as team, product, white paper. So, I usually don't pay attention to the status of a manager.
A good and successful project is not seen from who promotes it. So if there is a legendary member promoting the project, it does not mean that the project will be good in the future and will be a great success. It's just that every Manager or who has a service does not carelessly accept offers from the project. Because reputation must always be maintained, Suppose the legendary Member has a service and get an offer from the project. Then the service will see the project first, because they will provide a good project for everyone.
Nope, I don't trust easily, but I always give a benefit of a doubt. It is still my responsibility to examine the validity of the project and the people behind the project are trustworthy.
Yes, I will. because I believe legendary members are more knowledged and will not want to have bad reputation on there position. But in the same vein it doesn't need to necessarily be a lengendary. I have been involved in some project that are handled by members status and it was making sense. And vice versa.
Just by the member status of the OP poster? No. Anybody can start an announcement thread and claim their coin can do this or that. Most of time, they just want to earn a quick buck. The best way to analyze a project is extensively fact check every information they have shared.
If the Legendary member has reputation in this forum and was not hack then I might consider the project he/she announced but I will still do my own research for the project if ever I wanted to invest even though the Legendary member must have done some verification with the team owners before introducing it on this forum.
I trust some of the bounty managers or users who have legendary or hero member status. When I see a newbie, I just stay away because a project should be able to buy a copper membership aat least. When they open a thread as a newbie with no pics, I run away and do not look behind. They should be aware of how marketing is done.
depending on the account. If they are a legit account then I will trust their project. But if that account was hacked, I would never believe it
If an account is hacked, it is far from a fact that the community will immediately know about it. Therefore, do not focus on the lack of a red trust.
To begin with, you can check the message history of this forum member, his trust list, and also whether he has had successful bounty campaigns in the past.
If none of this exists, and the user has been inactive for a long time, it's probably a hacked or purchased account.
even he/she has a trust sign I will still not. Of course first I will research but if I found out that it is an ICO and it is based on the owner if he/she will pay the bounty hunters and investors or not. I will just trust it if it is already in the market or it is already announce by it's own partner. For sure if that specific campaign promoted by legendary member for sure it is a good project but still needed to be careful at all time.
Nope, just because it was introduced by a legendary member doesn't mean it's worth to invest. A legendary member also can work with scammers, it doesn't guarantee the legitimacy of the project. You should make a proper research before participating in bounty, whether it was announced by legendary member or a newbie.
legendary profile is more trusted than a lower rank but it doesn't mean you can fully trustvall legendary profile advertisements. Cause at last its all about money and work that's it.
depending on the account. If they are a legit account then I will trust their project. But if that account was hacked, I would never believe it
Will you trust a project that the one that announced it in the announcement thread is a legendary member even though the legendary has announced that he is not part of the team and was just part of the service he offered.
Let me know your thoughts here.
when a project is introduced with a legendary member, it might be a fairly convincing project, but, I don't think it's enough. however, we ourselves need to do research on the project that the member introduced. I might be more confident when the project was introduced by one of the moderators or a trusted member of this forum. it's more convincing, even when they don't join the project. Let me know your thoughts here.
That is one of the dirty myth which is been followed in this forum when the high rank members announce the the project from their account.
I personally don't believe the member instead I I try to to sneak more about the project using their white paper and team details.
There are much trusted Legendary Members in the forum who announce only legit projects. Even in this some gets to be a scam, which is exceptional. In one of the project just to keep up the trust of the users one of the manager of our forum paid from his own pocket as the project he handled didn't pay the funds. I personally don't believe the member instead I I try to to sneak more about the project using their white paper and team details.
Will you trust a project that the one that announced it in the announcement thread is a legendary member even though the legendary has announced that he is not part of the team and was just part of the service he offered.
Let me know your thoughts here.
Of course yes, I believe in the legendary members. They have a lot of experience in this market and they have definitely chosen good projects to publish Let me know your thoughts here.
Jump to: