Topic: Your opinions on IEOs - page 10. (Read 1860 times)
The IEO creates a limit for that investor that you want to join the IEO and you need to follow the rules of the IEO exchange. As the Binance or Houbi floor you have to keep the BNB or HT token for a long time. This makes your money imprisoned. I agree that the profits of IEOs on these exchanges are large but not everyone is eligible to join the IEO.
Now IEO is very popular among people, because participation in IEO brings a very large income and in time coins can be sold on the exchange
In my opinion, this IEO needs to be continued, because with the IEO, investors are eager to invest in Cryptocurrency. If the IEO is stopped, then people will be lazy to return to invest in the ICO. Because there are too many ICO scams.
I think IEOs are more safe for investors. At least you know that an exchange has verified the project. IEOs cannot eliminate scams generally. But changing the fundraising method from ICOs to IEOs was a good step.
When an IEO is running on a promising exchange like Binance, personally I will trust that eaiser. Because I don't think Binance will damage its reputation.
When an IEO is running on a promising exchange like Binance, personally I will trust that eaiser. Because I don't think Binance will damage its reputation.
I believe that the IEO topic is becoming irrelevant - at first, yes, the projects gave great profit, but if you look at the latest projects - it is very hard to get and there is almost no profit (even losses) - people will soon stop participating. Better to return the ICO format!
Considering what happened with ICOs and lack of the interest in investing in them, I don't think it's a good idea. I still think that IEO is better than ICO however there are still lots of problems. Instead of returing to the old format, creating a new format might be necessary.
yes, that is the consideration that I have made now, in my opinion the IEO is a new breakthrough for investment other than ICO, honestly the reason I switched investment with the IEO is because the IEO has provided benefits to me and has covered my losses when investing in ICO. ICO has made me lose, many of them are fraudulent and this is a fact.
I believe that the IEO topic is becoming irrelevant - at first, yes, the projects gave great profit, but if you look at the latest projects - it is very hard to get and there is almost no profit (even losses) - people will soon stop participating. Better to return the ICO format!
Considering what happened with ICOs and lack of the interest in investing in them, I don't think it's a good idea. I still think that IEO is better than ICO however there are still lots of problems. Instead of returing to the old format, creating a new format might be necessary.
yes, that is the consideration that I have made now, in my opinion the IEO is a new breakthrough for investment other than ICO, honestly the reason I switched investment with the IEO is because the IEO has provided benefits to me and has covered my losses when investing in ICO. ICO has made me lose, many of them are fraudulent and this is a fact.
Similar topics like this have been discussed a lot on forums. The IEO has the trust of investors because it is linked to listing of exchanges. I think it's only safe on large, secure trading platforms like binance, houbi, okex. For small and medium trading platforms such as latoken, emarket, ... should not participate in IEO programs here. Evidence shows that in successful large exchanges, the IEO has a very strong selection of the IEO project. But platforms like Latoken and Emarket have no choice, I think they just need to spend a little money to list IEO on this platform.
I believe that the IEO topic is becoming irrelevant - at first, yes, the projects gave great profit, but if you look at the latest projects - it is very hard to get and there is almost no profit (even losses) - people will soon stop participating. Better to return the ICO format!
It is true that the IEO is a good investment, but exchange companies should not create too many projects, it will be like the previous ICO. Too many projects and will make projects no longer quality as before
Of course there will not be many good projects to implement the IEO. They need to pass the tests of exchanges in order to achieve IEO requirements. I believe the IEO will not be the same as ICO, except exchange collapsed
IEOs sure are saving grace for investors and crypto enthusiasts alike. Though, IEO seems to be in the latest, several shortcomings have been identified already to the end that IEOs are starting to fail too soon too.
Hence a need to call ourselves to a confab to discuss long lasting solutions to the bad image, loss of popularity that's killing us gradually..
Hence a need to call ourselves to a confab to discuss long lasting solutions to the bad image, loss of popularity that's killing us gradually..
IEO has been a revolutionary means used by start-ups to raised fund after lots of ico scams which leads to people swaying from buying ICO tokens. Some exchange such as binance and gate has gathered a successful reputation for conducting IEO..
IEO has proven that there's lot potential and futere for cryptocurrency adoption
IEO has proven that there's lot potential and futere for cryptocurrency adoption
It is true that the IEO is a good investment, but exchange companies should not create too many projects, it will be like the previous ICO. Too many projects and will make projects no longer quality as before
All press has positive feedback for initial exchange offer. Only Binance exchange IEO is successful, others doing hold their exchange renown.
actually not only good binance for the IEO. we can see exchanges that have a fairly high trade after binance. if they do the IEO. the most important thing is to avoid latoken because I don't believe in this exchange. 
IEO is far better than ICO, IEO keeps investor money safe of course by using a strict system that requires KYC and other IEO participants, I think this is quite interesting compared to ICO held by the project team to invite investors to invest through their sites, I think we all know that there are almost a lot of ICO scams and most of them carry investors' money even the products launched are not as expected, I think the IEO is better than the ICO
In my opinion, IEO's are being more trusted by all because of what happened with ICO's from the previous years where a lot of the projects turning out to be scams, even other investors prefer participating in an IEO rather than an ICO tbh. But at the same time, there are setbacks with some IEO's such as it being expensive to join in at minimum and risk is still there. This new offering, however, is designed to mitigate the problems associated with IEOs and deliver the improved solution using a separate ecosystem which offer discounted tokens at a much lower risk than that associated with IEOs.
My opinion on IEO at the moment is good because the tokens have a big success rate that the project will continue , alive and kicking for the future plans but remember not all IEO are success right now because its turning to scam like the ICO times
It is true that the IEO is a good investment, but exchange companies should not create too many projects, it will be like the previous ICO. Too many projects and will make projects no longer quality as before
Exchangers wont really limit out to list out projects thru IEO yet we know that these things do bring out profit on their part so as expected that they would create as much as they like since the hype is still high their pretty sure that making money on this one would continue for some time.I wont be surprised if this would end up just like on what ICO did.
I am seeing small exchanges such as IDAX, Exmarkets, Latoken and other small exchange that are constantly launching IEO projects, they launched several IEOs in just one week. With such small volume exchanges, it will make IEO lose its appeal, but not completely because like Binance, Okex or Kucoin always make IEO attractive.
The small exchanger made IEO because to attract many people to register on their platform. In contrast to Binance, which held the IEO because binance was interested in the project. In addition, a small exchanger must charge a smaller fee than a large exchanger, which makes many projects register their IEOs on small exchangers
My opinion is that all IEOs are a deception of investors. You can participate in the IEO only for a short time and immediately sell the tokens you purchased as soon as the opportunity arises. Because over time, tokens can only fall in price.
It is true that the IEO is a good investment, but exchange companies should not create too many projects, it will be like the previous ICO. Too many projects and will make projects no longer quality as before
Exchangers wont really limit out to list out projects thru IEO yet we know that these things do bring out profit on their part so as expected that they would create as much as they like since the hype is still high their pretty sure that making money on this one would continue for some time.I wont be surprised if this would end up just like on what ICO did.
I am seeing small exchanges such as IDAX, Exmarkets, Latoken and other small exchange that are constantly launching IEO projects, they launched several IEOs in just one week. With such small volume exchanges, it will make IEO lose its appeal, but not completely because like Binance, Okex or Kucoin always make IEO attractive.
Jump to: