[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1777.

xa4

member

Activity: 71

Merit: 10

Quote from: onemorebtc on June 20, 2014, 11:22:00 AM

Quote from: xa4 on June 20, 2014, 11:17:02 AM

Some say XMR will rise when XMR/BTC market will open on Mintpal. What's the reasoning behind this (except from larger exposure) ... are there precedents ?

I'm under the impression last couple of days and certainly last couple of hours, XMR is being pumped on Polo in anticipation of the Mintpal notation and XMR will be dumped on Mintpal.

What's your opinion ?

i've been relative new to alt-currencies but i recognized very fast how crappy polo is (eg you have to talk to support every third withdraw)

so polo wont ever get more than 0.25btc from me at a time.

i hope that mintpal works better (it certainly looks like). i dont know if there are more than me who thinks that way and i'd like to see some precedents too

No problems with polo for me so far. 5 deposits and 3 withdrawals without any problem.... I guess I'm lucky ?

Ed4252

full member

Activity: 204

Merit: 100

Quote from: superresistant on June 20, 2014, 11:21:24 AM

Quote from: xa4 on June 20, 2014, 11:17:02 AM

Some say XMR will rise when XMR/BTC market will open on Mintpal. What's the reasoning behind this (except from larger exposure) ... are there precedents ?
I'm under the impression last couple of days and certainly last couple of hours, XMR is being pumped on Polo in anticipation of the Mintpal notation and XMR will be dumped on Mintpal.
What's your opinion ?

Short term variations doesn't matter.

People will regret not having XMR in few months.

Monero doesn't have the community size to have potential imo.

It's just not growing compared to the other coins.

454420031

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

For help, my 26 XMR into the poloniex did not receive, for several days, how to do?

onemorebtc

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: xa4 on June 20, 2014, 11:17:02 AM

Some say XMR will rise when XMR/BTC market will open on Mintpal. What's the reasoning behind this (except from larger exposure) ... are there precedents ?

I'm under the impression last couple of days and certainly last couple of hours, XMR is being pumped on Polo in anticipation of the Mintpal notation and XMR will be dumped on Mintpal.

What's your opinion ?

i've been relative new to alt-currencies but i recognized very fast how crappy polo is (eg you have to talk to support every third withdraw)

so polo wont ever get more than 0.25btc from me at a time.

i hope that mintpal works better (it certainly looks like). i dont know if there are more than me who thinks that way and i'd like to see some precedents too

superresistant

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1131

Quote from: xa4 on June 20, 2014, 11:17:02 AM

Some say XMR will rise when XMR/BTC market will open on Mintpal. What's the reasoning behind this (except from larger exposure) ... are there precedents ?
I'm under the impression last couple of days and certainly last couple of hours, XMR is being pumped on Polo in anticipation of the Mintpal notation and XMR will be dumped on Mintpal.
What's your opinion ?

Short term variations doesn't matter.

People will regret not having XMR in few months.

xa4

member

Activity: 71

Merit: 10

Some say XMR will rise when XMR/BTC market will open on Mintpal. What's the reasoning behind this (except from larger exposure) ... are there precedents ?

I'm under the impression last couple of days and certainly last couple of hours, XMR is being pumped on Polo in anticipation of the Mintpal notation and XMR will be dumped on Mintpal.

What's your opinion ?

jwinterm

legendary

Activity: 3136

Merit: 1116

Quote from: trip96 on June 20, 2014, 11:01:58 AM

Hey everyone! I have a simple question. Or confirmation that what I plan to do will work.

I mine to a simplewallet and it's obviously got a ton of dust transaction in it.

I now am ready to buy a little XMR too and wanted to make a new wallet to transfer all my XMR to.

SO, I plan on just putting a new copy of simple wallet into another/different folder on my computer and generating a wallet with the commands.

This is how you do this correct? OR am I going to mess up my older wallet/blockchain?

If I am wrong with this procedure, how would you do it?

Thanks everyone, Have an awesome day

You don't even need to switch folders, really. You can just generate a new wallet (with a different name) in the same folder. If your first wallet was named wallet.bin, just call this one trip96.bin, or trip96.dat, or just trip96 (the extension isn't needed).

trip96

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

Hey everyone! I have a simple question. Or confirmation that what I plan to do will work.

I mine to a simplewallet and it's obviously got a ton of dust transaction in it.

I now am ready to buy a little XMR too and wanted to make a new wallet to transfer all my XMR to.

SO, I plan on just putting a new copy of simple wallet into another/different folder on my computer and generating a wallet with the commands.

This is how you do this correct? OR am I going to mess up my older wallet/blockchain?

If I am wrong with this procedure, how would you do it?

Thanks everyone, Have an awesome day

othe

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Quote from: superresistant on June 20, 2014, 10:39:51 AM

Quote from: statdude on June 20, 2014, 09:38:06 AM

How soon will this "blockchain bloat" issue be addressed/corrected?

Boolberry team did it. Monero just need to adapt the fix.
No reason to not do it. It is just a matter of time.
No rush.

This needs _careful_ thinking first.

And the Btc/Ltc blockchain is far bigger than us currently..

superresistant

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1131

Quote from: statdude on June 20, 2014, 09:38:06 AM

How soon will this "blockchain bloat" issue be addressed/corrected?

Boolberry team did it. Monero just need to adapt the fix.
No reason to not do it. It is just a matter of time.
No rush.

devphp

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 260

Quote from: uvt9 on June 20, 2014, 09:24:43 AM

simplewallet.exe can be seen as a "thin client", it manages wallets and broadcast transactions to bitmonerod.exe.

I think it is possible to host deamon on a remote server, hence we could achieve a real light weight client.

It's not a trustless solution

parker928

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

wow sooo many trolls = good sign...people are scared!

good.

BldSwtTrs

legendary

Activity: 861

Merit: 1010

Hi guys, I wish to know if the limits of CoinJoin described in the following article apply also to Monero?
http://www.coindesk.com/blockchains-sharedcoin-users-can-identified-says-security-expert/

statdude

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

Quote from: devphp on June 20, 2014, 09:16:31 AM

Quote from: darkota on June 20, 2014, 09:15:26 AM

Quote from: devphp on June 20, 2014, 09:12:31 AM

Monero blockchain grew to 1 Gb in one month and it's a pain to sync, and only a few people use it now, imagine what would happen when/if it gets more popular. Do you think that Monero alone won't fly due to syncing and storing issues if everyone uses the same cryptonote currency?

In my opinion, a few cryptonote currencies will become popular and interexchangeable, since the code is shared, and users would need to download only one of the blockchains. The userbase and transactions are thus split into a few smaller blockchains instead of one huge and everyone chooses their favorite flavor, like linux OSes, with every flavor taking 20-30% of total marketcap of cryptonote currencies.

It's just a pain to wait for it to be fully synced if you only open it once every few days and have to wait 20-30 mins before you can use it. For now it's just pumping at exchanges as many people don't even bother with withdrawing, especially since there is no GUI and they are only speculators. What do you think of this?

I was thinking of this as well. What if a multibit version of the monero qt wallet was made? Where only the important parts of the blockchain are stored, so much less space is needed for the monero multibit/lightweight wallet.

Is a thin client even possible with cryptonote currencies? Let the devs answer this.

How soon will this "blockchain bloat" issue be addressed/corrected?

Limpuls

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: uvt9 on June 20, 2014, 09:24:43 AM

Quote from: devphp on June 20, 2014, 09:16:31 AM

Is a thin client even possible with cryptonote currencies? Let the devs answer this.

simplewallet.exe can be seen as a "thin client", it manages wallets and broadcast transactions to bitmonerod.exe.

I think it is possible for to host deamon on a remote server, hence we could achieve a real light weight client. Let's wait dev give some opinion about this

Quote from: Limpuls on June 20, 2014, 09:21:22 AM

Hey, just wondering is this normal that when i'm trying to synchronisize with network (I'm doing it without blockchain, will download it while updating) got this error? And the days, blocks numbers is not lessen. You can see somewhere is 2days, then again 52days. I'm waiting about 2h.Maybe I should first download blockchain file and then try to synchronisize bitmonerod with network?

It's quite annoying but nothing to worry about. Your client was flooding other's peer with too many connection and got rejected.

Oh, I felt better. But what about this things writted in the red color? I don't think that is normal :? And how long i will need to wait? About 5hours or less? Screenshot again

parker928

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: Rias on June 20, 2014, 06:19:44 AM

Quote from: sang on June 20, 2014, 06:05:32 AM

Let me break this down for you:

1) Top EC2 instance has around 700 hash/sec. -- Wrong
2) Each of the instances costs more than $1000 per month ($33 per day) -- Wrong
3) It's very unlikely that it could happen in 2 days. -- Wrong

Your math may be right, but your inputs are all wrong. Botnets can't come anywhere near EC2.

Let's check.

http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/

c3.8xlarge is $1.680 per Hour, which is $40 per day. Sorry, I was all wrong, it's even worse than I was writing.

Quote

3) It's very unlikely that it could happen in 2 days. -- Wrong

It would be a nightmare to get the limit and set up 2,800 servers. Is there a shortcut?

Rias, you have got to be one of the biggest trolls I have seen in a long time. You are the worst kind of person, you know that?

uvt9

sr. member

Activity: 300

Merit: 250

Quote from: devphp on June 20, 2014, 09:16:31 AM

Is a thin client even possible with cryptonote currencies? Let the devs answer this.

simplewallet.exe can be seen as a "thin client", it manages wallets and broadcast transactions to bitmonerod.exe.

I think it is possible to host deamon on a remote server, hence we could achieve a real light weight client. Let's wait dev give some opinion about this

Quote from: Limpuls on June 20, 2014, 09:21:22 AM

Hey, just wondering is this normal that when i'm trying to synchronisize with network (I'm doing it without blockchain, will download it while updating) got this error? And the days, blocks numbers is not lessen. You can see somewhere is 2days, then again 52days. I'm waiting about 2h.Maybe I should first download blockchain file and then try to synchronisize bitmonerod with network?

It's quite annoying but nothing to worry about. Your client was flooding other's peer with too many connection and got rejected.

Limpuls

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Hey, just wondering is this normal that when i'm trying to synchronisize with network (I'm doing it without blockchain, will download it while updating) got this error? And the days, blocks numbers is not lessen. You can see somewhere is 2days, then again 52days. I'm waiting about 2h.Maybe I should first download blockchain file and then try to synchronisize bitmonerod with network?

devphp

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 260

Quote from: darkota on June 20, 2014, 09:15:26 AM

Quote from: devphp on June 20, 2014, 09:12:31 AM

Monero blockchain grew to 1 Gb in one month and it's a pain to sync, and only a few people use it now, imagine what would happen when/if it gets more popular. Do you think that Monero alone won't fly due to syncing and storing issues if everyone uses the same cryptonote currency?

In my opinion, a few cryptonote currencies will become popular and interexchangeable, since the code is shared, and users would need to download only one of the blockchains. The userbase and transactions are thus split into a few smaller blockchains instead of one huge and everyone chooses their favorite flavor, like linux OSes, with every flavor taking 20-30% of total marketcap of cryptonote currencies.

It's just a pain to wait for it to be fully synced if you only open it once every few days and have to wait 20-30 mins before you can use it. For now it's just pumping at exchanges as many people don't even bother with withdrawing, especially since there is no GUI and they are only speculators. What do you think of this?

I was thinking of this as well. What if a multibit version of the monero qt wallet was made? Where only the important parts of the blockchain are stored, so much less space is needed for the monero multibit/lightweight wallet.

Is a thin client even possible with cryptonote currencies? Let the devs answer this.

darkota

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

Quote from: devphp on June 20, 2014, 09:12:31 AM

Monero blockchain grew to 1 Gb in one month and it's a pain to sync, and only a few people use it now, imagine what would happen when/if it gets more popular. Do you think that Monero alone won't fly due to syncing and storing issues if everyone uses the same cryptonote currency?

In my opinion, a few cryptonote currencies will become popular and interexchangeable, since the code is shared, and users would need to download only one of the blockchains. The userbase and transactions are thus split into a few smaller blockchains instead of one huge and everyone chooses their favorite flavor, like linux OSes, with every flavor taking 20-30% of total marketcap of cryptonote currencies.

It's just a pain to wait for it to be fully synced if you only open it once every few days and have to wait 20-30 mins before you can use it. For now it's just pumping at exchanges as many people don't even bother with withdrawing, especially since there is no GUI and they are only speculators. What do you think of this?

I was thinking of this as well. What if a multibit version of the monero qt wallet was made? Where only the important parts of the blockchain are stored like with Bitcoin's multibit wallet, so much less space is needed for the monero multibit/lightweight wallet.

Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1777. (Read 4670972 times)