Not worth the risk at this point IMO unless someone can tell me exactly what it would take to be in compliance.
Happy to take on the risk, what would you want to develop the system?
Topic: Yet another analyst :) - page 55. (Read 269580 times)
Happy to take on the risk, what would you want to develop the system?
I want to know when market will see a real good exchange with technically educated engineers. Without lag, without that god damn websocket, with "FAST" or similar trading protocol, with reliable feeds connected to modern trading software...
Do you know of any software package or project that could be built upon or used "out of the box" toward building a better version of mtgox? Short of finding a pile of fiat to hire said engineers starting with a known working package would make sense. Surely there is a good implementation of a private stock trading system out there...
Bitcoin central is open source:
https://github.com/davout/bitcoin-central
I doubt the current order matching implementation could even keep up with MtGox though. That said, most of the rest of what you need for a bitcoin exchange is there.
I want to know when market will see a real good exchange with technically educated engineers. Without lag, without that god damn websocket, with "FAST" or similar trading protocol, with reliable feeds connected to modern trading software...
What do we have here - is just madness. I say if 50% of funds will be moved to bitstamp or btce - we will see mtgox-2. None of existing exchanges have technically good internal implementation.
What do we have here - is just madness. I say if 50% of funds will be moved to bitstamp or btce - we will see mtgox-2. None of existing exchanges have technically good internal implementation.
When somebody with the legal knowledge makes a step by step guide to getting registered in various countries. Only then will people like me with the technical knowledge and interest actually build the thing. Right now, I'm dead in the water unless I hire a lawyer to work that shit out. I don't want to deal with it because even if I sunk a week into it, I still wouldn't be sure I was doing everything right. And in my country (USA) if you handle a lot of money without the proper licensing you will have all your money seized. I imagine other countries are similar, although apparently Japan doesn't require any more than a basic business license for MtGox. Not worth the risk at this point IMO unless someone can tell me exactly what it would take to be in compliance.
I want to know when market will see a real good exchange with technically educated engineers. Without lag, without that god damn websocket, with "FAST" or similar trading protocol, with reliable feeds connected to modern trading software...
Do you know of any software package or project that could be built upon or used "out of the box" toward building a better version of mtgox? Short of finding a pile of fiat to hire said engineers starting with a known working package would make sense. Surely there is a good implementation of a private stock trading system out there...
I want to know when market will see a real good exchange with technically educated engineers. Without lag, without that god damn websocket, with "FAST" or similar trading protocol, with reliable feeds connected to modern trading software...
any who pay all this investment and all this ppl ? 
For example, your I has time period of 2 years and II suddenly few days. This is not right.
I want to know when market will see a real good exchange with technically educated engineers. Without lag, without that god damn websocket, with "FAST" or similar trading protocol, with reliable feeds connected to modern trading software...
What do we have here - is just madness. I say if 50% of funds will be moved to bitstamp or btce - we will see mtgox-2. None of existing exchanges have technically good internal implementation.
What do we have here - is just madness. I say if 50% of funds will be moved to bitstamp or btce - we will see mtgox-2. None of existing exchanges have technically good internal implementation.
Hehe. I'd better use sierrachartfeed crunch for a while =)
https://www.sierrachart.com/SupportBoard.php?ThreadID=527
yes but u can trade on BTC-e man https://www.sierrachart.com/SupportBoard.php?ThreadID=527
Quote
So you all know, one thing we are noticing is that we keep losing the connection to the MTGox source data feed about every 20 minutes, however we automatically reconnect. This past hour we also noticed 2 interruptions lasting 3 minutes.
We see that the MTGox data feed is not entirely reliable and also from an engineering perspective, its technical implementation really is very confusing and not well structured. They are using what is called a web socket and then on top of that Socket I/O . This is unnecessary and the method by which this is implemented is not technically correct. So we are not very impressed with the MTGox data feed. This is just a comment.
They also do not provide an efficient data feed. However, this is not of much significance for us.
Aside from all this, we are going to do the very best we can to provide a reliable Bitcoin data feed.
We see that the MTGox data feed is not entirely reliable and also from an engineering perspective, its technical implementation really is very confusing and not well structured. They are using what is called a web socket and then on top of that Socket I/O . This is unnecessary and the method by which this is implemented is not technically correct. So we are not very impressed with the MTGox data feed. This is just a comment.
They also do not provide an efficient data feed. However, this is not of much significance for us.
Aside from all this, we are going to do the very best we can to provide a reliable Bitcoin data feed.
Hehe. I'd better use sierrachartfeed crunch for a while =)
https://www.sierrachart.com/SupportBoard.php?ThreadID=527
https://www.sierrachart.com/SupportBoard.php?ThreadID=527
Quote
So you all know, one thing we are noticing is that we keep losing the connection to the MTGox source data feed about every 20 minutes, however we automatically reconnect. This past hour we also noticed 2 interruptions lasting 3 minutes.
We see that the MTGox data feed is not entirely reliable and also from an engineering perspective, its technical implementation really is very confusing and not well structured. They are using what is called a web socket and then on top of that Socket I/O . This is unnecessary and the method by which this is implemented is not technically correct. So we are not very impressed with the MTGox data feed. This is just a comment.
They also do not provide an efficient data feed. However, this is not of much significance for us.
Aside from all this, we are going to do the very best we can to provide a reliable Bitcoin data feed.
We see that the MTGox data feed is not entirely reliable and also from an engineering perspective, its technical implementation really is very confusing and not well structured. They are using what is called a web socket and then on top of that Socket I/O . This is unnecessary and the method by which this is implemented is not technically correct. So we are not very impressed with the MTGox data feed. This is just a comment.
They also do not provide an efficient data feed. However, this is not of much significance for us.
Aside from all this, we are going to do the very best we can to provide a reliable Bitcoin data feed.
I've counted wave 5 go from 80-81 to 128.5, if breaks through 100 resistance.
On below picture (thx to firstcrypto!) B is counted as 129.59 - it's very close numbers.
Only wave B should be a zigzag upwards and against the falling trend, not 5 wave uptrend.
So 2 things doesn't makes sense - 5 wave and 100 resistance - i'm afraid people will start dumping on 95 and we will fall, making double top btw...
On below picture (thx to firstcrypto!) B is counted as 129.59 - it's very close numbers.
Only wave B should be a zigzag upwards and against the falling trend, not 5 wave uptrend.
So 2 things doesn't makes sense - 5 wave and 100 resistance - i'm afraid people will start dumping on 95 and we will fall, making double top btw...
lucif are yopu ready to quit using your sierrachart trading bot ?
link if u did not know (self promoting thread)
link if u did not know (self promoting thread)
Kinda bouncing
[chart]
[chart]
either you're being intentionally misleading or your position is biasing you.
I, for one am SHOCKED.
Isn't that the same thing?
Kinda bouncing
[chart]
[chart]
either you're being intentionally misleading or your position is biasing you.
I, for one am SHOCKED.
considering the relationship I've seen on other posts between google trends and the price of bitcoin - this could be an indicator (albeit a very rough one, and unfulfilled due to being nearly 2 days behind) of a continuing trend could it not?
some solid dump in last 10 minutes
Makes sense, we jumped about $10 higher than the current upward moving support line. Now its getting back down to the line.it's going up again, lol
Madness, haha
some solid dump in last 10 minutes
Makes sense, we jumped about $10 higher than the current upward moving support line. Now its getting back down to the line.
some solid dump in last 10 minutes
What setting for bb you use?
Not BB. Standard deviations from weighted MA.Ok, thanks... i bet now its over the standard deviation then
Kinda bouncing
[chart]
[chart]
lucif, that candle just opened. you can't call this a bounce yet. with this momentum we could break right through. and by my models, we will. i saw this from $80.
are you short? haha. either you're being intentionally misleading or your position is biasing you. wait 50 minutes then tell me we've bounced.
What setting for bb you use?
Not BB. Standard deviations from weighted MA. Jump to: