Topic: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS - page 310. (Read 804700 times)

We are not talking about the crypti source.

So many FUDs here,i don't know why people always trust what FUDs say and sell their nodes at low price.

God,the price is so cheap...i will buy more

I don't particularly like the way they insinuate that investing in large amounts of a coin is now considered just an effort to drive up the price. I can't speak for all of us here but I'd like to think that if investing a little in a solid product is good, then investing a lot must be great. Maybe they're butthurt because they didn't get in early enough. I don't know. But then again, it's still not too late.

informer

Great any info from them will help this project a lot.

It really should be up to the Crypti Foundation to decide what is best for Crypti.  If the Foundation decides to keep the code closed source, then it will remain closed source.  IF the Foundation votes for open source, then it will be released in the manner and method that is best for XCR.

Until then, rabbiter will just have to find another coin code to copy for his "Lucky168" coin.

Another interesting article on Coinssource:

http://www.coinssource.com/market-round-up-bitshares-x-market-skyrockets-greenback-ico-crypti-launch/

On pretty much all of my nodes I am getting:

+1

Just in the process of re-syncing 8 of 12 nodes I am running after they stopped running properly. Which is a big pain in the ass!

We need a more stable and efficient client...

On the plus side I've forged some nice blocks today!

any news on 0.1.6? I was "soon" 3 days ago.

Crypto currency works with digital signatures. Anyone who has the secret key can spend the money. You can give the secret key (encrypted by your password) to a third party and they will ask you for 2FA before you can download encrypted blob from their server (i.e blockchain info wallet),  but if you have the secret key on your machine, there can't be any 2FA. 

Google authenticator  is open source and has nothing to do with google itself, as it's just implementation of  TOTP tokens from RFC6238 ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6238 )

The real problem is that you can't implement 2FA with decentralized crypto. You can do with online wallet where you keep encrypted copy of the wallet/secret key (i.e like blockchain info encrypted wallet on their server) but 2FA cannot be implemented where user has the control of wallet/secret key.

Anyone feel up to the task of making a blockchain explorer using ABE?

https://github.com/bitcoin-abe/bitcoin-abe

Could be pretty simple, take a look.

No, we were trying to create a non-masonry traditional style homepage with available updates and a little bit of news functionality so that people would only have to check in there and could see straight away kind of what was going on.

Someone will just have to build a Crypti App that provides 2FA. I prefer text messages with the code contained.

Were you using Majestic v3/v4 as the theme?

Okay, I can set up, edit and customize the NodeBB forum, as long as you're still open to the idea of using it . I'm using the default theme currently and there aren't any problems here at the moment, I'm going to test it out soon though with a couple of separate themes to see the results.

We have discussed 2FA internally. Some felt that tying Google or another company into wallet access might be an issue for some who want less involvement for those players, but when we do the fully featured web wallet, it will more than likely contain some form of 2FA. Not making any promises, but it is a desire of mine as well.

Without hiring another developer to help customize and setup the forum the way we wanted it, we were having issues getting it to function the way we wanted it to. If you use the default template and simply install the base install, it functions ok. That being said, we couldn't afford to take Boris off of finishing Crypti and we didn't have the finds to hire a secondary developer to help us setup the forum the way we wanted it to function, therefore, as I said when I announced the decision to go with SMF, we weren't ruling it out all together, but at the time it just wasn't working for what we wanted to do.

We tested it internally for a couple weeks and the default just wasn't appealing to members of our team and to do the adjustments we wanted was going to take development work and customizations we couldn't do at the time. I still haven't written off the idea of using it, you know I am a fan, but we will have to re-visit it at a later time.

If you want to develop a NodeBB forum, customize it to not use the masonry style homepage, and get it to a stable point with all of the features necessary for our community (for instance if you can get the homepage modules to work, that was one thing that was bricking for me with the theme we were trying to use), then we would be more than willing to talk about having it be the official forums for the devs to use to answer questions, etc. As long as I can get admin privaleges to assign moderators and control the private forums for members, then I would be happy to discuss it.

Rypti Coin 

Rabbiter just wants to launch his "Krypti Coin" as soon as possible.  Our refusal to release the source is causing him to delay his clone.