I never said that it doesn't, why are you flipping my words?
I said not single word against investors in general.
I simply dislike the way he behaves:
Why should I give money for free?
I will rather get (passive) income from my moneros instead of just donating.
At this point I would choose emission.
I do not care brilliantly functioning coins if the only holders are me + Risto.
Monero is currently more or less premine coin.
I am acting rationally and maximizing my personal utility.
In general I do not believe in donations, the money should be collected in a way like any other business does.
Name me one person who wants to work for free? If there are no people working for free why should I give my money just as donations?
Also I agree still that a coin needs more users than me + Risto - what's the problem? The price is declining and this is nothing but due to the lack of adoption and it looks to me like a few whales are buying all the coins since smaller fish cannot addord to buy the daily emission (at the point I was writing this the price was hoovering somewhere around 0.002 - and now it is at 0.0015).
What comes to my comment on "premine". I corrected it already in my other messages. However, this is just semantics. The emission is still unfair towards later adoption and it is kind of problem. I can adjust myself to this but I am more worried about the later adopter's behalf if they refuse buying Monero due to this fast emission. That's all. Monero is not a premine, but it is mined pretty fast.