Pages:
Author

Topic: Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust on Bloomberg - page 5. (Read 10995 times)

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
October 23, 2013, 10:16:53 PM
#66
...

next step?  what are you talking about?  you act like there's some grand plan that is being executed to rob ppl of their BTC.  and who exactly is behind this?  the Winklevii in cahoots with the gubmint?  ridiculous.

if this ETF gets approved, it's to the moon.  it's too late to prevent private ownership of Bitcoin.  ask the Chinese.
There is no grand plan.  Government could care less about a few billion in total bitcoins.  But you think that bitcoin can reach a few trillion without more regulation from the government?  Bitcoin is unregulateable but so are drugs and that hasn't stopped most governments from trying.

Regulation is exactly what Bitcoin needs if its going to grow fast. All the major players are begging for regulation and rulings.

the problem with this is that regulators have this bad habit of moving the goalposts to protect their own private interests. 

Bitcoin was designed to circumvent this which is why so many businesses that you refer to are having a hard time.  ex:  Bitinstant

give them some coins, problem solved.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
October 23, 2013, 10:14:46 PM
#65
...

next step?  what are you talking about?  you act like there's some grand plan that is being executed to rob ppl of their BTC.  and who exactly is behind this?  the Winklevii in cahoots with the gubmint?  ridiculous.

if this ETF gets approved, it's to the moon.  it's too late to prevent private ownership of Bitcoin.  ask the Chinese.
There is no grand plan.  Government could care less about a few billion in total bitcoins.  But you think that bitcoin can reach a few trillion without more regulation from the government?  Bitcoin is unregulateable but so are drugs and that hasn't stopped most governments from trying.

Regulation is exactly what Bitcoin needs if its going to grow fast. All the major players are begging for regulation and rulings.

the problem with this is that regulators have this bad habit of moving the goalposts to protect their own private interests. 

Bitcoin was designed to circumvent this which is why so many businesses that you refer to are having a hard time.  ex:  Bitinstant
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
October 23, 2013, 10:11:14 PM
#64
...

next step?  what are you talking about?  you act like there's some grand plan that is being executed to rob ppl of their BTC.  and who exactly is behind this?  the Winklevii in cahoots with the gubmint?  ridiculous.

if this ETF gets approved, it's to the moon.  it's too late to prevent private ownership of Bitcoin.  ask the Chinese.
There is no grand plan.  Government could care less about a few billion in total bitcoins.  But you think that bitcoin can reach a few trillion without more regulation from the government?  Bitcoin is unregulateable but so are drugs and that hasn't stopped most governments from trying.

Regulation is exactly what Bitcoin needs if its going to grow fast. All the major players are begging for regulation and rulings.
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1006
First 100% Liquid Stablecoin Backed by Gold
October 23, 2013, 10:05:48 PM
#63
...

next step?  what are you talking about?  you act like there's some grand plan that is being executed to rob ppl of their BTC.  and who exactly is behind this?  the Winklevii in cahoots with the gubmint?  ridiculous.

if this ETF gets approved, it's to the moon.  it's too late to prevent private ownership of Bitcoin.  ask the Chinese.
There is no grand plan.  Government could care less about a few billion in total bitcoins.  But you think that bitcoin can reach a few trillion without more regulation from the government?  Bitcoin is unregulateable but so are drugs and that hasn't stopped most governments from trying.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
October 23, 2013, 10:01:39 PM
#62
Gee I really want to invest in this shady market, but it's not really shady, it just looks shady so could you go bust some guys doing bad things with it?
bitcoin is used for shady deals, it will continue to be used for that, because it works.

also: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZfg1Gtcg08
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
October 23, 2013, 09:55:04 PM
#61
Gee I really want to invest in this shady market, but it's not really shady, it just looks shady so could you go bust some guys doing bad things with it?
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
October 23, 2013, 09:50:19 PM
#60
Filing accepted October 8, that's about when the current rally started. Coincidence?

Would explain why the SR drop was not as large as it was, (It should have been more), and why nobody was afraid of ~400-600k of DPRs private stash ending up in FBI hands with a Plea deal.

ya peoples 401k and RRSPs will save us
sr. member
Activity: 306
Merit: 257
October 23, 2013, 09:45:46 PM
#59
Filing accepted October 8, that's about when the current rally started. Coincidence?
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
October 23, 2013, 09:42:29 PM
#58
So basically if this goes through, we could see a massive spike in BTC prices?

yes

In a way, its not too much unlike owning stock (BTC) in a company (Bitcoin Protocol) before an IPO (ETF).

NOT EXACTLY, but definitely similar in some aspects.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
October 23, 2013, 09:41:47 PM
#57
Once all these derivatives are approved on top of bitcoin next step is to outlaw private bitcoin ownership itself.  The governmental logic would be why you need to own bitcoin when you can own an ETF for it.  Also gotta love the risk section of it
"The loss or destruction of a private key required to access a Bitcoin may be irreversible. The Trust’s loss of access to its private keys or its experience of a data loss relating to the Trust’s Bitcoins could adversely affect an investment in the Shares.
Bitcoins are controllable only by the possessor of both the unique public key and private key relating to the local or online digital wallet in which the Bitcoins are held. The Trust is required by the operation of the Bitcoin Network to publish the public key relating to a digital wallet in use by the Trust when it first verifies a spending transaction from that digital wallet and disseminates such information into the Bitcoin Network. The Trust safeguards and keeps private the private keys relating to such digital wallets using the Security System. To the extent a private key is lost, destroyed or otherwise compromised and no backup of the private key is accessible, the Trust will be unable to access the Bitcoins held in the related digital wallet and the private key will not be capable of being restored by the Bitcoin Network. Any loss of private keys relating to digital wallets used to store the Trust’s Bitcoins could adversely affect an investment in the Shares."
Also where is the bitcoin address with all these coins?  You'd think that would be front and center but I can't seem to find it.

next step?  what are you talking about?  you act like there's some grand plan that is being executed to rob ppl of their BTC.  and who exactly is behind this?  the Winklevii in cahoots with the gubmint?  ridiculous.

if this ETF gets approved, it's to the moon.  it's too late to prevent private ownership of Bitcoin.  ask the Chinese.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
October 23, 2013, 09:36:40 PM
#56
So basically if this goes through, we could see a massive spike in BTC prices?

You might see an initial spike and then longer term future traction, best case scenario, imo.
sr. member
Activity: 342
Merit: 250
October 23, 2013, 09:34:42 PM
#55
So basically if this goes through, we could see a massive spike in BTC prices?
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1006
First 100% Liquid Stablecoin Backed by Gold
October 23, 2013, 09:34:18 PM
#54
Once all these derivatives are approved on top of bitcoin next step is to outlaw private bitcoin ownership itself.  The governmental logic would be why you need to own bitcoin when you can own an ETF for it.  Also gotta love the risk section of it
"The loss or destruction of a private key required to access a Bitcoin may be irreversible. The Trust’s loss of access to its private keys or its experience of a data loss relating to the Trust’s Bitcoins could adversely affect an investment in the Shares.
Bitcoins are controllable only by the possessor of both the unique public key and private key relating to the local or online digital wallet in which the Bitcoins are held. The Trust is required by the operation of the Bitcoin Network to publish the public key relating to a digital wallet in use by the Trust when it first verifies a spending transaction from that digital wallet and disseminates such information into the Bitcoin Network. The Trust safeguards and keeps private the private keys relating to such digital wallets using the Security System. To the extent a private key is lost, destroyed or otherwise compromised and no backup of the private key is accessible, the Trust will be unable to access the Bitcoins held in the related digital wallet and the private key will not be capable of being restored by the Bitcoin Network. Any loss of private keys relating to digital wallets used to store the Trust’s Bitcoins could adversely affect an investment in the Shares."
Also where is the bitcoin address with all these coins?  You'd think that would be front and center but I can't seem to find it.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
October 23, 2013, 09:33:58 PM
#53

Doesnt it make more sense that they have, lets say, 100k coins. They market sell all of them to people, and with this money buy.. 80k more? And then sell them.. rinse and repeat.

Seems bullish.

Do you understand how much money is in US Retirement Funds that this opens up.  We are talking billions.

try $18 trillion. as of 2011:

http://www.ebri.org/publications/benfaq/index.cfm?fa=retfaq4

edit:  $20.9 trillion as of 2nd qtr 2013

http://ici.org/research/stats/retirement/ret_13_q2
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
October 23, 2013, 09:32:11 PM
#52

Doesnt it make more sense that they have, lets say, 100k coins. They market sell all of them to people, and with this money buy.. 80k more? And then sell them.. rinse and repeat.

Seems bullish.

Do you understand how much money is in US Retirement Funds that this opens up.  We are talking billions.

try $18 trillion. as of 2011:

http://www.ebri.org/publications/benfaq/index.cfm?fa=retfaq4
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
October 23, 2013, 09:30:26 PM
#51

Doesnt it make more sense that they have, lets say, 100k coins. They market sell all of them to people, and with this money buy.. 80k more? And then sell them.. rinse and repeat.

Seems bullish.

Do you understand how much money is in US Retirement Funds that this opens up.  We are talking billions.

yeah, thats what im talking about.

if the sec accepts this, $1000 overnight easy.

Most people are not liquid, I live very well, but with house equity, retirement 401k and retirement pension, savings and such I have a hard time pulling anything meaningful into BTC without huge risks.

If ETF is approved I easily have $100k USD in retirement funds I can play with in BTC, even if I lose 5% to Winklvii for holding it for me.

Don't you lose 5% per yearHuh

Seriously, BTC moves 5% in a day.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
October 23, 2013, 09:27:21 PM
#50
So they are going to lose a couple % of their bitcoins but accelerate the rate of their acceptance drastically..?

Basically this.

And not really lose a couple of their BTC, because they'll collect fees, which of course they can use to buy more BTC.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
October 23, 2013, 09:27:12 PM
#49
So basically you are buying futures in bitcoin when you buy this stock? I don't understand how this works.

I think its more like you're buying a share in Winklevoss's 1% stake in bitcoin.
the Winklevoss hold the bitcoin, and say that these shares are as good as the real thing, and poeple trade the shares not the bitcoins.
poeple believe that these shares are as good as the real thing, so in theory they will follow BTC price very closely.


can you actually get BTC out of this trust?
no i would think not. $ in $ out.

so why do poeple believe its as good as the real thing?
idk!

So basically even if every single "share" of their bitcoin was bought, not a single coin would be bought on the market? All the Winklevoss gains are from fees?

In other words of some other words, its the way they can dump their coins without crashing the market.



If you are going with the RIDICULOUS assertion that they are doing this to dump their coins you are bat***t crazy.

These guys are worth 64 million+. They have invested $2 million into bitcoin. They are creating a ETF to profit and spread accessibility to the BTC marketplace.

End. Of. Story.

+1
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
October 23, 2013, 09:26:09 PM
#48
So they are going to lose a couple % of their bitcoins but accelerate the rate of their acceptance drastically..?

They will use their 17k bitcoins are a starting point. They can always replenish those.
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
October 23, 2013, 09:24:49 PM
#47
So they are going to lose a couple % of their bitcoins but accelerate the rate of their acceptance drastically..?
Pages:
Jump to: