XII FREE Tipster Competition -sponsored by DirectBet- (Main Thread) - page 157.

Wendigo

legendary

Activity: 2604

Merit: 1036

Actually I don't think anyone with a 1 btc bankroll would do 100 bets of 1% of their bankroll @ 100 odds or more Cool

Because you could just 3x all-in and get max reward and don't follow any long-shots right? Cool

GrandeMar

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

https://www.directbet.eu/BetStatus.cshtml?BetID=DSzwrGKHXLPVWqpBpSxcRVaDP1ttDJwpWb

Joca97

legendary

Activity: 3794

Merit: 1030

The Best Tipster on the Forum!!

When can we post entries for next month?
Im intrested to go next month serious even with a bankroll of 1 btc

MonsterV

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1008

Muttley

hero member

Activity: 853

Merit: 500

insulter

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

https://www.directbet.eu/BetStatus.cshtml?BetID=DNPKGP7xb2nsF5is6ZGtGpuANcq6D6acCs
https://www.directbet.eu/BetStatus.cshtml?BetID=DMCUxcvi3EsYY1vuGQ74TsLYMpxnNLDgNq
https://www.directbet.eu/BetStatus.cshtml?BetID=DSv6LnWqWU3snUWsAr7ieNhbv62pMn5p5n

saladin7000

sr. member

Activity: 500

Merit: 250

PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market

https://directbet.eu/BetStatus.cshtml?BetID=D5C6KPaYwpYGcrk9iW2tBbqUJYMidbXrvv

bitbollo

legendary

Activity: 3276

Merit: 3537

Nec Recisa Recedit

The choice of bankroll it's free and every one can choose what some one wants.

Look in the bottom of tables, there is so also people with low bankroll !

This competition implies "best ROI" get "best prize", not for best earning or for the courage in a competition (ps if you play with one btc and try to get 75 betting you earn x3 .... you earn MORE of double of first plus the eventually ROI!)

u9y42

legendary

Activity: 2562

Merit: 1071

Quote from: amin28 on October 29, 2015, 06:27:02 AM

Quote from: FrueGreads on October 28, 2015, 06:37:54 PM

Quote from: amin28 on October 28, 2015, 11:44:03 AM

Hi. this competition is great but also i think its not FAIR ENOUGH ! Huh

If you look at the leader boards table you can see participants with smaller bankrolls are at the top of standing. but why? because of a simple reason! they can take more RISKS due to their smaller bankroll! they place their bets with little money continuously and Waiting for a chance! So to have a fair competition i think must be a MINIMUM LIMIT for bankrolls. for example 100 mbtc or 50 mbtc Or any other reasonable amount. good luck

The only reason why we don't have a minimum bankroll is to allow anyone to enter. We rewarded those who took a bigger risk with a large bankroll by giving them better prizes and freebets.
I understand what you are saying, an we will take that into consideration, but you must really understand that what you can do with a small bank you can do with a big one. So what really should be happening is that the smaller banks should be thinking, maybe I can trust my bets and use a bigger one to increase my profit next time.

Imagine if sanerin played with 1 BTC bankroll, and made exactly the same bets. His ROI% would be the same, and his profit would be really good. So in my opinion players should be able to trust their skill.
Anyway like I said, we will take your opinion into consideration.

Thanks for your consideration dear FrueGreads but as i said the difference between those who have smaller bankrolls and some ones with large bankrolls is COURAGE IN BETTING ! As a rule in betting, the less money the more daring

So I think in order to eliminate this issue one way is PUTTING LIMITS for bankrolls.

I can't say I disagree with you, but I certainly don't like the solution you are proposing - personally (and mind you, the decision won't be up to me; at most, I will be asked my opinion on it so, here it is in advance, I guess Tongue

), I feel that we should be aiming for a set of rules that make the competition interfere as little as possible with what the participants would normally be doing without any additional incentives. The most I would deviate from this would be to promote consistent results whenever possible (by reducing the effect luck has), and to encourage more users to join the competition (it won't be interesting, or last very long, otherwise).

With that in mind, I believe participants should enter with whatever bankroll they feel comfortable with and, if someone with a very low starting bankroll ends up winning the competition, so be it - the alternative as you propose it, it seems to me, would be to discourage users joining, and force others (potentially the majority) to play with a bankroll they don't feel comfortable with, and probably wouldn't be using in any other circumstances. Further, exaggerated risk taking wouldn't really disappear; it would be relegated to those who feel the minimum mandatory bankroll is small enough for them (effectively rewarding those with more BTC to spend).

Now, this doesn't mean the rules, as they are now, are perfect, or set in stone, of course; several changes have been made so far and, this competition continuing for any length of time in the future, many more will be made, I'm sure. To this end, and repeating what FrueGreads already stated, we will take every opinion and idea participants share with us into consideration - which is only fair, I guess, since it is you all who will have to follow the rules - but I hope they will move things in the direction of promoting more participation, and not less.

amin28

sr. member

Activity: 261

Merit: 250

Quote from: FrueGreads on October 28, 2015, 06:37:54 PM

Quote from: amin28 on October 28, 2015, 11:44:03 AM

Hi. this competition is great but also i think its not FAIR ENOUGH ! Huh

If you look at the leader boards table you can see participants with smaller bankrolls are at the top of standing. but why? because of a simple reason! they can take more RISKS due to their smaller bankroll! they place their bets with little money continuously and Waiting for a chance! So to have a fair competition i think must be a MINIMUM LIMIT for bankrolls. for example 100 mbtc or 50 mbtc Or any other reasonable amount. good luck

The only reason why we don't have a minimum bankroll is to allow anyone to enter. We rewarded those who took a bigger risk with a large bankroll by giving them better prizes and freebets.
I understand what you are saying, an we will take that into consideration, but you must really understand that what you can do with a small bank you can do with a big one. So what really should be happening is that the smaller banks should be thinking, maybe I can trust my bets and use a bigger one to increase my profit next time.

Imagine if sanerin played with 1 BTC bankroll, and made exactly the same bets. His ROI% would be the same, and his profit would be really good. So in my opinion players should be able to trust their skill.
Anyway like I said, we will take your opinion into consideration.

Thanks for your consideration dear FrueGreads but as i said the difference between those who have smaller bankrolls and some ones with large bankrolls is COURAGE IN BETTING ! As a rule in betting, the less money the more daring

So I think in order to eliminate this issue one way is PUTTING LIMITS for bankrolls.

patt0

legendary

Activity: 1694

Merit: 1005

Betting Championship betking.io/sports-leaderboard

Quote from: nickaizoku on October 28, 2015, 07:14:18 PM

Quote from: FrueGreads on October 28, 2015, 06:37:54 PM

Quote from: amin28 on October 28, 2015, 11:44:03 AM

Hi. this competition is great but also i think its not FAIR ENOUGH ! Huh

If you look at the leader boards table you can see participants with smaller bankrolls are at the top of standing. but why? because of a simple reason! they can take more RISKS due to their smaller bankroll! they place their bets with little money continuously and Waiting for a chance! So to have a fair competition i think must be a MINIMUM LIMIT for bankrolls. for example 100 mbtc or 50 mbtc Or any other reasonable amount. good luck

The only reason why we don't have a minimum bankroll is to allow anyone to enter. We rewarded those who took a bigger risk with a large bankroll by giving them better prizes and freebets.
I understand what you are saying, an we will take that into consideration, but you must really understand that what you can do with a small bank you can do with a big one. So what really should be happening is that the smaller banks should be thinking, maybe I can trust my bets and use a bigger one to increase my profit next time.

Imagine if sanerin played with 1 BTC bankroll, and made exactly the same bets. His ROI% would be the same, and his profit would be really good. So in my opinion players should be able to trust their skill.
Anyway like I said, we will take your opinion into consideration.

If he use 1btc as bank roll.. i believe he will think dozen times before make that 50+ multiplier toto parlay with maximum bet.

I guess next time with minimum bank roll would be fair enough. Just saying. Wink

From my point of view I agree with you but I can't say that FrueGreads is not right. The thing is, at least in my case, I can't play with 1 BTC bankroll, so of course I would never risk it, and in my case I did 15% ROI on the last competition, and I'm on 25% ROI on this one, so I don't trust my betting skills. But I do understand that those who are doing well maybe should trust their skills. They made a large amount of bets and got those amazing ROI%, so I understand FrueGreads when he says that people should put those emotions behind and just trust their skills.

I always heard in the trading and poker world that what you can do with a big bank you can do with a small one. We normally use that so that we start with small banks to test our skills and then move up to bigger banks. So I think that is exactly what should happen here. People tested their skill with safe banks, and now should move to bigger banks.
And if what you can do with a small bank you can do with a big one, that would also mean that this competition is not unfair. The problem is in our minds really.

nickaizoku

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

❃ CyberNick ❃

Quote from: FrueGreads on October 28, 2015, 06:37:54 PM

Quote from: amin28 on October 28, 2015, 11:44:03 AM

Hi. this competition is great but also i think its not FAIR ENOUGH ! Huh

If you look at the leader boards table you can see participants with smaller bankrolls are at the top of standing. but why? because of a simple reason! they can take more RISKS due to their smaller bankroll! they place their bets with little money continuously and Waiting for a chance! So to have a fair competition i think must be a MINIMUM LIMIT for bankrolls. for example 100 mbtc or 50 mbtc Or any other reasonable amount. good luck

The only reason why we don't have a minimum bankroll is to allow anyone to enter. We rewarded those who took a bigger risk with a large bankroll by giving them better prizes and freebets.
I understand what you are saying, an we will take that into consideration, but you must really understand that what you can do with a small bank you can do with a big one. So what really should be happening is that the smaller banks should be thinking, maybe I can trust my bets and use a bigger one to increase my profit next time.

Imagine if sanerin played with 1 BTC bankroll, and made exactly the same bets. His ROI% would be the same, and his profit would be really good. So in my opinion players should be able to trust their skill.
Anyway like I said, we will take your opinion into consideration.

If he use 1btc as bank roll.. i believe he will think dozen times before make that 50+ multiplier toto parlay with maximum bet.

I guess next time with minimum bank roll would be fair enough. Just saying. Wink

FrueGreads

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1059

Quote from: amin28 on October 28, 2015, 11:44:03 AM

Hi. this competition is great but also i think its not FAIR ENOUGH ! Huh

If you look at the leader boards table you can see participants with smaller bankrolls are at the top of standing. but why? because of a simple reason! they can take more RISKS due to their smaller bankroll! they place their bets with little money continuously and Waiting for a chance! So to have a fair competition i think must be a MINIMUM LIMIT for bankrolls. for example 100 mbtc or 50 mbtc Or any other reasonable amount. good luck

The only reason why we don't have a minimum bankroll is to allow anyone to enter. We rewarded those who took a bigger risk with a large bankroll by giving them better prizes and freebets.
I understand what you are saying, an we will take that into consideration, but you must really understand that what you can do with a small bank you can do with a big one. So what really should be happening is that the smaller banks should be thinking, maybe I can trust my bets and use a bigger one to increase my profit next time.

Imagine if sanerin played with 1 BTC bankroll, and made exactly the same bets. His ROI% would be the same, and his profit would be really good. So in my opinion players should be able to trust their skill.
Anyway like I said, we will take your opinion into consideration.

sanerin

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

https://directbet.eu/BetStatus.cshtml?BetID=146RzfvNZNgoQL9F1aXKLMHWsBxpYcpJK2

nickaizoku

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

❃ CyberNick ❃

Quote from: amin28 on October 28, 2015, 11:44:03 AM

Hi. this competition is great but also i think its not FAIR ENOUGH ! Huh

If you look at the leader boards table you can see participants with smaller bankrolls are at the top of standing. but why? because of a simple reason! they can take more RISKS due to their smaller bankroll! they place their bets with little money continuously and Waiting for a chance! So to have a fair competition i think must be a MINIMUM LIMIT for bankrolls. for example 100 mbtc or 50 mbtc Or any other reasonable amount. good luck

Seriously.. i keep thinking myself, why i dont start with 1mbtc.. lol no risk at all.

sanerin

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500