[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 850.

btcsql

sr. member

Activity: 292

Merit: 250

Quote from: Teka on July 12, 2014, 08:04:19 PM

Quote from: btcsql on July 12, 2014, 07:54:25 PM

Quote from: Teka on July 12, 2014, 07:14:16 PM

Here you go - http://downloads.xc-official.com/release/windows/XCv0.9.2.40XCurrency-2.42.zip.sig

This isn't what I'm looking for.

See: https://bitcoin.org/bin/0.9.2.1/SHA256SUMS.asc

That should be more than adequate enough for verification.

There is nothing of value to me in that file you uploaded:

https://i.imgur.com/KW5c0Tb.png

Again, the file should contain a PGP message including the URL of each wallet download, and its corresponding sha256 hash, signed off by Dan. If Dan can certify from his account here that he is in control of the key:

1356792A (from http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=atcsecure&op=index)

that key would suffice in my opinion.

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: btcsql on July 12, 2014, 07:54:25 PM

Quote from: Teka on July 12, 2014, 07:14:16 PM

Here you go - http://downloads.xc-official.com/release/windows/XCv0.9.2.40XCurrency-2.42.zip.sig

This isn't what I'm looking for.

See: https://bitcoin.org/bin/0.9.2.1/SHA256SUMS.asc

That should be more than adequate enough for verification.

KimmyF

sr. member

Activity: 978

Merit: 250

Quote from: Mountaingoat on July 12, 2014, 07:46:29 PM

Quote from: cyberhacker on July 12, 2014, 05:44:15 PM

Quote from: Mountaingoat on July 12, 2014, 05:41:36 PM

How many XC do you have atm?

LOL.

Why is that funny?

I have 267 XC atm, it isn't much, but it is all I could afford.

He, i know people that are sure you can buy a great car with that amount 6 months from now. Wait some more while you think about what you could do with 267 BTC you stored in 2011. There are not so many coins going around & this is a POS coin

btcsql

sr. member

Activity: 292

Merit: 250

Quote from: Teka on July 12, 2014, 07:14:16 PM

Here you go - http://downloads.xc-official.com/release/windows/XCv0.9.2.40XCurrency-2.42.zip.sig

This isn't what I'm looking for.

See: https://bitcoin.org/bin/0.9.2.1/SHA256SUMS.asc

Driv3n

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

I'm a little torn, XCend is catchy... but something simple like enable private transaction is good too and won't lead to any confusion if and when things go more mainstream.

Mountaingoat - Cyberhacker probably has a lot of XC and may not want to disclose how much... which is probably smart

Grifftech2k4

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: Teka on July 12, 2014, 05:47:40 PM

Quote from: SpringfieldM1A on July 12, 2014, 05:45:03 PM

Rumour has it DrasticRaven is designing a GUI wallet

That's a rumor, all I'm sayin....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_6BBAVfzqM

Mountaingoat

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote from: cyberhacker on July 12, 2014, 05:44:15 PM

Quote from: Mountaingoat on July 12, 2014, 05:41:36 PM

How many XC do you have atm?

LOL.

Why is that funny?

I have 267 XC atm, it isn't much, but it is all I could afford.

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: flashbit on July 12, 2014, 07:33:07 PM

Quote from: mr_random on July 12, 2014, 07:30:22 PM

Quote from: Teka on July 12, 2014, 07:25:00 PM

Quote from: CoinsDude on July 12, 2014, 07:22:52 PM

IMHO: Don't make things too complicated.

New users will not understand what "XCend" means.. "Enable Private Transaction" makes much more sense as EVERYONE will know what it means...

Yes I totally agree, orginally were going to go with enable privacy mode but that seemed more confusing as new features are added. So I suggested enable privacy transaction and we discussed it. However, we are open to ideas.

Not to rock the boat but I like the "XCend" idea. Not necessarily the name "XCend", but the fact we have a branded name for that function (think Darkcoin with Darksend!).

Perhaps on the UI itself have "Enable Private Transaction (XCend)" next to the checkbox, so it's clear and intuitive what the function does to someone who doesn't even know what XCend is.

Just my 0.2 XC.

+1 - love the idea as well FWIW

Hmm... I'm wondering if we could do XSEND and the hover over for info.

flashbit

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 505

Quote from: mr_random on July 12, 2014, 07:30:22 PM

Quote from: Teka on July 12, 2014, 07:25:00 PM

Quote from: CoinsDude on July 12, 2014, 07:22:52 PM

IMHO: Don't make things too complicated.

New users will not understand what "XCend" means.. "Enable Private Transaction" makes much more sense as EVERYONE will know what it means...

Yes I totally agree, orginally were going to go with enable privacy mode but that seemed more confusing as new features are added. So I suggested enable privacy transaction and we discussed it. However, we are open to ideas.

Not to rock the boat but I like the "XCend" idea. Not necessarily the name "XCend", but the fact we have a branded name for that function (think Darkcoin with Darksend!).

Perhaps on the UI itself have "Enable Private Transaction (XCend)" next to the checkbox, so it's clear and intuitive what the function does to someone who doesn't even know what XCend is.

Just my 0.2 XC.

+1 - love the idea as well FWIW

policymaker

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter

Quote from: Teka on July 12, 2014, 07:14:16 PM

Here you go - http://downloads.xc-official.com/release/windows/XCv0.9.2.40XCurrency-2.42.zip.sig

so this is the checksum thing he s been asking? Can we depart for moon now ?

mr_random

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Teka on July 12, 2014, 07:25:00 PM

Quote from: CoinsDude on July 12, 2014, 07:22:52 PM

IMHO: Don't make things too complicated.

New users will not understand what "XCend" means.. "Enable Private Transaction" makes much more sense as EVERYONE will know what it means...

Yes I totally agree, orginally were going to go with enable privacy mode but that seemed more confusing as new features are added. So I suggested enable privacy transaction and we discussed it. However, we are open to ideas.

Not to rock the boat but I like the "XCend" idea. Not necessarily the name "XCend", but the fact we have a branded name for that function (think Darkcoin with Darksend!).

Perhaps on the UI itself have "Enable Private Transaction (XCend)" next to the checkbox, so it's clear and intuitive what the function does to someone who doesn't even know what XCend is.

Just my 0.2 XC.

dida

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

SoNiC BooM

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: CoinsDude on July 12, 2014, 07:22:52 PM

IMHO: Don't make things too complicated.

New users will not understand what "XCend" means.. "Enable Private Transaction" makes much more sense as EVERYONE will know what it means...

Yes I totally agree, orginally were going to go with enable privacy mode but that seemed more confusing as new features are added. So I suggested enable privacy transaction and we discussed it. However, we are open to ideas.

CoinsDude

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

IMHO: Don't make things too complicated.

New users will not understand what "XCend" means.. "Enable Private Transaction" makes much more sense as EVERYONE will know what it means...

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Here you go - http://downloads.xc-official.com/release/windows/XCv0.9.2.40XCurrency-2.42.zip.sig

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: takramltc on July 12, 2014, 06:44:50 PM

Quote from: btcsql on July 12, 2014, 03:17:00 PM

I'd like to download and install the wallet but would like to see checksums at a minimum published by Dan first.

It's industry best practice to publish checksum / PGP sign off on wallet downloads, see Bitcoin Core:

https://bitcoin.org/bin/0.9.2.1/SHA256SUMS.asc

@TEKA
@SYNECHIST

Please could you address btcsql concern - I agree with him its standard practice and nearly all software uses checksum validation as a minimum (Nearly all Microsoft MSDN downloads use it).

It would definitely be in line with "secure private transactions"

I understand Dan is probably busy coding - and perhaps will be able to address this concern when he has some time.

I would hate that FUD is spread about this, when its something easy to resolve.

Thanks.

You hit the nail on the head. Also I seriously don't think this as much of a big deal as problems that other coins have.

btcsql

sr. member

Activity: 292

Merit: 250

I am offering a 100 XC bounty (Bounty 1) for Dan's PGP signed checksums of all currently available wallet downloads.

Bounty 1 will be paid on mainnet using distmix.

There will be another 100 XC bounty (Bounty 2) for anyone who can successfully discover the sending address for Bounty 1.

takramltc

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Quote from: btcsql on July 12, 2014, 03:17:00 PM

I'd like to download and install the wallet but would like to see checksums at a minimum published by Dan first.

It's industry best practice to publish checksum / PGP sign off on wallet downloads, see Bitcoin Core:

https://bitcoin.org/bin/0.9.2.1/SHA256SUMS.asc

@TEKA
@SYNECHIST

Please could you address btcsql concern - I agree with him its standard practice and nearly all software uses checksum validation as a minimum (Nearly all Microsoft MSDN downloads use it).

It would definitely be in line with "secure private transactions"

I understand Dan is probably busy coding - and perhaps will be able to address this concern when he has some time.

I would hate that FUD is spread about this, when its something easy to resolve.

Thanks.

KimmyF

sr. member

Activity: 978

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Thank you for your reply.

It still gives me error with my Internal IP address and the External one that you can find in http://ipchicken.com/

Any suggestion?

Check your PM ....

CryptoPromotions

sr. member

Activity: 332

Merit: 250

This coin will take it's place at the head of the table soon enough. Kudos to the fabulous development team!

Cheesy

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 850. (Read 1484197 times)