[XPM] [ANN] Primecoin High Performance | HP14 released! - page 63.

Aggrophobia

legendary

Activity: 1106

Merit: 1001

Quote from: bitrich on July 26, 2013, 10:43:50 PM

{
"blocks" : 84942,
"chainspermin" : 8,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 9.27951360,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"roundsievepercentage" : 20,
"primespersec" : 2954,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"sievepercentage" : 5,
"sievesize" : 100000,
"testnet" : false
}

Try
roundsievepercentage 15
sievepercentage 8

bitrich

member

Activity: 109

Merit: 10

{
"blocks" : 84942,
"chainspermin" : 8,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 9.27951360,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"roundsievepercentage" : 20,
"primespersec" : 2954,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"sievepercentage" : 5,
"sievesize" : 100000,
"testnet" : false
}

bitrich

member

Activity: 109

Merit: 10

cool thx
here's what im running now.

{
"blocks" : 84772,
"chainspermin" : 4,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 9.27764088,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"roundsievepercentage" : 20,
"primespersec" : 2886,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"sievepercentage" : 5,
"sievesize" : 100000,
"testnet" : false
}

ReCat

sr. member

Activity: 406

Merit: 250

No, it doesn't matter. Increasing it will probably just bloat the network and slow everyone down.

bitrich

member

Activity: 109

Merit: 10

My number of connection in the info window always maxes at 8. Anyway to increase this and does it matter?

bitrich

member

Activity: 109

Merit: 10

best settings for i5 2.3 2 core 4 thread sandy? 0.02 btc bounty!!!PM me first one who get me over 3k/pps and 5/cpm gets it!

bitrich

member

Activity: 109

Merit: 10

Quote from: itod on July 26, 2013, 06:59:00 PM

Quote from: bitrich on July 26, 2013, 06:37:19 PM

Quote from: mhps on July 26, 2013, 06:18:31 PM

Quote from: drummerjdb666 on July 26, 2013, 12:09:13 PM

for hp8 are there more settings i should try here for 3770k?

rpcuser=
rpcpassword=
rpcport=8001
gen=0
server=1
daemon=1
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
addnode=137.116.230.21
addnode=54.225.81.214
addnode=54.225.116.178
addnode=107.20.202.112
addnode=54.225.123.87
addnode=54.225.123.48
addnode=54.224.142.224
addnode=54.224.28.160
sievesize=2000000

Looks like your miner wasn't turned on to mine.

what are the addnode's? Is this something I should be putting in my .conf file? running windows

No. Noobs do it thinking it would gain them something, the more addnode lines the bigger the n00b.

lol

itod

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 1077

Honey badger just does not care

Quote from: bitrich on July 26, 2013, 06:37:19 PM

Quote from: mhps on July 26, 2013, 06:18:31 PM

Quote from: drummerjdb666 on July 26, 2013, 12:09:13 PM

for hp8 are there more settings i should try here for 3770k?

rpcuser=
rpcpassword=
rpcport=8001
gen=0
server=1
daemon=1
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
addnode=137.116.230.21
addnode=54.225.81.214
addnode=54.225.116.178
addnode=107.20.202.112
addnode=54.225.123.87
addnode=54.225.123.48
addnode=54.224.142.224
addnode=54.224.28.160
sievesize=2000000

Looks like your miner wasn't turned on to mine.

what are the addnode's? Is this something I should be putting in my .conf file? running windows

No. Noobs do it thinking it would gain them something, the more addnode lines the bigger the n00b.

bitrich

member

Activity: 109

Merit: 10

Quote from: mhps on July 26, 2013, 06:18:31 PM

Quote from: drummerjdb666 on July 26, 2013, 12:09:13 PM

for hp8 are there more settings i should try here for 3770k?

rpcuser=
rpcpassword=
rpcport=8001
gen=0
server=1
daemon=1
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
addnode=137.116.230.21
addnode=54.225.81.214
addnode=54.225.116.178
addnode=107.20.202.112
addnode=54.225.123.87
addnode=54.225.123.48
addnode=54.224.142.224
addnode=54.224.28.160
sievesize=2000000

Looks like your miner wasn't turned on to mine.

what are the addnode's? Is this something I should be putting in my .conf file? running windows

mhps

hero member

Activity: 516

Merit: 500

CAT.EX Exchange

Quote from: drummerjdb666 on July 26, 2013, 12:09:13 PM

for hp8 are there more settings i should try here for 3770k?

rpcuser=
rpcpassword=
rpcport=8001
gen=0
server=1
daemon=1
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
addnode=137.116.230.21
addnode=54.225.81.214
addnode=54.225.116.178
addnode=107.20.202.112
addnode=54.225.123.87
addnode=54.225.123.48
addnode=54.224.142.224
addnode=54.224.28.160
sievesize=2000000

Looks like your miner wasn't turned on to mine.

albon

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1537

could anyone tell me how good this is?

primemeter 11429105 prime/h 99846055

Dsfyu

member

Activity: 75

Merit: 10

Quote from: Tuck Fheman on July 26, 2013, 03:56:40 PM

Thanks for sharing that info. Since I haven't found blocks for some time I needed someone to confirm these settings do actually find blocks. The speeds are much higher, but I have no idea if they actually produce blocks faster (if at all). I've used high PPS/CPM as a measure for success simply because it showed success on testnet as an indicator for high BPM's. So finding the highest PPS/CPM on mainnet was my goal.

We need a larger sample though to determine what settings are best. I"m sure someone's finding a lot of blocks with one or both settings we just need to have them confirm their settings. But, I can understand people not sharing successful BPM settings. It's just hard to determine BPM when you have 1 CPU on mainnet to test with. Embarrassed

So, I'm willing to find the highest PPS/CPM settings if someone (with a lot of rigs) will confirm the BPM's for me/us.

I'll post when I find more blocks but so far the only blocks I have found have been on hp7/hp8 with the 1m sievesize (three on one 3930k on hp7 and one on each of the lower end ones previously mentioned). I have family members mining on another 3930k/an i7 laptop getting 2k pps/ 5cpm/a phenom II getting 3kpps/5-6cpm and they haven't gotten anything in the two days they have mined - it seems to all come down to luck with this, but the only sievesize we have found blocks on was the 1m setting so far, not the 100k setting. Then again, the 100k setting might be much better and it could be a combination of good/bad luck across the different computers. We really have no way to tell since the testnet isn't reflecting the mainnet right now.

On an unrelated note I got an interesting address when I created one to put in my signature ending with "GodxCD". I am a little amused that I got something with some sort of word in it just by chance.

Tuck Fheman

sr. member

Activity: 363

Merit: 250

Quote from: Dsfyu on July 26, 2013, 03:46:51 PM

Right now I'm running into something weird - I set up a few computers in my house mining primecoin on hp8 - half had a sievesize of 100000 and half at 1000000 (I forgot to change a few settings). Since the release of hp8 I have had the two lowest end machines that I am running on each find a block with the 1m sievesize and none of the other machines (much newer/better) have found anything with the 100k sieveesize since the launch of hp8. It's probably a coincidence but it's still strange to see a Phenom 9500 getting 1k pps/2 cpm and a laptop i5 getting 1500 pps/2 cpm each get a block on the 1m sievesize while two 3930ks each getting 10k pps/20cpm get nothing in the same time frame with the 100k sievesize that people are suggesting. To me this is saying that the 1m sievesize is better or the numbers really don't matter in mining right now. What do you guys think?

Thanks for sharing that info. Since I haven't found blocks for some time I needed someone to confirm these settings do actually find blocks. The speeds are much higher, but I have no idea if they actually produce blocks faster (if at all). I've used high PPS/CPM as a measure for success simply because it showed success on testnet as an indicator for high BPM's. So finding the highest PPS/CPM on mainnet was my goal.

We need a larger sample though to determine what settings are best. I"m sure someone's finding a lot of blocks with one or both settings we just need to have them confirm their settings. But, I can understand people not sharing successful BPM settings. It's just hard to determine BPM when you have 1 CPU on mainnet to test with. Embarrassed

So, I'm willing to find the highest PPS/CPM settings if someone (with a lot of rigs) will confirm the BPM's for me/us.

Dsfyu

member

Activity: 75

Merit: 10

Quote from: Tuck Fheman on July 26, 2013, 03:27:06 PM

Quote from: xyzzy099 on July 26, 2013, 01:50:29 PM

so it's easy to compare configurations.

eh. From my experience, I see no comparison from testnet vs mainnet, unless you reverse everything.

you can find out if you are actually mining blocks, which is good. but the settings that work on testnet usually don't work well at all on mainnet.

for me ... right now, higher settings do well on testnet, while lower settings do better on mainnet.

I wish testnet gave some indication of settings to use, but (due to the difficulty difference?) it doesn't come close.

Right now I'm running into something weird - I set up a few computers in my house mining primecoin on hp8 - half had a sievesize of 100000 and half at 1000000 (I forgot to change a few settings). Since the release of hp8 I have had the two lowest end machines that I am running on each find a block with the 1m sievesize and none of the other machines (much newer/better) have found anything with the 100k sieveesize since the launch of hp8. It's probably a coincidence but it's still strange to see a Phenom 9500 getting 1k pps/2 cpm and a laptop i5 getting 1500 pps/2 cpm each get a block on the 1m sievesize while two 3930ks each getting 10k pps/20cpm get nothing in the same time frame with the 100k sievesize that people are suggesting. To me this is saying that the 1m sievesize is better or the numbers really don't matter in mining right now. What do you guys think?

xyzzy099

legendary

Activity: 1066

Merit: 1098

Quote from: Tuck Fheman on July 26, 2013, 03:27:06 PM

Quote from: xyzzy099 on July 26, 2013, 01:50:29 PM

so it's easy to compare configurations.

eh. From my experience, I see no comparison from testnet vs mainnet, unless you reverse everything.

you can find out if you are actually mining blocks, which is good. but the settings that work on testnet usually don't work well at all on mainnet.

for me ... right now, higher settings do well on testnet, while lower settings do better on mainnet.

I wish testnet gave some indication of settings to use, but (due to the difficulty difference?) it doesn't come close.

Yeah, you're right... I should have added "theoretically"

Tuck Fheman

sr. member

Activity: 363

Merit: 250

Quote from: xyzzy099 on July 26, 2013, 01:50:29 PM

so it's easy to compare configurations.

eh. From my experience, I see no comparison from testnet vs mainnet, unless you reverse everything.

you can find out if you are actually mining blocks, which is good. but the settings that work on testnet usually don't work well at all on mainnet.

for me ... right now, higher settings do well on testnet, while lower settings do better on mainnet.

I wish testnet gave some indication of settings to use, but (due to the difficulty difference?) it doesn't come close.

xyzzy099

legendary

Activity: 1066

Merit: 1098

Quote from: zax983 on July 26, 2013, 01:48:48 PM

I have no set any option for testnet... How to do? And why?

Use the '-testnet' switch when you start, or put 'testnet=1' in your config.

It's just for testing - you can generate blocks quickly, so it's easy to compare configurations.

zax983

full member

Activity: 156

Merit: 100

I have no set any option for testnet... How to do? And why?

n4ru

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Quote from: r3animation on July 26, 2013, 01:15:16 PM

I'm guessing you didn't sync the blockchain fully and you were farming blocks that people had already mined.

Not quite how it works, he just wasn't on the longest chain.

wetroof

member

Activity: 75

Merit: 10

nvm

Topic: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin High Performance | HP14 released! - page 63. (Read 397657 times)