Mymonero.com used to accept 25 word seeds until a few days ago.
I don't think mymonero.com accepts 25 word seeds any more. I can't get it to work.
If this is right, then the only way to have a wallet compatible with both moneroaddress.org and mymonero.com is to do an import, which costs 10 xmr.
Am I correct?
Topic: [XMR] Monero Speculation - page 1519. (Read 3313576 times)
...
What was the hashfast fiasco about anyway?
What was the hashfast fiasco about anyway?
Preorder asics that were never delivered. Cypherdoc has been accused of receiving 3000 btc to shill for them on btctalk to get people to make orders. iCEBREAKER has also been accused of being paid to shill or being in some way affiliated with the company, but I haven't seen as direct and specific accusation as has been levied against cypherdoc.
Cypherdoc's name is also on the plaintiff, whereas iCEBREAKER's isn't as far as I can see.
...
What was the hashfast fiasco about anyway?
What was the hashfast fiasco about anyway?
Preorder asics that were never delivered. Cypherdoc has been accused of receiving 3000 btc to shill for them on btctalk to get people to make orders. iCEBREAKER has also been accused of being paid to shill or being in some way affiliated with the company, but I haven't seen as direct and specific accusation as has been levied against cypherdoc.
...
This community is so "polluted" ...
iCEBRAKER was a former CEO of Hashfast, criminal ASIC scammer with a lawsuit in progress.
No wonder he's all-in in Monero, he had to 'wash' his stolen bitcoins...
I see this thrown around a lot, but without any accompanying evidence. Obviously the nick iCEBREAKER appears to have been involved somehow, but in what capacity no one seems to know.
I am not sure either if it confirmed it was him. In one of the screenshots he states:
Quote
To be fair, it's possible the site was under attack. Haters abound.
Wouldn't he know for sure if he was the CEO? Not trying to defend anyone here, but the evidence is kind of inconclusive.
Haha, of course he would know. As far as I've seen, he doesn't talk about it.
What was the hashfast fiasco about anyway?
Im not defending anyone either, certainly many scammers in the crypto currency space but remaining silent on a matter before the courts does not imply guilt. Any lawyer would advise you to reserve your comments until the matter is fully resolved.
Wise words, man! My lowest ask is at 20 BTC/XMR and I am selling at that price only 0.05 XMR worth of 1 BTC.
Conversely, now might be the time to take advantage of low hanging fruit on that ask stack. We've tested the 170k/180k levels more than a few times and last night the top 10 cryptos on Poloniex were all slightly red. We've seen this story before, right around February 10th.
...
This community is so "polluted" ...
iCEBRAKER was a former CEO of Hashfast, criminal ASIC scammer with a lawsuit in progress.
No wonder he's all-in in Monero, he had to 'wash' his stolen bitcoins...
I see this thrown around a lot, but without any accompanying evidence. Obviously the nick iCEBREAKER appears to have been involved somehow, but in what capacity no one seems to know.
I am not sure either if it confirmed it was him. In one of the screenshots he states:
Quote
To be fair, it's possible the site was under attack. Haters abound.
Wouldn't he know for sure if he was the CEO? Not trying to defend anyone here, but the evidence is kind of inconclusive.
Haha, of course he would know. As far as I've seen, he doesn't talk about it.
The Satoshi Roundtable event is happening this weekend.
I feel confident there will be at least a few people who may have disregarded Monero previously as 'just another altcoin', talk to fluffyponyza at this event, and subsequently have the same awakening we have and realize this going to be really big. Even outside of the crypto world, there are reps from places like Fidelity Investments etc.
Some of these parties may then want in.
I suggest, gentlemen and ladies, we let them it wholeheartedly and welcome them into the flock.
But not cheaply. Perhaps now is the time to pull those asks off the market and find out what Monero's true market value is?
I feel confident there will be at least a few people who may have disregarded Monero previously as 'just another altcoin', talk to fluffyponyza at this event, and subsequently have the same awakening we have and realize this going to be really big. Even outside of the crypto world, there are reps from places like Fidelity Investments etc.
Some of these parties may then want in.
I suggest, gentlemen and ladies, we let them it wholeheartedly and welcome them into the flock.
But not cheaply. Perhaps now is the time to pull those asks off the market and find out what Monero's true market value is?
Wise words, man! My lowest ask is at 20 BTC/XMR and I am selling at that price only 0.05 XMR worth of 1 BTC.
The Satoshi Roundtable event is happening this weekend.
I feel confident there will be at least a few people who may have disregarded Monero previously as 'just another altcoin', will talk to fluffyponyza at this event, and subsequently have the same awakening we have and realize this going to be really big. Even outside of the crypto world, there are reps from places like Fidelity Investments etc.
Some of these parties may then want in.
I suggest, gentlemen and ladies, we let them in wholeheartedly and welcome them into the flock.
But not cheaply. Perhaps now is the time to pull those asks off the market and find out what Monero's true market value is?
I feel confident there will be at least a few people who may have disregarded Monero previously as 'just another altcoin', will talk to fluffyponyza at this event, and subsequently have the same awakening we have and realize this going to be really big. Even outside of the crypto world, there are reps from places like Fidelity Investments etc.
Some of these parties may then want in.
I suggest, gentlemen and ladies, we let them in wholeheartedly and welcome them into the flock.
But not cheaply. Perhaps now is the time to pull those asks off the market and find out what Monero's true market value is?
...
This community is so "polluted" ...
iCEBRAKER was a former CEO of Hashfast, criminal ASIC scammer with a lawsuit in progress.
No wonder he's all-in in Monero, he had to 'wash' his stolen bitcoins...
I see this thrown around a lot, but without any accompanying evidence. Obviously the nick iCEBREAKER appears to have been involved somehow, but in what capacity no one seems to know.
I am not sure either if it confirmed it was him. In one of the screenshots he states:
Quote
To be fair, it's possible the site was under attack. Haters abound.
Wouldn't he know for sure if he was the CEO? Not trying to defend anyone here, but the evidence is kind of inconclusive.
...
This community is so "polluted" ...
iCEBRAKER was a former CEO of Hashfast, criminal ASIC scammer with a lawsuit in progress.
No wonder he's all-in in Monero, he had to 'wash' his stolen bitcoins...
I see this thrown around a lot, but without any accompanying evidence. Obviously the nick iCEBREAKER appears to have been involved somehow, but in what capacity no one seems to know.
...
This community is so "polluted" ...
iCEBRAKER was a former CEO of Hashfast, criminal ASIC scammer with a lawsuit in progress.
No wonder he's all-in in Monero, he had to 'wash' his stolen bitcoins...
I have Moneros waiting for you and other bears to be lent out.
Please short and pay me some interest. I am generously giving out loans with max. maturity (60 days) at these rates so no hurry to repay.
I am considering buying coins from the shorters and re-lending them back to them so that they can short and sell those coins twice.
Which part of 'I mine with 350KH/s' don't you understand ? I dump as i go..
Blocks mined today :
Code:
973035 943206526 afbd884608bc5853c68d240d5bea2b4ac042682a92c7e088ba45e98f3b4fd848 2/26/2016, 3:41:17 PM 55%
973000 906928883 cfe4d99a58ed7ac77d3d144477af665e638352b3489c8a820463ec0ac66d5314 2/26/2016, 3:14:30 PM 231%
972842 825242842 bb745914dd53a6249db49a59b47334c8ec86ef200027279bf8ecd8c1f2bb86bb 2/26/2016, 1:00:39 PM 123%
972767 765597888 300abd24451af2013744943cfcdecbc529f6f4a9580ab0732335d0e57541e518 2/26/2016, 11:54:57 AM 6%
972762 765853740 4c9622f06237c88376c6dc96e457cabb4855b8c297e0b7f247208cf108cdf632 2/26/2016, 11:52:07 AM 116%
972673 710079684 8579f0f5ad47cb90d58f3475169b9fad3170289d16fd7845a6ecd8263ce58e27 2/26/2016, 10:53:58 AM 39%
972642 707692305 bae42dda2b91a0cf2b589e89effd39d0ae68f9b121ca4634fd231390ae7ab92e 2/26/2016, 10:34:43 AM 23%
972628 709127126 63e3734fbef9d0430da495b1763193318f7e5a0c87d524300c0af5a09774f2cd 2/26/2016, 10:22:53 AM 7%
972621 710618121 91d49911ff9a45f991c7f9aebf41641b418fd9ccfb7f31e7b07d4f4fa43be411 2/26/2016, 10:19:22 AM 22%
972606 711093184 1d824f1d074ea8af08785323c8918a84159b2a52125ff5e7570a48d97f02e872 2/26/2016, 10:07:14 AM 13%
972593 707764980 ceef28a8bf9a337a24978b10a44633ab5c44d800d41e16180e081a79c85d1778 2/26/2016, 9:59:50 AM 17%
972584 705135962 666a227d381c8591c1268a7582af60a2736c2b02236562a7f372ecb235f79143 2/26/2016, 9:50:51 AM 25%
972569 707322523 1e28819956f4fdff128f8bd34c3b673f52b2b01c731faa2a4e76fc99721290c2 2/26/2016, 9:36:56 AM 64%
972528 718735560 a23cf0b9eb491a4548a222d3160949c3cbdf8ea3cc38e0eaff86cd6721c3504d 2/26/2016, 9:03:13 AM 376%
972307 781819080 7dbdd78a35e6f7eba4775bf6cfee3a00303c52adbb0c9cb1b08c54dcdd18d33c 2/26/2016, 5:44:21 AM 142%
972243 820443578 97934dcf7b6d720570b84ac23e8f4e097173206fa7801b402b24337654fbd74b 2/26/2016, 4:22:45 AM 41%
972220 829047524 ee70cc3da1bc95eb0705fedb5d2504f77156ae7a14db45c6f151832b0235702f 2/26/2016, 3:57:41 AM 43%
972202 846321681 0c11d3b4eb00bb8c828e23c67d91f37e104fa2c1de8e45f77f42c3b6c040f554 2/26/2016, 3:32:00 AM 112%
972145 894540090 4d7642989d6779f6b913d2021d71e8e15d7eb71fda1c44adc5ae9ebe89a6ae89 2/26/2016, 2:23:02 AM 14%
972136 904230855 705e9fad0150191c6fb7fa3a417bec49936a0225387613ed4727977b5e1d2563 2/26/2016, 2:14:00 AM 71%
972103 926052180 178d01dbab60418ea676e2cdfeaf0e9613076c9cc221b3970fb8b8f0e913db9a 2/26/2016, 1:26:35 AM 7%
972101 930735847 7a06c66657142d935b7c22e755214f3164ca661b30e6e7d0f649b33650577516 2/26/2016, 1:21:47 AM 32%
972092 928898437 9539ff685b7d385493c7d6fee831414630406bf49e157e52fdb6d82d144ec416 2/26/2016, 1:00:27 AM 43%
972074 934587637 17fdd790e0947eec9619a4986c31e80b68bf59108f2e1dcf625cd56b613786b4 2/26/2016, 12:31:55 AM 307%
973000 906928883 cfe4d99a58ed7ac77d3d144477af665e638352b3489c8a820463ec0ac66d5314 2/26/2016, 3:14:30 PM 231%
972842 825242842 bb745914dd53a6249db49a59b47334c8ec86ef200027279bf8ecd8c1f2bb86bb 2/26/2016, 1:00:39 PM 123%
972767 765597888 300abd24451af2013744943cfcdecbc529f6f4a9580ab0732335d0e57541e518 2/26/2016, 11:54:57 AM 6%
972762 765853740 4c9622f06237c88376c6dc96e457cabb4855b8c297e0b7f247208cf108cdf632 2/26/2016, 11:52:07 AM 116%
972673 710079684 8579f0f5ad47cb90d58f3475169b9fad3170289d16fd7845a6ecd8263ce58e27 2/26/2016, 10:53:58 AM 39%
972642 707692305 bae42dda2b91a0cf2b589e89effd39d0ae68f9b121ca4634fd231390ae7ab92e 2/26/2016, 10:34:43 AM 23%
972628 709127126 63e3734fbef9d0430da495b1763193318f7e5a0c87d524300c0af5a09774f2cd 2/26/2016, 10:22:53 AM 7%
972621 710618121 91d49911ff9a45f991c7f9aebf41641b418fd9ccfb7f31e7b07d4f4fa43be411 2/26/2016, 10:19:22 AM 22%
972606 711093184 1d824f1d074ea8af08785323c8918a84159b2a52125ff5e7570a48d97f02e872 2/26/2016, 10:07:14 AM 13%
972593 707764980 ceef28a8bf9a337a24978b10a44633ab5c44d800d41e16180e081a79c85d1778 2/26/2016, 9:59:50 AM 17%
