Topic: #1 RATINGS of BITCOIN SPORTSBOOKS since 2014 : KYC Rankings, Bonuses, Scam Accus - page 55. (Read 260310 times)
August 10, 2019, 06:04:32 PM
August 07, 2019, 03:33:31 PM
August 04, 2019, 10:01:42 PM
Nitrogen has a free pool that pays .2 BTC.
https://blog.nitrogensports.eu/nfl-survivor-pool
any other books have a Survivor Pool?
https://blog.nitrogensports.eu/nfl-survivor-pool
any other books have a Survivor Pool?
August 01, 2019, 07:43:23 PM
Books - If you have a NFL Survivor pool going this year, feel free to post details. I know that Nitrogen and Bitcoinrush had pools last year.
August 01, 2019, 07:27:04 PM
It's fine to make money. It's not ok to act like your ratings are impartial if you aren't willing to share the financial details of your relationships with the books.
Just share how much money you've made from each book you're currently rating in this thread, by week, month, quarter? Whatever. This will make your ratings so much more valuable for the rest of the community.
Be transparent. Please.
Just share how much money you've made from each book you're currently rating in this thread, by week, month, quarter? Whatever. This will make your ratings so much more valuable for the rest of the community.
Be transparent. Please.
I know that this is probably the wrong time to chime in and I will probably get shouted down, but we have never been approached or have offered anything to @PeepsPlace for anything that is written in this thread. I don't know if he has a separate affiliate account with us, but I have just checked and none of his links have an affiliate ID. Sometimes people just try and do the right thing by others.
Thanks Shaun.
August 01, 2019, 06:09:50 PM
It's fine to make money. It's not ok to act like your ratings are impartial if you aren't willing to share the financial details of your relationships with the books.
Just share how much money you've made from each book you're currently rating in this thread, by week, month, quarter? Whatever. This will make your ratings so much more valuable for the rest of the community.
Be transparent. Please.
Just share how much money you've made from each book you're currently rating in this thread, by week, month, quarter? Whatever. This will make your ratings so much more valuable for the rest of the community.
Be transparent. Please.
I know that this is probably the wrong time to chime in and I will probably get shouted down, but we have never been approached or have offered anything to @PeepsPlace for anything that is written in this thread. I don't know if he has a separate affiliate account with us, but I have just checked and none of his links have an affiliate ID. Sometimes people just try and do the right thing by others.
July 31, 2019, 07:40:06 AM
If anyone is having problems with a payout, please post it here. If you would like help, I'll contact the book on your behalf if given permission.
July 31, 2019, 06:48:19 AM
Please post a review if you have any experiences with the following "NR" books.
NR - not rated.
betbit.com
betopen.co
bitgame.online
dbet.io
spirebet.com
uobet.com
zombiewager.com
NR - not rated.
betbit.com
betopen.co
bitgame.online
dbet.io
spirebet.com
uobet.com
zombiewager.com
July 31, 2019, 06:40:13 AM
It's fine to make money. It's not ok to act like your ratings are impartial if you aren't willing to share the financial details of your relationships with the books.
Just share how much money you've made from each book you're currently rating in this thread, by week, month, quarter? Whatever. This will make your ratings so much more valuable for the rest of the community.
Be transparent. Please.
Zero from this thread and the links aren't affiliate links from the ratings below. The ratings are identical to the average of the other three guides. I'm not going to rehash this again.Just share how much money you've made from each book you're currently rating in this thread, by week, month, quarter? Whatever. This will make your ratings so much more valuable for the rest of the community.
Be transparent. Please.
Nitrogen is rated #1 at all four guides. Betcoin is 2nd averaging the other three guides. Those two are the "A" rated books.
"A" rated books
nitrogensports.eu A+ (2013)
betcoin.ag A (2013)
"B"rated books
bitcoinrush.io B+ (2013)
"C" rated books
mBet.io C+ (2017)
betbtc.co C (2014)
fortunejack.com C (2019) sportsbook, (2014) casino.
anonibet.com C- (2011)
jetwin.ps C- (2013)
playbetr.com C- (2019)
"D" rated books
cloudbet.com D+ (2013)
coinbet24.com D+ (2015)
1xbit.com D (2016)
lunarbets.eu D (2016)
Ryan K's guide -
Quote
#1 nitrogensports.eu
#2 bitcoinrush.io
#3 betcoin.ag
#4 cloudbet.com
#5 sportsbet.io
#6 fairlay.com
#7 anonibet.com
#8 coinbet24.com
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-sports-betting-review-best-btc-sportsbooks-2018-customer-feedback-577102#2 bitcoinrush.io
#3 betcoin.ag
#4 cloudbet.com
#5 sportsbet.io
#6 fairlay.com
#7 anonibet.com
#8 coinbet24.com
FrueGreed's guide
Quote
(4.13) NitrogenSports.eu
(3.95) Fairlay.com
(3.88) Bitcoinrush.io
(3.69) Sportsbet.io
(3.07) Betcoin.ag
(3.00) Cloudbet
(2.58) 1xbit
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/sports-book-rankings-completely-user-generated-1820529(3.95) Fairlay.com
(3.88) Bitcoinrush.io
(3.69) Sportsbet.io
(3.07) Betcoin.ag
(3.00) Cloudbet
(2.58) 1xbit
sportsbettor's guide
Quote
The first 10 Sportsbooks of our Rating at the moment looks like this:
Nitrogen Sports
BetCoin
Cloudbet
Sportsbet.io
1xBit
Bitcoin Rush
mBit Sports
JetWin
Fairlay
Anonibet
I used the books that are included in all four rating's guide. Then I averaged the rating's from the three other guides. They are identical to the rating's I put up in this thread.
1. Nitrogen
2. Betcoin
3. Bitcoinrush
4. Cloudbet
5. 1xbit
July 31, 2019, 04:19:51 AM
It's fine to make money. It's not ok to act like your ratings are impartial if you aren't willing to share the financial details of your relationships with the books.
Just share how much money you've made from each book you're currently rating in this thread, by week, month, quarter? Whatever. This will make your ratings so much more valuable for the rest of the community.
Be transparent. Please.
Just share how much money you've made from each book you're currently rating in this thread, by week, month, quarter? Whatever. This will make your ratings so much more valuable for the rest of the community.
Be transparent. Please.
July 31, 2019, 02:17:03 AM
Betlake.com changed from "NR" to "F". Betlake opened in 2018. The site is currently up but was down for a period of over one month. There are currently unpaid players.
July 31, 2019, 01:48:03 AM
Add dbet.io to NR. If someone is playing there, please post a review.
July 31, 2019, 01:45:01 AM
I think it has never been in a stance of "this is the best ranking" type of deal, it was more like "lets come together and vote for the sportsbooks". It has never been objective in the sense that it has data that can back this up or what not, it doesn't use some algorithm or whatever to make the list more technological or robotic.
It is just a place where peep does whatever he wants and he comes in talks about what has changed in what place and what has improved, we go and play in those places and then we all come here and talk about how we feel about the sportsbook in general. If you can provide proof of you not being able to withdraw for 24 hours for example, peep would take notice and go do it himself too, if he has the same problem then he will downgrade it. This is not a universal ranking system, it is just us doing whatever we want.
It is just a place where peep does whatever he wants and he comes in talks about what has changed in what place and what has improved, we go and play in those places and then we all come here and talk about how we feel about the sportsbook in general. If you can provide proof of you not being able to withdraw for 24 hours for example, peep would take notice and go do it himself too, if he has the same problem then he will downgrade it. This is not a universal ranking system, it is just us doing whatever we want.
I agree with a lot of what you have written. This is a thread where we all come together to post our experiences and thoughts on sportsbooks. As you said if there's a problem in a payout, I'll try one myself and also contact the book on the player's behalf.
Because this is a conglomeration of thoughts, it does portray a realistic view of ratings. It's best to look at many ratings guides. This one seems to be in line with most. Nitrogen and Betcoin are at or near the top of most guides.
I know we've been over this before, but...
this isn't a thread where "where we all come together to post our experiences and thoughts on sportsbooks"
It's a thread that allows you to make a lot of money off some combination of affiliate/shady off the record payments to keep certain books at the top and others at the bottom. (see my previous trust ref for evidence)
You could really clear all this up by being 100% transparent when it comes to how much money you have received/expect to receive/what kind of deal you have from each book....
