As I said, I had no idea that EC existed. This is not a thread for EC and so point taken and now I know that EC exists and I will refrain from claiming Tor first. I think it's been settled then.
Fair enough. No qualms on that.
Ok, y_0. I'm not trying to be rude or unfair. What is your point? What do you want to accomplish? Why do you come here to this thread, which is about Spectre, and talk about Eclipse Crypto?
Do you want to point out that Eclipse Crypto exists and also has Tor? Ok, got it. Everyone got it. There are a lot of coins. If you like EC more than XSPEC, fine! I like Spectre more. But please stop bothering us here because this is starting to get annoying.
I've done nothing more but speak the truth in as civil manner as is possible.
Well, not the whole truth, the EC dev left his community high and dry and never fulfilled his obligation.
You want to talk about "misled" and "lies"
Leaving this guy....the last poor bastard that posted on their thread. out his one Bitcoin.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15003206Not to mention others.
Its one thing to dream up all the features maybe even get a few working......but to follow through...well we'll just leave it at that. Spectrecoin works, EC is dust in the wind.
In the interest of fairness I have made a few minor updates to the OP and the website and I say that we are
the only crypto w/ anon tx and Tor that is being actively developed and traded. I don't think I ever said first, I couldn't find that anywhere. This is based on evidence. We have proved that we are actively developing this crypto and I have not seen any evidence that any other crypto with the same features are being actively developed or traded. Hundreds, maybe thousands of cryptos exists that are not being developed or traded and has for whatever reason faded from view. It is impossible to research every single crypto out there.
XSPEC is here to stay and we will develop our privacy technology and obviously welcome open source collaboration and exchange of ideas and as we look to others, others may look to us. This only strengthens the progress of cryptocurrencies and we should not be in opposition but rather learn from each other.
My apologies for stating that you said you were the first and not the only. Only implies first, in a way. Regardless, at least that portion of the matter is settled.
I agree that it would be impossible to research EVERY single coin out there; however, it is but a simple matter to search ring signatures on the altcoin announcements of bitcointalk and conduct your own due diligence. There's only 4 pages of threads, less with actual coins, and you'll find it on there.
Anyway, your claim that Eclipse Crypto is not being actively developed is only based on the evidence that is made available to you. That's not to say that your claim is true. I hope you are as amicable in the future when an update appears, and you retract the not actively developed statement.
Also, EC is still actively traded on C-Cex. That much you can still verify yourself, so, in the interest of fairness when it comes to your marketing materials, you should (as of now) only have the statement that it is "only actively developed (to the best of your knowledge)".
~