No one else has had such an open dev team is that correct? The fact Dans linkedin was posted was the single reason I got into XC in the first place, and we've come a long way since then with the new team members, site, wallet, etc etc
I guess simply patience is key. if it gets below the 14's im gonna bust out another BTC. f**k it. lol
In all fairness to me, the other coin I mentioned was Namecoin and it's still #8 on the coin market cap list. It's not dead yet.
The one thing my 3 main holdings have in common is an open and transparent development team. I don't think any coin will go mainstream without this and I believe it 100%. Before anyone mentions Satoshi, BTC has a huge team of developers that are publicly identified. Some of them even worked with Satoshi, so as far as I'm concerned BTC already has a transparent team and foundation.
To the person that says CLOAK is a competitor, you need to ask yourself a couple of questions and step outside of your current opinion to answer it. Do you see the public accepting a coin named "CLOAK", developed by an unknown person? This is a very simple yet important question. The answer seems obvious to me.
I made mention of this, its something that the crypto world will understand, but a 55 year old garbage man will ask what the fuck is cloak. I previously mentioned XC is geared towards the entire population or mass adoption. Long term I do think XC is better. But enough about the chitchat of other coins, lets keep this on XC