Hey, let's take a moment to get some perspective. Sometimes fudders can make it seem like XC is somehow lacking or in trouble, but that's a pure illusion.
- XC's private payments and (non-group) XChat are working beautifully.
- Nothing even remotely compares to XC's anon tech.
- We're on the verge of XC Mobile!
i have said for weeks now that this should be the core of the PR efforts. nothing will sell XC like its anonymity. which is the first and only that really carrys on with satoshis vision on all fronts while bringing full privacy.
this will sell XC and i don't see the point in waiting forever to communicate not to experts but in simple words what is getting worked on here. you do the same with blocknet. the PR was easy to understand compared to the mesh net ones. it has an emotional catch phrase with "internet of blockchains". we need that for XCs privacy tec too. like "privacy the Satoshi way" but thats probably to abstract but somthing like that.
i love the blocknet but it is to new to be the driving force here.
people will have to learn that the blocknet is beneficial for xc by seeing first hand. You can repeat yourself millions of times the next weeks it won't matter.
and please never use "enough said" again it sounds super arrogant even not intended.
I apologise for coming across as arrogant with the words "enough said".
It wasn't my intention. I simply wished to assert that I think a strong case for a given point is clear.
Then on the topic of marketing, remember we're in agreement about the significance of XC's privacy tech, and also in agreement that it should be marketed in normal non-technical language.
The consumer-marketing will begin when we have consumer products. It does not make sense to do so earlier than this, because people would just be attracted to something they can't use.
