I think today ($235) the below major event is far from priced in yet. In <14 months tail emission kicks in, the last variable block reward is mined (currently ~1.09 XMR per two minute block and dropping). At that future date in just eight years time a whopping 18.4 million XMR are mined. A then constant tail emission of 0.6 XMR per block means ~0.85% inflation in the first year (157,680 XMR), and that percentage is declining each following year. The only way still being able to get a decent number of monero is increasing your bid price, there a very few new moneros coming into existence from miners.
I will check in again in a year's time. But in the meanwhile, grab some while they are still cheap.
Monero block rewards will never drop to zero. Block rewards will gradually drop until tail emission commences at the end of May 2022. At this point, rewards will be fixed at 0.6 XMR per block.
https://www.getmonero.org/resources/moneropedia/tail-emission.htmlThe market can stay irrational longer than.. Nope, hodling without leverage FTW. Almost dead on the same USD price as this time around last year. 50k blocks left before tail emission kicks in, exciting times. Let’s see in a years time how the market caught up with reality regarding supply inelasticity and the ever increasing need for online financial privacy.
https://p2pool.io/tail.htmlA good point. And the tail emission is a deceptive twist in a way. I have to admit my knee jerk reaction to it was negative. I do not think Bitcoin will need it. But only because the ecosystem will evolve to the point where the fees make mining still worth it, and the fact that Bitcoin will (probably?) always have big hashrate pointed at it. But unless Monero actually flipped bitcoin, which I would give it about a 2% chance of doing, then it will need the emission to remain secure. Particularly if we do not intend to let the fee market do what the Bitcoin fee market will (hopefully).
A huge point of contention and one of the arguments that is often used to pit Monero against Bitcoin. I think very few coins will survive with a hard cap.
But the part that's not easy to see at first is the the supply is only "infinite" over infinity. A release rate asymptotically approaching 0 forever will not add enough coins across the span of a human lifetime to make the coin a bad store of value. I think Bitcoin will be BETTER as long as it survives (which it will).
I think a good way to digest it is to say how many coins will you have to hold to have 1/1000000th of the supply.
At the very start of the tail emission that will be:
18.4Then TEN YEARS into the tail emission it will be:
19.19At the end of a HUNDRED YEARS into the tail :
27.07And so on. So even after a hundred years your original 18.4 coins will only have diminished to ~68% of it's former percent of the total. And this does not even account for lost coins. Only 788k coins lost a year would mean you broke even.
But a reduction of 32% of your value over a century? Not such a big deal... and certainly not what you feel like it would be when someone says "INFINITE SUPPLY!!!" Plus your percentage of former value is constantly decelerating on the way down... The longer you hold Monero the less the inflation will impact the total percentages.
It is easy to look at the privacy value prop of Monero and see that as the key selling point. But the market does not have that ANYWHERE NEAR priced in yet, and it is completely ignoring other design choices like dynamic blocksize, the tail emission, and ASIC resistance. Those are also deeply complimentary strategies when compared to Bitcoin. Each coin will charge the users a fee to use it. Bitcoin will charge people at the time of the transaction, incentivizing holding. Monero will penalize holders slightly, but most likely remain cheap to transact in. Incentivizing velocity slightly.
That said one problem we may still face is a large and unwieldy blockchain...
Monero truly is an exception in a giant field of cowshit that is the alts...