972584 705135962 666a227d381c8591c1268a7582af60a2736c2b02236562a7f372ecb235f79143 2/26/2016, 9:50:51 AM 25%
972569 707322523 1e28819956f4fdff128f8bd34c3b673f52b2b01c731faa2a4e76fc99721290c2 2/26/2016, 9:36:56 AM 64%
972528 718735560 a23cf0b9eb491a4548a222d3160949c3cbdf8ea3cc38e0eaff86cd6721c3504d 2/26/2016, 9:03:13 AM 376%
972307 781819080 7dbdd78a35e6f7eba4775bf6cfee3a00303c52adbb0c9cb1b08c54dcdd18d33c 2/26/2016, 5:44:21 AM 142%
972243 820443578 97934dcf7b6d720570b84ac23e8f4e097173206fa7801b402b24337654fbd74b 2/26/2016, 4:22:45 AM 41%
972220 829047524 ee70cc3da1bc95eb0705fedb5d2504f77156ae7a14db45c6f151832b0235702f 2/26/2016, 3:57:41 AM 43%
972202 846321681 0c11d3b4eb00bb8c828e23c67d91f37e104fa2c1de8e45f77f42c3b6c040f554 2/26/2016, 3:32:00 AM 112%
972145 894540090 4d7642989d6779f6b913d2021d71e8e15d7eb71fda1c44adc5ae9ebe89a6ae89 2/26/2016, 2:23:02 AM 14%
972136 904230855 705e9fad0150191c6fb7fa3a417bec49936a0225387613ed4727977b5e1d2563 2/26/2016, 2:14:00 AM 71%
972103 926052180 178d01dbab60418ea676e2cdfeaf0e9613076c9cc221b3970fb8b8f0e913db9a 2/26/2016, 1:26:35 AM 7%
972101 930735847 7a06c66657142d935b7c22e755214f3164ca661b30e6e7d0f649b33650577516 2/26/2016, 1:21:47 AM 32%
972092 928898437 9539ff685b7d385493c7d6fee831414630406bf49e157e52fdb6d82d144ec416 2/26/2016, 1:00:27 AM 43%
972074 934587637 17fdd790e0947eec9619a4986c31e80b68bf59108f2e1dcf625cd56b613786b4 2/26/2016, 12:31:55 AM 307%
...
This community is so "polluted" ...
iCEBRAKER was a former CEO of Hashfast, criminal ASIC scammer with a lawsuit in progress.
No wonder he's all-in in Monero, he had to 'wash' his stolen bitcoins...
I have Moneros waiting for you and other bears to be lent out.
Please short and pay me some interest. I am generously giving out loans with max. maturity (60 days) at these rates so no hurry to repay.
I am considering buying coins from the shorters and re-lending them back to them so that they can short and sell those coins twice.
AFAIK (correct me if wrong), Poloniex does not hold the account owner personally at risk if the short game goes bust.
According to their Terms of Use, they do hold the account holder responsible:
Quote
If, after your positions and assets are liquidated, your account still contains insufficient funds to settle your debts to lenders, you will be responsible for any additional funds owed
However, if the account holder doesn't pay, the risk then theoretically falls next on the lender:
Quote
When you lend to other users using the Platform’s P2P lending system, you risk the loss of an unpaid principle if the borrower defaults on a loan and liquidation of the borrower's account fails to raise sufficient funds to cover his or her debt.
In practice, I agree true black swan risks probably exist (aside from those that exist outside the lending system altogether).
They may be able to recover the funds from the rogue shorts, but I would not count on that.
As a non-borrowing nor lending customer, I am very happy that the lenders are the next in line, which should shield the ordinary users from any risk as naturally no more funds can be lost than what the lenders have provided.
Thank you.
... Who knows, maybe fluffypony is paying iCEBREAKER for shilling Monero
Fluffypony is a garage dweller, he would have to sell his wife to afford iCEBREAKER's services
...
This community is so "polluted" ...
iCEBRAKER was a former CEO of Hashfast, criminal ASIC scammer with a lawsuit in progress.
No wonder he's all-in in Monero, he had to 'wash' his stolen bitcoins...
It's kind of interesting that iCEBREAKER was apparently mixed up in this scam ( http://www.deanslyons.com/PDFs/2014-03-25-Plaintiff-s-First-Amended-Petition.pdf ; interesting aside - who'd have thought you'd see bitcointalk screenshots in court proceedings) with cypherdoc, and subsequently they each ended up on opposite sides of the big block/small block bitcoin debate. Since they were both allegedly paid shills for hashfast, maybe blockstream is now paying iCEBREAKER for shilling and coinbase is paying cypherdoc to shill blocksize arguments. Who knows, maybe fluffypony is paying iCEBREAKER for shilling Monero
...
This community is so "polluted" ...
iCEBRAKER was a former CEO of Hashfast, criminal ASIC scammer with a lawsuit in progress.
No wonder he's all-in in Monero, he had to 'wash' his stolen bitcoins...
AFAIK (correct me if wrong), Poloniex does not hold the account owner personally at risk if the short game goes bust. All they can do is to liquidate the collateral. In the illiquid markets, this can cause anything to happen. So the real risk is on anyone who holds any value there. It is tempting to operate this kind of platforms but the black swan has a long, fat tail...
And when you calculate that someone is short X coins and "has to cover", don't forget that it is at least possible that he is a legitimate (covered) short. Someone might for tax or other reasons be shorting (instead of selling his position) to skim some profits while waiting for m00n.
And when you calculate that someone is short X coins and "has to cover", don't forget that it is at least possible that he is a legitimate (covered) short. Someone might for tax or other reasons be shorting (instead of selling his position) to skim some profits while waiting for m00n.
When the banks offer mortgages, they take similar risk. Sometimes a house/appartment is under water and a borrower defaults.
There are risks. My job as a lender is to estimate the probabilities and compare it to the reward I am getting. Definetely, if the interest rates are sub 0.1 % per day, it is not worth the risk.
AFAIK (correct me if wrong), Poloniex does not hold the account owner personally at risk if the short game goes bust.
According to their Terms of Use, they do hold the account holder responsible:
Quote
If, after your positions and assets are liquidated, your account still contains insufficient funds to settle your debts to lenders, you will be responsible for any additional funds owed
However, if the account holder doesn't pay, the risk then theoretically falls next on the lender:
Quote
When you lend to other users using the Platform’s P2P lending system, you risk the loss of an unpaid principle if the borrower defaults on a loan and liquidation of the borrower's account fails to raise sufficient funds to cover his or her debt.
In practice, I agree true black swan risks probably exist (aside from those that exist outside the lending system altogether).
AFAIK (correct me if wrong), Poloniex does not hold the account owner personally at risk if the short game goes bust. All they can do is to liquidate the collateral. In the illiquid markets, this can cause anything to happen. So the real risk is on anyone who holds any value there. It is tempting to operate this kind of platforms but the black swan has a long, fat tail...
And when you calculate that someone is short X coins and "has to cover", don't forget that it is at least possible that he is a legitimate (covered) short. Someone might for tax or other reasons be shorting (instead of selling his position) to skim some profits while waiting for m00n.
And when you calculate that someone is short X coins and "has to cover", don't forget that it is at least possible that he is a legitimate (covered) short. Someone might for tax or other reasons be shorting (instead of selling his position) to skim some profits while waiting for m00n.
Can anyone explain to me how lending monero does any good for monero at all?
The way I figure it, lending monero, at any rate, doesn't make any sense. Because even if its at 5%, you simply borrow monero, dump, then place a buy wall with you new bitcoin right above the price you dumped to. So you're bound to buyback the monero you just sold + more monero to cover the lending rate.
or do I not get markets. This second option is highly likely.
The way I figure it, lending monero, at any rate, doesn't make any sense. Because even if its at 5%, you simply borrow monero, dump, then place a buy wall with you new bitcoin right above the price you dumped to. So you're bound to buyback the monero you just sold + more monero to cover the lending rate.
or do I not get markets. This second option is highly likely.
The interest payments squeezes more Moneros from the market when repaid than initially borrowed.
Jump to: