From what I saw from PeterTodd's comments about CN and ring signatures
How about instead of basing your opinion on "what you saw" (individual comments taken out of context by DRK supporters), you should read the entire context, including where he said he should buy some XMR (and never retracted that as far as I know), and also try to understand what is meant when someone with a lot of knowledge says that Monero has such-and-such an issue that is better solved by Zerocash (hint: it does not mean that Zerocash doesn't have problems of its own).
As far as the issues he pointed out with ring signatures generally, those were identified by us in MRL-0001 and addressed in MRL-0004. If you are interested and not trolling you might want to read those.
I'm not sure that your very well designed system is not full of exploits because its origin BCN was a scam and probably has a numerous backdoors inside..
It is reasonable to be skeptical about these things.
Because of that I would like to see a complete peer review of Moneros implementation of CN from an independent cryptographer/security professional.
Cool. You should pay for it then. The community would appreciate your contribution just as it appreciates others'
No thank you. I find these altcoin "peer review" efforts to be a little more than marketing for pumpers.
You should talk with a little more respect to other's work.
I call it as I see it, and I was not referring in particular to any individual's work.
.