It's fine to make money. It's not ok to act like your ratings are impartial if you aren't willing to share the financial details of your relationships with the books.
Just share how much money you've made from each book you're currently rating in this thread, by week, month, quarter? Whatever. This will make your ratings so much more valuable for the rest of the community.
Be transparent. Please.
I doubt you will do this though. And it's terribly obvious why.
July 30, 2019, 11:37:40 PM
I think it has never been in a stance of "this is the best ranking" type of deal, it was more like "lets come together and vote for the sportsbooks". It has never been objective in the sense that it has data that can back this up or what not, it doesn't use some algorithm or whatever to make the list more technological or robotic.
It is just a place where peep does whatever he wants and he comes in talks about what has changed in what place and what has improved, we go and play in those places and then we all come here and talk about how we feel about the sportsbook in general. If you can provide proof of you not being able to withdraw for 24 hours for example, peep would take notice and go do it himself too, if he has the same problem then he will downgrade it. This is not a universal ranking system, it is just us doing whatever we want.
It is just a place where peep does whatever he wants and he comes in talks about what has changed in what place and what has improved, we go and play in those places and then we all come here and talk about how we feel about the sportsbook in general. If you can provide proof of you not being able to withdraw for 24 hours for example, peep would take notice and go do it himself too, if he has the same problem then he will downgrade it. This is not a universal ranking system, it is just us doing whatever we want.
I agree with a lot of what you have written. This is a thread where we all come together to post our experiences and thoughts on sportsbooks. As you said if there's a problem in a payout, I'll try one myself and also contact the book on the player's behalf.
Because this is a conglomeration of thoughts, it does portray a realistic view of ratings. It's best to look at many ratings guides. This one seems to be in line with most. Nitrogen and Betcoin are at or near the top of most guides.
I know we've been over this before, but...
this isn't a thread where "where we all come together to post our experiences and thoughts on sportsbooks"
It's a thread that allows you to make a lot of money off some combination of affiliate/shady off the record payments to keep certain books at the top and others at the bottom. (see my previous trust ref for evidence)
You could really clear all this up by being 100% transparent when it comes to how much money you have received/expect to receive/what kind of deal you have from each book....
It's fine to make money. It's not ok to act like your ratings are impartial if you aren't willing to share the financial details of your relationships with the books.
Just share how much money you've made from each book you're currently rating in this thread, by week, month, quarter? Whatever. This will make your ratings so much more valuable for the rest of the community.
Be transparent. Please.
I doubt you will do this though. And it's terribly obvious why.
July 27, 2019, 05:37:11 PM
I think it has never been in a stance of "this is the best ranking" type of deal, it was more like "lets come together and vote for the sportsbooks". It has never been objective in the sense that it has data that can back this up or what not, it doesn't use some algorithm or whatever to make the list more technological or robotic.
It is just a place where peep does whatever he wants and he comes in talks about what has changed in what place and what has improved, we go and play in those places and then we all come here and talk about how we feel about the sportsbook in general. If you can provide proof of you not being able to withdraw for 24 hours for example, peep would take notice and go do it himself too, if he has the same problem then he will downgrade it. This is not a universal ranking system, it is just us doing whatever we want.
It is just a place where peep does whatever he wants and he comes in talks about what has changed in what place and what has improved, we go and play in those places and then we all come here and talk about how we feel about the sportsbook in general. If you can provide proof of you not being able to withdraw for 24 hours for example, peep would take notice and go do it himself too, if he has the same problem then he will downgrade it. This is not a universal ranking system, it is just us doing whatever we want.
I agree with a lot of what you have written. This is a thread where we all come together to post our experiences and thoughts on sportsbooks. As you said if there's a problem in a payout, I'll try one myself and also contact the book on the player's behalf.
Because this is a conglomeration of thoughts, it does portray a realistic view of ratings. It's best to look at many ratings guides. This one seems to be in line with most. Nitrogen and Betcoin are at or near the top of most guides.
July 27, 2019, 02:51:34 PM
I think it has never been in a stance of "this is the best ranking" type of deal, it was more like "lets come together and vote for the sportsbooks". It has never been objective in the sense that it has data that can back this up or what not, it doesn't use some algorithm or whatever to make the list more technological or robotic.
It is just a place where peep does whatever he wants and he comes in talks about what has changed in what place and what has improved, we go and play in those places and then we all come here and talk about how we feel about the sportsbook in general. If you can provide proof of you not being able to withdraw for 24 hours for example, peep would take notice and go do it himself too, if he has the same problem then he will downgrade it. This is not a universal ranking system, it is just us doing whatever we want.
It is just a place where peep does whatever he wants and he comes in talks about what has changed in what place and what has improved, we go and play in those places and then we all come here and talk about how we feel about the sportsbook in general. If you can provide proof of you not being able to withdraw for 24 hours for example, peep would take notice and go do it himself too, if he has the same problem then he will downgrade it. This is not a universal ranking system, it is just us doing whatever we want.
July 27, 2019, 12:47:48 AM
July 25, 2019, 06:13:31 PM
I feel this must be very difficult to achieve, to be independent, but does that make you a sportsbook of choice for people? I guess the only way to find out is if the odds are actually different for them. I have learned now that sportsbooks that pay out with no fuss or shady business is of course most important,,, but it helps if the odds are better.
We are in a agreement here on this point. Why would being "independent" in this case be any advantage whatsoever for the gambler? Especially if your "independent" odds are worst then most sportsbooks. Yes,,, I thought about it as well and looked even more online and it is actually very expensive to be independent. It means you have to do your own research and either hire other people to do the calculations or buy a software to do it for you,,, I think many people would prefer to enjoy other benefits especially better odds. And better odds means the site has to cut down on cost and just take odds from another provider, maybe tweak it a little.
July 25, 2019, 06:11:11 PM
There are many bitcoin sportsbook that already existed. In fact, I never seen the nitrogen sport right now. But I know that they are operating till now. I am just not quite popular with this bitcoin sportsbook. Anyway, fortunejack is also. That is my site when I needed also a past time.
July 25, 2019, 06:03:40 PM
"A" and "B" books are recommended.
"A" rated books
nitrogensports.eu A+ (2013)
betcoin.ag A (2013)
"B"rated books
bitcoinrush.io B+ (2013)
"C" rated books
mBet.io C+ (2017)
betbtc.co C (2014)
fortunejack.com C (2019) sportsbook, (2014) casino.
anonibet.com C- (2011)
jetwin.ps C- (2013)
playbetr.com C- (2019)
"D" rated books
cloudbet.com D+ (2013)
coinbet24.com D+ (2015)
1xbit.com D (2016)
email: [email protected] and support ticket........Reduced juice: Yes
email: [email protected] and support ticket.................Reduced juice: Yes
email: [email protected]..........................................Reduced juice: Yes.
email: [email protected]................................. Reduced juice: No
email: [email protected].............................................Reduced juice: No
email: [email protected] Under maintenance....................Reduced juice: No
email: [email protected] ......................................Two sets of lines.
email: [email protected] .......................................Reduced juice:Yes
"A" rated books
nitrogensports.eu A+ (2013)
betcoin.ag A (2013)
"B"rated books
bitcoinrush.io B+ (2013)
"C" rated books
mBet.io C+ (2017)
betbtc.co C (2014)
fortunejack.com C (2019) sportsbook, (2014) casino.
anonibet.com C- (2011)
jetwin.ps C- (2013)
playbetr.com C- (2019)
"D" rated books
cloudbet.com D+ (2013)
coinbet24.com D+ (2015)
1xbit.com D (2016)
email: [email protected] and support ticket........Reduced juice: Yes
email: [email protected] and support ticket.................Reduced juice: Yes
email: [email protected]..........................................Reduced juice: Yes.
email: [email protected]................................. Reduced juice: No
email: [email protected].............................................Reduced juice: No
email: [email protected] Under maintenance....................Reduced juice: No
email: [email protected] ......................................Two sets of lines.
email: [email protected] .......................................Reduced juice:Yes
Jump to: