who feel harmed by it? I think that's fair, especially if early adopters have a skill that is better than the old adopters. I personally don't feel it's not fair, and I think it is good if the early adopters benefit, so everyone will be easily attracted to adopt bitcoin.
Topic: Yes or No? Doesn't Bitcoin unfairly benefit early adopters? - page 6. (Read 3974 times)
Yes or No? Doesn't Bitcoin unfairly benefit early adopters?
Of course it does and that's always the case with businesses. Those that had balls to gamble in bitcoin a few years ago are now smiling from ear to ear reaping their rewards. Some would even wait even more and see where all these go to.
Absolutely yes, There are a lot of videos on youtube where people who invest in bitcoins before are already billionaires today. So i think that everyone should earn bitcoins as early as they so they can earn more profit in the future.
I answered No because the treatment or the worth of profit that the early adapters earned are fair for me since they have been there o its early stage which means that they have gambled their fortune for the future. Which we all know is worth it since they have not just doubled their profit but even greater than what they have expected to earn. To sum up, is was not unfair in the first place since they have gambled with their fortune unknowingly how good will bitcoin will turn into.
i am agree with this lad opinion
they got to risking their wealthiness and investment in the early phase of bitcoin. So bitcoin right now can be like this because of early adopters. yeah you can say that they're pioneer. but, what matter is to HODL its coin and believe in the coin itself that's my opinion
Definitely Not! 1) It would be unfair if you couldn't participate early on. Everyone had the chance to invest relatively early on, now that the price is high people are kicking themselves. 2) Early adopters took significant risk. e.g All the wallet services & exchanges didn't exist back then.All projects need to reward early risk takers otherwise the projects would never have gone anywhere.
Yes or No? Doesn't Bitcoin unfairly benefit early adopters?
Yes, its obvious they would benefit the most because they started buying it at early price.
No, that is extremely fair that the pioneers, who risked their money and time on something not at all established are rewarded. It is thanks to them that Bitcoin passed throught the hard times of its infacy to slowly become what it is now.
And you know, we are all the early adopter of someone else
!
They are getting what they are deserving because they trusted this coin before than anyone and on top of it nobody was investing at that time because all other think that this coin is not that much profit giving but the pioneers did well they invested their money to give this coin strength and now this coin is giving more and more and I am also in favor of early investor and this coin is giving all to them who believe in it.And you know, we are all the early adopter of someone else
!
Early adopter's belief and contribution made Bitcoin's today, how you can say it's "unfair"?
A lot of people heard of Bitcoin back in 2013, and only very few actually participated in Eco System. It's not Bitcoin's fault, it's their own decision.
A lot of people heard of Bitcoin back in 2013, and only very few actually participated in Eco System. It's not Bitcoin's fault, it's their own decision.
Yes or No? Doesn't Bitcoin unfairly benefit early adopters?
My answer is no. I think it depends to the person who earn and gain bitcoin. Even if a person is an early adopters or not, as long as they have the skills and knowledge on how they can maximize their profit in bitcoin, there wil be no unfair benefit. Just remember to be careful with your bitcoin and dont be afraid to take risks.But, even if you have skill to maximize your profit in bitcoin, you will have a very low chance of becoming a millionaire within an instant time.
Yes or No? Doesn't Bitcoin unfairly benefit early adopters?
It's up to the people on how they are using bitcoin in their life. For me I am using bitcoin to support our life in providing our needs and I can say that j was benefited a lot by bitcoin. So I think bitcoin Unfairly distributed early adopters. 
I think it is their advantage because they trust it in its early age ,
But I think all of the early adopters have already sold their coins.
But I think all of the early adopters have already sold their coins.
Yes, bitcoin unfairly benefited the early adopters but there is nothing to do much for that because that is the bonus or reward of the people who believed in bitcoin for a long time and also to those people who just buy and hold bitcoin in the earlier stage of bitcoin. If you want to get benefits for bitcoin also then just hold your bitcoin for long term.
But is not that is completely fair for those people who are early birds in the investment? They are the one who support the real development when they come early and show their trust in the bitcoin. I think this is completely fair that they are getting benefited from it. Because they are the one who push the market for the bitcoin in early stages, depending in which we others, the late comers start believing into that and then make the investment. I think its fair to have that.
Nobody would even know about BTC without struggle of early adopters. Would you buy some fictional digital number based on only IT-sector known technology without real value and use cases, as it was at the very beginning? Only later, pure enthusiasm, development and marketing made it what it is right now. So, it's their right to get benefit out of this situation.
Nope It is because even they are early adopters some of them messed up their bitcoin and made a huge mistakes and loses. Why? the hype is really tempting when you are a pioneers of bitcoin where the price is still small and can be afford by ordinary citizens, some of the buy the FOMO of other altcoins and some them believe in the FUD that is spreading that time what is their reaction? panic selling missing out the big opportunity that is already happening now and that is the edge for the late adopters they learn from their mistakes and continues to hodl.
The reward scales with risk taken. Early adopters always have more risk, hence it makes sense they get more reward. Just look at all the ICO participants–high risk as many of them don't last, but if one becomes a major player then they get an outsized reward for that risk.
Yes or No? Doesn't Bitcoin unfairly benefit early adopters?
My answer is no. I think it depends to the person who earn and gain bitcoin. Even if a person is an early adopters or not, as long as they have the skills and knowledge on how they can maximize their profit in bitcoin, there wil be no unfair benefit. Just remember to be careful with your bitcoin and dont be afraid to take risks. 
Unfairly? Is there even such a law for a certain individual to venture into something that were still very much uncertain? No, there is none.
I strongly admire the early adopters for they took a vast leap of faith for gambling into bitcoin. They mastered their fear and collect all their guts for something very raw and unknown to some, believing that it (bitcoin) will potentially blossom into something huge. And it did.
Now, the early adopters were rewarded extensively for being a risk taker. We should follow their example.
No it does unfair to the early adopters becuse every one has an opportunity this kind fair market place for the early adopters window of opportunity is still wide because the price still growing.I strongly admire the early adopters for they took a vast leap of faith for gambling into bitcoin. They mastered their fear and collect all their guts for something very raw and unknown to some, believing that it (bitcoin) will potentially blossom into something huge. And it did.
Now, the early adopters were rewarded extensively for being a risk taker. We should follow their example.
Unfairly? Is there even such a law for a certain individual to venture into something that were still very much uncertain? No, there is none.
I strongly admire the early adopters for they took a vast leap of faith for gambling into bitcoin. They mastered their fear and collect all their guts for something very raw and unknown to some, believing that it (bitcoin) will potentially blossom into something huge. And it did.
Now, the early adopters were rewarded extensively for being a risk taker. We should follow their example.
I strongly admire the early adopters for they took a vast leap of faith for gambling into bitcoin. They mastered their fear and collect all their guts for something very raw and unknown to some, believing that it (bitcoin) will potentially blossom into something huge. And it did.
Now, the early adopters were rewarded extensively for being a risk taker. We should follow their example.
Unfairly? Is there even such a law for a certain individual to venture into something that were still very much uncertain? No, there is none.
I strongly admire the early adopters for they took a vast leap of faith for gambling into bitcoin. They mastered their fear and collect all their guts for something very raw and unknown to some, believing that it (bitcoin) will potentially blossom into something huge. And it did.
Now, the early adopters were rewarded extensively for being a risk taker. We should follow their example.
I strongly admire the early adopters for they took a vast leap of faith for gambling into bitcoin. They mastered their fear and collect all their guts for something very raw and unknown to some, believing that it (bitcoin) will potentially blossom into something huge. And it did.
Now, the early adopters were rewarded extensively for being a risk taker. We should follow their example.
Jump to: