We will be listed at MP next Mondat 
https://www.mintpal.com/voting
Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1785. (Read 4670972 times)
We will be listed at MP next Mondat https://www.mintpal.com/voting
Long term Monero price can be 200$ ore even more if Bitcoin keep rising.
If Bitcoin keeps rising the sky's the limit!
And if bitcoin falls, prepare for interstellar space.
Does this imply you think XMR to be the most likely used hedge against a falling BTC or are you just noodling around?
Long term Monero price can be 200$ ore even more if Bitcoin keep rising.
If Bitcoin keeps rising the sky's the limit!
And if bitcoin falls, prepare for interstellar space.
[...]
This is actually not their fault. The wallet is not mempool aware at the moment, so if a tx falls out the mempool (no miners mine it because maybe it's malformed or has the wrong fee or whatever) then the wallet doesn't know that those outputs are now unspent. It's on our list of things to fix ASAP!
This is actually not their fault. The wallet is not mempool aware at the moment, so if a tx falls out the mempool (no miners mine it because maybe it's malformed or has the wrong fee or whatever) then the wallet doesn't know that those outputs are now unspent. It's on our list of things to fix ASAP!
Good to hear you're on it, because it can be very confusing to anyone who doesn't know how things work, and annoying in any case!
Today I got a lot of "COMPLETE: ERROR" from poloniex, even when sending in smaller chunks. I guess their wallet is too dusty because of small deposits.
Fixing these two things is very important, as having something rock solid *at least for an exchange operator* is pretty much mandatory.
For the second problem, is it the "auto split" of too big transactions that is going to help?
Yes - the auto-split will make sure that the chance of a failed tx is minimal:)
I've been playing with simplewallet.exe. Sometimes when I try to transfer monero from one wallet to another the client complains that the transaction is too large. When I try again it works. Is the transaction building logic not deterministic? I guess this comes down to the RNG? Why not try a few more in the event of the transaction being too large?
It's not deterministic, it's random and depending on the mixin count it will use other *random* inputs, so it's never going to be the same. What you're experiencing is definitely an interesting edge-case given your mix of inputs, most of the time no amount of fiddling with different inputs will get a transaction to fit:)
If you haven't already, read this week's Monero Missive, as we show off transaction auto-splitting (which is also available for testing if you're able to compile Monero).
Sending xmr for that peer review:
Quote from: Peer Review
Such speed, much wow
Edit: Sent - Money successfully sent, transaction
lol - glad you enjoyed that:) Thanks!
OP bittrex market link is broken. Heres the correct one: https://www.bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-XMR
Fixed - thanks!
OP bittrex market link is broken. Heres the correct one: https://www.bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-XMR
P.S. Ask about more features and tell us about bugs!
Cool update!
Any chance you could get him to put HR in the widget?
What do you think about difficulty derived from the monerochain data also?
Sending a couple xmr for the update
edit: sent - Money successfully sent, transaction <2d8a6997dfd831cc18b9752191072867bdf70177d611ece7e33f96dcce602a40>
We will be listed at MP next Mondat
Anybody know what happened to my deposit to poloniex. This is in my log and the money is gone but doesnt show up in the blockchain explorer:
transfer 0 47sghzufGhJJDQEbScMCwVBimTuq6L5JiRixD8VeGbpjCTA12noXmi4ZyBZLc99e66NtnKff34fHsGR oyZk3ES1s1V4QVcB 33 5e4f6b638dfd3b195e1bf88f2892db3f24d69ad05f52a2e17f24c5d45c02bfb9
2014-Jun-19 15:40:11.391690 Transaction successfully sent. <>
Commission: 0.000001021866 (dust: 0.000000021866)
Balance: xx
Unlocked: xx
Please, wait for confirmation for your balance to be unlocked.
2014-Jun-19 15:40:11.391690 Money successfully sent, transaction
transfer 0 47sghzufGhJJDQEbScMCwVBimTuq6L5JiRixD8VeGbpjCTA12noXmi4ZyBZLc99e66NtnKff34fHsGR oyZk3ES1s1V4QVcB 33 5e4f6b638dfd3b195e1bf88f2892db3f24d69ad05f52a2e17f24c5d45c02bfb9
2014-Jun-19 15:40:11.391690 Transaction successfully sent. <
Commission: 0.000001021866 (dust: 0.000000021866)
Balance: xx
Unlocked: xx
Please, wait for confirmation for your balance to be unlocked.
2014-Jun-19 15:40:11.391690 Money successfully sent, transaction
4 coins I am watching like a hawk at.
1. Monero
2. Cloakcoin
3. Boostcoin
4. Talkcoin
I held 13k boostcoin but sold pretty much all of it due to the lack of progress by Dev
1. Monero
2. Cloakcoin
3. Boostcoin
4. Talkcoin
I held 13k boostcoin but sold pretty much all of it due to the lack of progress by Dev
Also, any ideas why everytime I open my bitmonerod.exe, even though I synced last night, it resyncs blocks from like 2 or 3 days ago everytime? I thought it would have updated the blockchain already which will be saved to my computer ?
Close bitmonerod by typing "save"
lol... thanks... makes me so noob
2014.06.19 Significant Pool Updates were made at Monero pool: http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu :
- We are now DDOS protected.
- Running smoothly and fully set up.
- 0% Orphans after changing servers.
- Added port 80 and 8080 for mining through HTTP ports.
- Updated to the newest daemon.
I have been checking the coins in circulation charts here : http://monerochain.info/charts/coins
It seems the past few days from 23K+- production a day, yesterday was slightly under 11K.
The total BTC equivalent of 11000XMR is 57.5BTC at 525K sat (current price when posting) which will not ofcourse all be sold on the market as many people will be holding for mid-long term.
If this continues we will have very interesting results in terms of how the price moves when more people mine as the Block reward is Smoothly varying [3]
I think someone else can probably do analytics graphs on this and "predict" what will happen when the GUI wallet will be released aswell as more people hear about XMR.
It seems the past few days from 23K+- production a day, yesterday was slightly under 11K.
The total BTC equivalent of 11000XMR is 57.5BTC at 525K sat (current price when posting) which will not ofcourse all be sold on the market as many people will be holding for mid-long term.
If this continues we will have very interesting results in terms of how the price moves when more people mine as the Block reward is Smoothly varying [3]
I think someone else can probably do analytics graphs on this and "predict" what will happen when the GUI wallet will be released aswell as more people hear about XMR.
Yesterday can be confusing when looking from different time zones. ~23k/day is the standard that should be created every single 24 hour period right now. If the graph at monerchain.info/minergate shows less than 23k/day it's because the day isn't over and it's still summing coins for that 24 hour period. Maximum deviation from that 23k is 9%, which is 20930 coins.
What kind of graphs could you see being made modeling adoption? Most anything to compare it to already has a GUI wallet due to being based on a BTC protocol. I think nxt launched without one (someone correct me if wrong), so maybe modeling the number of wallets created after that day compared to before that day could be used to show an adoption model?
My error is due to the timezone , thanks for the input.
Im no genious in math and economies but here is my view :
Having a maximum deviation of 9% (20930 - 25XXX~) would have an effect in the short term.
The tech savvy enough would hoard most of the coins (this might sound funny to a few as the wallet+mining is relatively easy), I even feel kind of guilty as its one of the most profitable coins to mine and I haven't been in XMR for more than a week.
I know there are many issues with the code that need to be fixed and its not something you can put an ETA on.
I feel we need to reach more people (smart people at least) even with the simplewallet.
I am currently preparing a clone parallax website of monero.cc that can probably help newcomers slightly better and instead of them coming in here go there and get setup faster and easier without all the clutter in this thread.
Maybe someone might consider it to be the official website
Also, any ideas why everytime I open my bitmonerod.exe, even though I synced last night, it resyncs blocks from like 2 or 3 days ago everytime? I thought it would have updated the blockchain already which will be saved to my computer ?
Close bitmonerod by typing "save"
You really need to type 'save' or 'exit', instead of just closing bitmonerod. If you just close the window or control-C the heck of it, it will not save the blockchain state to disk -> so next time, syncs up all over again.
Cheers,
~ Myagui
Cheers,
~ Myagui
Also, any ideas why everytime I open my bitmonerod.exe, even though I synced last night, it resyncs blocks from like 2 or 3 days ago everytime? I thought it would have updated the blockchain already which will be saved to my computer ?
[...]
This is actually not their fault. The wallet is not mempool aware at the moment, so if a tx falls out the mempool (no miners mine it because maybe it's malformed or has the wrong fee or whatever) then the wallet doesn't know that those outputs are now unspent. It's on our list of things to fix ASAP!
This is actually not their fault. The wallet is not mempool aware at the moment, so if a tx falls out the mempool (no miners mine it because maybe it's malformed or has the wrong fee or whatever) then the wallet doesn't know that those outputs are now unspent. It's on our list of things to fix ASAP!
Good to hear you're on it, because it can be very confusing to anyone who doesn't know how things work, and annoying in any case!
Today I got a lot of "COMPLETE: ERROR" from poloniex, even when sending in smaller chunks. I guess their wallet is too dusty because of small deposits.
Fixing these two things is very important, as having something rock solid *at least for an exchange operator* is pretty much mandatory.
For the second problem, is it the "auto split" of too big transactions that is going to help?
I've been playing with simplewallet.exe. Sometimes when I try to transfer monero from one wallet to another the client complains that the transaction is too large. When I try again it works. Is the transaction building logic not deterministic? I guess this comes down to the RNG? Why not try a few more in the event of the transaction being too large?
It's not deterministic, it's random and depending on the mixin count it will use other *random* inputs, so it's never going to be the same. What you're experiencing is definitely an interesting edge-case given your mix of inputs, most of the time no amount of fiddling with different inputs will get a transaction to fit:)
If you haven't already, read this week's Monero Missive, as we show off transaction auto-splitting (which is also available for testing if you're able to compile Monero).
Sending xmr for that peer review:
Quote from: Peer Review
Such speed, much wow
Edit: Sent - Money successfully sent, transaction
I am comparing coins, not advertising. I provide links, facts, ideas, opinions. This forum should be about this, not about one bullshit sentence like yours saying nothing useful.
All the people here are already awared of BBR, many of us (including me) also hold some BBR from very early, so your advertisement is pointless.
The problem with BBR right now is it's being exploited by private GPU miners. Christian might be the not only one who have this optimized miner because he said the coding is not hard. And these guys don't just run it in one server, they're running optimized miners on hundreds of Amazon instances and hence dominate network hash rate. I've been want to buy some more BBR but not this time, not until a GPU miner is released to the public.
I agree, bool berry is being demolished by those with gpu's with their private closed sourced miner and it's largely unfair.
How difficult is it to code these miners? Do you need a few people who are VERY good programmers or would an amaetur programmer be able to do this ?
Jump to: