Topic: Your opinions on IEOs - page 9. (Read 1841 times)
In any case, IEO is much better than the company’s ico, and many investors have already seen this. It seems to me that trading markets are a definite fuse for IEO. At the same time, ico companies could also give good results even today, if not for the rampant fraud.
I know IEOs are just a phase and may be replaced soon will h another format. Ico was population about 2-3 years back. Cure most exchanges hold IEO with some making gains while some makes loss. Not all IEO are successful. Those successful are crazily nipped up on the day of trading.
Well IEO is the more secured version of ICO, it is just feels more legit because it has reviewed by exchanges and guaranteed to be listed on exchanges immediately after IEO finished, while technology is indeed always developing, I don't think this one could be replaced by new format easily because it just already solve the problem needed to solve which is safety and security. 
IEO is more suitable for long-term investment because not all new projects are not always successful quickly, all projects certainly require not fast time. And the IEO is a good collaboration that creates a mutually beneficial ecosystem for the project and exchange.
hype that happen in market now , investors thinking IEO be main way to earn profit in short time.after listing in market they will wait price rise more than 3x and then selll it , switch to another projects.holding coins looks like is not interesting anymore since IEO occur. 
The IEO is now an attraction for us to invest. Many people believe in the IEO and now it is a place to invest. Many large or small exchanges do it IEO for the sake of crypto projects to raise funds to develop projects. So it's no wonder IEO is one of the best places to invest now.
True, I also always look for the best IEO on some exchanges that hold it, but not all IEOs will work, we also need to research so that there is no minimum loss we have to know on the exchange where the IEO always gets profits.
While IEO is popular, it is necessary to use it and earn money, because in the future it can be late and the earnings can be much less
I know IEOs are just a phase and may be replaced soon will h another format. Ico was population about 2-3 years back. Cure most exchanges hold IEO with some making gains while some makes loss. Not all IEO are successful. Those successful are crazily nipped up on the day of trading.
Only Binance has real volume or success in any IEO. Decentralized exchange has almost no IEO, after success some projects want to list decentralized exchange. Decentralized exchange has in top ten exchange.
I see two big reasons why ICO is now replaced by IEO. One, there is more trust here compared to the usual ICOs because the exchange (assuming that it is reputable as well because there are now many exchanges springing almost everyday and many of them are just here for the money) can be providing additional layer of security as long as the exchange is doing its job of vetting on the project and the people behind it so that we can be sure that it is real, genuine and would have less chance to run once they have the money on the bag. Two, this is providing a better liquidity for token buyers because the coins/tokens are automatically taken in by the exchange. We know that there were so many ICO projects in the past that failed to get into even just one exchange.
As to the concern that exchanges can be getting more powerful...that can be true only because maybe we are just concentrating on Binance but when there can be more reputable exchanges doing the same thing, then the so-called power can easily be diluted or minimized. We have to remember that even without the IEOs, in my opinion, exchanges have their own inherent power as they can decide which projects they would like to be on board and which to reject.
How can you say that ICO now is replaced by IEO? as far as I know there are still ico that are running good now.
It just need research well, it is through that majority of the ico became not good in the sight of many community here, but
compared to 2018 ico, 2019 ico now are much better and good unto it.
IEO is currently the best way crypto projects can raise funds in the form of crowdfunding. It presents investors with enough information regarding the amount of coins or tokens made available for investors to purchase and the possible profit margin they can gain if they invest in the project. With IEO, exchange platforms are in charge of the tokens or coins distribution which eliminates the potential of investors getting scammed. IEO eliminates scams. It is the perfect method for crowdfunding activities.
I think it is better than ICO seeing the coins in the exchange and circulating rather than having the coin but not having listed on an exchange and not having value.
I believe that the IEO topic is becoming irrelevant - at first, yes, the projects gave great profit, but if you look at the latest projects - it is very hard to get and there is almost no profit (even losses) - people will soon stop participating. Better to return the ICO format!
Considering what happened with ICOs and lack of the interest in investing in them, I don't think it's a good idea. I still think that IEO is better than ICO however there are still lots of problems. Instead of returing to the old format, creating a new format might be necessary.
I believe that the IEO topic is becoming irrelevant - at first, yes, the projects gave great profit, but if you look at the latest projects - it is very hard to get and there is almost no profit (even losses) - people will soon stop participating. Better to return the ICO format!
I do not think people around are foolish enough to return to the ICO stuff. They have lost enough money and gained enough wisdom to stay away from ICO. The success of a project in IEO depends on one thing and that is the project itself. If the project is good, it will gain value and will give back returns. In addition, do not go for IEOs on the weak exchanges and target Binance. 
In my own opinion, IEOs has come to stay because when you study their growth, it is evident they are doing well and thus attracting more investors. Also, since exchanges contributes a lot we need to be sure of the exchange before getting involved.
It's more like a domino effect, people are posting how good IEO's are and how they are making a quick profit on it, and of course, everybody wants quick profit, we all know DEX's are good but the lack of volume is not attractive to investors, we really need to educate people about how good and the many benefits of these DEX's
All press has positive feedback for initial exchange offer. Only Binance exchange IEO is successful, others doing hold their exchange renown.
IEO is a chance to raise capital. You know, without enough money you can participate in several IEOs and as a result grow your capital. That is true, just try it!
In as much as you stated the disadvantages of IEOs mainly because they give more power to centralized exchanges running them, IEOs have done more good to crypto. Some blockchain start-ups who did IEO were very successful, which would have been a failed token sale with ICO. IEO to me is cool, since we are sure of listing and also there is some level of trust for the team since they must have been verified by the exchange.
I feel more at home with IEOs simply because they are properly checked and analysed by the team of analysts that represent the exchange platform, only if the project passes their tests only then a project is listed so that gives major confidence boost to investors and that is why i like IEOs too.
At the beginning of 2017, there was an ICO boom, and many people were deceived. Now, IEO has come to replace ICO, which should reduce the number of scam projects. IEOs are checked by the exchanges, therefore, the possibility to be involved in the fraud is minimized. I am sure that now, people will be more opened to these projects and start making money on them.
Recently, I've seen a lot of positive press regarding IEOs. After all, Binance is already successfully running them, giving ICO projects a chance to shine and many other exchanges are following suit.
My personal opinion is that IEOs should be discouraged. Firstly, it gives more and more power to these centralised exchanges, who are able to charge higher, more ridiculous listing fees for coins as well as extremely large payments to hold IEOs. Their vested interests in this way mean they are less likely to care about vetting projects that may be untrustworthy, leading to even more irresponsible behaviour.
Exchanges are already making far too much from listing fees, so IEOs on top are completely unnecessary. While they are good promotion for coins, such practices cannot be good in the long-term.
Instead, the focus should be easy-to-use decentralised exchanges which don't require intrusive KYC/AML and are much less likely to be corrupt/ill-willed if some DAO-like structure is in place. While blockchain technology has made the storage of data much safer, what is the point if thousands of crypto exchanges hold endless amounts of data on the customers in the same way banks do? The only thing changing is who owns the data, so privacy has not improved. And as crypto adoption increases, so will regulation of exchanges.
We don't want to end up in a situation where to trade any meaningful amount of crypto you have to send your name, address, ID, and bank account details to some exchange which can do whatever it likes with your data.
Your thoughts?
My personal opinion is that IEOs should be discouraged. Firstly, it gives more and more power to these centralised exchanges, who are able to charge higher, more ridiculous listing fees for coins as well as extremely large payments to hold IEOs. Their vested interests in this way mean they are less likely to care about vetting projects that may be untrustworthy, leading to even more irresponsible behaviour.
Exchanges are already making far too much from listing fees, so IEOs on top are completely unnecessary. While they are good promotion for coins, such practices cannot be good in the long-term.
Instead, the focus should be easy-to-use decentralised exchanges which don't require intrusive KYC/AML and are much less likely to be corrupt/ill-willed if some DAO-like structure is in place. While blockchain technology has made the storage of data much safer, what is the point if thousands of crypto exchanges hold endless amounts of data on the customers in the same way banks do? The only thing changing is who owns the data, so privacy has not improved. And as crypto adoption increases, so will regulation of exchanges.
We don't want to end up in a situation where to trade any meaningful amount of crypto you have to send your name, address, ID, and bank account details to some exchange which can do whatever it likes with your data.
Your thoughts?
in my thinking about IEO it is very good to run in the future ... IEO is more trusted for me ... because all are focused on an exchanger ... so only certain people can access it through the KYC verification process ... but between IEO and ICO have positive and negative sides ... because both have advantages and disadvantages ... if talking about cheating, there has been a lot of launching Altcoin that is not through the IEO cheating and running away with investor money ... so ... in my positive mind before investing then You must be more careful in choosing an IEO or ICO project in the future ..
IEO is more suitable for long-term investment because not all new projects are not always successful quickly, all projects certainly require not fast time. And the IEO is a good collaboration that creates a mutually beneficial ecosystem for the project and exchange.
Jump to: