60.000 ish and staying this way
now if you want to transfer,fee is ridiculous
if you send with regular,chances are you play this special miner's lottery and prepare to wait for hours
Topic: wow ,almost 30,000 unconfirmed trans - page 12. (Read 13772 times)
second day in a row almost same amount of unconfirmed tx
60.000 ish and staying this way
now if you want to transfer,fee is ridiculous
if you send with regular,chances are you play this special miner's lottery and prepare to wait for hours
60.000 ish and staying this way
now if you want to transfer,fee is ridiculous
if you send with regular,chances are you play this special miner's lottery and prepare to wait for hours
Can i buy an Antminer S9, and manually set it to confirm my transaction??
You can. It would be both quicker and cheaper to pay a higher fee though.
I am the receiver of the transaction. The sender was the one that put the low fee.
Unfortuantly I gave him fiat before the transaction was confirmed.
Is it perhaps possible to ask someone with an antminer to verify the transaction? I'll give some extra btc for the effort
Can i buy an Antminer S9, and manually set it to confirm my transaction??
You can. It would be both quicker and cheaper to pay a higher fee though.
Can i buy an Antminer S9, and manually set it to confirm my transaction??
How nice, a 2kb block when 60000+ transactions are waiting:
https://blockchain.info/block/000000000000000002a2f346ea35b3bffe4239b00ae0a3f2ac83d9488dbac1a6
https://blockchain.info/block/000000000000000002a2f346ea35b3bffe4239b00ae0a3f2ac83d9488dbac1a6
These signature spammers are really obvious here. You do not need to constantly post updates. Anyone can find this information on several websites (including blockchain.info).
Hope Issue gets solved soon.....
There is no permanent solution. Adopting Segwit would give the network short term 'relief'. 
Unfortunately this happens at times. Let's hope they are simply a large amount of spam transactions and not the mining pools trying to force higher fees by not including transactions into their blocks..
If the latter is the case, they are actually harming their business in the long run, which is very short sighted imo.
If the latter is the case, they are actually harming their business in the long run, which is very short sighted imo.
60,000 now ,
any higher history?
any higher history?
30.000?
I'm seeing 62.000 and going up...
What is this? Big miners aren't processing transactions with small fees?
That's a big challange the the coin!
I'm seeing 62.000 and going up...
What is this? Big miners aren't processing transactions with small fees?
That's a big challange the the coin!
60k+ unconfirmed transactions currently and still rising. Hope Issue gets solved soon.....
The blocks are almost never full. Below is the average block size chart
You don't want to look at the average block size. What you want to look at is the median block size.
Every day there are 10 or so empty blocks, they distort the average block size chart making an impression that blocks aren't full. These empty blocks must be discarded from the data, they never include transactions. Median block size is very close to 1 MB and has been for a number of months.
This remains to be seen
If we have 24x6=144 blocks mined daily (a new block every 10 minutes on average), of which 134 blocks are full (1) and 10 blocks are empty (0), then we should have had an arithmetic average of the fill-up ratio at around (134*1+10*0)/144=0.93. As you can see from the chart, there were only 5 such days during the last month, while the average ratio for the whole month is still somewhere around 0.8 (with ~0.6 being the lowest value). That pretty much proves that the blocks are far from being full even if we count only filled blocks (with more than one transaction)
Does it gives that reasonable doubt about those speculation before that thse 50% of the mining power is on the centralized area?(you know what i already mean lol i just dont want to point out)
Could it be the massive control of the said mining power on a single area?
Experts do talk about it
Could it be the massive control of the said mining power on a single area?
Experts do talk about it
I did pay the recommended fee that Blockchain.info automatically adds to the transactions!
This should be stickied IMO:
Blockchain.info doesn't always contain good info about the blockchain. It's been unreliable in various ways for years now.
The blocks are almost never full. Below is the average block size chart
You don't want to look at the average block size. What you want to look at is the median block size.
Every day there are 10 or so empty blocks, they distort the average block size chart making an impression that blocks aren't full. These empty blocks must be discarded from the data, they never include transactions. Median block size is very close to 1 MB and has been for a number of months.
So that's the reason my transaction was stuck almost for 24 hours, the exchanger canceled the order and I started to panic (a little). Luckily it eventually confirmed and we were able to sort things out with the merchant. Oh and I did pay the recommended fee that Blockchain.info automatically adds to the transactions!
are the blocks full or are the miners getting greed with the transaction fee?
or someone send thousants of transactions at once?
or someone send thousants of transactions at once?
For the most part the blocks are full. https://blockchain.info/
The blocks are almost never full. Below is the average block size chart for the last 30 days, with points corresponding data on the given day. The fill-up ratio increased somewhat over the baseline during the last few days, but nearly identical situation was about a month ago. And I don't remember people complaining about their transactions not being confirmed on time back then...
Looks more like miners are deliberately ignoring some of the transactions
Some are even empty, although their percentage has been dropping. The miners tehnically decide whether they want to include TXs.
The same story was a year and a half ago, as I wrote earlier
my transaction is now gone
https://blockchain.info/tx/34ec67c5b4500190f62de88f8f8e59105722aba76b23a26f97af4e4285207f2b
Transaction rejected by our node. Reason: Transaction was previously accepted but has been pruned from our database.
i lost the bitcoins.... really the worst piece of )(&%!#¤=)/(&?)=R#¤
No, that can not be correct. Are you using blockchain.info? Contact their support, get this fixed and stop using such a bad wallet. Use one of the desktop SPV wallets (e.g. Electrum) if you do not want to run Bitcoin Core. https://blockchain.info/tx/34ec67c5b4500190f62de88f8f8e59105722aba76b23a26f97af4e4285207f2b
Transaction rejected by our node. Reason: Transaction was previously accepted but has been pruned from our database.
i lost the bitcoins.... really the worst piece of )(&%!#¤=)/(&?)=R#¤
Initiated a transaction w/ high fees 3 hours ago and still not 1 confirm. THis really gets old...
TX ID?
80c0b5a9011ab164c1bd23330ce25eb1bbfe5ca697526667856ea5d0f1512166
I would not call 35 Satoshi per Byte a high fee. Ill rebroadcast it, let me know (best via PM) when its confirmed please.
my transaction is now gone
https://blockchain.info/tx/34ec67c5b4500190f62de88f8f8e59105722aba76b23a26f97af4e4285207f2b
Transaction rejected by our node. Reason: Transaction was previously accepted but has been pruned from our database.
i lost the bitcoins.... really the worst piece of )(&%!#¤=)/(&?)=R#¤
https://blockchain.info/tx/34ec67c5b4500190f62de88f8f8e59105722aba76b23a26f97af4e4285207f2b
Transaction rejected by our node. Reason: Transaction was previously accepted but has been pruned from our database.
i lost the bitcoins.... really the worst piece of )(&%!#¤=)/(&?)=R#¤
Jump to: