I think it'll be very interesting if wallet holders could chat with each other.
So whales could get together? LOL
more significant thing is that we'll have a decentralized market place. WOW......
Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 846. (Read 1484197 times)
July 13, 2014, 08:30:36 AM
July 13, 2014, 08:25:24 AM
I wonder why the downtrend?
- whales suppressing the price to accumulate further?
- people from competing projects hoping to suppress the price?
Either way I don't mind. I can accumulate more for now, and XC's bright future remains unaffected. We'll be a decimal place higher before long.
I hear this often. But one cannot accumulate if there is no volume.
My theory: few investors, a lot of speculators/whales in crypto atm.
Agree that the coins future seems bright.
July 13, 2014, 08:24:11 AM
is there going to be a PR campaign or something like that? you can have the best product, but if no one is aware of it, then youre left empty handed.
Yes, the world will know about XC.
We've raised money through community donations and also have Arlyn and Rob on board whos experience and credentials are impressive. They (and the XC team) have a plan.
July 13, 2014, 08:20:15 AM
I wonder why the downtrend?
- whales suppressing the price to accumulate further?
- people from competing projects hoping to suppress the price?
Either way I don't mind. I can accumulate more for now, and XC's bright future remains unaffected. We'll be a decimal place higher before long.
Nice! 1 decimal point to the left! _ Can't Wait ;-)
July 13, 2014, 08:17:01 AM
is there going to be a PR campaign or something like that? you can have the best product, but if no one is aware of it, then youre left empty handed.
July 13, 2014, 07:57:12 AM
I wonder why the downtrend?
- whales suppressing the price to accumulate further?
- people from competing projects hoping to suppress the price?
Either way I don't mind. I can accumulate more for now, and XC's bright future remains unaffected. We'll be a decimal place higher before long.
July 13, 2014, 07:53:29 AM
I wonder why the downtrend?
July 13, 2014, 07:45:40 AM
which version of OS X are you guys using ?
Version 10.9.3
Build 13D65
July 13, 2014, 07:35:12 AM
July 13, 2014, 07:32:02 AM
which version of OS X are you guys using ?
July 13, 2014, 06:37:24 AM
My wallet (OS X v0.9.2.40XCurrency-2.42) is still syncing (more than one hour) 
Could be an issue on localhost or in the OS X latest version?
Maybe something related to your connection, it sync's fine with other people so it's mostly not an error on the wallet program itself. Could be an issue on localhost or in the OS X latest version? If you can confirm that you have tested on OS X, then it is definitely an issue with my machine and not a wallet issue
Here:
Thank you. I confirm that the wallet works fine on localhost (synced and managing transactions). It was definitely some issue with my machine (hardware most probably).
July 13, 2014, 06:30:23 AM
My wallet (OS X v0.9.2.40XCurrency-2.42) is still syncing (more than one hour) Could be an issue on localhost or in the OS X latest version?
Maybe something related to your connection, it sync's fine with other people so it's mostly not an error on the wallet program itself. Could be an issue on localhost or in the OS X latest version? If you can confirm that you have tested on OS X, then it is definitely an issue with my machine and not a wallet issue
Here:
July 13, 2014, 06:26:28 AM
I think I get what you’re saying…
Remembering an endless alphanumeric key is like writing an email where you can easily make a backup of your wallet (e.g. by telling it to your friends). On the other hand having a wallet file which you can only make a backup of and put it on an usb-stick and put it in a safe is like writing with a stick in the sand.
Also you’re implying that today is opposite day?
Btw, if XC team will deliver a brainwallet, I think it would be best to do it along with free tin foil hat as additional security layer to prevent the gov from reading our unencrypted brain waves
Jk’n ya, no offense.
July 13, 2014, 06:03:57 AM
...
if you have brainwallet, ereasing file or missing/breaking a device does not mean loosing money.
if you have brainwallet, ereasing file or missing/breaking a device does not mean loosing money.
True, at least until the bottle with vodka is drained.
July 13, 2014, 05:47:06 AM
When is XC going to use a brainwallet?
Using wallet.dat file if we know we can have a brainwallet is like writing paper manual letter, while you know you can write an email...
And the comparison is for purpose: if you have brainwallet, ereasing file or missing/breaking a device does not mean loosing money.
So the same is with email vs paper letter. If you make a mistake on paper - you lost your previous work, and write another one. Doing this on a computer makes it easy to change and saves your work
Using wallet.dat file if we know we can have a brainwallet is like writing paper manual letter, while you know you can write an email...
And the comparison is for purpose: if you have brainwallet, ereasing file or missing/breaking a device does not mean loosing money.
So the same is with email vs paper letter. If you make a mistake on paper - you lost your previous work, and write another one. Doing this on a computer makes it easy to change and saves your work
July 13, 2014, 05:28:48 AM
RFC for documentation
Isn't is better if we use repository and decent docs' format (for example bitbucket and readthedocs) like most software projects (for example http://docs.python-requests.org/en/v2.0-0/)? If the community approves this idea I can take care of this task.
Isn't is better if we use repository and decent docs' format (for example bitbucket and readthedocs) like most software projects (for example http://docs.python-requests.org/en/v2.0-0/)? If the community approves this idea I can take care of this task.
When XC launches this will all been taken care of (from my understanding). You can always send Teka a message and offer your help.
July 13, 2014, 05:22:28 AM
RFC for documentation
Isn't is better if we use repository and decent docs' format (for example bitbucket and readthedocs) like most software projects (for example http://docs.python-requests.org/en/v2.0-0/)? If the community approves this idea I can take care of this task.
Isn't is better if we use repository and decent docs' format (for example bitbucket and readthedocs) like most software projects (for example http://docs.python-requests.org/en/v2.0-0/)? If the community approves this idea I can take care of this task.
July 13, 2014, 05:15:41 AM
My wallet (OS X v0.9.2.40XCurrency-2.42) is still syncing (more than one hour) Could be an issue on localhost or in the OS X latest version?
Maybe something related to your connection, it sync's fine with other people so it's mostly not an error on the wallet program itself. Could be an issue on localhost or in the OS X latest version? If you can confirm that you have tested on OS X, then it is definitely an issue with my machine and not a wallet issue
July 13, 2014, 05:11:46 AM
My wallet (OS X v0.9.2.40XCurrency-2.42) is still syncing (more than one hour) Could be an issue on localhost or in the OS X latest version?
Maybe something related to your connection, it sync's fine with other people so it's mostly not an error on the wallet program itself. Could be an issue on localhost or in the OS X latest version? July 13, 2014, 05:08:55 AM
Yes, I have seen that on dark forum too. But it is running nodes in EC2 cluster. I dont want to run them in cloud. Second, it is a guide how to run it on 5 public static addresses. I have one public address (for now). If I need few addresses, I shall get them from local ISP since I know the owner, at zero cost. But not everyone can get static public address at zero cost. Consider in my country it can cost from 5 to even 20 euro per address per month. Other than that, I can hos it on several PCs at work (they are all mine, I don't work in some public service, I work in my own company). And I host one at home and one at work since xnode story started. But I would like to try to host it on my home pc in few virtual instances. Is it possible or not? I think not, but had to ask.
Thanks for adding some information. I'm not really tech savy so only thing I can do is repeat/link old information. If you think you know how to do this and could put this information in words/screenshots for newbie's that would be great. You should definitely make a new thread on XCtalk.com
I can't make a guide, since it seems only way to host few xnodes is to have public IP per node. It is not XC problem, it is the same with all crypto. I am not a programmer, so I don't know why one wallet could not use few ports to listen, instead of one. As I said, I can buy 200 euro PC, install ubuntu or CentOS, make virtual instances, give every instance public IP, and voila, I have few xnodes running on same PC. But as I said, I can host PC for free at ISP. So I can get as many xnodes as I want with 200-250 euro investment. Point is can we make all ppl have the same, without having to pay someone hosting? It only takes xnode client to listen on 10 ports, and you can have 10 nodes on local PC (assuming it is powerful enough)? As I see it ec2 one m3.medium from guide cost 50$ per month for 24x7 runingtime. And you get 5 xnodes for that price. It is not bad, but till payments start to arrive, I would prefer free xnodes, as many as I can get. I assume all would. Not to mention with local hosting, my wallet is mine only. With amazon hosting, well, I have to trust them with my money. Well I don't. If my coins disappear from amazon cluster, they will say "ooops, we are very sorry, we are sorry almost like Mark Karpeles is".
Jump to: