Pages:
Author

Topic: Will You Trust a Project Announce BY A Legendary Member - page 19. (Read 4469 times)

member
Activity: 854
Merit: 10
There have been some projects successfully managed by legendary and there have been the vice versa. However, the success of a project goes beyond being managed by a legendary. If a newbie professionally and successfully manages a genuine and solid project, I will definitely participate in it.
hero member
Activity: 983
Merit: 502
I will not trust a project through anyone's recommendation, there is no guarantee that a project published by a legendary member will succeed.
I usually analyze the development team, the white paper, the project media sites before investing in a project.
sr. member
Activity: 430
Merit: 250
Will you trust a project that the one that announced it in the announcement thread is a legendary member even though the legendary has announced that he is not part of the team and was just part of the service he offered.

Let me know your thoughts here.
no for me bcos the legendary member is only do his/her job by making a thread and dats it you even say the legendary member is not party of the team so i will not trust the project easily like that
hero member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 537
The most important ANN made by Newbi or Legendary is that the project concept is not the Rank of the Bitcointalk account because it can be rented to make ANN. I just was not too concerned about it when looking for new projects for me to learn
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 11
As stated by some peers in here, a senior or legendary account can be bought any moment and anytime and why would you trust a project posted by a legendary not even maybe by a reputable or well-known admin too, hell no, the most important aspect is to do an individual research on the project and make a decision on it.
jr. member
Activity: 120
Merit: 1
well clearly, because there is a hierarchy, a project announced by a LEGENDARY will be trusted more than other ranks, but still we have to consider other things
full member
Activity: 728
Merit: 131
It will give a boost for me to join the project,
But will definitely give the 100 percent trust on it, Legendary members are mostly the campaign or bounty manager.
They are paid to manage the advertisement here in bitcointalk but not necessarily living in a legit project.
member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 10
Martian Swap - Anti Whale Measures New Yield Farmi
It doesn't matter who announced a project. But its better than a member or junior member announced something. Cause a legendary member profile mean something and take a lots of time to reach there. So don't go over who announced the project. Check the project is good or not. That will help more.
sr. member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 306
Peoples here are really weirdos, do you really share your trust that way? you just trust peoples because they are in a high grade? That doesn't work in Crypto. Our only lord here is the research and the analysis, no more no less. If you just trust everything and everyone here and there, you'll have your bank account drained unfortunately, you'll find yourself living in the streets. Instead, be more wise and learn from the wounds that the world have faced in the past, go read and go learn, please.
sr. member
Activity: 951
Merit: 259
We are for the most part humans,either sir members or legendary members it doesn't vary ,what makes a difference is the innovative project the part is attempting to present.

I can't say you are totally wrong, but remember that Legendary accounts have been on this platform for a long time. And every movement they make is reviewed and evaluated by the community.
It means you can trust legendary accounts with a high number of trusts. Personally, I'd rather trust a Legendary account with + trust than trusting Jr.Member.
sr. member
Activity: 784
Merit: 282
Will you trust a project that the one that announced it in the announcement thread is a legendary member even though the legendary has announced that he is not part of the team and was just part of the service he offered.

Let me know your thoughts here.

Forum rank isn't everything. There are a lot of reasons which can be listed to show how a legendary account can not be trusted. In fact, here are some:

1. Legendary accounts can be bought.
2. Legendary accounts can be borrowed.
3. Legendary accounts can be created by spammers.

Those are only some reasons but as you can see the only thing you can guarantee with account rank is how old that account is. Other than that, it's all a mask that you can't really trust.
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
Depends, I trust some legendary members here who I know personally who helped me during the hype of ICO last 2017 they suggested and promoted some good project to invest with.
member
Activity: 378
Merit: 10
We are for the most part humans,either sir members or legendary members it doesn't vary ,what makes a difference is the innovative project the part is attempting to present.
This is great piece and I do second that, whether a senior member or a legendary member, they are all humans are bound to make mistakes in our decision making so the most important part of it all is the innovative part of the project and the core team behind the project and at the same time what the project is trying to solve or bring to the crypto world.
sr. member
Activity: 1039
Merit: 256
It seems to me that one legendary participant is not enough! As there are other components for a successful project. For example, trust in the exchange on which the project is placed, the rating of the project, as well as companies that will invest in the project.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 501
Personally, it would gain some trust from my side but I would still check everything. You’re getting really paranoid when you invest Wink
sr. member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 310
Will you trust a project that the one that announced it in the announcement thread is a legendary member even though the legendary has announced that he is not part of the team and was just part of the service he offered.

Let me know your thoughts here.
Yes no second thought answer, legendary would not put his name I  jeopardy , imagine how hard it is to get to legendary status that sleepless nights, where he/she post and answer all questions
im sure he /she check if its legit or scam, he/she will not announce  if its not legit, legendary members are legit because if they are not they will be ban by the moderator im sure about that
member
Activity: 378
Merit: 10
Legendary members are humans are also found of making mistakes and are capable of making mistakes anytime of their life's so why put your trust in a project only because it was posted by such a person. Trusting a project should be based on your very own research and deductions done on the project at hand and making vivid conclusion on it as to whether to promote or participate in it.
jr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 1
Well, a project introduced by a legendary member can be an indicator, (of course the legendary member I mean is a legendary member who has a positive trust, or at least they don't have a negative trust). but even that doesn't have much effect, in my opinion we still have to look at the project as a whole.
"If asked whether the project introduced by legendary members can be an indicator? the answer it can be.
but does it have a big impact? I dont think so
member
Activity: 462
Merit: 10
It's one of the flags, but not a prerequisite for success. But INHO I will defenetly take a look at a project and DYOR it
full member
Activity: 798
Merit: 103
No, i would not trust a project just because it was announced by a legendary member. The project can be a scam too. It is surely better than making an announcement with a Newbiew account. But there is no proof that the project is going to be successful or not. It is just that the team is going to pay more the person in charge for creating the project announcement.
Pages:
Jump to: