Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 746. (Read 1484192 times)

legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

I told synechist that is a stupid move but nobody is paying attention to my words

Meh, its the previous version.  Now open sourcing the current version (which still is not getting as much praise and attention as it should) would be stupid IMO.

LOL....copycat shitcoins are ruthless.  I'm glad the devs aren't releasing the new technology for this exact reason.  This was a good science experiment. 

Yeah, we don't release new code. Here's our statement on open source:

XC is committed to the open source model. Open source code is vital for the health and advancement of cryptographic technologies, and it is a privilege to share our technical breakthroughs with a community such as this. We believe that XC's code embodies several world-firsts enabling anonymity that is scalable, mobile-friendly, POS-integrated, and is ultimately a platform upon which a broad range of Blockchain 2.0 technologies will be built. However we have been under severe attack from competing projects. Furthermore people’s faith in altcoins is significantly hindered by clones. Therefore we believe that the ethical way to engage with the community is to make code available on a delayed timeline. This way, the community will still benefit from our work, while we'd reduce the incentive for developers to flood the marketplace with clones that lack a long term future and reduce the trustworthiness of the altcoin phenomenon. XC represents several market-leading innovations, and we are honoured to make these available to the community in the near future.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500

Just think about this for a moment:

- some dumb coin copies XC's old tech and gets an article published about it

- we kindly inform the coin's followers that their dev is several steps behind XC and has implemented last-gen technology

- people rationally head on over to the exchanges and buy XC instead.


It's too easy.



It would be 100x easier if we had a whitepaper to point them to.  


I couldn't agree more. A white paper is on the Rev 3 to-do list.






Not until REV3?  There should be whitepapers for each major revision.  REV2 --> and then REV3 to explain how it ADDS to the privacy that REV2 offered.

New "anon" coins are added weekly to the markets.  People cannot tell one solution from the other anymore.  

This is the last I'll post about it, but as far as I'm concerned, Dan needs to stop whatever coding is he is doing, and spend however long it takes to publish a well documented whitepaper explaining XC's current tech.  


I think I Agree on this we need detailed Explanation From Dan On How REV2-2.5 Improve the anonimity of XC and makes it the market leader at the moment so that we can give people a quick source where they can get Informed and make their best decision to invest in. I mean fuking Bitcoindark is ahead of us in price at the moment we should have smashed DARKCOIN Records already after REV 2 for fuck sake.
sr. member
Activity: 270
Merit: 250
Haha. Crypto community at it finest. 10% litterally takes money from the other 90%. If there was not a 4000 BTC sale/ipo in ethereum a small number of people actually could have made some money. When half of the holders (yes half, they do not care about the tech) will dump 2000 BTC worth of ethereum we will see how many of them will get profit;) jesus fucking christ
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250

I told synechist that is a stupid move but nobody is paying attention to my words

Meh, its the previous version.  Now open sourcing the current version (which still is not getting as much praise and attention as it should) would be stupid IMO.

LOL....copycat shitcoins are ruthless.  I'm glad the devs aren't releasing the new technology for this exact reason.  This was a good science experiment. 
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500

Just think about this for a moment:

- some dumb coin copies XC's old tech and gets an article published about it

- we kindly inform the coin's followers that their dev is several steps behind XC and has implemented last-gen technology

- people rationally head on over to the exchanges and buy XC instead.


It's too easy.



It would be 100x easier if we had a whitepaper to point them to.  


I couldn't agree more. A white paper is on the Rev 3 to-do list.






Not until REV3?  There should be whitepapers for each major revision.  REV2 --> and then REV3 to explain how it ADDS to the privacy that REV2 offered.

New "anon" coins are added weekly to the markets.  People cannot tell one solution from the other anymore.  

This is the last I'll post about it, but as far as I'm concerned, Dan needs to stop whatever coding is he is doing, and spend however long it takes to publish a well documented whitepaper explaining XC's current tech.  
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Just think about this for a moment:

- some dumb coin copies XC's old tech and gets an article published about it

- we kindly inform the coin's followers that their dev is several steps behind XC and has implemented last-gen technology

- people rationally head on over to the exchanges and buy XC instead.


It's too easy.



It would be 100x easier if we had a whitepaper to point them to. 


I couldn't agree more. A white paper is on the Rev 3 to-do list.




legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
I, for one, like the fact that old revisions are released as the path moves forward. Sure, it isn't what is currently being used, but it allows XC to be one-step ahead of all the other clones out there that will attempt to adopt old code. I agree that a whitepaper should be a major priority when 2.5 gets finished, but I'd also say that functionality-wise, 2.5 has to be able to easily do anon-transfers with no issues (some of you probably seen me posting pages back about not being able to private send over a dozen transactions).
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500

Just think about this for a moment:

- some dumb coin copies XC's old tech and gets an article published about it

- we kindly inform the coin's followers that their dev is several steps behind XC and is implemented last-gen technology

- people rationally head on over to the exchanges and buy XC instead.


It's too easy.



It would be 100x easier if we had a whitepaper to point them to.  What do we point them to now?  Our word? 
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

I told synechist that is a stupid move but nobody is paying attention to my words

We are paying attention, but I respectfully disagree with you.

What we do need is a whitepaper.




Synec just write this guy to Correct this article they do not Improve Shit he is stating that XC anonimity is at the moment pre Rev 1.5 and that Key coin is Improving Xc anonimity and what they are using is our 1.5 REV this is super crazy fucking hell

Responded to the article.

This is nothing to worry about.

Of course people will use our last-gen mixing tech. That's the whole point.



Just think about this for a moment:

- some dumb coin copies XC's old tech and gets an article published about it

- we kindly inform the coin's followers that their dev is several steps behind XC and has implemented last-gen technology

- people rationally head on over to the exchanges and buy XC instead.


It's too easy.

hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500

I told synechist that is a stupid move but nobody is paying attention to my words

We are paying attention, but I respectfully disagree with you.

What we do need is a whitepaper.




Synec just write this guy to Correct this article they do not Improve Shit he is stating that XC anonimity is at the moment pre Rev 1.5 and that Key coin is Improving Xc anonimity and what they are using is our 1.5 REV this is super crazy fucking hell

Responded to the article.

This is nothing to worry about.

Of course people will use our last-gen mixing tech. That's the whole point.



Thank you I posted in their thread also
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
XC
Do not open the network source.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
If people fall for that.. God blesh them

You know they will.  Looking at their ANN I can tell you exactly how this is going to go as I've seen this exact pattern several times.  The price will get a nice bump over the next 4 days or so and within two weeks it will be dead with nothing but bag holders wondering how they fell for it while everyone else has moved onto the next P&D.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

I told synechist that is a stupid move but nobody is paying attention to my words

We are paying attention, but I respectfully disagree with you.

What we do need is a whitepaper.




Synec just write this guy to Correct this article they do not Improve Shit he is stating that XC anonimity is at the moment pre Rev 1.5 and that Key coin is Improving Xc anonimity and what they are using is our 1.5 REV this is super crazy fucking hell

Responded to the article.

This is nothing to worry about.

Of course people will use our last-gen mixing tech. That's the whole point.

sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
I don't think we should have open sourced anything until our current tech's method (REV 2+) was properly documented via whitepaper...

Seriously, this just makes the waters muddier.  What we need is clarity amongst the wide variety of anon solutions.  Until XC provides clear documentation of method, the waters get muddier day by day.

Well said.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500

I told synechist that is a stupid move but nobody is paying attention to my words

We are paying attention, but I respectfully disagree with you.

What we do need is a whitepaper.




Synec just write this guy to Correct this article they do not Improve Shit he is stating that XC anonimity is at the moment pre Rev 1.5 and that Key coin is Improving Xc anonimity and what they are using is our 1.5 REV this is super crazy fucking hell
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I don't think we should have open sourced anything until our current tech's method (REV 2+) was properly documented via whitepaper...

Seriously, this just makes the waters muddier.  What we need is clarity amongst the wide variety of anon solutions.  Until XC provides clear documentation of method, the waters get muddier day by day.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
SoNiC BooM

I told synechist that is a stupid move but nobody is paying attention to my words

Meh, its the previous version.  Now open sourcing the current version (which still is not getting as much praise and attention as it should) would be stupid IMO.

..but you can see what came out of it... that we must take defensive position..I'm not sure that is good right now
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

I told synechist that is a stupid move but nobody is paying attention to my words

We are paying attention, but I respectfully disagree with you.

What we do need is a whitepaper.


full member
Activity: 214
Merit: 100
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250

I told synechist that is a stupid move but nobody is paying attention to my words

Meh, its the previous version.  Now open sourcing the current version (which still is not getting as much praise and attention as it should) would be stupid IMO.
Jump to: