Ask any average person to extract the links from the blockchain.
Answer. They can't.
Topic: WTF - Kiddy Porn in the Blockchain for life? - page 6. (Read 74366 times)
How did the dude posting the info on twtr knew what and where to look at if it was not easy to stumble upon it?
I think this could be a kin to two people beaming data through the air and that beam happens to cross your property. Yes if you went out and got an antenna you could intercept, but if you don't are you liable for someone putting CP into thin air that crosses your property? Or are the Internet line carriers at risk if someone transmits illegal data across their network?
...and why can't somebody get a takedown on the stupid CP link? Or do the feds want to keep the link up as a honeypot?
It's a Tor link. It's impossible to know where it actually is, and thus is impossible to take down, let alone find out whom to contact to have it be taken down. For all anyone knows, those files could actually be stored, hidden in an encrypted form, on your own computer, and are being served to everyone using a computer virus based web server.
Finding where it's hosted shouldn't be that hard - you would need a compromised Tor exit node. I doubt you'd even need to decrypt the traffic, just trace the packets?
...and why can't somebody get a takedown on the stupid CP link? Or do the feds want to keep the link up as a honeypot?
It's a Tor link. It's impossible to know where it actually is, and thus is impossible to take down, let alone find out whom to contact to have it be taken down. For all anyone knows, those files could actually be stored, hidden in an encrypted form, on your own computer, and are being served to everyone using a computer virus based web server.
I think I agree with charles. There is an attempt to create bad pr for bitcoins, the foundation should try and counteract such attempt.
Until I read this thread I thought there were actual proper images on the blockchain. In fact what seems to be the case is that there are encoded links. That's a non issue. Why should anyone care that in a code there are some links. I mean links themselves are not porn to begin with. Then, you need to decode the code.
However, this should be explained. The CNN article for example (http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/02/technology/security/bitcoin-porn/index.html) should contain a quote from someone on the bitcoin side stating, hey guys this is just giberish code which would need to be decoded and even then it only shows some links, so it is not porn.
Until I read this thread I thought there were actual proper images on the blockchain. In fact what seems to be the case is that there are encoded links. That's a non issue. Why should anyone care that in a code there are some links. I mean links themselves are not porn to begin with. Then, you need to decode the code.
However, this should be explained. The CNN article for example (http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/02/technology/security/bitcoin-porn/index.html) should contain a quote from someone on the bitcoin side stating, hey guys this is just giberish code which would need to be decoded and even then it only shows some links, so it is not porn.
...and why can't somebody get a takedown on the stupid CP link? Or do the feds want to keep the link up as a honeypot?
I think I agree with charles. There is an attempt to create bad pr for bitcoins, the foundation should try and counteract such attempt.
Until I read this thread I thought there were actual proper images on the blockchain. In fact what seems to be the case is that there are encoded links. That's a non issue. Why should anyone care that in a code there are some links. I mean links themselves are not porn to begin with. Then, you need to decode the code.
However, this should be explained. The CNN article for example (http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/02/technology/security/bitcoin-porn/index.html) should contain a quote from someone on the bitcoin side stating, hey guys this is just giberish code which would need to be decoded and even then it only shows some links, so it is not porn.
Until I read this thread I thought there were actual proper images on the blockchain. In fact what seems to be the case is that there are encoded links. That's a non issue. Why should anyone care that in a code there are some links. I mean links themselves are not porn to begin with. Then, you need to decode the code.
However, this should be explained. The CNN article for example (http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/02/technology/security/bitcoin-porn/index.html) should contain a quote from someone on the bitcoin side stating, hey guys this is just giberish code which would need to be decoded and even then it only shows some links, so it is not porn.
It's the same as saying that roads must be removed, vehicles be barred from driving on the road, and all pedestrians be prosecuted if someone plastered some kiddieporn pics on the sidewalk.
The founder is spreading FUD, and this is not the first time he does so.
The founder is spreading FUD, and this is not the first time he does so.
Not exactly. In that case, the offending images would simply be removed from the sidewalk. In the case of the blockchain, it can't be removed.
Try this:
A strip mine is used as a repository for undesired fill dirt. Eventually a nice set of vegetation grows and it's a decent place be and is obtained as a public green-space.
Years later, it is found that someone dumped a stash of offending material in the pit before it was filled. Everyone who uses the park comes within 300 feet of the stuff, and it would be possible for someone to dig a tunnel and actually look at it.
What to do? Make the park off-limits and prosecute anyone who walks in it? Tear out the park to find and destroy the offending material? Ignore what is obviously a non-issue?
I suspect that if occupy-wallstreet started using the park it would be obvious to the authorities, media, etc, that making the park off-limits would be the thing to do.
It's the same as saying that roads must be removed, vehicles be barred from driving on the road, and all pedestrians be prosecuted if someone plastered some kiddieporn pics on the sidewalk.
The founder is spreading FUD, and this is not the first time he does so.
The founder is spreading FUD, and this is not the first time he does so.
Not exactly. In that case, the offending images would simply be removed from the sidewalk. In the case of the blockchain, it can't be removed.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
The same muppet that posted this thread recently asked how he could inject data in the blockchain. Then shortly thereafter he mysteriously found someone on twitter claiming that kiddiepornlinks was injected in the block-chain.
Kind of like how he had found an exploit for instawallet and then asked what would happen, then told everyone that coins were stolen long before instawallet had even announced that coins were stolen?
OK so we can concluded the following:
Discussion over
Discussion over
Exactly. Now some mod put this thread to the thrash bin where it belongs.
I think this thread belongs where it is because it raises many valid questions. This is actually one of my theoretical attack vectors against the Bitcoin network. If you can make storing the block chain illegal you can effectively make Bitcoin illegal. Does anyone know which idiot did this entry? I can't be bothered to dig through all the links but if its not known it could be some government agent as part of a wider spread campaign against Bitcoin.
The same muppet that posted this thread recently asked how he could inject data in the blockchain. Then shortly thereafter he mysteriously found someone on twitter claiming that kiddiepornlinks was injected in the block-chain.
No, this is not an attack vector, this is sheer lunacy.
Exactly. Now some mod put this thread to the thrash bin where it belongs.
I think this thread belongs where it is because it raises many valid questions. This is actually one of my theoretical attack vectors against the Bitcoin network. If you can make storing the block chain illegal you can effectively make Bitcoin illegal. Does anyone know which idiot did this entry? I can't be bothered to dig through all the links but if its not known it could be some government agent as part of a wider spread campaign against Bitcoin.
Downloading the blockchain to look at some porn? No? Then no crime.
Exactly. Now some mod put this thread to the thrash bin where it belongs.
http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/02/technology/security/bitcoin-porn/?source=cnn_bin
"The U.S. Justice Department wouldn't comment on this specific case, but an agency spokesman pointed CNNMoney to the exact wording of the law, which states that the issue becomes a crime when a person "knowingly possesses, or knowingly accesses with intent to view" child porn. It doesn't appear that an unsuspecting user with these coded links sitting on their hard drive has much to worry about. "
Downloading the blockchain to look at some porn? No? Then no crime.
"The U.S. Justice Department wouldn't comment on this specific case, but an agency spokesman pointed CNNMoney to the exact wording of the law, which states that the issue becomes a crime when a person "knowingly possesses, or knowingly accesses with intent to view" child porn. It doesn't appear that an unsuspecting user with these coded links sitting on their hard drive has much to worry about. "
Downloading the blockchain to look at some porn? No? Then no crime.
What happens when inserting EICAR string into blockchain?
That's been tried on testnet; nothing happens. Anti-virus tools seem to ignore data in the middle of large unexecutable binary files.
Seriously WTF is going on here:
https://twitter.com/travisgoodspeed/status/328906226572345344
If this is true (I can't find that transaction) This cannot help our cause at all.
(moderator note: read http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/04/on-bitcoin-data-spam-and-evil-data.html for an insight of this by the devs)
https://twitter.com/travisgoodspeed/status/328906226572345344
If this is true (I can't find that transaction) This cannot help our cause at all.
(moderator note: read http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/04/on-bitcoin-data-spam-and-evil-data.html for an insight of this by the devs)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1932955
I have a really dumb question. I know it would bloat the blockchain (if it's possible the in the first place), however I would like to know if I could put a message on the blockchain using the default client (or any client for that matter). The content must be stored in the blockchain and not just some site that does aliasing like blockchain.info ... I am talking sending bitcoins to X with the message 'paid in full' or something idiotic like that.
I understand there might be some big fees.. but it's just a question I want to know.
I understand there might be some big fees.. but it's just a question I want to know.
This is so silly. Anything could be injected to the blockchain. Who cares? Noone's going to decipher it or be able to prove people other than the originator guilty.
Dare to explain this to a prosecutor?
Dude the second a cop breaks down your door and hauls you and your machine away, a week later the headlines would be "Bitcoin User found with kiddie porn"
The Founder has made himself worthy of a hiatus from this forum. Also, the fact that somebody could arbitrarily put something in the block-chain, thus incriminating Bitcoin as a whole is a complete and utterly stupid concept. It's the same as saying that roads must be removed, vehicles be barred from driving on the road, and all pedestrians be prosecuted if someone plastered some kiddieporn pics on the sidewalk.
The founder is spreading FUD, and this is not the first time he does so.
+1
Seriously WTF is going on here:
https://twitter.com/travisgoodspeed/status/328906226572345344
If this is true (I can't find that transaction) This cannot help our cause at all.
(moderator note: read http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/04/on-bitcoin-data-spam-and-evil-data.html for an insight of this by the devs)
https://twitter.com/travisgoodspeed/status/328906226572345344
If this is true (I can't find that transaction) This cannot help our cause at all.
(moderator note: read http://garzikrants.blogspot.com/2013/04/on-bitcoin-data-spam-and-evil-data.html for an insight of this by the devs)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1932955
I have a really dumb question. I know it would bloat the blockchain (if it's possible the in the first place), however I would like to know if I could put a message on the blockchain using the default client (or any client for that matter). The content must be stored in the blockchain and not just some site that does aliasing like blockchain.info ... I am talking sending bitcoins to X with the message 'paid in full' or something idiotic like that.
I understand there might be some big fees.. but it's just a question I want to know.
I understand there might be some big fees.. but it's just a question I want to know.
This is so silly. Anything could be injected to the blockchain. Who cares? Noone's going to decipher it or be able to prove people other than the originator guilty.
Dare to explain this to a prosecutor?
Dude the second a cop breaks down your door and hauls you and your machine away, a week later the headlines would be "Bitcoin User found with kiddie porn"
The Founder has made himself worthy of a hiatus from this forum. Also, the fact that somebody could arbitrarily put something in the block-chain, thus incriminating Bitcoin as a whole is a complete and utterly stupid concept. It's the same as saying that roads must be removed, vehicles be barred from driving on the road, and all pedestrians be prosecuted if someone plastered some kiddieporn pics on the sidewalk.
The founder is spreading FUD, and this is not the first time he does so.
This thread now is so illegal 
4 85650 78965 73978 29309 84189 46942 86137 70744 20873 51357 92401 96520 73668 69851 34010 47237 44696 87974 39926 11751 09737 77701 02744 75280 49058 83138 40375 49709 98790 96539 55227 01171 21570 25974 66699 32402 26834 59661 96060 34851 74249 77358 46851 88556 74570 25712 54749 99648 21941 84655 71008 41190 86259 71694 79707 99152 00486 67099 75923 59606 13207 25973 79799 36188 60631 69144 73588 30024 53369 72781 81391 47979 55513 39994 93948 82899 84691 78361 00182 59789 01031 60196 18350 34344 89568 70538 45208 53804 58424 15654 82488 93338 04747 58711 28339 59896 85223 25446 08408 97111 97712 76941 20795 86244 05471 61321 00500 64598 20176 96177 18094 78113 62200 27234 48272 24932 32595 47234 68800 29277 76497 90614 81298 40428 34572 01463 48968 54716 90823 54737 83566 19721 86224 96943 16227 16663 93905 54302 41564 73292 48552 48991 22573 94665 48627 14048 21171 38124 38821 77176 02984 12552 44647 44505 58346 28144 88335 63190 27253 19590 43928 38737 64073 91689 12579 24055 01562 08897 87163 37599 91078 87084 90815 90975 48019 28576 84519 88596 30532 38234 90558 09203 29996 03234 47114 07760 19847 16353 11617 13078 57608 48622 36370 28357 01049 61259 56818 46785 96533 31007 70179 91614 67447 25492 72833 48691 60006 47585 91746 27812 12690 07351 83092 41530 10630 28932 95665 84366 20008 00476 77896 79843 82090 79761 98594 93646 30938 05863 36721 46969 59750 27968 77120 57249 96666 98056 14533 82074 12031 59337 70309 94915 27469 18356 59376 21022 20068 12679 82734 45760 93802 03044 79122 77498 09179 55938 38712 10005 88766 68925 84487 00470 77255 24970 60444 65212 71304 04321 18261 01035 91186 47666 29638 58495 08744 84973 73476 86142 08805 29443
Tee hee you're all criminals now
Tee hee you're all criminals now
GOD DAMN! Rickrolled again....
Jump to: