Author

Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1321. (Read 4670643 times)

sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Botnet operators don't need to pay for electricity

could you explain a little more?!

A large portion of the Monero global hash rate is made up of botnets. A botnet is "a network of private computers infected with malicious software and controlled as a group without the owners' knowledge,". In this case the botnet operators are using the computers to mine Monero, since Monero is quite profitable to mine with CPUs. Obviously the botnet operators don't need to pay for the electricity, so they will be making a profit no matter what.

this is terrible, by this logic, they can bring the price down to 1 Satoshi


is there a way for developers to prevent this - Botnets
Not really, it doesn't effect the amount of Monero being mined per day. I suppose most of the botnet operators would sell their Monero as soon as they receive it though, which could cause problems. Really it shouldn't be a problem if their are enough people buying. However due to the very high emission rate (the amount of coins mined per day set by the network), there selling pressure is starting to out weight the buying pressure causing the price to decrease a bit.

why do you think botnet owners would sell immediatly?
i think the opposit is true: a normal miner has to cover costs: he has to sell. a botnet owner get them nearly for free (just a little risk and maybe some cost to buy the botnet in the first lace)
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Botnet operators don't need to pay for electricity

could you explain a little more?!

A large portion of the Monero global hash rate is made up of botnets. A botnet is "a network of private computers infected with malicious software and controlled as a group without the owners' knowledge,". In this case the botnet operators are using the computers to mine Monero, since Monero is quite profitable to mine with CPUs. Obviously the botnet operators don't need to pay for the electricity, so they will be making a profit no matter what.

this is terrible, by this logic, they can bring the price down to 1 Satoshi


is there a way for developers to prevent this - Botnets
Not really, it doesn't effect the amount of Monero being mined per day. I suppose most of the botnet operators would sell their Monero as soon as they receive it though, which could cause problems. Really it shouldn't be a problem if there are enough people buying. However due to the very high emission rate (the amount of coins mined per day set by the network), there selling pressure is starting to out weight the buying pressure causing the price to decrease a bit.

and no, there isn't any way for the devs to stop botnets. However they can reduce the emission rate, which would decrease sell pressure causing a more stable and higher price.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Botnet operators don't need to pay for electricity

could you explain a little more?!

A large portion of the Monero global hash rate is made up of botnets. A botnet is "a network of private computers infected with malicious software and controlled as a group without the owners' knowledge,". In this case the botnet operators are using the computers to mine Monero, since Monero is quite profitable to mine with CPUs. Obviously the botnet operators don't need to pay for the electricity, so they will be making a profit no matter what.

this is terrible, by this logic, they can bring the price down to 1 Satoshi


is there a way for developers to prevent this - Botnets

They can't do anything.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
Botnet operators don't need to pay for electricity

could you explain a little more?!

A large portion of the Monero global hash rate is made up of botnets. A botnet is "a network of private computers infected with malicious software and controlled as a group without the owners' knowledge,". In this case the botnet operators are using the computers to mine Monero, since Monero is quite profitable to mine with CPUs. Obviously the botnet operators don't need to pay for the electricity, so they will be making a profit no matter what.

this is terrible, by this logic, they can bring the price down to 1 Satoshi


is there a way for developers to prevent this - Botnets
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Botnet operators don't need to pay for electricity

could you explain a little more?!

A large portion of the Monero global hash rate is made up of botnets. A botnet is "a network of private computers infected with malicious software and controlled as a group without the owners' knowledge,". In this case the botnet operators are using the computers to mine Monero, since Monero is quite profitable to mine with CPUs (and generally botnets give a lot of CPU power without the host noticing). Obviously the botnet operators don't need to pay for the electricity, so they will be making a profit no matter what.
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
When I first got involved in crypto there were 69 currencies listed on coinmarketcap with a total market cap of $ 13,890,378,655  https://web.archive.org/web/20140104141936/http://coinmarketcap.com/

Is it rational to expect the moon though, when only one out of 69 currencies, and now only one out of >545 currencies and a few assets has actually delivered?

He's saying that he got involved at the top of the market and Bitcoin certainly hasn't "delivered" what he is looking for which is high and increasing prices. So that would be 0/69 at this point.

Get involved at the top of any market and things will look bleak later from that perspective. Quite understandable.


I may have gotten in at the top of the market but I never put anything into it.  I got extremely lucky with some of the coins I mined early.  Most notably Darkcoin and then Bitmonero.  So even in a shrinking market I have done extremely well.  

My point in posting those figures for the growth in currencies while the market cap shrunk was to show the amount of money that has left crypto even though there was an explosion of altcoins offering everything anyone could ever want.  It had nothing to do with my expectations because I didn't have any.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
Botnet operators don't need to pay for electricity

could you explain a little more?!
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
is there someone who can mining monero any profit at these prices

I was already it profitable to buy than to mining

My the electricity is expensive on the number of coins that I get for 1 month

______
I officially stopped mining  Angry
_______



Botnet operators don't need to pay for electricity
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
is there someone who can mining monero any profit at these prices

I was already it profitable to buy than to mining

My the electricity is expensive on the number of coins that I get for 1 month

______
I officially stopped mining  Angry
_______

legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
When I first got involved in crypto there were 69 currencies listed on coinmarketcap with a total market cap of $ 13,890,378,655  https://web.archive.org/web/20140104141936/http://coinmarketcap.com/

There are now 545 currencies with a market cap of $ 5,192,835,057.

789% more currencies worth 37% of what 69 were worth January 8th 2014.

All of these currencies offered the moon but delivered nothing.  Why should people think any different of Monero or any other coin?  One thing is for sure, nobody's going to wait three years.






Is it rational to expect the moon though, when only one out of 69 currencies, and now only one out of >545 currencies and a few assets has actually delivered?

Even at the time you started, 1 out of 69 isn't the greatest odds when you're led to believe that everyone is offering only the moon.

Now, at 1 in 545, the chances of offering the moon are much less, if you were to randomly throw money at these things.

When bitcoin started, it offered a cryptocurrency. Investors saw the moon. Chances back then were likely 1 in 1, or even 1 in 5, and the ticket was cheap.

With the complete disregard for the technical offerings of some of these things, and incessant talks about the moon, I have only been left with the thought that everyone here is absolutely irrational. I say irrational, because >99% is basically everyone.

Especially when they're offering, for the most part, something you already have, or think you have, in your bank account .. and tend to think very very little about what it is or where it came from .. just that you need it to live and you need more of it to make more of it.

I mean, there's very few moons out there. Earth has one, Saturn has (62?) moons. So the idea that we're even talking about potentially legitimate alternative cryptocurrencies offering the moon means most of us are on another damn planet in regards to where our heads are at.

With that in mind, I must admit that I likely would have had to pay to be on another planet, as I'm pretty sure I started on earth. so my fee paid is in grabbing a rational amount of just about anything that pokes out of bitcoins shadow and seeing what they did.

I like this one, because the developers were there when I had questions, and have been there when I've had more questions. I'm convinced that they'll continue to be here when I have even more questions. That's important .. that they're here and responsive and helpful, because they've convinced me that they'll likely always be here. That's just as important as innovation, of which they have also provided. Electrum seeds, i2p development, GUI development, core protocol development, seeding a community, there's lists of things that have been provided. Not many of these things were available for the US dollar for a few hundred years, save for seeding a community, so I think we're pretty on track here.

Worst comes to worst, it's just tulips Cheesy

Warning, only fun follows.

Forget about the Earth's Moon, we are talking about Pluto!

The New Horizons spacecraft will be at it's closest on July 14, 2015.  It went into it's last hibernation on Aug. 29th and will wake up on Dec 9. 

Now look at the charts.  Monero was at a high on Aug 29th and it's been downhill from there.  Coincidence?, I think not.  Therefore we can expect an upswing to start on Dec. 9th.  There will be a record high on July 14, 2015 but I'm unsure what it will be.  Happy Bastille Day!
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
 What worked for bitcoin or the history of bitcoin will never be repeated.  But good luck.


you may not have read enough history

History always repeats ... Always
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
If any cryptocurrency wants to be around in three years then it needs to offer something people want and it needs to offer it now.  If it doesn't it won't be around in three years, monero included.

Telling people it might take three years is like shooting yourself in the foot.  People aren't going to do that.  They are already losing patience as proven by the recent selling.  People want results now.  That's just a fact of life.

Monero is currently almost exclusively owned by people with a horizon of 3 years or more, as was Bitcoin 3 years ago.

Last time the owners were richly rewarded, let's see this time.

I agree with you
Now I can spend a few thousand dollars, while after three years I might have a few million in my pocket.

Several thousand dollars today are nothing to some people

Let's stop people sell their coins and the price will start to grow with every day
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Activity: 350
He's saying that he got involved at the top of the market and Bitcoin certainly hasn't "delivered" what he is looking for which is high and increasing prices. So that would be 0/69 at this point.

Get involved at the top of any market and things will look bleak later from that perspective. Quite understandable.

I see, sometimes I drink too much cheap rum and misunderstand things Cheesy

In which case, I highly suggest grabbing a cheap bottle of rum on this beautiful  fall saturday (NE USA for me), have fun and not worry about whether the money's going to have the same non-existant purchasing power it did a year or six months ago!

It sucks to see value go, but the absolutely violent and quick re-emergence of it will be a sight to see. I'd consider that an accomplishment, even if I kept this in the back of my mind for years to come. Sometimes, timeframes are just too narrow I guess.

People just don't churn out new protocols every day.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Ha I remember a time when someone was buying BCN for MRO. Price was like 100BCN = 1 MRO. I made a huge mistake in sticking to Bytecoin...
donator
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
All I'm saying is that you have a window of opportunity and it's much less than three years.

We are on the same page here. That's why when something brilliant comes up, it must be executed swiftly, and fluently.

Eg. We have spent months to form consensus that the emission must be cut. Once the vote affirms that there actually is a consensus (you never know until ballots are counted), we will not wait another month for execution.

But pricewise, anyone who cannot concentrate on the (technical and economic) development for 3 years and totally forget the price, no matter if it goes to zero meanwhile or not, as long as it will succeed in the end, is in a "wrong place" Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
When I first got involved in crypto there were 69 currencies listed on coinmarketcap with a total market cap of $ 13,890,378,655  https://web.archive.org/web/20140104141936/http://coinmarketcap.com/

Is it rational to expect the moon though, when only one out of 69 currencies, and now only one out of >545 currencies and a few assets has actually delivered?

He's saying that he got involved at the top of the market and Bitcoin certainly hasn't "delivered" what he is looking for which is high and increasing prices. So that would be 0/69 at this point.

Get involved at the top of any market and things will look bleak later from that perspective. Quite understandable.

legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
If any cryptocurrency wants to be around in three years then it needs to offer something people want and it needs to offer it now.  If it doesn't it won't be around in three years, monero included.

Telling people it might take three years is like shooting yourself in the foot.  People aren't going to do that.  They are already losing patience as proven by the recent selling.  People want results now.  That's just a fact of life.

Monero is currently almost exclusively owned by people with a horizon of 3 years or more, as was Bitcoin 3 years ago.

Last time the owners were richly rewarded, let's see this time.

It is?  Then why all the selling and people complaining about the price?


If you use the history of bitcoin to justify holding any new cryptocurrency you'll end up holding worthless coins in three years.  What worked for bitcoin or the history of bitcoin will never be repeated.  But good luck.

Nobody is expecting history to be repeated. But the idea that it takes time (years) to build something truly useful has nothing to do with history. Anything but a pump-and-dump takes more than a few months to build. People need to come up with useful ideas, organize, and build them out. That takes time. Some of that is already ongoing. If you can't wait you are in the wrong place.





I'm in the wrong place?  Where should I be?  

All I'm saying is that you have a window of opportunity and it's much less than three years.  I'm not one of those complaining about price.  I'm just stating what I think is a widespread sentiment regarding altcoins in general.  Why would someone wait three years when bitcoin already exists?  In three years bitcoin could very well have incorporated all the features that all these altcoins claim to offer or will offer.  Time is not on Monero's or any altcoins side.  But I guess we'll all know in a few years.  

Maybe I misunderstood the discussion. I certainly wouldn't wait three years for any progress at all, but that progress will happen over a period of years.
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Monero was worth roughly $2.20 not all that long ago, and now it is worth less than $.70.
Those who invested $2000 in your project here in the past few months now only have about $600 in investment value.
While I agree with people saying it isn't the devs job necessarily to maintain the price of a currency, I can't say these
facts should just be ignored.

Why is the price falling so much though? Mining reward is too high? I thought I read somewhere about mining botnets making up a large portion of the net hash rate of Monero, and the operators dump the Monero for BTC causing huge sell pressure.

For whatever reason its falling, isn't the price fall a serious problem? At this rate Monero will literally be worthless soon wouldn't it?
In the beginning there was not a lot of monero and demand was super high. New exciting technology that actually has merit is not something you see every day in the pump n dump altcoin space. Naturally it became very sought after by
You see, the emission is very high, and it makes it difficult for monero to rally high and stay there. There is simply too much pressure at this time. The only way to change that is to increase adoption or make current holders invest more. Another solution that has been suggested for voting is changing emission to make the coins spread out over a longer period of time. That will put less pressure on the price in regards to mined coins, however there are other issues with doing so which must be contemplated.
Well if emission is very high as you say, then why haven't we lowered it? What issues could possibly arise? Surly the problems that arise would be smaller than the big problem of the ever decreasing price.
As smooth pointed out, the price only will decrease until the emission can be absorbed. The lower the price, the less money is required to absorb it. It's that, or more adoption. Changing emission is problematic. Can you imagine bitcoin changing block rewards to 1 BTC today? It would upset a lot of people.

I see your point, but is emission really a problem with Bitcoin? because apparently it is for Monero. If the reduction of emission of Monero isn't happening because the community won't be happy, then why don't we ask them if they actually will be happy or not? I mean, Monero is still in its infancy so it can't be too bad. I'm sure most would agree that the selling pressure of Monero has been quite overwhelming. I think most people will want a higher and more stable price too.
Jump to: