[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 934.

mojun7982

full member

Activity: 269

Merit: 100

The Standard Protocol - Solving Inflation

Quote from: bitcad4u on July 08, 2014, 11:32:57 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on July 08, 2014, 11:28:50 AM

Quote

While I am severely pissed off at how things were handled last night by the entire team, I still have complete faith in this coin and Dan. Please XC team, learn from your mistakes and stop hurting your own project. I understand growing pains, but if Rev2 would have been released at 8pm last night, XC's name would be held high today and the price would reflect the respect.

I want to respond to this, as I don't blame anybody for being upset how things went down last night. Could it have been handled better, yes... we will we learn from this.. YES...

However, it was a decision that I had to make, as I was not comfortable releasing the mainnet code in its current state and I stand by that decision.

Moving forward a more formal release process will be followed.

-Dan-

Thank you Dan. I still love you deep down.

first,thanks for your love
but sorry,he was married.
a Joke Grin

policymaker

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter

Quote from: atcsecure on July 08, 2014, 11:28:50 AM

Quote

While I am severely pissed off at how things were handled last night by the entire team, I still have complete faith in this coin and Dan. Please XC team, learn from your mistakes and stop hurting your own project. I understand growing pains, but if Rev2 would have been released at 8pm last night, XC's name would be held high today and the price would reflect the respect.

I want to respond to this, as I don't blame anybody for being upset how things went down last night. Could it have been handled better, yes... we will we learn from this.. YES...

However, it was a decision that I had to make, as I was not comfortable releasing the mainnet code in its current state and I stand by that decision.

Moving forward a more formal release process will be followed.

-Dan-

ty for the response dan !

@pookielax

I actually don't mind u and Boh talking all these trash cause I do believe that all this was hurtful to ur trading plan but its just getting a little distracting from the topic itself, like the price speculation 2 weeks ago, so plz at least stop spamming

@bitcad4u

you r a weak little bastard but I hope you bought back in @ 150k

swannsonite

member

Activity: 109

Merit: 10

In Crypto We Verify

Quote from: FoldingTime on July 08, 2014, 11:01:22 AM

Quote from: qawzsx on July 08, 2014, 10:47:29 AM

We need more testnet nodes...

I'm on testnet.

Send some to mpMM5d2QXfCH6NYheUzxa5mL4526g1FMN9 using sendfrommixer

Sent a 6 x 10 your way.

mwTpsPXsXJCesqfKsZakUXMM6kU3x61NNM if anyone wants to send some my way.

weedsmoke420

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: the_game1224 on July 08, 2014, 11:45:25 AM

Quote from: weedsmoke420 on July 08, 2014, 11:44:10 AM

Quote from: the_game1224 on July 08, 2014, 11:37:52 AM

Quote from: evtrmm on July 08, 2014, 11:34:53 AM

10:30:06

sendfrommixer main msK6o7xVMNY4Fg2wNqFEBsVU2FpkL7nCyZ 5.0 1

but didn't send the coins? what do we need in .bat to sendfrommixer?

seeing the same thing, command doesnt error and the next line is blank

11:36:53

sendfrommixer test1 n3M24QPKVB4CQvm2zQskrCNxTW1RZSwumN 10 0

11:36:53

Friendly suggestion; evtrmm, I believe that your command contains 'sendfrommixer main', but this is testnet.

the_game1224 the difference i noticed between you and evtrmm's command is the decimal point after that 5 , maybe that's what you're missing.

'main' in his command is simply the address label. The 10 in my command is the amount of coins

I was just offering advice based on the pretense that a little difference in code makes a world of difference. Thanks for clearing that up.

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: qawzsx on July 08, 2014, 11:32:34 AM

Anybody else who want some testnet coins, post your testnet address, i'll send you some coins for you to play with the wallet...
Cheers

mhUoZW5DX3x1fBWsr7EtUapQijjAsdcmwv

Im on testnet and my wallet received already three transactions of 333 coins each as "mined" what is happening here can someone explain? are those real XCs that will be confirmed in my wallet ? and where are they coming from?? hups other 333 just arrived from mined also.

the_game1224

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: braxx on July 08, 2014, 11:43:19 AM

I'm trying the command "sendfrommixer"

but I'm getting "Account has insufficient funds (code -6)"
while there are already 1900+ confirmed

I was getting this too after changing the address label, had to move from a phantom "account" into the correct one. Run the listaccounts command and see what you get

hoertest

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: hoertest on July 08, 2014, 11:09:37 AM

Pookie relax dude, Wink

, If you would have been canned on the spot or would be the one canning in your "real world" environment , i feel a little sorry for you.
That tough guy business mentality you project is called for some times, i know, but it doesn't apply here , or at least it doesn't provide any constructive benefits. I'm all for real talk when the shit hits the fan and preferably before that in business, but we are far, far away from a scenario like that with our PR , its rather the opposite in my humble opinion.

Marketing isn't Marketing and since crypto is a new playing field in all kinds of regards that applies to the PR as well. The middle ground Synechist is trying to find between strait corporate PR and a more POP culture approach ,which i think is an important part of crypto also, isn't that easy to accomplish and understand some times if you are coming from a more corporate only environment.

Hope this helps to understand both sides.

+10000 for actually coming at me with a logical thought out response and not automatically Screaming hes a fudder... I have been in this community long time.. last night was very frustrating.. for many different reasons about way things were handled...

Thats what this community is about and guess who established that culture and tone with his levelheaded style of writing to a big part, yes Synechist. Wink

I think its a little bit part of human nature that we take all thats been done right as normal, and let that one thing that goes wrong or not ideal frustrate us more than it should looking at the big picture.

pookielax31

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 500

I asked him not 2....

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

so there are 2 new commands

atcsecure@ubuntu12:~/rev2$ ./x11coind simpledistmix
error: {"code":-1,"message":"simpledistmix \n"}

atcsecure@ubuntu12:~/rev2$ ./x11coind distmix
error: {"code":-1,"message":"distmix \n For testing, use an outamount of 1 for the best results; a minimum fee is removed from the change.\n"}
atcsecure@ubuntu12:~/rev2$

I am pushing a minor update to enable the first command as the 2nd is complicated.. give me 10 minutes

holyprofit

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: hoertest on July 08, 2014, 11:09:37 AM

Pookie relax dude, Wink

, If you would have been canned on the spot or would be the one canning in your "real world" environment , i feel a little sorry for you.
That tough guy business mentality you project is called for some times, i know, but it doesn't apply here , or at least it doesn't provide any constructive benefits. I'm all for real talk when the shit hits the fan and preferably before that in business, but we are far, far away from a scenario like that with our PR , its rather the opposite in my humble opinion.

Marketing isn't Marketing and since crypto is a new playing field in all kinds of regards that applies to the PR as well. The middle ground Synechist is trying to find between strait corporate PR and a more POP culture approach ,which i think is an important part of crypto also, isn't that easy to accomplish and understand some times if you are coming from a more corporate only environment.

Hope this helps to understand both sides.

+10000 for actually coming at me with a logical thought out response and not automatically Screaming hes a fudder... I have been in this community long time.. last night was very frustrating.. for many different reasons about way things were handled...

I agree we could have been given a more realistic idea of how it was going but I also think we need to give these guys a lot of space. It isn't a business and they are working for the coin not for us. We can help them by pointing out to them how it can be improved and maybe try the new stuff out. At least until rev3 I'm trying to avoid thinking what we are going to see is business grade. In my view this is a way better approach than many coins which can appear polished from the start mainly because their development is much slower and it's purely PR.

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

Quote from: weedsmoke420 on July 08, 2014, 11:44:10 AM

Quote from: the_game1224 on July 08, 2014, 11:37:52 AM

Quote from: evtrmm on July 08, 2014, 11:34:53 AM

10:30:06

sendfrommixer main msK6o7xVMNY4Fg2wNqFEBsVU2FpkL7nCyZ 5.0 1

but didn't send the coins? what do we need in .bat to sendfrommixer?

seeing the same thing, command doesnt error and the next line is blank

11:36:53

sendfrommixer test1 n3M24QPKVB4CQvm2zQskrCNxTW1RZSwumN 10 0

11:36:53

Friendly suggestion; evtrmm, I believe that your command contains 'sendfrommixer main', but this is testnet.

the_game1224 the difference i noticed between you and evtrmm's command is the decimal point after that 5 , maybe that's what you're missing.

main is the label of the address.

the_game1224

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: weedsmoke420 on July 08, 2014, 11:44:10 AM

Quote from: the_game1224 on July 08, 2014, 11:37:52 AM

Quote from: evtrmm on July 08, 2014, 11:34:53 AM

10:30:06

sendfrommixer main msK6o7xVMNY4Fg2wNqFEBsVU2FpkL7nCyZ 5.0 1

but didn't send the coins? what do we need in .bat to sendfrommixer?

seeing the same thing, command doesnt error and the next line is blank

11:36:53

sendfrommixer test1 n3M24QPKVB4CQvm2zQskrCNxTW1RZSwumN 10 0

11:36:53

Friendly suggestion; evtrmm, I believe that your command contains 'sendfrommixer main', but this is testnet.

the_game1224 the difference i noticed between you and evtrmm's command is the decimal point after that 5 , maybe that's what you're missing.

'main' in his command is simply the address label. The 10 in my command is the amount of coins

weedsmoke420

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: the_game1224 on July 08, 2014, 11:37:52 AM

Quote from: evtrmm on July 08, 2014, 11:34:53 AM

10:30:06

sendfrommixer main msK6o7xVMNY4Fg2wNqFEBsVU2FpkL7nCyZ 5.0 1

but didn't send the coins? what do we need in .bat to sendfrommixer?

seeing the same thing, command doesnt error and the next line is blank

11:36:53

sendfrommixer test1 n3M24QPKVB4CQvm2zQskrCNxTW1RZSwumN 10 0

11:36:53

Friendly suggestion; evtrmm, I believe that your command contains 'sendfrommixer main', but this is testnet.

the_game1224 the difference i noticed between you and evtrmm's command is the decimal point after that 5 , maybe that's what you're missing.

braxx

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

I'm trying the command "sendfrommixer"

but I'm getting "Account has insufficient funds (code -6)"
while there are already 1900+ confirmed

the_game1224

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: evtrmm on July 08, 2014, 11:34:53 AM

10:30:06

sendfrommixer main msK6o7xVMNY4Fg2wNqFEBsVU2FpkL7nCyZ 5.0 1

but didn't send the coins? what do we need in .bat to sendfrommixer?

seeing the same thing, command doesnt error and the next line is blank

11:36:53

sendfrommixer test1 n3M24QPKVB4CQvm2zQskrCNxTW1RZSwumN 10 0

11:36:53

bearjewpacabra

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

Quote from: atcsecure on July 08, 2014, 11:28:50 AM

Quote

While I am severely pissed off at how things were handled last night by the entire team, I still have complete faith in this coin and Dan. Please XC team, learn from your mistakes and stop hurting your own project. I understand growing pains, but if Rev2 would have been released at 8pm last night, XC's name would be held high today and the price would reflect the respect.

I want to respond to this, as I don't blame anybody for being upset how things went down last night. Could it have been handled better, yes... we will we learn from this.. YES...

However, it was a decision that I had to make, as I was not comfortable releasing the mainnet code in its current state and I stand by that decision.

Moving forward a more formal release process will be followed.

-Dan-

Dan, I appreciate your response.

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

10:30:06

sendfrommixer main msK6o7xVMNY4Fg2wNqFEBsVU2FpkL7nCyZ 5.0 1

but didn't send the coins? what do we need in .bat to sendfrommixer?

braxx

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

atc...
is there anything you would like us to test on testnet?
how to engage multipath?

is it the # of mixer hops in the command?

Teka

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Arlyn is sleeping and I believe he made that clear a few pages back

bitcad4u

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 255

Quote from: atcsecure on July 08, 2014, 11:28:50 AM

Quote

While I am severely pissed off at how things were handled last night by the entire team, I still have complete faith in this coin and Dan. Please XC team, learn from your mistakes and stop hurting your own project. I understand growing pains, but if Rev2 would have been released at 8pm last night, XC's name would be held high today and the price would reflect the respect.

I want to respond to this, as I don't blame anybody for being upset how things went down last night. Could it have been handled better, yes... we will we learn from this.. YES...

However, it was a decision that I had to make, as I was not comfortable releasing the mainnet code in its current state and I stand by that decision.

Moving forward a more formal release process will be followed.

-Dan-

Thank you Dan. I still love you deep down.

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 934. (Read 1484198 times)