Pages:
Author

Topic: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][BTC Multipool] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█ Paid 925+ BTC - page 7. (Read 217698 times)

legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1126
is MMR and NH blocked from using zpool? Still unable to connect to sha256.mine.zpool.ca:3333

I've been using NH, but not on SHA... can't see any reason they wouldn't connect...

Whats your mining address start with? just the first 5-6 is fine.

14R8wj

try now
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
is MMR and NH blocked from using zpool? Still unable to connect to sha256.mine.zpool.ca:3333

I've been using NH, but not on SHA... can't see any reason they wouldn't connect...

Whats your mining address start with? just the first 5-6 is fine.

14R8wj
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1126
is MMR and NH blocked from using zpool? Still unable to connect to sha256.mine.zpool.ca:3333

I've been using NH, but not on SHA... can't see any reason they wouldn't connect...

Whats your mining address start with? just the first 5-6 is fine.

looks like they were banned on that machine. I'll check into this a bit further but plz let me know your address, first 6 char
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1126
is MMR and NH blocked from using zpool? Still unable to connect to sha256.mine.zpool.ca:3333

I've been using NH, but not on SHA... can't see any reason they wouldn't connect...

Whats your mining address start with? just the first 5-6 is fine.
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
is MMR and NH blocked from using zpool? Still unable to connect to sha256.mine.zpool.ca:3333
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1126
All the fee's in the config are set at 2

https://github.com/tpruvot/yiimp/blob/next/web/serverconfig.sample.php#L18-L20

I do mention on the main page:

You can also use any valid wallet address from any of the coins we mine. This feature has had minimal testing so use at your own risk

But I'm not really sure why I did that, I've had it there since the beginning...
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
so brothas, in this test i've mined a piece of J (nist5) with payout to J.
pool took exactly 25% off me.




Good work. You just eliminated exchange issues as the problem. You mined J and got paid in J, no exchange required.

Edit: You also eliminated estimates as the problem. The only thing left is the distribution to users.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Does Someone have a x17 miner that work with rx 480,mine is constantly getting hardware errors
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
so tell me something, is the actual amount you get on par with your hash rate?

takes another test as well, and slightly more complex.
probably mining on single-coin pool here and the same coin/algo in another pool,
in parallel, 2 ~identical gpu/rigs, time-synced, looong run.
well maybe one rig mining 50/50 would suffice, can't tell for sure.
that may help to see share stats hype here if any.
volunteers ? i don't have time again Smiley

That information is already available from the image you posted.

You were monitoring 2 AUR blocks and the block size is 2.5.

.0071 * 2.5 = .01775 vs .01774
.0072 * 2.5 = .018     vs .018

Looks fine to me but I don't think this matters.  As long as the estimate matches the coin amount and price
before exchange, you should get the same value back. Did you check the price and calculate your own estimated
value?

there's nothing wrong with estimates and prices at all, everything checks out,
before exchange and after exchange, shit hits the fan only when it gets cleared

shares hype i meant smth like
pool stats: 0.017743 AUR 0.710% 0.00316
in fact: 0.01242 AUR 0.497% 0.00221
yep rather awkward and impossible if only 1 miner on the pool with no shares left from others,
but i can't think of another excuse for 30% fee.
btw i missed the moment when MYR exchanged to MYR,
can't tell if it's general fee or "exchange" fee (to other coins only)


About the shit hitting the fan when the block is cleared, I just noticed the blocks you highlighted were marked
as cleared but still showed their expected value in AUR, not a reduced value. No error there.

The amount deducted from your AUR pending was equal to the sum of the two blocks you hightlighed, so there is no problem
there either.

Everything in AUR looks correct all the way to the amount deducted on exchange.

The problem is either the exchanged amount (Myriad in your case) is incorrect or it's not being distributed to miners correctly.
That data is not available to users but might be in the logs. If only someone with access to them would check.

Regarding trading fees, you shouldn't pay any because you're paid in an altcoin which are payed out from mined coins.
Only BTC payouts require a trade on an exchange with a fee. The internal trade should also get a favourable price because
there is no bid/ask spread.


legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
so tell me something, is the actual amount you get on par with your hash rate?

takes another test as well, and slightly more complex.
probably mining on single-coin pool here and the same coin/algo in another pool,
in parallel, 2 ~identical gpu/rigs, time-synced, looong run.
well maybe one rig mining 50/50 would suffice, can't tell for sure.
that may help to see share stats hype here if any.
volunteers ? i don't have time again Smiley

That information is already available from the image you posted.

You were monitoring 2 AUR blocks and the block size is 2.5.

.0071 * 2.5 = .01775 vs .01774
.0072 * 2.5 = .018     vs .018

Looks fine to me but I don't think this matters.  As long as the estimate matches the coin amount and price
before exchange, you should get the same value back. Did you check the price and calculate your own estimated
value?
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
I can`t connect to zpool from miningrigrentals
sha256.mine.zpool.ca:3333

have you tried setting difficulty like d=8192 in the password field? The rig's description should mention minimal difficulty.
sr. member
Activity: 772
Merit: 261
I can`t connect to zpool from miningrigrentals
sha256.mine.zpool.ca:3333
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
Can anyone explain me how I managed to get negative profit from placing an order on nicehash with a price of 1.06 BTC/PH/day to zpool showing average profit estimate 0.00148 mBTC/GHs/day ? (sha256, no errors, no rejects)

You lose on nicehash fee.

You lose on payment tx to NH.

24hr estimates are for the previous 24hr with x hashrate;  not 24 with X plus your rental.


Many ways to loose on a rental.  If t was as easy as you think, machines would be rented 247 by the same people all tihe time earning profit.



I also agree: argon2 is crap.  I don't mine it anymore.

its better to be seller in NH than a buyer, renting.



In NH order details I noticed delta is very big (some 10% - 20%) and is related to "extra rewards" which NH is paying to miners (quote) "due to fast job switching or disconnects". Strange.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
so tell me something, is the actual amount you get on par with your hash rate?



using which profitability information for your hashrate?
legendary
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
so tell me something, is the actual amount you get on par with your hash rate?

hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
THE PHANTOM OF THE ZPOOL


as promised. after all it's plain and simple 30% fee,
the only excuse could be compensating hype of mined shares' stats

is the same seen on BTC addresses?? I haven't been able to tell, but perhaps there is a different code path for non btc exchanging??

all my payouts noted before where btc, so yes
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
THE PHANTOM OF THE ZPOOL



as promised. after all it's plain and simple 30% fee,
the only excuse could be compensating hype of mined shares' stats

im sorry but i dont understand this screen without any description of those numbers and what they mean and in which context they stand. i hope you can clarify Smiley

The problem is that Zpool over estimates the exchange values for coins (most of which are actually quite worthless). To calculate how much Zpool's estimates are off do: actual_last24h - (estimate_last24h*1000)

this sadly does not work for algorithms where ttf is high as actual24h is 0 when no block is found (like lbry when pool had 6gh/s)
also it is an average estimate which is useless for current switching, it is only useful to determine if mining a single algo on zpool is profitable

legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1126
THE PHANTOM OF THE ZPOOL


as promised. after all it's plain and simple 30% fee,
the only excuse could be compensating hype of mined shares' stats

is the same seen on BTC addresses?? I haven't been able to tell, but perhaps there is a different code path for non btc exchanging??
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
THE PHANTOM OF THE ZPOOL



as promised. after all it's plain and simple 30% fee,
the only excuse could be compensating hype of mined shares' stats

im sorry but i dont understand this screen without any description of those numbers and what they mean and in which context they stand. i hope you can clarify Smiley

The problem is that Zpool over estimates the exchange values for coins (most of which are actually quite worthless). To calculate how much Zpool's estimates are off do: actual_last24h - (estimate_last24h*1000)
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
ok thanks, this also proves my point and the points made by others
Pages:
Jump to: