Betcoin confiscated 7 BTC from KGambler for what they called bonus abuse. KGamber had civilized communications with Betcoin. When Betcoin didn't pay, KGambler took it to the forum. Both sides posted their story. The posters then stated their opinions and KGambler was paid. That's the way it should work.
bplayer threatened Anonibet with his first post
From the very start I wanted to be clear that I will make our dispute public unless I'm satisfied.
The purpose of this thread is not to threaten books. We are all here for the benefit of the players. We try to help them get paid and the ratings serve as a guide to help players determine where they will play. It's unfortunate that bplayer made a threat in post #1. Anonibet is in a situation now where they can't give in. I wish that this thread could work in a similar fashion as KGamler/Bercoin, but it's too late for that.
When gogo posted why Anonibet should change their 5% rule, Anonibet reconsidered and the rule was changed. When Anonibet overpaid Bitcoinzrulez 15 BTC, Bitcoinzrulez was the first to bring it to the forums. Prior to Bitcoinzrulez paying the 15 BTC back, Anonibet took full responsibility and stated that Bitcoinzrulez was not a scammer.
We don't even have all the facts of the bplayer/Anonibet case. Anonibet posted that bplayer is a long time player and this is his first problem. Due to the way bplayer handled this case, all the facts aren't going to come out. I can't see how a downgrade would be justified. In the future, I hope that players take the KGambler approach. This way the player, book and posters can all have input in one thread.