Pages:
Author

Topic: : (Read 70881 times)

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
:
February 15, 2012, 06:55:40 PM

No textbooks are squarish, this is much more rounded... Cheesy lmfao


As always, thank you for your valuable contribution Wink.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
You're fat, because you dont have any pics on FB
February 15, 2012, 06:32:27 PM
Here is a look at the ratio of cumulative $ volume vs cumulative BTC volume over time. So far the highest peak was at $6.65 on September 8, 2011. Linear scale.



Gartner hype cycle..

Textbook.

No textbooks are squarish, this is much more rounded... Cheesy lmfao
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
You're fat, because you dont have any pics on FB
February 14, 2012, 07:57:43 PM
Here is a look at the ratio of cumulative $ volume vs cumulative BTC volume over time. So far the highest peak was at $6.65 on September 8, 2011. Linear scale.



Gartner hype cycle..
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
this statement is false
February 14, 2012, 07:22:18 PM
Random reinforcement still seems to be the order of the day.

This tells me that profits from trading will remain easy pickings in the foreseeable future.

maybe sharing your charts added stability to the market?  Huh
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
February 11, 2012, 02:58:53 PM
Seeing that the order book seems to be converging on my support resistance chart I am going to stop feeding information into the market altogether... For now.

Sorry guys, it's for science.

For Science!
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
this statement is false
February 11, 2012, 02:26:14 PM
Seeing that the order book seems to be converging on my support resistance chart I am going to stop feeding information into the market altogether... For now.

Sorry guys, it's for science.

lol i noticed that but didn't say anything because i rely on your analysis so much Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077
February 10, 2012, 06:25:26 PM
Interesting charts you have there, chodpada. The Price/$ Volume somewhat scares me: it indicates the dollars pumped into the market since the June 2011 peak is close to 8 times the amount that brought Bitcoin to that peak. Is this interpretation correct, or am I missing something?
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
bitcoin hundred-aire
February 10, 2012, 12:22:04 PM
I see... interesting.  So since you're simply correlating time series, what role does the "volume needed to move price" diagram play in your analysis?
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
this statement is false
February 05, 2012, 04:55:50 AM
combined with the recent market resilience to the small correction back to $5.70, i'd say it looks rather bullish
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
February 01, 2012, 10:22:17 PM
What proportion of those "steps" occur at a multiple of 10 cents? It looks like all of them. Do you round to the nearest $0.1?
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
bitcoin hundred-aire
February 01, 2012, 05:42:58 PM
dang, missed the action!

Did the walls get bought up or were they removed?
there is a 19k wall that is moving 0.05 USD up every 5 min or so

what will it do when it gets to $6.2 Shocked
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
February 01, 2012, 05:36:10 PM
dang, missed the action!

Did the walls get bought up or were they removed?
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
[#][#][#]
February 01, 2012, 05:13:02 PM
Oops, we just broke a few walls.  Time to reevaluate...

 Smiley
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
bitcoin hundred-aire
February 01, 2012, 05:02:10 PM
Oops, we just broke a few walls.  Time to reevaluate...
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
this statement is false
February 01, 2012, 05:03:19 AM
looks fairly bullish when combined with recent uptrends and the ability of the price to coast back to $7 once we get over this very next level of resistance...
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
January 31, 2012, 01:30:56 PM
we're looking quite entrenched, for the moment.

stable perhaps?

Whale can come by at any moment and blow everyone's expectations out of the water.

Except for the expectation that a whale will come by at any moment Cheesy

sleepy squirrel?
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
January 31, 2012, 11:59:28 AM
It is actually more likely that we have two or more bots battling each other. That can make it very difficult to tease out individual strategies.

zby
legendary
Activity: 1592
Merit: 1001
January 31, 2012, 10:23:05 AM
No, what I’m saying is the buying happened AFTER the bot put up some big bids. It was definitely a bot because a) the bids were of the same size and b) the order book transformed within minutes, it was over 53k to $5 at the peak. Now it’s back to "normal".

What I do not get is WTF happened thereafter. Bids withdrawn and someone sold into it?

Maybe this is an attempt to get the Bitcoinica longs to leverage up more? Grin
So you say that he bot provoked someone to buy?  This can be a possible bot strategy - it leave asks and then try to push someone to buy them.  When they are bought remove the bids and hope for the price to return to the base.
N12
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
January 31, 2012, 10:01:49 AM
No, what I’m saying is the buying happened AFTER the bot put up some big bids. It was definitely a bot because a) the bids were of the same size and b) the order book transformed within minutes, it was over 53k to $5 at the peak. Now it’s back to "normal".

What I do not get is WTF happened thereafter. Bids withdrawn and someone sold into it?

Maybe this is an attempt to get the Bitcoinica longs to leverage up more? Grin
zby
legendary
Activity: 1592
Merit: 1001
January 31, 2012, 09:56:01 AM
The upwards pressure was initiated buy a bot putting up bigger, evenly sized bit near the market price. The bids then vanished after there was some buying.

Maybe it’s one bot trying to create VOLATILITY so it can profit?

Or it’s two fighting bots. I don’t know.
I did not look very carefully - but what I've seen is that there was a strong buy up to 5.57 - with a sizeable leftover that was later moved back to 5.16.  Did the bot participate in this?
Pages:
Jump to: