10000.00000000 11de35c5727122f4f58517a8d963b208442dc3a3 12dUggmXPYsPVHaHr1DoW5J6bb6gvh4yZq Sun Dec 19 02:21:49 2010
Wow, Untouched for so long
Topic: z - page 9. (Read 58402 times)
I would like to see this updated! 
Your wish has been granted, but please recall
that you can use the tool that creates this list
yourself at any time.
Thanks!
- There is a byte limit to the size of a post. This is the reason why there are only 410 lines in the post.
Adding the full 500 goes over the limit imposed by the forum.
Adding the full 500 goes over the limit imposed by the forum.
why not just break it up to two post? 250 on one and 250 on another? Just an idea
- There is a byte limit to the size of a post. This is the reason why there are only 410 lines in the post.
Adding the full 500 goes over the limit imposed by the forum.
Adding the full 500 goes over the limit imposed by the forum.
why not just break it up to two post? 250 on one and 250 on another? Just an idea
That would be too difficult. lol
There's lots of chatter about early hoarders in light of the new paper, here's one post which embeds informative graphs and relevant links
http://www.loper-os.org/?p=1009
1. I happen to disagree with the conclusions for several reason, I don't think the distribution of owners / hoarders is nearly as top heavy as it used to be and I think it's getting less top heavy with time.
2. Early adopters are unlikely to call cash out at the same time unless most of early 78% of hoarded coins are held by nefarious gov't organizations
3. Massive selling does not need to lead to the end of bitoin and the price can and will recover in the future, hence it's not necessarily a kill switch
http://www.loper-os.org/?p=1009
1. I happen to disagree with the conclusions for several reason, I don't think the distribution of owners / hoarders is nearly as top heavy as it used to be and I think it's getting less top heavy with time.
2. Early adopters are unlikely to call cash out at the same time unless most of early 78% of hoarded coins are held by nefarious gov't organizations
3. Massive selling does not need to lead to the end of bitoin and the price can and will recover in the future, hence it's not necessarily a kill switch
I just looked at my 300ish address and found less than 10% used small letters. That is very odd and I don't know why.
It is definitely an artifact of the base58 encoding and is normal. A small number of addresses will have a slightly smaller length as well. For a simple illustration, imagine a number set with numbers evenly distributed between 1 and 5999999. This number set will have numbers starting with 6,7,8,9 but will occur far less frequently than ones starting with 1,2,3,4,5. In bitcoin base58 the lowercase letters stand for the highest base58 digits.
A slightly off-topic, but curious factoid:
I've just noticed that VERY few of these addresses begin with 1[a-z] ... The overwhelming majority begins with 1[A-Z] or 1[0-9]. I would have expected a more random distribution. Any explanation for that? Perhaps I'm missing something obvious.
I've just noticed that VERY few of these addresses begin with 1[a-z] ... The overwhelming majority begins with 1[A-Z] or 1[0-9]. I would have expected a more random distribution. Any explanation for that? Perhaps I'm missing something obvious.
list updated.
notable events: the fat address has shrunk considerably.
Yeah it's pretty much at 0.
Spending too much time in here doesn't mean I ignore the fact there is life and Bitcoin outside this forum.
There is ?
Pray tell us more O wise one, we are hanging in deep anticipation at your every word.
I'm not on the business of teaching dumbasses to browse the web. You have to figure it out for yourself.
100,000 btc withdrawal from the monster address... Right now...
Looks like Pirate cashed out a big chunk.
.03133700
What's with the 0.03133700? On most of them.
What's with the 0.03133700? On most of them.
31337 means "elite" in LeetSpeak.
Jump to: