Author

Topic: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining USA/DE 255 blocks solved! - page 341. (Read 1514894 times)

sr. member
Activity: 268
Merit: 250
gambling gets expensive when you never win lmao Cry Cry
sr. member
Activity: 268
Merit: 250
i miss the word "Congratulation to bla bla bla.." in this thread  Wink
At 355TH it'll average a block less than once per week.
mmmmm  Sad
now its up @ 1.03P
Pushing 500-600 for 6 hours to try and get lucky Grin Grin
member
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
i miss the word "Congratulation to bla bla bla.." in this thread  Wink
At 355TH it'll average a block less than once per week.
mmmmm  Sad
now its up @ 1.03P
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
i miss the word "Congratulation to bla bla bla.." in this thread  Wink
At 355TH it'll average a block less than once per week.
sr. member
Activity: 287
Merit: 250
Global economic crisis? i hold my bitcoin..
i miss the word "Congratulation to bla bla bla.." in this thread  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 251
Of course it's bad for Bitcoin...

My own opinion is that Bitcoin shouldn't hamstring itself with a 1M block size limit.  On the other hand, Bitcoin should most definitely not hamstring itself by dissension leading to separate and incompatible blocks that cause a fork.

In any case, investors are going to get scared, and we're already seeing the effects as price has dumped 20% or more in the past 24 hours.

It's unclear if the existence of XT actually drove that though... If overall correctly there were several large margin calls that hit yesterday.

Price has really bombed in the last few days, there was some large calls as you rightly put but this whole XT situation has eroded some confidence without doubt, I personally think its a bad idea the way it has been forced upon users and miners alike....I don't think it'll gain much traction but only time will tell ...

All investors are pulling to the sidelines right now across markets. Give it 30 days to see what China and Japan are going to do with their currency. It'll stabilize again. As for XT, it isn't forced on anyone. It's just a stupid guy with a megalomaniac idea. Braum Cohen (sp) the creator of Bittorrent warned that this might happen in 2007. The real test is to see how many people run to XT and give power to the evil side of Bitcoin. So far it's 12.9%

It really depends on the miners, that is - you and me. If you want your BTC devalued then sure, go with XT. If you want BTC to be worth more (and consequently charge more for transaction fees to cover the cost after the mining fee is gone) then stay with Core. I'll be a Core man forever.
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
Of course it's bad for Bitcoin...

My own opinion is that Bitcoin shouldn't hamstring itself with a 1M block size limit.  On the other hand, Bitcoin should most definitely not hamstring itself by dissension leading to separate and incompatible blocks that cause a fork.

In any case, investors are going to get scared, and we're already seeing the effects as price has dumped 20% or more in the past 24 hours.

It's unclear if the existence of XT actually drove that though... If overall correctly there were several large margin calls that hit yesterday.

Price has really bombed in the last few days, there was some large calls as you rightly put but this whole XT situation has eroded some confidence without doubt, I personally think its a bad idea the way it has been forced upon users and miners alike....I don't think it'll gain much traction but only time will tell ...
sr. member
Activity: 419
Merit: 250
Of course it's bad for Bitcoin...

My own opinion is that Bitcoin shouldn't hamstring itself with a 1M block size limit.  On the other hand, Bitcoin should most definitely not hamstring itself by dissension leading to separate and incompatible blocks that cause a fork.

In any case, investors are going to get scared, and we're already seeing the effects as price has dumped 20% or more in the past 24 hours.

It's unclear if the existence of XT actually drove that though... If overall correctly there were several large margin calls that hit yesterday.
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1024
Mine at Jonny's Pool
Of course it's bad for Bitcoin...

My own opinion is that Bitcoin shouldn't hamstring itself with a 1M block size limit.  On the other hand, Bitcoin should most definitely not hamstring itself by dissension leading to separate and incompatible blocks that cause a fork.

In any case, investors are going to get scared, and we're already seeing the effects as price has dumped 20% or more in the past 24 hours.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1004
bitcoin XT?? only heard of QT

XT is a forked altcoin, despite how it's being marketed.  So far it's biggest impact has been to crash the BTC price by about 20%, not sure that's working as intended.
XT represents a fork, yes, but it does not represent an alt coin.  An alt coin would have its own blockchain, its own genesis block, etc.  XT intends to dump blocks onto the existing Bitcoin blockchain that will be incompatible with blocks found by the Core software (once the larger block size goes into effect).  Currently, any blocks mined by an XT node are completely compatible with existing Core blocks because they are not sized differently.  However, if and when XT gets the 75% vote, they will be able to mine a block that is larger than the 1MB block size Core currently supports, and that will be when the split occurs.

Not sure it will happen. Actually im pretty sure this could be really bad for bitcoin. The war between core and XT is bad.
If we cant work together inside community how and why will extern person join bitcoin?
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1024
Mine at Jonny's Pool
bitcoin XT?? only heard of QT

XT is a forked altcoin, despite how it's being marketed.  So far it's biggest impact has been to crash the BTC price by about 20%, not sure that's working as intended.
XT represents a fork, yes, but it does not represent an alt coin.  An alt coin would have its own blockchain, its own genesis block, etc.  XT intends to dump blocks onto the existing Bitcoin blockchain that will be incompatible with blocks found by the Core software (once the larger block size goes into effect).  Currently, any blocks mined by an XT node are completely compatible with existing Core blocks because they are not sized differently.  However, if and when XT gets the 75% vote, they will be able to mine a block that is larger than the 1MB block size Core currently supports, and that will be when the split occurs.
member
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
bitcoin XT?? only heard of QT

XT is a forked altcoin, despite how it's being marketed.  So far it's biggest impact has been to crash the BTC price by about 20%, not sure that's working as intended.
Nice Job!!
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
bitcoin XT?? only heard of QT

XT is a forked altcoin, despite how it's being marketed.  So far it's biggest impact has been to crash the BTC price by about 20%, not sure that's working as intended.
member
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
This pool is NOT running bitcoin XT, in case you're interested.
bitcoin XT?? only heard of QT
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
This pool is NOT running bitcoin XT, in case you're interested.

Hallelujah!!!
fuck that shit!
let them make their own coin, not crap on our table!
sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 251
This pool is NOT running bitcoin XT, in case you're interested.

Amen to that!  Cheesy
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
This pool is NOT running bitcoin XT, in case you're interested.
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Hello,
Is there a problem with the stats? My hash-rate is 0 while the machine is fully pointed to the pool.
Thanks.
Nope, everything's working fine. Have you just started mining with a low hashrate device? It can take a while to get any shares and the diff adjust at the pool if you have something under 500GH.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1118
Lie down. Have a cookie
Is there any stat page to see all blocks That are found with this pool ?

I don't believe there are any on the pool's web server. This probably has been done to have better latency. I know ck has told people no to ideas of having more functions on the pool itself, as block solving is whoever is fastest to solve a block and have the network confirm it
Jump to: