Topic: 🐺WOLF.BET - Advanced Dice Game 🎲 Sportsbook 🏟️ Slots 🎰 - page 29. (Read 50307 times)

That's the reason why I am not really in favor of people promoting certain type of strategies like they are better than the others. Like for example martingale is the most known one, why? I mean do anyone know martingale is known better than any other strategy?

I personally do not know the reason because let's face it martingale doesn't earn you any money, you end up losing all of your money that way as well, come here and test it if you do not believe it and you will realize that you will lose all of your money that way as well. This is why I do not get it, like what is the purpose of something like that if you have zero chance of profiting?

If there is zero chance with martingale and zero chance with the other one, why would people prefer one over the other? Some people create topics just to promote their own "unique" strategy but there is zero chance they could make a profit neither.

What kind of problems you had? As i noticed i can login on wolfbet and bet like usual i do. Seems your problem was a bit huge because it needs management team to handle it instead moderator or anyone on this forum?

What we are forgetting is that you can always put on a "limit" and that means you will not lose your whole life over it . I personally can play on flash bet anytime I want and I usually do end up with a loss, one time I made it out super high, I made nearly 120x of what I put in and that was one of the best times of my life, it was really awesome.

However I definitely did lose that back as well as some more on top of that, so it is not really that shocking. What I do is I deposit a small amount, amount I am willing to lose, and do a flashbet, because that is usually the fastest way to see if you can 100x your money or lose it, which in the end is almost always lose it all, but I do it knowing that I will lose it, I act as if it is a 99x bet basically, sure you will lose 99 times out of 100, but if you win you get 100x, same logic for me, which is why I never risk too much, think of like 10 bucks at most, I wouldn't mind losing 10 bucks to have a chance of winning 1000 bucks. Do not test it with all of your money.

Time flies, it's Wednesday and time for our legendary $5000 Wolf Race! Who is joining this time? 

We had a small problem with this site and I am waiting for the management's response

It makes sense why most casinos don't teach their players about different strategies that can be utilised in the gambling world primarily because no strategy will work in the long-term thanks to the house edge.

However, these strategies help increase the fun factor associated with gambling which is their primary advantage in my opinion.

Professional strategies can help increase your profits in P2P games like poker etc and sports-betting where your experience matters more than luck.

Someone is risking, we can see that in this video!

Flash bet is for high rollers, especially now when the prices are higher! But we can play it regularly, with a lower base bet! I played all these strategies with lower base bets...
The first strategy, x9900 payout with an increase of 100% on every streak of 9998 losses! In the first session from the video, he had 2 wins, in the second session he had 3 wins! I would say it's huge luck! At x9900 it's not strange to have 50000 reds, and even more! And the guy in the video had 5 hits in 50k rolls!

The second and thirds strategy are the same! You chase x100k on limbo, and you manually raise the bet after every 25k rolls session, with stop after first win! What do you think how many reds can there be at x100k?

I busted my bankroll a few times with these or similar strategies! It's all about luck here, to hit that higher payout quickly! Which can happen, or not! It's gambling!
There are guys on Wolf who are chasing that x1m on limbo from time to time... we talked about it here in the thread! Of course, they playing regular auto with min 1 satoshi base bet and they raise bets after every 100k losing streaks. But even for that, you need to have some balance, so people are trying that with TRX, Doge, XRP... you can play it with 50-100 coins!

If doge isn't worth like today, it can be easily copied to try that strategy. But doge now is worth $0.3 for each doge, do you think someone would risk their huge amount of doges by trying on flash bet with 25000 rolls which can wiped out their balance ASAP? The bankroll used on that video also quite large, 21k doges or around $6300

The video is super exceptional, thank you very much, the truth is that these strategies are worth studying and applying, in gambling it is very difficult to find strategies, in fact some books are very difficult and the few that there are only talk about games in general such as poker , roulette and are strategies that many players have known for years. Has anyone tried the first strategy? that of Doges? the second and third intrigue me .... What I like about all this is that very few casinos are interested in their clients' learning, I have seen that bitcasino.io publishes articles on many strategies, also stake.com in its forum strategies are discussed internally, this is exciting because it makes the games look from a more professional point of view.

Simple strategies for higher payouts! I try similar ones from time to time, but I never had some big success... I think more times I got busted than won something interesting!
Exactly!

That's literally the reason why I am in crypto, I want nothing to do with regulations from the governments and that is why I came to bitcoin world to begin with. I hate banks, I hate governments and I hate politicians and crypto allowed me to be in a decentralized world. Sure there are moments I feel like it is not decentralized at all but I still think that it is a good one. This is why I do not think that any KYC or anything remotely close to doxxing would make me happy.

This is why I try to stay away from everything that focuses on those type of things, I personally would rather just not be involved then give all my info because at that point I could easily use fiat world and I wouldn't need to be in crypto. Long story short KYC is making bitcoin more like fiat and that is why I am staying away from it, I suggest all companies to stay away from it as well.

Hello iv4n,

you can click the following image and it will redirect you to our video, where you can watch and check the mentioned strategies. 

Regulations are swords with two edges! Do we seek regulations from people we hate (governments and banks)?! Would we feel safer if we give a percent to "Uncle Sam"?


Where do you watch that? Is there some link?! I would like to check those strategies?!

Excuse me, I have a question, if the casino happens to offer an implementation of placing the Monero coin, wouldn't they be totally solving the problem with KYC there? Monero gives a lot of privacy and anonymity, in fact it is the most used currency in the DeepWeb, how then could they detect those players who buy, play and withdraw with Monero? I know that each account would be being monitored by the platform, but in a bet in that currency, win or lose, would it be the same in the case of money, the problem is not only for Fiat money? That idea had occurred to me before, but under the circumstances, can't it be used as a defense mechanism for players?

It's Wednesday and time for another $5000 Wolf Race! Are you joining?

I just watched it now. There are 3 strategies from that video, first to hit 9000 profit on doges, 2nd and 3rd is trying to hit 1.3 btc. On first video, that user achieved the profit, but not in 2 and 3rd video, which he lose a lot of bitcoin because he chasing 100,000x multipler payout. Sometimes using autobet feature can make you rich instant and also can make you bankrupt so quick as well, it's not recommend for newbies IMO

I guess the only "down" side is that people may not want it. I get that the business world needs to become more legit and that's why they are doing stuff like this, there are other places that changed their system and doing it this way as well, there is really nothing that would be shocking if all places forced KYC from now on.

However when there are fiat gambling sportsbooks that I know which tries to find a way to not have any KYC at all, then the crypto ones do not make sense at all. You are literally sending money to some guys account in the fiat one, they could easily just rat you out or you could be found very easily, and you could be given a fine for that, whereas in crypto it is a lot easier to hide it. So the question remains, if the fiat ones are that brave, why the crypto ones are so eager to be "legit" when they can become even more illegal?

Indeed, most people who like to gamble in crypto want their identities to be anonymous and many things have happened if most of the KYC is not applied to the platform, even if there are people who are fanatical about KYC, of course he will leave him looking for other options because there are still many gambling site that provides no KYC and this is free for anyone who plays there.

I admit this has become your decision and after leaving roobet because the KYC system is not a big problem for you, including Wolfbet, I think they will try to be anonymous in the future.

It isn't a problem for you, but it will be a problem for many people including me who prefer staying anonymous on crypto gambling sites. I don't gamble on Roobet anymore primarily because of this issue.

The main advantage of crypto gambling sites is the ability to gamble anonymously. If this advantage disappears, this makes them far less appealing in my opinion.

I understand the sentiment of others about this implementation since I myself is skeptical on providing my details to any platform but also I understand that sometimes we need to provide it to continuously avail some services or others, so we should be selective on this we will not get a problem if we go on good platforms like wolfbet.

But eventhough how good they if others don't feel to provide their details better they should stay out since gaining stress for worrying about this is totally not good.