#1
Аккаунт:
Копия:
Perhaps no one will argue with the fact that Bitcoin is just a digital currency. Initially, this coin was created for payments and a limited range of tasks. Proceeding from this, the scope of using crypto currency is limited. Nevertheless, the prospects of development as a currency, a means of payment from this less did not. A highly specialized asset will cope with the original purpose more effectively than a universal tool. Judge for yourself, a professional camera will always make better pictures in comparison with a smartphone. However, this analogy can also be used in the opposite direction, for example, you can not call from the camera, respectively, and Bitcoin is deprived of additional functions.
The Ethereum system is a platform that is based on Block Chain technology, in other words it is not a digital currency in the traditional sense. For example, using this system you can work with Smart contracts, and this platform can be used to further implement certain projects in a decentralized environment. As a result, the Efirium is not interested in simply because it is a reliable means of payment. Of course, this has a positive effect on the investment attractiveness of the asset. However, the principle of "bearish service" can always work. Therefore, no one can answer with a maximum accuracy to the question that Betcoin or Etherium is more profitable. In fact, each of these systems has certain strengths and weaknesses, so there is no unambiguous inference and can not be.
(Архив)The Ethereum system is a platform that is based on Block Chain technology, in other words it is not a digital currency in the traditional sense. For example, using this system you can work with Smart contracts, and this platform can be used to further implement certain projects in a decentralized environment. As a result, the Efirium is not interested in simply because it is a reliable means of payment. Of course, this has a positive effect on the investment attractiveness of the asset. However, the principle of "bearish service" can always work. Therefore, no one can answer with a maximum accuracy to the question that Betcoin or Etherium is more profitable. In fact, each of these systems has certain strengths and weaknesses, so there is no unambiguous inference and can not be.
Оригинал:
With a certain amount of fantasy, one may get the impression that bitcoin belongs to the class of so-called "Giffen goods". This term describes a product, the demand for which increases as its price rises. This is the goods, the demand curve for which is tilted up. The prehistory of the origin of the term is as follows. English economist Robert Giffen in the second half of the 19 century drew attention to an interesting fact - during the famine in Ireland, the demand for potatoes, the price of which was constantly growing, increased significantly, which looked frankly illogical. However, such a paradoxical effect was observed extremely rarely, and only with respect to the goods, without which it is absolutely impossible to do without. This was in the case described with the "potato famine" in Ireland, similar to rice in China. Obviously, bitcoin does not belong to the vital goods. Rather, "Giffen's goods" is an entertaining anomaly, mainly useful in verifying students' understanding of the subtleties of income and replacement effects. But why the dynamics of the course and the volumes of bitcoin trade correspond to the way prices and sales volumes of "Giffen's goods" behave? Perhaps, because in the world the point of view is increasingly popular: bitcoin is an excellent option to save and increase savings. While everything says about the correctness of this thesis. However, it is not known how long the present situation will last.
(Архив)Оригинал:
A bank is a third person, which only complicates the whole process of transferring or receiving money between people. With this, a significant commission is charged for their services. Everyone understands that this is what banks do to themselves a certain profit. But with the advent of crypto currency, such commercial companies lose their value in the financial world. Who needs these inconveniences when transferring funds? Why complicate your life, pay extra money and wait for a long translation time, if you can just solve everything with the help of digital currencies ...
Such a state of affairs is understood by all the banking organizations of the world, which were so much in demand in the past. Now their need is quietly going to second place, as more people are beginning to understand what crypto currency is and what advantages it gives. And this is a big problem for banks, as this will make them incapable of further existence, due to their gradual exclusion from the financial system. In connection with such financial freedom from the banking system, the leaders of various commercial organizations will continue to tell people through various sources of paid media that the crypto currency is a bubble that will soon burst. That all this is a deception and a conspiracy. However, already now there is a lot of evidence that the top guiding echelons of banks continue to unnoticedly buy up the crypto currency and keep it in their caches. This is done, of course, in order to increase investment. And this is worth thinking about ... Therefore, I am quite confident that the banks in the near future will leave the stage!
(Архив)Such a state of affairs is understood by all the banking organizations of the world, which were so much in demand in the past. Now their need is quietly going to second place, as more people are beginning to understand what crypto currency is and what advantages it gives. And this is a big problem for banks, as this will make them incapable of further existence, due to their gradual exclusion from the financial system. In connection with such financial freedom from the banking system, the leaders of various commercial organizations will continue to tell people through various sources of paid media that the crypto currency is a bubble that will soon burst. That all this is a deception and a conspiracy. However, already now there is a lot of evidence that the top guiding echelons of banks continue to unnoticedly buy up the crypto currency and keep it in their caches. This is done, of course, in order to increase investment. And this is worth thinking about ... Therefore, I am quite confident that the banks in the near future will leave the stage!
Оригинал:
Giants of the crypto-currency world are striving to maximize their activities and strengthen the market. That there is only one Bitmain. "Miner's expansion" - in another way you will not name.
Let's remember: back in January Bitmain announced the move from China to Switzerland, then to Canada and finally to the US. While Bitmain "arranges comfortable", the rest can only shrug.
Bitmain seized the market and discarded all its competitors for many years to come.
Bitmain is a good example of how a bunch of people can manipulate the market. Thought that Trump's publication on Twitter could affect the dollar? Maybe. But the next bitmix from Bitmain can affect the bitcoin rate. Information has long been leaked about the fact that they made a more recent nook, more steep chips. As you can see, they do not hurry to sell it, we do not see them on the market with you.
Do you think that they can manipulate the market only by increasing the hashed? Or throwing power from one coin to another? Hardly.
They can easily push the price if they want to. In the same way they can ramp it. Their hashed allows them to hunt hundreds of bitcoins daily. On their accounts, a huge number of different crypto-currencies. I'm already silent about their sales revenue from sales of asics.
I hasten to please: bitcoin is unlikely to fall. It's not profitable for anyone, starting with the same Bitmain, ending with AMD or Nvidia. Have you seen what happens to their shares since the beginning of 17? And you have burned.
Last year, Bitmain received only officially $ 4 billion in profits, Nvidia received the same amount, but if the latter company went to this for 24 years, Bitmain managed to do it in 4 years. Think about it ... Die the crypto currency or not!
(Архив)Let's remember: back in January Bitmain announced the move from China to Switzerland, then to Canada and finally to the US. While Bitmain "arranges comfortable", the rest can only shrug.
Bitmain seized the market and discarded all its competitors for many years to come.
Bitmain is a good example of how a bunch of people can manipulate the market. Thought that Trump's publication on Twitter could affect the dollar? Maybe. But the next bitmix from Bitmain can affect the bitcoin rate. Information has long been leaked about the fact that they made a more recent nook, more steep chips. As you can see, they do not hurry to sell it, we do not see them on the market with you.
Do you think that they can manipulate the market only by increasing the hashed? Or throwing power from one coin to another? Hardly.
They can easily push the price if they want to. In the same way they can ramp it. Their hashed allows them to hunt hundreds of bitcoins daily. On their accounts, a huge number of different crypto-currencies. I'm already silent about their sales revenue from sales of asics.
I hasten to please: bitcoin is unlikely to fall. It's not profitable for anyone, starting with the same Bitmain, ending with AMD or Nvidia. Have you seen what happens to their shares since the beginning of 17? And you have burned.
Last year, Bitmain received only officially $ 4 billion in profits, Nvidia received the same amount, but if the latter company went to this for 24 years, Bitmain managed to do it in 4 years. Think about it ... Die the crypto currency or not!
Оригинал:
The assumption that bitcoin can replace the Fiat money is absurd and can not be seriously considered. The number of virtual coins can be mined 21 million. This is not enough for the world economy. This is only one of 1000 reasons why the replacement will not happen.
Another reason is the difficulty in using crypto currency for most people. Storage on a digital wallet carrier with all transactions is not the most convenient format for many. The variant with the sites providing services for storage and work with digital accounts is not considered - anonymity and decentralization are lost, and with them and the meaning of such a replacement.
(Архив)Another reason is the difficulty in using crypto currency for most people. Storage on a digital wallet carrier with all transactions is not the most convenient format for many. The variant with the sites providing services for storage and work with digital accounts is not considered - anonymity and decentralization are lost, and with them and the meaning of such a replacement.
Оригинал:
The ICO market begins to calm down after an unprecedented rush and gradually turns into a stable and reliable tool for crowdfunding. When crypto community realized all the charm of smart contracts, then with the help of ether began to release tokens. Now there are four main types of tokens: Payment, Donation, Utility and Security. Over the past two years, Utility has been able to collect a huge amount of money on kriptornke using the tool ICO.
After the explosions in the collections of 2016 and 2017 (about $ 4 billion and $ 6 billion, respectively) summer of 2018 came - ICO volumes fell by about 10 times. According to the chairman of the expert council, the cause itself was kriptornok - influence is exerted both by the fall of the BTC rate, and the projects of previous years, which did not justify themselves. Koltsov believes these factors are the main reasons why investors stopped believing and investing in Utility tokens and startups. So it seems to me that the ICO time is most likely coming to an end.
(Архив)After the explosions in the collections of 2016 and 2017 (about $ 4 billion and $ 6 billion, respectively) summer of 2018 came - ICO volumes fell by about 10 times. According to the chairman of the expert council, the cause itself was kriptornok - influence is exerted both by the fall of the BTC rate, and the projects of previous years, which did not justify themselves. Koltsov believes these factors are the main reasons why investors stopped believing and investing in Utility tokens and startups. So it seems to me that the ICO time is most likely coming to an end.
Оригинал:
All because it refers to revolutionary technologies. Block chains are the technology underlying the Bitcoin crypto currency, which is characterized by high security, transparency and resistance to change. At the same time, block circuits have much more potential than one that can be implemented in digital currency. This technology makes transactions between two objects possible without an intermediary in the face of the clearing center, which significantly reduces the time and cost of the transaction. Moreover, when combined with "smart" contracts, block-chain technology allows you to automatically issue digital securities and trade financial derivatives. For example, the insurance industry has a great potential, which can offer new opportunities for the application of block-chain technology.
(Архив)Оригинал:
Блочные цепи – технология, лежащая в основе криптовалюты Bitcoin, которая характеризуется высокой безопасностью, прозрачностью и устойчивостью к изменениям. При этом, блочные цепи обладают значительно большим потенциалом, чем тот, который может быть реализован в цифровой валюте. Эта технология делает возможным транзакции между двумя объектами без посредника в лице клирингового центра, что значительно снижает время и стоимость транзакции. Более того, при объединении с «умными» контрактами, технология блочных цепей позволяет автоматически эмитировать цифровые ценные бумаги и торговать финансовыми деривативами. Например, страховая индустрия обладает большим потенциалом, способным предложить новые возможности для применения технологии блочных цепей.
