Pages:
Author

Topic: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][BTC Multipool] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█ Paid 925+ BTC - page 66. (Read 217685 times)

legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
MINERCONTROL CONFIGURATION--

Well, I added Decred (DCR), and my work box now has a fine DCR load to haul, and it makes normal use sluggish.  To add an unlisted algo, cut and paste an algorithm in the "algorithms" section, adding a line, being careful about the end comma where appropriate.  Modify the newly pasted line to represent the algo you wish to add, for example, "Decred".  Use a low estimate for hash rate, and the same for intensity in the command  section at the end of the line.  In the pool section, ONLY under YAAMP-style pools (Zpool), follow the same procedure of cut-and-paste, making sure to use the correct PORT value when editing the newly added line.

Check for typos, save, and  reload the configuration in MinerControl.  Test and tune useing the "start" button for the new algo.  Adjust hash rate and CCminer launch command parameters like intensity as you go.  Trial and error, if you set the intensity too high and crash the driver, you may have to reboot.




Scryptr  here is what you need for cmd window on windows .. this is just part of opening statements.... then add to rest of  algo's


 "dynamicswitchpower": 3,
        "dynamicpivot": 1,
        "minprofit": 1.1,
        "deadtime": 1,
        "logerrors": false,
        "logactivity": false,
        "gridsortmode": 2,
        "minerkillmode": 1,
        "traymode": 0,
        "usewindow": true,   <<<

and this   "usewindow": true  ....end of each stratum

},
    "zpool.ca": {
        "account": "wallet",
        "pricemode": 0,
        "balancemode": 0,
        "btcfee": 2,
        "sparam1": "-o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca",
        "sparam2": "-p",
        "minprofit": 1.1,
        "algos": [           
            {
                "algo": "blake2s",
                "folder": "_APARAM1_",
                "command": "_APARAM2_",
                "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:5766 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_ MHC,c=BTC -i 0,22,0",
                "usewindow": true
            },
            {
                "algo": "blakecoin",
                "folder": "_APARAM1_",
                "command": "_APARAM2_",
                "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:5743 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_ MHC,c=BTC -i 0,22,0",
                "usewindow": true
            },
            {
                "algo": "c11",
                "folder": "_APARAM1_",
                "command": "_APARAM2_",
                "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:3573 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_ MHC,c=BTC -i 0,15,0",
                "usewindow": true
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


To add an unlisted algo I still don't know what you mean.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Why is this constant?

2   1.2962%   30.9 Mh/s reject=48.7%

What is your question? Not enough information.

It should be self explanatory the pool rejects are ridiculous. 

It's just reject calculation for display that's off as far as I can tell.

So my card has been locked on lyra2 for several days now (by choice) and it gets lots of reports of being offline yet shares keep rolling in at the proper rate.

Thought I'd comment.


Profitability for me has been somewhat down a touch across the board, but I am no longer running any SHA at all on zpool; sold my personal miners < s7, and the s7's are pointed at NH and solo.

No comments on skein removal but I also yanked it from my machines in SF just today.
Ok  thx
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
MINERCONTROL CONFIGURATION--

Well, I added Decred (DCR), and my work box now has a fine DCR load to haul, and it makes normal use sluggish.  To add an unlisted algo, cut and paste an algorithm in the "algorithms" section, adding a line, being careful about the end comma where appropriate.  Modify the newly pasted line to represent the algo you wish to add, for example, "Decred".  Use a low estimate for hash rate, and the same for intensity in the command  section at the end of the line.  In the pool section, ONLY under YAAMP-style pools (Zpool), follow the same procedure of cut-and-paste, making sure to use the correct PORT value when editing the newly added line.

Check for typos, save, and  reload the configuration in MinerControl.  Test and tune useing the "start" button for the new algo.  Adjust hash rate and CCminer launch command parameters like intensity as you go.  Trial and error, if you set the intensity too high and crash the driver, you may have to reboot.

I put copies of several of the best CCminer variations in the same directory with MinerControl, giving each a unique name.  Make sure to add supporting "dll" files as well.  That way no sub-directory information needs to be passed in the top "algorithms" section.

By the way, I have not been able to implement the "usewindow" command, although I successfully added it in the launch parameters in JSON format.  It may be broken?       --scryptr

EDIT:  My EVGA GTX 960 gets 1.0 GH/s mining DCR at Zpool.  BlakeCoin is served with over 1.5 GH/s by the same card.  Both coins demand a high intensity setting ("-i" is 28.5 for Decred, and 29 for BlakeCoin) for performance, leaving the computer sluggish.  This is ok for a headless dedicated rig, or a mining fool slaving for the electric bill, but JK has a point in using lower intensities in his batch file.

MinerControl can be found at https://github.com/KBomba , version 1.6.5.1(modded) is the very latest version.  There are 3 main contributors, StuffOfInterest, the author, KBomba/Bombadil, and Fuzzbawls, mod-men.  Handle the following file with care, a tiny typo will cause it to fail.  This file will run with any nVidia card that can run CCminer; adjustments to intensity may be needed.  It can also be modified for an AMD card.  Other examples can be found at StuffOfInterest's BitCoinTalk thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-miner-control-161-auto-profit-switching-miner-controller-769239.  It would be a good idea to visit this linked thread and read the opening page (OP) and the last few pages before running MinerControl.  The configuration file is performance tuned for a GTX 960.  I still need to add a couple Zpool algos, the power settings need to be adjusted, and intensity settings may be too high for cards smaller/older than a GTX 960.  The configuration is a Work-In-Progress.  NOTE:  This file was corrected on 5 JUL 2016 to reflect proper hashrate values for BlakeCoin, Blake2s, and Decred.  I had overlooked an important pricing note: (*** values in mBTC/Mh/day (mBTC/Gh/day for sha256, decred and blake algos).  Today, three trailing zeros were cut from each value for the Blake and Decred algos previously posted.  Apologies to anyone inconvenienced, and Big Thanks! to sp_ and antantti, who both caught the error and notified me.

MinerControl Configuration File:   (MUST be named "minercontrol.conf")
====================

{
    "general": {
        "power": 0.10,
        "exchange": 700,
        "currencycode": "USD",
        "mintime": 2,
        "maxtime": 30,
        "switchtime": 5,
        "delay": 1,
        "exittime": 0,
        "deadtime": 10,
        "statwindow": 60,
        "minprofit": 1.05,
        "minprice": "0BTC",
        "minebyaverage": true,
        "dynamicswitching": true,
        "dynamicswitchpower": 2,
        "ignoreoutliers": true,
        "iqrmultiplier": 2.2,
        "showhistory": true,
        "logerrors": true,
        "logactivity": true,
        "gridsortmode": 2,
        "minerkillmode": 1,
        "traymode": 1,
        "donationpercentage": 0,
        "donationfrequency": 0,
        "remotesend": false,
        "remotereceive": false
    },
    "algorithms": [
        { "name": "x11", "display": "X11", "hashrate": 5500, "power": 49,  "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a x11 -i 20.5 -C --no-color" },
        { "name": "x13", "display": "X13", "hashrate": 4400, "power": 49, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a x13 -i 20.5 -C  --no-color" },
        { "name": "x14", "display": "X14", "hashrate": 4100, "power": 52, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a x14 -i 20.5 -C --no-color" },
        { "name": "x15", "display": "X15", "hashrate": 3600, "power": 52, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a x15 -i 20.5 -C --no-color" },
        { "name": "x17", "display": "X17", "hashrate": 3475, "power": 52, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a x17 -i 20.5 -C --no-color" },
        { "name": "c11", "display": "C11", "hashrate": 5200, "power": 52, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a c11 -i 20.5 -C --no-color" },
        { "name": "x11evo", "display": "X11evo", "hashrate": 4890, "power": 50, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminerx11evo.exe", "aparam3": "-a x11evo -i 19 --no-color" },
        { "name": "quark", "display": "Quark", "hashrate": 11000, "power": 54, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a quark -i 23 -C --no-color" },
        { "name": "nist5", "display": "Nist5", "hashrate": 18400, "power": 54, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a nist5 -i 19 -C --no-color" },
        { "name": "neoscrypt", "display": "NeoScrypt", "hashrate": 410, "power": 54, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "P5miner.exe", "aparam3": "-a neoscrypt -i 15.5 -C --cpu-priority 5  --no-color" },
        { "name": "scryptn", "display": "Scrypt-N", "hashrate": 253, "power": 60, "aparam1": "c:\\windows\\system32", "aparam2": "tpminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a scrypt:10" },
        { "name": "keccak", "display": "Keccak", "hashrate": 301500, "power": 50, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a keccak -i 19 -C --no-color" },
        { "name": "qubit", "display": "Qubit", "hashrate": 8350, "power": 50, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a qubit -i 19.7 -C --no-color" },
        { "name": "lyra2", "display": "Lyra2", "hashrate": 2100, "power": 50, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "L2miner.exe", "aparam3": "-a lyra2 - i 22 --no-color" },
        { "name": "lyra2v2", "display": "Lyra2v2", "hashrate": 15200, "power": 50, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a lyra2v2 -i 22 -C  --no-color" },
        { "name": "whirlpoolx", "display": "WhirlpoolX", "hashrate": 150000, "power": 50, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a whirlpoolx -C --no-color" },
        { "name": "blakecoin", "display": "BlakeCoin", "hashrate": 1650, "power": 50, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a blakecoin -i 29 -C --no-color" },
        { "name": "blake2s", "display": "Blake2s", "hashrate": 690, "power": 50, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "tpminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a blake2s -i 27  --no-color" },
        { "name": "skein", "display": "Skein", "hashrate": 170000, "power": 50, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a skein -i 27.5 -C --no-color" },
        { "name": "groestl", "display": "Groestl", "hashrate": 16350, "power": 50, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "ccminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a groestl -i 22.5 -C --no-color" },
        { "name": "decred", "display": "Decred", "hashrate": 1000, "power": 50, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "tpminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a decred -i 28.5 --no-color" },
        { "name": "sib", "display": "Sib", "hashrate": 700, "power": 50, "aparam1": "", "aparam2": "tpminer.exe", "aparam3": "-a sib -i 19.7 --no-color" }
    ],
    "nicehash": {
        "account": "1Fs4uZ6a9ABYBTaHGUfqcwCQmeBRxkKRQT",
        "detectstratum": true,
        "worker": "rig1",
        "sparam1": "",
        "sparam2": "-p x",
        "minprofit": 1.2,
        "algos": [
            { "algo": "x11", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ -u _ACCOUNT_._WORKER_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "x13", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ -u _ACCOUNT_._WORKER_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "x15", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ -u _ACCOUNT_._WORKER_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "quark", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ -u _ACCOUNT_._WORKER_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "qubit", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ -u _ACCOUNT_._WORKER_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "scryptn", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ -u _ACCOUNT_._WORKER_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "keccak", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ -u _ACCOUNT_._WORKER_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "nist5", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ -u _ACCOUNT_._WORKER_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "neoscrypt", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ -u _ACCOUNT_._WORKER_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "lyra2", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ -u _ACCOUNT_._WORKER_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "lyra2v2", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ -u _ACCOUNT_._WORKER_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "whirlpoolx", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ -u _ACCOUNT_._WORKER_ _SPARAM2_" }
       ]
    },
    "Zpool.ca": {
        "account": "1Fs4uZ6a9ABYBTaHGUfqcwCQmeBRxkKRQT",
        "pricemode": 1,
        "balancemode": 0,
        "btcfee":2,
        "sparam1": "-o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca",
        "sparam2": "-p rig1,c=BTC",
        "algos": [
            { "algo": "x11", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:3533 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "x13", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:3633 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "x14", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:3633 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "x15", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:3733 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "x17", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:3737 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "c11", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:3573 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "quark", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:4033 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "qubit", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:4733 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "nist5", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:4733 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "neoscrypt", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:4233 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "lyra2v2", "priceid": "lyra2v2", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:4533 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "x11evo", "priceid": "x11evo", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:3553 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "blakecoin", "priceid": "blakecoin", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:5743 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "blake2s", "priceid": "blake2s", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:5766 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "skein", "priceid": "skein", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:4933 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "groestl", "priceid": "groestl", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:5333 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "decred", "priceid": "decred", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:5744 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" },
            { "algo": "sib", "priceid": "sib", "folder": "_APARAM1_", "command": "_APARAM2_", "arguments": "_APARAM3_ _SPARAM1_:5033 -u _ACCOUNT_ _SPARAM2_" }

       ]
    }
}
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1166
My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?
So my card has been locked on lyra2 for several days now (by choice) and it gets lots of reports of being offline yet shares keep rolling in at the proper rate.

Thought I'd comment.

Got back from SF finally after almost a week.

Miner was up and running producing steady shares.   Backed off intensity for machine usability and restarted the app.  Now the pool sees and reports it as a connected miner.

The whole time it was not shows as a connected miner, but the summary showed 0 connected miners at ~2% share rate and ~28-32Mh.

Something else I noticed earlier that this was if you compare the table just below the summary, it shows a different share percentage, as well as a different share percentage of the block reward.

There has to be some sort of issue with the pool web-end which stems down to them not having the calculation done by a child function;  instead they are coding it on a per-need basis and one of those on many algos are flat-out calculated wrong.

The final payout and rewards seem to be correct and consistent with the past, and the way the market has been going recently as well (BTC worth more, miners paid less;  because people tend to base price off power usage for some not so insane reasoning)....  Its bound to happen.

Maybe I am totally wrong and am not here to debate it, just saying I am getting near what I expect (I take my expectation and payout usually is +/- 12-20% on average.
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1166
My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?
Why is this constant?

2   1.2962%   30.9 Mh/s reject=48.7%

What is your question? Not enough information.

It should be self explanatory the pool rejects are ridiculous. 

It's just reject calculation for display that's off as far as I can tell.

So my card has been locked on lyra2 for several days now (by choice) and it gets lots of reports of being offline yet shares keep rolling in at the proper rate.

Thought I'd comment.


Profitability for me has been somewhat down a touch across the board, but I am no longer running any SHA at all on zpool; sold my personal miners < s7, and the s7's are pointed at NH and solo.

No comments on skein removal but I also yanked it from my machines in SF just today.
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 506
Why is this constant?

2   1.2962%   30.9 Mh/s reject=48.7%

What is your question? Not enough information.

It should be self explanatory the pool rejects are ridiculous. 
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 506
I think all the profits are way under expectation i ran 2 s3+ @ ~500gh freq 350 almost 4 days to get 0.005 btc combined confirmed and unconfirmed.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
A side note to see if anyone feels the same...

skein just doesn't seem to earn enough... maybe its the algo switching and the larger value coins don't come in regularly enough to keep it profitable.  I have seen my average slowly decrease since adding all the algos so I think I may be pulling it from the batch;  but I will leave the code at the bottom for people to paste in if they want to use it.

Interested on any others opinions....
Yes profits are dropping for me too..almost down to the price of electricity.

Did you find an increase since dropping skein algo?  thx
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Why is this constant?

2   1.2962%   30.9 Mh/s reject=48.7%

What is your question? Not enough information.
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
SHA256 POOL IS DOWN--

Zero live miners, reported as "DEAD" by my miners.       -scryptr

Yeah sorry. I left the port running with gdb (debug) and forgot it wouldn't restart after a crash.

Looked pretty stable since the restart and have adjusted code again based of the last crash.

It looks like it's becoming more and more stable.

cheers
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
A side note to see if anyone feels the same...

skein just doesn't seem to earn enough... maybe its the algo switching and the larger value coins don't come in regularly enough to keep it profitable.  I have seen my average slowly decrease since adding all the algos so I think I may be pulling it from the batch;  but I will leave the code at the bottom for people to paste in if they want to use it.

Interested on any others opinions....

"maybe its the algo switching and the larger value coins don't come in regularly enough to keep it profitable"

not sure that makes sense from a statistical point of view.
Yes all profits are down .... almost to the level of nicehash ..it should be much higher because the coins we mine are low difficulty coins. I can see it on Minercontrol. Use to make .06 BTC a day now .016 BTC.
Then again it could be coins like DECRED that one doesn't make a profit on...that should be taken out of my jason file. It may help.

MINERCONTROL--

I gave MinerControl another look yesterday.  The configuration file is a beast!  As far as I know, Zpool and NiceHash are the two pools to configure, at least for a start.  What do you use to edit the configuration?  WordPad, or Word?, The default configuration file included in the zip is formatted too much to make sense in Notepad.  EDIT:  I cut and pasted from the MinerControl OP, and will start with just Zpool.  The cut-and-paste fits fine in Notepad.

I also notice lower payoouts from Zpool.  Like some other posters have noted in various threads, the value of altcoins seems tied to the value of ETH and BTC.        --scryptr
http://pro.jsonlint.com/  to check my conf file and it straightens it out like on note pad. And I use note pad to copy and paste.
I guess you could use  http://pro.jsonlint.com/  also to modify the file.

>The default configuration file included in the zip is formatted too much to make sense in Notepad.<
Paste it on http://pro.jsonlint.com/  and then hit enter... straightens it right out so you can read it.

MINERCONTROL IS RUNNING! --

It took a while because the configuration file is so big.  I found a good example and reworked it.  I spent all afternoon, but it is running now.  Rainy day...

The switching seems more smooth than with a batch file.  I have configured NiceHash and Zpool.  Apparently, you can add non-listed algos if you are using a YAAMP clone, as I have been adding many of the Zpool algos.  

After I let it run overnight, I'll have a better opinion.       --scryptr
Yes the switching is great... you can have it do any type of switching due to the dynamic switching pivot amazing.
add non-listed algos? can you give me an example plz scryptr?
Can I see your conf file? pm me with that plz.
I wonder if suprnova pools could work with it?
I like to see the non listed algo's.  thx
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
SHA256 just back from DEAD for few hours. The average 24 Hours earning is still remain at 0.003. Unbelievable
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
SHA256 POOL IS DOWN--

Zero live miners, reported as "DEAD" by my miners.       -scryptr
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
A side note to see if anyone feels the same...

skein just doesn't seem to earn enough... maybe its the algo switching and the larger value coins don't come in regularly enough to keep it profitable.  I have seen my average slowly decrease since adding all the algos so I think I may be pulling it from the batch;  but I will leave the code at the bottom for people to paste in if they want to use it.

Interested on any others opinions....

"maybe its the algo switching and the larger value coins don't come in regularly enough to keep it profitable"

not sure that makes sense from a statistical point of view.
Yes all profits are down .... almost to the level of nicehash ..it should be much higher because the coins we mine are low difficulty coins. I can see it on Minercontrol. Use to make .06 BTC a day now .016 BTC.
Then again it could be coins like DECRED that one doesn't make a profit on...that should be taken out of my jason file. It may help.

MINERCONTROL--

I gave MinerControl another look yesterday.  The configuration file is a beast!  As far as I know, Zpool and NiceHash are the two pools to configure, at least for a start.  What do you use to edit the configuration?  WordPad, or Word?, The default configuration file included in the zip is formatted too much to make sense in Notepad.  EDIT:  I cut and pasted from the MinerControl OP, and will start with just Zpool.  The cut-and-paste fits fine in Notepad.

I also notice lower payoouts from Zpool.  Like some other posters have noted in various threads, the value of altcoins seems tied to the value of ETH and BTC.        --scryptr
http://pro.jsonlint.com/  to check my conf file and it straightens it out like on note pad. And I use note pad to copy and paste.
I guess you could use  http://pro.jsonlint.com/  also to modify the file.

>The default configuration file included in the zip is formatted too much to make sense in Notepad.<
Paste it on http://pro.jsonlint.com/  and then hit enter... straightens it right out so you can read it.

MINERCONTROL IS RUNNING! --

It took a while because the configuration file is so big.  I found a good example and reworked it.  I spent all afternoon, but it is running now.  Rainy day...

The switching seems more smooth than with a batch file.  I have configured NiceHash and Zpool.  Apparently, you can add non-listed algos if you are using a YAAMP clone, as I have been adding many of the Zpool algos. 

After I let it run overnight, I'll have a better opinion.       --scryptr
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
I mine because math
SHA256 has been down for 2 hours, any word on a fix? That profitability going un-mined  Undecided
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
A side note to see if anyone feels the same...

skein just doesn't seem to earn enough... maybe its the algo switching and the larger value coins don't come in regularly enough to keep it profitable.  I have seen my average slowly decrease since adding all the algos so I think I may be pulling it from the batch;  but I will leave the code at the bottom for people to paste in if they want to use it.

Interested on any others opinions....

"maybe its the algo switching and the larger value coins don't come in regularly enough to keep it profitable"

not sure that makes sense from a statistical point of view.
Yes all profits are down .... almost to the level of nicehash ..it should be much higher because the coins we mine are low difficulty coins. I can see it on Minercontrol. Use to make .06 BTC a day now .016 BTC.
Then again it could be coins like DECRED that one doesn't make a profit on...that should be taken out of my jason file. It may help.

MINERCONTROL--

I gave MinerControl another look yesterday.  The configuration file is a beast!  As far as I know, Zpool and NiceHash are the two pools to configure, at least for a start.  What do you use to edit the configuration?  WordPad, or Word?, The default configuration file included in the zip is formatted too much to make sense in Notepad.  EDIT:  I cut and pasted from the MinerControl OP, and will start with just Zpool.  The cut-and-paste fits fine in Notepad.

I also notice lower payoouts from Zpool.  Like some other posters have noted in various threads, the value of altcoins seems tied to the value of ETH and BTC.        --scryptr
http://pro.jsonlint.com/  to check my conf file and it straightens it out like on note pad. And I use note pad to copy and paste.
I guess you could use  http://pro.jsonlint.com/  also to modify the file.

>The default configuration file included in the zip is formatted too much to make sense in Notepad.<
Paste it on http://pro.jsonlint.com/  and then hit enter... straightens it right out so you can read it.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Added scryptn to the pool with MRY and some FUJI once it's sync'd



only get rejeced shares most of the time...
i have set scrypt:10 and have only 2/29 shares accepted. normal ?
using gigabyte gtx 750 ti

hrmmm I didn't see any errors I'll see if I can get some more testing on this one.
DJM34  should know from https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annpledge-for-the-release-of-100-faster-cuda-75-nvidia-miner-for-neoscrypt-1317772

Or ask in the Cuda mining thread  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-cudaminer-ccminer-cuda-based-mining-applications-windowslinuxmacosx-167229
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
I see the scryptn port was just turned on.... as I now see the 4 posts above this one =)

I can't find any support in any release of ccminer.   What a shame.

I believe cudaminer supports scryptn but that's ancient.

spent 30 min trying to get an app with it to no avail.    gave up.
Yes it looks like the links to the apps are gone.
I have everything ready to go for 2 years been awhile though ..I'm rusty .... it's a shame it was taken off.

Try http://ccminer.org/  for apps.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
A side note to see if anyone feels the same...

skein just doesn't seem to earn enough... maybe its the algo switching and the larger value coins don't come in regularly enough to keep it profitable.  I have seen my average slowly decrease since adding all the algos so I think I may be pulling it from the batch;  but I will leave the code at the bottom for people to paste in if they want to use it.

Interested on any others opinions....

It's a problem on all algo's where you have high difficulty high value blocks mixed with low difficulty low value coins. If you switch to Lyra2v2, you really hope for a VTC or MONA block to be found, otherwise your contribution gets wasted on low value merged mined coins.
One of the problems with myr-gr is that saffron is only functioning on 2.5 out of 5 algos. A lot of hash rate gets wasted on rejects until one of the other algos pushes it along.
Another problem is that some junk algo's such as c11 gets bursts of high pooled hash rate far above its average hash rate.
Another issue is that the block notify mechanism cannot solve blocks as fast as block winning hashes coming in on some coins.
I would suggest a longer algo wide PPLNS time period is considered, but there are many more issues as to why an algo falls short of its estimate.
On the c11 issue .. Minercontrol Kboma ver. 1.6.5.1 has a setting that ignores those spikes called outliers.
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
Hi. I have little farm(390, 3*290, 7950 Radeon) I try to run sgminer-5-1-0-yescrypt with folowing  conf file:
"intensity" : "9",
"worksize" : "16",
"kernel" : "yescrypt",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "512",
"shaders" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-engine" : "900",
"gpu-fan" : "50-95",
"auto-fan" : true,
"gpu-memclock" : "1300",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "10",
"temp-cutoff" : "85",
"temp-overheat" : "75",
"temp-target" : "65",
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "28",
"failover-switch-delay" : "60",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "7",
"tcp-keepalive" : "30",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}
Please tell what parameters I did right or wrong....
I have 1.7Khs on yescrypt on my farm - is it good?
Please tell what's the best way to run Radeon vards on yescrypt & what parameters I use to write in conf or but file.
What algo is the best way to mine on Radeon 7970 or 290?
Much thanks!!!
Pages:
Jump to: