[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 117.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: wooder on October 21, 2014, 08:09:50 PM

Quote from: qawzsx on October 21, 2014, 08:05:13 PM

Quote from: wooder on October 21, 2014, 07:52:10 PM

Quote from: stealth923 on October 21, 2014, 07:30:14 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on October 21, 2014, 06:19:06 PM

It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...

Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community.

Its claims like this that make investors run away.

+1

i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone.

maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days.

even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless

Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days
APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 %
SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 %
SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 %
XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 %
NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 %
UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 %
FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 %

XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 %

Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?
Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?

And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically.

I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to
build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins.

First of all, you are a moron,

"Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?" - Coins are not added, coins can apply to join.
"Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough?
"And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically." - what does that tells you?

"I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to
build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins." - money money money and money again.

Full of morons...

I'm holding this coin since months, and yeah i'd like to see this coin go up in price like nearly 100% of the investors, i mean why would you invest in something that just looses value?

I am not angry I'm just disappointed that XC takes this directoin before REV3 is even released

This is not an XC direction change at all

wooder

sr. member

Activity: 324

Merit: 250

Quote from: qawzsx on October 21, 2014, 08:08:20 PM

Quote from: wooder on October 21, 2014, 08:02:50 PM

Quote from: tr8kr on October 21, 2014, 07:57:41 PM

Quote from: stealth923 on October 21, 2014, 07:30:14 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on October 21, 2014, 06:19:06 PM

It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...

Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community.

Its claims like this that make investors run away.

we already begin to see what is doing open source to this community like 'cannabisdarkcoin' .... Open source is just a hype thing that some coin use in the hope of a big pump and backlash them cause of a bad coding and old moded tech ...

are you on drugs? without "the" opensouce coin BITCOIN there would be no altcoin at all. Only ripple and NXT would exist but nothing else and i bet even this two coins took a lot of ideas from bitcoin.
thats the way it works, innovate or die

"we already begin to see what is doing open source to this community like ..." could also be a sentence from some early adopters of bitcoin

and btw the closed source world already exists at your bank ...

Dev already stated that the coin will be open source at some point. Why the hell do people even bring this up? It makes not sense.

Why the hell would we want the coin to be cloned right now?

I don't want it to be cloned right now - this was just my answere to "Open source is just a hype thing that some coin use in the hope of a big pump and backlash them cause of a bad coding and old moded tech"

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote

"Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough?

I believe what he's saying is that it appears that very small market cap coins were pumped at the expense of XC according to the charts with the BlockNET release. Insider information probably let developers buy ... so it could be construed as a way for XC to try to give shitcoins some legitimacy.

But then again ... I might be mis-reading what he's trying to say.

Quote

First of all, you are a moron,

Maybe don't namecall but have an objective discussion?

Why don't you go look at the charts for when the ITO was announced vs the price change

wooder

sr. member

Activity: 324

Merit: 250

Quote from: qawzsx on October 21, 2014, 08:05:13 PM

Quote from: wooder on October 21, 2014, 07:52:10 PM

Quote from: stealth923 on October 21, 2014, 07:30:14 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on October 21, 2014, 06:19:06 PM

It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...

Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community.

Its claims like this that make investors run away.

+1

i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone.

maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days.

even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless

Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days
APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 %
SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 %
SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 %
XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 %
NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 %
UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 %
FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 %

XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 %

Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?
Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?

And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically.

I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to
build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins.

First of all, you are a moron,

"Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?" - Coins are not added, coins can apply to join.
"Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough?
"And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically." - what does that tells you?

"I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to
build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins." - money money money and money again.

Full of morons...

I'm holding this coin since months, and yeah i'd like to see this coin go up in price like nearly 100% of the investors, i mean why would you invest in something that just looses value?

I am not angry I'm just disappointed that XC takes this directoin before REV3 is even released

qawzsx

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

NOT FUD! FACTS!

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote

"Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough?

I believe what he's saying is that it appears that very small market cap coins were pumped at the expense of XC according to the charts with the BlockNET release. Insider information probably let developers buy ... so it could be construed as a way for XC to try to give shitcoins some legitimacy.

But then again ... I might be mis-reading what he's trying to say.

Quote

First of all, you are a moron,

Maybe don't namecall but have an objective discussion?

You angry too?

)))))))))

qawzsx

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

NOT FUD! FACTS!

Quote from: wooder on October 21, 2014, 08:02:50 PM

Quote from: tr8kr on October 21, 2014, 07:57:41 PM

Quote from: stealth923 on October 21, 2014, 07:30:14 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on October 21, 2014, 06:19:06 PM

It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...

Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community.

Its claims like this that make investors run away.

we already begin to see what is doing open source to this community like 'cannabisdarkcoin' .... Open source is just a hype thing that some coin use in the hope of a big pump and backlash them cause of a bad coding and old moded tech ...

are you on drugs? without "the" opensouce coin BITCOIN there would be no altcoin at all. Only ripple and NXT would exist but nothing else and i bet even this two coins took a lot of ideas from bitcoin.
thats the way it works, innovate or die

"we already begin to see what is doing open source to this community like ..." could also be a sentence from some early adopters of bitcoin

and btw the closed source world already exists at your bank ...

Dev already stated that the coin will be open source at some point. Why the hell do people even bring this up? It makes not sense.

Why the hell would we want the coin to be cloned right now?

qawzsx

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

NOT FUD! FACTS!

Quote from: wooder on October 21, 2014, 07:52:10 PM

Quote from: stealth923 on October 21, 2014, 07:30:14 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on October 21, 2014, 06:19:06 PM

It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...

Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community.

Its claims like this that make investors run away.

+1

i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone.

maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days.

even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless

Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days
APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 %
SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 %
SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 %
XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 %
NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 %
UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 %
FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 %

XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 %

Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?
Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?

And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically.

I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to
build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins.

First of all, you are a moron,

"Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?" - Coins are not added, coins can apply to join.
"Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough?
"And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically." - what does that tells you?

"I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to
build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins." - money money money and money again.

Full of morons...

wooder

sr. member

Activity: 324

Merit: 250

Quote from: tr8kr on October 21, 2014, 07:57:41 PM

Quote from: stealth923 on October 21, 2014, 07:30:14 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on October 21, 2014, 06:19:06 PM

It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...

Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community.

Its claims like this that make investors run away.

we already begin to see what is doing open source to this community like 'cannabisdarkcoin' .... Open source is just a hype thing that some coin use in the hope of a big pump and backlash them cause of a bad coding and old moded tech ...

are you on drugs? without "the" opensouce coin BITCOIN there would be no altcoin at all. Only ripple and NXT would exist but nothing else and i bet even this two coins took a lot of ideas from bitcoin.
thats the way it works, innovate or die

"we already begin to see what is doing open source to this community like ..." could also be a sentence from some early adopters of bitcoin

and btw the closed source world already exists at your bank ...

tr8kr

hero member

Activity: 661

Merit: 500

Quote from: stealth923 on October 21, 2014, 07:30:14 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on October 21, 2014, 06:19:06 PM

It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...

Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community.

Its claims like this that make investors run away.

we already begin to see what is doing open source to this community like 'cannabisdarkcoin' .... Open source is just a hype thing that some coin use in the hope of a big pump and backlash them cause of a bad coding and old moded tech ...

wooder

sr. member

Activity: 324

Merit: 250

Quote from: stealth923 on October 21, 2014, 07:30:14 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on October 21, 2014, 06:19:06 PM

It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...

Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community.

Its claims like this that make investors run away.

+1

i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone.

maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days.

even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless

Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days
APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 %
SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 %
SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 %
XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 %
NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 %
UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 %
FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 %

XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 %

Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?
Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?

And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically.

I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to
build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins.

CryptoChronic

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: stealth923 on October 21, 2014, 07:30:14 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on October 21, 2014, 06:19:06 PM

It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...

Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community.

Its claims like this that make investors run away.

BUMP

stealth923

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

Quote from: atcsecure on October 21, 2014, 06:19:06 PM

It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...

Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community.

Its claims like this that make investors run away.

Jacques de Molay

sr. member

Activity: 339

Merit: 250

Quote from: flashbit on October 21, 2014, 06:02:01 PM

Quote from: synechist on October 21, 2014, 05:50:52 PM

Quote from: flashbit on October 21, 2014, 05:08:53 PM

Hey Arlyn, don't mean to pull the PM card (but I will) - how can you say there won't be delays when we don't have any dates tied to the OP milestones?

Can you tell us if XC will be offically launched before or after blocknet? i believe Dan mentioned blocknet would be launched sometime in first half of 2015?

Put it this way: when there are wallet updates nearly every day, when the timeline is being adhered to and items steadily ticked off the list, and when the team has lost none of its focus, there's no reason whatsoever to suppose that things are getting pushed back.

The Blocknet doesn't have a launch date, so I can't tell which will launch first.

Thanks for the response Arlyn!

I know you don't hear this enough but I just want to thank you, Dan, Teka, and the entire XC team for such a fantastic job you're all doing with XC and now blocknet with such adversity. I'm very excited to being a part of something so revolutionary and making history. Stay the course guys. Cheers!

+1 I cant agree more, thanks. Nearing my fist node, you'd be crazy not to host at least one node in all of this.

100 more xc to go Sad

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: URSAY on October 21, 2014, 07:18:32 PM

Quote from: qawzsx on October 21, 2014, 06:52:13 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

I see the bans are coming in full force. Am I the next to be banned for discussing XC?

[removed unoffical thread]

Abusive comments and posts with baseless and outright harassing allegations are deleted. Bans are totally within forum rules.

rdnkjdi, you've been banned and your comment's calling members of the xc community 'delusional' aren't helping yourself. You can reply to him in PM.

Well, there is one thing you can do, ignore them, don't quote them at all, delete useless/fud posts, and concentrate on the serious matters.

Or alternatively, listen to users and investors, quote them to your team so you understand their concerns, OWN their concerns by addressing them, and that IS concentrating on serious matter. I see your buy side. Wink

Which we do on a dailly basis and we address a lot of concerns including yours. However when it's baseless allegations coming from new accounts with a clear agenda, there is no point wasting our time addressing those.

URSAY

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 1010

Quote from: qawzsx on October 21, 2014, 06:52:13 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

I see the bans are coming in full force. Am I the next to be banned for discussing XC?

[removed unoffical thread]

Abusive comments and posts with baseless and outright harassing allegations are deleted. Bans are totally within forum rules.

rdnkjdi, you've been banned and your comment's calling members of the xc community 'delusional' aren't helping yourself. You can reply to him in PM.

Well, there is one thing you can do, ignore them, don't quote them at all, delete useless/fud posts, and concentrate on the serious matters.

Or alternatively, listen to users and investors, quote them to your team so you understand their concerns, OWN their concerns by addressing them, and that IS concentrating on a serious matter. I see your buy side. Do you?

sugarboy321

sr. member

Activity: 361

Merit: 250

The more trolls, the more I know I made a good choice. Grin

qawzsx

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

NOT FUD! FACTS!

Quote from: ?? on ??

I see the bans are coming in full force. Am I the next to be banned for discussing XC?

[removed unoffical thread]

Abusive comments and posts with baseless and outright harassing allegations are deleted. Bans are totally within forum rules.

rdnkjdi, you've been banned and your comment's calling members of the xc community 'delusional' aren't helping yourself. You can reply to him in PM.

Well, there is one thing you can do, ignore them, don't quote them at all, delete useless/fud posts, and concentrate on the serious matters.

tr8kr

hero member

Activity: 661

Merit: 500

Thanks to Dan , Synechist , Teka and all those that work hard to push the limit of the blockchain !

akula999

hero member

Activity: 509

Merit: 500

Quote from: Waldozaur12 on October 21, 2014, 06:36:49 PM

cheap coins 4 me

Lets hope it stays at this price. payday is Friday for me!!

Sabretooth

full member

Activity: 138

Merit: 100

I think we should be pushing the below this will reduce XCs price getting diluted further. It refers to the Blocknet ITO.

Quote from: Sabretooth on October 21, 2014, 06:35:47 PM

To save mucking around with trying to balance out price differentials at the time of the ITO the following could be done:

1. Set the volume per coin according to market capitalisation at the time of the start of the ITO, and fix throughout the ITO. Do not adjust at any point in time.
2. Float the cost per BLOCK according to the bitcoin to currency conversion rate less 10%.

This saves alot of mucking around with trying to get everything balanced. It also stops small volume coins markets being manipulated.

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 117. (Read 1484218 times)