Pages:
Author

Topic: ♨️🎲 WINDICE.io 🎲 0.3 BTC Wagering Contest 🔰 Progressive Faucet💰 Jackpots 🎁❤ - page 65. (Read 29951 times)

full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 116
But I understand why you are confused. It is written above the table of the latest contest: "FROM: 26 Sep 2019 03:00 GMT+03:00 TO: 29 Sep 2019 03:00 GMT+03:00". I think this is a mistake.

I think the dates shown in the website are correct. The lastest contest held from October 2 to October 5.
Here is the post made by windice on October 6 just after the contest was over.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52666583
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 2198
I stand with Ukraine.
while I can't say the same about the guy who took the 50th place, and, actually, about anyone not belonging to the top 3. Starting from the 4th place, the prize is less than 1% of the wagered amount, so it's possible that those guys lost more in the process than the prize they received. But let's hear from them though.
That is definitly true, users from 4th to 50th place won't have made any money this time (statistically of course). Would be very nice if someone eg. from the top 10 could post statistics about what he spent and what he earned (price and winnings) Smiley

Not only 4th to 50th places, but the prize is lower than 1% of the amount wagered for first three places too.
They have wagered 10.02, 6.43 and 5.08 BTC and won 0.1, 0.05 and 0.03 respectively.

You are looking at the wrong page, mate. Here are the top 3 for the latest contest:



But I understand why you are confused. It is written above the table of the latest contest: "FROM: 26 Sep 2019 03:00 GMT+03:00 TO: 29 Sep 2019 03:00 GMT+03:00". I think this is a mistake.



~but I don't know or understand how the team does the winning prize pools calculation but the winning prize pool are not stable and it also eye catching either.

I think they just divide 0.3 BTC among the top 50 contestants in descending order. No complicated algorithms are applied. Smiley

hero member
Activity: 2646
Merit: 686
Contest much more competetive this time around Wink


And yet you won this time again! Congrats, yoloer808!

So, what's your real profit from this event, if you don't mind me asking?

Thanks, looking forward to the next race.

My overall winnings are quite volatile. The last contest cost me a quite a bit of money, this one was slightly profitable. The prizes are a nice cherry on top of winning from rolling.

Congratulations @yoloer808 you seem to have a hot winning streak, and I wish you continue winning more competitions ahead.

Yoloer with the win once more! Dude has been rocking these competitions like crazy, this is his second win that I got to see, I don't know if he had any more wins in any other place.
He is the winner of the last contest of Wolf.bet and also the leader of their current contest. There are probably some others too. 
There are many gamblers hide their profile. But Yoloer not only doesn't do this but talk about his bets publicly. I wish him good luck.

@ahmadakbari it’s always good to interact with contest winners here, as we can get insights into their strategies and mindset when they play big bets to win.

full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 116
Yoloer with the win once more! Dude has been rocking these competitions like crazy, this is his second win that I got to see, I don't know if he had any more wins in any other place.
He is the winner of the last contest of Wolf.bet and also the leader of their current contest. There are probably some others too.  
There are many gamblers hide their profile. But Yoloer not only doesn't do this but talk about his bets publicly. I wish him good luck.
hero member
Activity: 2884
Merit: 579
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Thanks, looking forward to the next race.

My overall winnings are quite volatile. The last contest cost me a quite a bit of money, this one was slightly profitable. The prizes are a nice cherry on top of winning from rolling.
Good to know that it has been profitable to you although it's just a little bit.

If top wagerers are on the line between profit and negative then we can presume on what are the status of those who are on lower places.We cant fully conclude generally but majority of them didnt make any money.
Yeah, the prize was small for them but that's it. The competition was for the most with the highest so if you're a whale and you love taking risk and winning some decent amount, it should worth to take the risk. But for the small wins, still congrats to them there's a pride that they've made it to the top 50.
hero member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 586
Yoloer with the win once more! Dude has been rocking these competitions like crazy, this is his second win that I got to see, I don't know if he had any more wins in any other place. And to be honest with you guys I have never seen a winner come on bitcointalk topic and claim his win live neither, that seems a bit rare, usually you just see the name of the winner and nothing else, this time we actually have a chance to respond to him or even PM him as well.

Windice is looking good with the wagered amounts going up as well, this time around it looks even bigger than last time if I am not wrong, the higher ups at the top 5 really gambled a lot more than the last time. I feel like windice will keep doing this wagered contest a lot more frequently now that the wagered amounts increased.
hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 651
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
There's huge possibility that the windice team will increase the waging volume because they usually care about what their users want and affections. However, the previous contest prize pool was huge than this one.
You mean that windice will increase the price pool because users want bigger prizes? I dont think its working this way *g*
What they will definitly do is monitoring the amount of btc wagered compared to the winnings. Lets say if someone has to wager 100 BTC to win the first price they will definitly adjust it or they wont have any participants anymore.

In the latest contest yoloer808 won 0.1 BTC with 5.3 BTC wagered, so I'm not surprised that he is in profit, according to his own words:

Betwrong, have explained to you what I'm trying to clarify here but I don't know or understand how the team does the winning prize pools calculation but the winning prize pool are not stable and it also eye catching either.
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 116
while I can't say the same about the guy who took the 50th place, and, actually, about anyone not belonging to the top 3. Starting from the 4th place, the prize is less than 1% of the wagered amount, so it's possible that those guys lost more in the process than the prize they received. But let's hear from them though.
That is definitly true, users from 4th to 50th place won't have made any money this time (statistically of course). Would be very nice if someone eg. from the top 10 could post statistics about what he spent and what he earned (price and winnings) Smiley

Not only 4th to 50th places, but the prize is lower than 1% of the amount wagered for first three places too.
They have wagered 10.02, 6.43 and 5.08 BTC and won 0.1, 0.05 and 0.03 respectively.

sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 260
while I can't say the same about the guy who took the 50th place, and, actually, about anyone not belonging to the top 3. Starting from the 4th place, the prize is less than 1% of the wagered amount, so it's possible that those guys lost more in the process than the prize they received. But let's hear from them though.
That is definitly true, users from 4th to 50th place won't have made any money this time (statistically of course). Would be very nice if someone eg. from the top 10 could post statistics about what he spent and what he earned (price and winnings) Smiley

It is common statistic but in fact we do not know the exact number how much they lost or how much they won during the process. There are also some players who did not even focusing on the wagering contest but those players did play as normal gambler only without looking at the wagering contest but at they might be on top 50 at the end of the contest. Anyway, I doubt that we will hear it from the top 10 players as they are usually keep it as a private thing.

I very much agree with Bitinity, these players are hard core players and probably the wagered amount is something they don't even look at carefully, especially if they're in just for the game/fun of it. And, of course, they'd keep this info private at this may be used against them in future races/contest, or perhaps, these are details they no longer concern themselves with - who knows  Undecided
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1312
while I can't say the same about the guy who took the 50th place, and, actually, about anyone not belonging to the top 3. Starting from the 4th place, the prize is less than 1% of the wagered amount, so it's possible that those guys lost more in the process than the prize they received. But let's hear from them though.
That is definitly true, users from 4th to 50th place won't have made any money this time (statistically of course). Would be very nice if someone eg. from the top 10 could post statistics about what he spent and what he earned (price and winnings) Smiley

It is common statistic but in fact we do not know the exact number how much they lost or how much they won during the process. There are also some players who did not even focusing on the wagering contest but those players did play as normal gambler only without looking at the wagering contest but at they might be on top 50 at the end of the contest. Anyway, I doubt that we will hear it from the top 10 players as they are usually keep it as a private thing.
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1140
while I can't say the same about the guy who took the 50th place, and, actually, about anyone not belonging to the top 3. Starting from the 4th place, the prize is less than 1% of the wagered amount, so it's possible that those guys lost more in the process than the prize they received. But let's hear from them though.
That is definitly true, users from 4th to 50th place won't have made any money this time (statistically of course). Would be very nice if someone eg. from the top 10 could post statistics about what he spent and what he earned (price and winnings) Smiley
If top wagerers are on the line between profit and negative then we can presume on what are the status of those who are on lower places.We cant fully conclude generally but majority of them didnt make any money.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2721
while I can't say the same about the guy who took the 50th place, and, actually, about anyone not belonging to the top 3. Starting from the 4th place, the prize is less than 1% of the wagered amount, so it's possible that those guys lost more in the process than the prize they received. But let's hear from them though.
That is definitly true, users from 4th to 50th place won't have made any money this time (statistically of course). Would be very nice if someone eg. from the top 10 could post statistics about what he spent and what he earned (price and winnings) Smiley
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 116
My overall winnings are quite volatile. The last contest cost me a quite a bit of money, this one was slightly profitable. The prizes are a nice cherry on top of winning from rolling.
I expected the first contest to be more profitable than the second one for you. Because you won the first one with wagering 5 bitcoins and 0.05 expected loss and won the second one with wagering 10 bitcoins and 0.1 expected loss.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 2198
I stand with Ukraine.
There's huge possibility that the windice team will increase the waging volume because they usually care about what their users want and affections. However, the previous contest prize pool was huge than this one.
You mean that windice will increase the price pool because users want bigger prizes? I dont think its working this way *g*
What they will definitly do is monitoring the amount of btc wagered compared to the winnings. Lets say if someone has to wager 100 BTC to win the first price they will definitly adjust it or they wont have any participants anymore.

In the latest contest yoloer808 won 0.1 BTC with 5.3 BTC wagered, so I'm not surprised that he is in profit, according to his own words:

~My overall winnings are quite volatile. The last contest cost me a quite a bit of money, this one was slightly profitable. ~

 while I can't say the same about the guy who took the 50th place, and, actually, about anyone not belonging to the top 3. Starting from the 4th place, the prize is less than 1% of the wagered amount, so it's possible that those guys lost more in the process than the prize they received. But let's hear from them though.

Contest participants, users form the top 50, was your participation profitable overall?
full member
Activity: 288
Merit: 113
Web dev for hire
Contest much more competetive this time around Wink


And yet you won this time again! Congrats, yoloer808!

So, what's your real profit from this event, if you don't mind me asking?

Thanks, looking forward to the next race.

My overall winnings are quite volatile. The last contest cost me a quite a bit of money, this one was slightly profitable. The prizes are a nice cherry on top of winning from rolling.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2721
There's huge possibility that the windice team will increase the waging volume because they usually care about what their users want and affections. However, the previous contest prize pool was huge than this one.
You mean that windice will increase the price pool because users want bigger prizes? I dont think its working this way *g*
What they will definitly do is monitoring the amount of btc wagered compared to the winnings. Lets say if someone has to wager 100 BTC to win the first price they will definitly adjust it or they wont have any participants anymore.
hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 651
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me

And then we can imagine that the results will be very exciting. Will you explain the results with statistical data? It will be the guide for the next events.
I dont think the team need to provide the result statistic data since every single account holder on their site can easy see the statistic data


In the last round of the contest the first winner has wagered 10 bitcoins and won 0.1 BTC. Given the 1% house edge, he is expected to lose 0.1 BTC.
So, I don't think the wagring volume can increase very much in next contests unless Windice increase the prize pool.
There's huge possibility that the windice team will increase the waging volume because they usually care about what their users want and affections. However, the previous contest prize pool was huge than this one.





hero member
Activity: 2884
Merit: 579
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Contest much more competetive this time around Wink

https://i.imgur.com/Ei6Pxx3.jpg
It's a sure win again for you yoloer! Chickendinner took the 1st place spot within a short period of time and there you are taking the spot like a king.  Grin

Enjoy your price man and kudos to you for winning consecutive contests. I think that if there will be another contest on windice again soon, you'll no doubt to compete again.

Thanks, it was a pleasure to compete!
I didn't even know that you're also big in other dice sites. We're glad to have you here and hear you personally.

OMG, this is getting closer and closer to half a billion. There were some that tell that because these bets weren't too big and most of the wagered were counted but still this is a huge number of bets and are we still going to consider as a new dice site?
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 116
In the last round of the contest the first winner has wagered 10 bitcoins and won 0.1 BTC. Given the 1% house edge, he is expected to lose 0.1 BTC.
So, I don't think the wagring volume can increase very much in next contests unless Windice increase the prize pool.
sr. member
Activity: 1568
Merit: 321
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!

And then we can imagine that the results will be very exciting. Will you explain the results with statistical data? It will be the guide for the next events.
Pages:
Jump to: