Pages:
Author

Topic: ... - page 40. (Read 61015 times)

donator
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
August 18, 2015, 09:49:46 PM
#11
Looks like XT is a piece of shady bullshit. What will be in the next version ? Direct reporting to NSA ?
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
--------------->¿?
August 18, 2015, 09:49:11 PM
#10
This as been discussed in the open:

Quote
Default refresh period is 24 hours, controllable via the command line. New dependency on libcurl is added.

This improves robustness against Tor based jamming attacks. I have implemented this attack and tested it against the existing XT code: this version just ensures the data is fresh.

https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt/pull/20
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
August 18, 2015, 09:48:19 PM
#9
These things can through away Bitcoin into more problems.  So we must need to stick with Bitcoin Core.

I have been familiarizing myself with the issue and have to agree. Stick to core, there are many OTHER ways to achieve code fixes, larger block sizes, ect then a hard fork. The thought of this hard fork scares me to the point I'm ready to go into fiat until everything stablizes... It's making me sick....
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
August 18, 2015, 09:47:16 PM
#8
congratulation fuder you succes make bitcoin down

after this im sure wyou will create new account to trolling bitcoin price
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
August 18, 2015, 09:44:08 PM
#7
These things can through away Bitcoin into more problems.  So we must need to stick with Bitcoin Core.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
August 18, 2015, 09:34:19 PM
#6
this is why you never run code written by mike hearn

Heam is a true shitlord.  He'd have to be, in order to get laanwj this pissed:



Bitcoin's real chief dev was over Heam's toxic BS and privacy-hostile assclown antics long ago.  It's time for the rest of the us to catch up.

We should start referring to XT as 'PanoptiCoin.'
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Crypto-Games.net: DICE and SLOT
August 18, 2015, 09:17:51 PM
#5
If this is true this isn't just a case of FUD, it's rather damning. Again, I don't know if it's true, but it would essentially mean that it's a soft roll-out of removed anonymity which down the line becomes more apparent with further excuses/reasons for changing things further.

Intelligent infiltration always happens in increments.

Can someone weigh in on this code?
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
--------------->¿?
August 18, 2015, 08:56:44 PM
#4
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
August 18, 2015, 08:51:57 PM
#3
this is why you never run code written by mike hearn
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
August 18, 2015, 08:51:46 PM
#2
yes more control is always gained under the disguise of protectionism  Lips sealed
full member
Activity: 197
Merit: 100
August 18, 2015, 08:48:48 PM
#1
...
Pages:
Jump to: