1XBIT.COM ᐉ 7 BTC WB ᐉ Altcoin Betting ᐉ no KYC ᕗ Instant payouts - page 269.

Haunebu

hero member

Activity: 3178

Merit: 977

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

Quote from: Naficopa on August 28, 2021, 09:22:19 AM

It is obvious that everyone is closely watching what is happening with 1xBit. I would like these people to speak objectively about this situation and not to shout accusations based on the past, which at this point has nothing to do with the current situation of 1xBit.

Nonsense. Stating that the past accusations have nothing to do with the current state of 1xbit is absurd and dumb. Open your eyes instead of covering them up because of your earnings from their ongoing signature campaign.

@kontrakwel just posted below your post claiming that he lost 550 mbtc which is a huge amount. This is just one among many recent scam accusations against this scam site.

Reatim

sr. member

Activity: 2828

Merit: 357

Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!

Quote from: Naficopa on August 28, 2021, 09:22:19 AM

Quote from: Reatim on August 28, 2021, 04:04:35 AM

Quote from: Naficopa on August 28, 2021, 02:19:44 AM

Officially, the reason for their removal has not been given, but from what I noticed, all those who in the "trust" had information that they supported Adkinsbet were removed. (you can check that in spreadsheet)
Edit/ Sorry for the mistake, they were removed in week 3

Spreadsheet is not hidden: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jd9RqLTK10kQJ20CjT0xQfLbYFyQxPW0VYUJ2CFtg4Y/edit?usp=sharing

If the team did not accept those members from the beginning ? i believe that this will not go this far from bashing and complications .
because they have been warned about those adkinsbet Army of shill but instead of disregarding their application , the 1xbit team accepts them all and this made the issue more questionable in the whole forum.

but of course lets see what is the future of this company now that all eyes are in them and also the players here in bitcointalk are doubting their credibility .

I know it's a bit weird, but it's possible the manager didn't check exactly what the Adkinsbet case was about. I didn't know about the whole situation with Adkinsbet either. It is true that these accounts should not be accepted from the beginning, but it is good that this situation is finally settled.

Well he should have pay attention because from the very beginning of the campaign thread creation it was already mentioned about those gangs , and obviously seeing their
trust history is an obvious violators.

but of course that is past that needs not to talk anymore .

Quote

It is obvious that everyone is closely watching what is happening with 1xBit. I would like these people to speak objectively about this situation and not to shout accusations based on the past, which at this point has nothing to do with the current situation of 1xBit.

While i understand your concern mate about being objective in pointing issue, yet we cannot blame them because the team yet doing no expected action towards the
claimants instead continue denying about their funds.

anyway it is not ours to be feeling bad because we are not the victim here.

kontrakwel

jr. member

Activity: 56

Merit: 6

Quote from: MonsterV on August 27, 2021, 12:58:32 PM

Quote from: kontrakwel on August 27, 2021, 12:30:13 PM

Quote from: 1xbit_official on August 27, 2021, 09:27:14 AM

Quote from: kontrakwel on August 27, 2021, 09:22:43 AM

1xbit took 550 mbtc away from my account

Hello kontrakwel,

in pm you mentioned that you don't know the number of your account. Also, if you could post when this issue has occurred, and if you have transactions hashes - that would help.

We will forward this info to the security so we can check if there is such account, and what happened to it.

As you can see in our signature - there are a lot of resolved cases, so if the wins were fair - you don't need to worry about your funds.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

I won the bets fair, but the problem is that you indicate I didn't.
Accept the fair won bets from my account and credit the funds back.
giving back my deposit is not a solution, its stealing money and scamming.
I did not violate any rules!
here is the screenshot:

This proves again that 1xbit is just scamming and scamming, and it continues.
I also want to point out to people that 1xcorp n.v. does not exist anymore. According to Wikipedia, 1xcorp is the owner of 1xbit.
Which means that 1xbit is at this moment illegally running their website. I advise people not to deposit here.

What bothers me a lot is that 1xbit_official writes that there are many cases "Solved"
Well, the definition of Solved in their opinion is refund the deposit, and just void all the winnings.
That is not solving situations, that is scamming. There are many examples.
Erdogan can not be taken serious, he get paid every week on the signature campaign, so please just shut up instead of nonsene defending.
This user seems to be another victims as well, as many others.

They still did not solve my case, and the 550 mbtc is still missing in my account.
Its just a scam, nobody should deposit here!!!!
I did not violate any terms, that is just made up by 1xbit because they dont want to pay me.

Naficopa

hero member

Activity: 2002

Merit: 516

Quote from: nakamura12 on August 28, 2021, 02:58:42 AM

Quote from: Naficopa on August 28, 2021, 02:08:40 AM

There was a previous 1xBit signature campaign? I do not know about that.

As far as I remember, there is a discussion that those who promote scam/shady sites are getting negative trust. You can search it here in this forum. I don't know the rest if they really got red trusted just like the supporters of adkinsbet and yobit. I wouldn't say it if I haven't know that 1xbit have previous signature campaign.

I found old signature campaign: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbit-signature-campaignfullpayday-changed-1656122
But I can not find thread with that discussion. Thank you if anyone can provide the link.

Quote from: Reatim on August 28, 2021, 04:04:35 AM

Quote from: Naficopa on August 28, 2021, 02:19:44 AM

Officially, the reason for their removal has not been given, but from what I noticed, all those who in the "trust" had information that they supported Adkinsbet were removed. (you can check that in spreadsheet)
Edit/ Sorry for the mistake, they were removed in week 3

Spreadsheet is not hidden: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jd9RqLTK10kQJ20CjT0xQfLbYFyQxPW0VYUJ2CFtg4Y/edit?usp=sharing

If the team did not accept those members from the beginning ? i believe that this will not go this far from bashing and complications .
because they have been warned about those adkinsbet Army of shill but instead of disregarding their application , the 1xbit team accepts them all and this made the issue more questionable in the whole forum.

but of course lets see what is the future of this company now that all eyes are in them and also the players here in bitcointalk are doubting their credibility .

I know it's a bit weird, but it's possible the manager didn't check exactly what the Adkinsbet case was about. I didn't know about the whole situation with Adkinsbet either. It is true that these accounts should not be accepted from the beginning, but it is good that this situation is finally settled.

It is obvious that everyone is closely watching what is happening with 1xBit. I would like these people to speak objectively about this situation and not to shout accusations based on the past, which at this point has nothing to do with the current situation of 1xBit.

Chato1977

member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 58

Quote from: nakamura12 on August 28, 2021, 01:20:37 AM

Quote from: Naficopa on August 28, 2021, 12:05:31 AM

This is not entirely correct. The rule that someone who has a negative trust will not be accepted was implemented in the 2nd week of the campaign. In the first days of the campaign, all users were accepted. Also in the second week, users who actively supported another bookmaker that turned out to be a scam were removed.

Did I ever mention that users with negative trust are not accepted in 1xbit?. What about the users who supported 1xbit in their previous signature campaign?. I never mentioned that the rule about users who have negative trust is implemented at the start of the campaign. It is about what rules they implemented at this time. I'm sure you know that since you are a supporter of 1xbit, you even wear a 1xbit signature.

you guys are getting out of topic , it is the victims claims is our concern here and not about that signature campaign or other advertising they are having here.

instead let us push things for the sake of the victim from scamming and not the not related topics like this.

Haunebu

hero member

Activity: 3178

Merit: 977

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

Quote from: Desmong on August 27, 2021, 06:10:24 PM

I don't blame you because you are such an ignorance person that need to get a life...are you doing this because you are being paid just to make posts for your campaign or you just want to make common sense.

Hilarious. I pity shills like you who possess below average debating skills. It's ignorant(Not ignorance). Tip: Improve your grammar and debating skills fool!

Quote from: Reatim on August 28, 2021, 04:04:35 AM

but of course lets see what is the future of this company now that all eyes are in them and also the players here in bitcointalk are doubting their credibility .

They don't have a future in my opinion. Their reputation went down the drain a long time back and they are trying their best to keep their business afloat in various ways(Advertising in this forum etc).

Reatim

sr. member

Activity: 2828

Merit: 357

Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!

Quote from: Naficopa on August 28, 2021, 02:19:44 AM

Officially, the reason for their removal has not been given, but from what I noticed, all those who in the "trust" had information that they supported Adkinsbet were removed. (you can check that in spreadsheet)
Edit/ Sorry for the mistake, they were removed in week 3

Spreadsheet is not hidden: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jd9RqLTK10kQJ20CjT0xQfLbYFyQxPW0VYUJ2CFtg4Y/edit?usp=sharing

If the team did not accept those members from the beginning ? i believe that this will not go this far from bashing and complications .
because they have been warned about those adkinsbet Army of shill but instead of disregarding their application , the 1xbit team accepts them all and this made the issue more questionable in the whole forum.

but of course lets see what is the future of this company now that all eyes are in them and also the players here in bitcointalk are doubting their credibility .

nakamura12

hero member

Activity: 2268

Merit: 669

Bitcoin Casino Est. 2013

Quote from: Naficopa on August 28, 2021, 02:08:40 AM

There was a previous 1xBit signature campaign? I do not know about that.

As far as I remember, there is a discussion that those who promote scam/shady sites are getting negative trust. You can search it here in this forum. I don't know the rest if they really got red trusted just like the supporters of adkinsbet and yobit. I wouldn't say it if I haven't know that 1xbit have previous signature campaign.

Naficopa

hero member

Activity: 2002

Merit: 516

Quote from: bitterguy28 on August 28, 2021, 02:10:44 AM

Quote from: Naficopa on August 28, 2021, 12:05:31 AM

Quote from: nakamura12 on August 27, 2021, 11:52:43 PM

Even if those old members that have negative trust are still accepted. It is in their campaign rules that those who had negative trust are not accepted except the negative trust they get is because of participating in their campaign. There are forum users who have received negative trust because of participating in previous signature campaign of 1xbit.

This is not entirely correct. The rule that someone who has a negative trust will not be accepted was implemented in the 2nd week of the campaign. In the first days of the campaign, all users were accepted. Also in the second week, users who actively supported another bookmaker that turned out to be a scam were removed.

I did not see this happened , that the supporters of Adkinsbet was removed in the second week? they gladly accepted them at first and then abandoning after their "Great Service"?
But my question is anyway this does not concerns us anymore because everyone that wears 1xbit signature was being tagged accordingly. no matter if campaign participants or not.

Officially, the reason for their removal has not been given, but from what I noticed, all those who in the "trust" had information that they supported Adkinsbet were removed. (you can check that in spreadsheet)
Edit/ Sorry for the mistake, they were removed in week 3

Spreadsheet is not hidden: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jd9RqLTK10kQJ20CjT0xQfLbYFyQxPW0VYUJ2CFtg4Y/edit?usp=sharing

bitterguy28

full member

Activity: 2170

Merit: 182

“FRX: Ferocious Alpha”

Quote from: Naficopa on August 28, 2021, 12:05:31 AM

Quote from: nakamura12 on August 27, 2021, 11:52:43 PM

Quote from: Lanatsa on August 27, 2021, 05:46:37 PM

Most or all of those accounts would really be already a trash after this campaign ends and if you do look that all of their participants had negative feedback and some are just old negative trusted members

and some are just recently been tagged because of advertising scam platform. Some says that 1xbit is a legit site and those are just take opinions and words since its paid then you could really
expect that they would really be saying that.

Even if those old members that have negative trust are still accepted. It is in their campaign rules that those who had negative trust are not accepted except the negative trust they get is because of participating in their campaign. There are forum users who have received negative trust because of participating in previous signature campaign of 1xbit.

This is not entirely correct. The rule that someone who has a negative trust will not be accepted was implemented in the 2nd week of the campaign. In the first days of the campaign, all users were accepted. Also in the second week, users who actively supported another bookmaker that turned out to be a scam were removed.

I did not see this happened , that the supporters of Adkinsbet was removed in the second week? they gladly accepted them at first and then abandoning after their "Great Service"?
But my question is anyway this does not concerns us anymore because everyone that wears 1xbit signature was being tagged accordingly. no matter if campaign participants or not.

Naficopa

hero member

Activity: 2002

Merit: 516

Quote from: nakamura12 on August 28, 2021, 01:20:37 AM

Quote from: Naficopa on August 28, 2021, 12:05:31 AM

This is not entirely correct. The rule that someone who has a negative trust will not be accepted was implemented in the 2nd week of the campaign. In the first days of the campaign, all users were accepted. Also in the second week, users who actively supported another bookmaker that turned out to be a scam were removed.

Did I ever mention that users with negative trust are not accepted in 1xbit?.

I'm the one who says that participants with negative trust are no longer accepted, it was only at the beginning.

Quote from: nakamura12 on August 28, 2021, 01:20:37 AM

What about the users who supported 1xbit in their previous signature campaign?.

There was a previous 1xBit signature campaign? I do not know about that.

Quote from: nakamura12 on August 28, 2021, 01:20:37 AM

I never mentioned that the rule about users who have negative trust is implemented at the start of the campaign. It is about what rules they implemented at this time. I'm sure you know that since you are a supporter of 1xbit, you even wear a 1xbit signature.

Of course, I know the current rules, because as you noticed, I am a participant in the 1xBit signature campaign. That is why I am explaining them to you.

nakamura12

hero member

Activity: 2268

Merit: 669

Bitcoin Casino Est. 2013

Quote from: Naficopa on August 28, 2021, 12:05:31 AM

This is not entirely correct. The rule that someone who has a negative trust will not be accepted was implemented in the 2nd week of the campaign. In the first days of the campaign, all users were accepted. Also in the second week, users who actively supported another bookmaker that turned out to be a scam were removed.

Did I ever mention that users with negative trust are not accepted in 1xbit?. What about the users who supported 1xbit in their previous signature campaign?. I never mentioned that the rule about users who have negative trust is implemented at the start of the campaign. It is about what rules they implemented at this time. I'm sure you know that since you are a supporter of 1xbit, you even wear a 1xbit signature.

Naficopa

hero member

Activity: 2002

Merit: 516

Quote from: nakamura12 on August 27, 2021, 11:52:43 PM

Quote from: Lanatsa on August 27, 2021, 05:46:37 PM

Most or all of those accounts would really be already a trash after this campaign ends and if you do look that all of their participants had negative feedback and some are just old negative trusted members

and some are just recently been tagged because of advertising scam platform. Some says that 1xbit is a legit site and those are just take opinions and words since its paid then you could really
expect that they would really be saying that.

Even if those old members that have negative trust are still accepted. It is in their campaign rules that those who had negative trust are not accepted except the negative trust they get is because of participating in their campaign. There are forum users who have received negative trust because of participating in previous signature campaign of 1xbit.

This is not entirely correct. The rule that someone who has a negative trust will not be accepted was implemented in the 2nd week of the campaign. In the first days of the campaign, all users were accepted. Also in the second week, users who actively supported another bookmaker that turned out to be a scam were removed.

nakamura12

hero member

Activity: 2268

Merit: 669

Bitcoin Casino Est. 2013

Quote from: Lanatsa on August 27, 2021, 05:46:37 PM

Most or all of those accounts would really be already a trash after this campaign ends and if you do look that all of their participants had negative feedback and some are just old negative trusted members

and some are just recently been tagged because of advertising scam platform. Some says that 1xbit is a legit site and those are just take opinions and words since its paid then you could really
expect that they would really be saying that.

Even if those old members that have negative trust are still accepted. It is in their campaign rules that those who had negative trust are not accepted except the negative trust they get is because of participating in their campaign. There are forum users who have received negative trust because of participating in previous signature campaign of 1xbit.

Desmong

member

Activity: 812

Merit: 13

Crypto bookmaker and casino

Quote from: Haunebu on August 27, 2021, 01:51:33 PM

Quote from: Erdogan on August 27, 2021, 12:46:41 PM

When you look at the comments, 90% of those who accuse 1xBit of being a scam website have not played on this site even once. Almost everyone who slanders 1xBit is suck puppet that wear an advertisement for a competing casino or bookmaker in their signature. Think for yourself whether such people can be credible.

You are literally a brainless hypocrite. I find it hilarious that someone like you who scammed some other person for a small amount has the audacity to question someone else's credibility. Absolute weirdo!

Quote from: MonsterV on August 27, 2021, 12:58:32 PM

That is not solving situations, that is scamming. There are many examples.
Erdogan can not be taken serious, he get paid every week on the signature campaign, so please just shut up instead of nonsene defending.

Exactly. They keep scamming gamblers and try and make themselves look legit by returning their deposits. The messed up part is the fact that some gamblers still continue investing big amounts of money like@kontrakwel in this scam site.

Also, shills like @Erdogan are fools are actively advertising this site in order to lure in more gamblers from this forum. Despicable stuff!

I don't blame you because you are such an ignorance person that need to get a life...are you doing this because you are being paid just to make posts for your campaign or you just want to make common sense. Can you afford to write all these shits without being paid? Now you are the biggest hypocrite.

Haunebu please go get a job that could pay you reasonable money rather than coming here to make noise when we all know that you are being paid to act as if you care. Ensure you get your weekly penny and smile to heavens!

Naficopa

hero member

Activity: 2002

Merit: 516

Quote from: Lanatsa on August 27, 2021, 05:46:37 PM

Most or all of those accounts would really be already a trash after this campaign ends and if you do look that all of their participants had negative feedback and some are just old negative trusted members

and some are just recently been tagged because of advertising scam platform. Some says that 1xbit is a legit site and those are just take opinions and words since its paid then you could really
expect that they would really be saying that.

It is true that I became interested in the 1xbit platform due to the launched signature campaign. We all have to admit that the rates are high and surely many users are thinking about whether to risk a red trust.
However, I don't have to pretend that my positive opinion is based on something unreal. Every day I look at the comments of players about 1xBit and from what I can see, complaints are very rarely. Certainly there is not more complaints than in the case of other major casinos and bookmakers.

Lanatsa

hero member

Activity: 2968

Merit: 687

Quote from: rodskee on August 26, 2021, 08:33:15 PM

Quote from: dunfida on August 26, 2021, 05:23:37 PM

Quote from: nakamura12 on August 26, 2021, 02:39:55 PM

Quote from: dezoel on August 26, 2021, 02:15:51 PM

I do agree with you when it is 1xbit, which is true that they are looking shadier everyday. However, I do not agree that everyone who wears a signature has to defend the place they carry the signature neither, I could like a place and someone else may not, I do not need to defend them though, they should defend themselves as much as they can, we are getting paid as signature carriers to post, and I can post to places that has to nothing to do with my signature and I would say that it would definitely be paid as well, so why go defend them? This guy definitely did that, I am not arguing about that, he is caring their signature and getting paid so he is defending them, not a smart move in the long run of course, but it would seem that he thinks it is good for today.

In any case, I would not defend a bad place, and I would get out of signature as soon as I get paid as well if I believe it is bad, but even if I believe it is good, I am not going to go around defending them, promote? Sure.

In 1xbit participant's case of getting negative trust have reason why they received a negative trust or negative feedback from DT. First is, 1xbit have many accusations in this forum which is enough to tell everyone one that it is not trusted and having a bad service to their users. Second, signature campaign in this forum is a promotional type. Why did I say that?. You are paid to post in any board wearing their signature which shows what site, product, projects you are advertising or promoting. There you have your answer why participants that wear 1xbit signature have negative trust or feedback.

Even just using up your common sense then you can directly able to find the reason on why people had promoted or joined the signature got painted red into their feedbacks.
Scams on this forum is never been tolerated or highly frown upon on this place and its just normal that DT's would normally have this kind of view and would really give
that feedback which i do see for it to be worth of or it is really just right to do so.

you forgot to mention that This scam site signature campaign is one of the highest paying campaign now so accounts joined care nothing about their reputation as long as they are gaining So Decent money .

they will realize this mistake once this campaign ends and when they cannot join another projects because of their paints .

Most or all of those accounts would really be already a trash after this campaign ends and if you do look that all of their participants had negative feedback and some are just old negative trusted members

and some are just recently been tagged because of advertising scam platform. Some says that 1xbit is a legit site and those are just take opinions and words since its paid then you could really
expect that they would really be saying that.

Erdogan

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1005

Quote from: MonsterV on August 27, 2021, 12:58:32 PM

Quote from: kontrakwel on August 27, 2021, 12:30:13 PM

Quote from: 1xbit_official on August 27, 2021, 09:27:14 AM

Quote from: kontrakwel on August 27, 2021, 09:22:43 AM

1xbit took 550 mbtc away from my account

Hello kontrakwel,

in pm you mentioned that you don't know the number of your account. Also, if you could post when this issue has occurred, and if you have transactions hashes - that would help.

We will forward this info to the security so we can check if there is such account, and what happened to it.

As you can see in our signature - there are a lot of resolved cases, so if the wins were fair - you don't need to worry about your funds.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

I won the bets fair, but the problem is that you indicate I didn't.
Accept the fair won bets from my account and credit the funds back.
giving back my deposit is not a solution, its stealing money and scamming.
I did not violate any rules!
here is the screenshot:

This proves again that 1xbit is just scamming and scamming, and it continues.
I also want to point out to people that 1xcorp n.v. does not exist anymore. According to Wikipedia, 1xcorp is the owner of 1xbit.
Which means that 1xbit is at this moment illegally running their website. I advise people not to deposit here.

What bothers me a lot is that 1xbit_official writes that there are many cases "Solved"
Well, the definition of Solved in their opinion is refund the deposit, and just void all the winnings.
That is not solving situations, that is scamming. There are many examples.
Erdogan can not be taken serious, he get paid every week on the signature campaign, so please just shut up instead of nonsene defending.
This user seems to be another victims as well, as many others.

I guess you haven't paid attention to details and are driven by a general aversion to 1xBit driven by people who work for competing casinos (look on signatures)
If you look at this situation, you will see that the player broke the rules, received a deposit refund and in addition it all happened in December 2020, i.e. 9 months ago.

Haunebu

hero member

Activity: 3178

Merit: 977

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

Quote from: Erdogan on August 27, 2021, 12:46:41 PM

When you look at the comments, 90% of those who accuse 1xBit of being a scam website have not played on this site even once. Almost everyone who slanders 1xBit is suck puppet that wear an advertisement for a competing casino or bookmaker in their signature. Think for yourself whether such people can be credible.

You are literally a brainless hypocrite. I find it hilarious that someone like you who scammed some other person for a small amount has the audacity to question someone else's credibility. Absolute weirdo!

Quote from: MonsterV on August 27, 2021, 12:58:32 PM

That is not solving situations, that is scamming. There are many examples.
Erdogan can not be taken serious, he get paid every week on the signature campaign, so please just shut up instead of nonsene defending.

Exactly. They keep scamming gamblers and try and make themselves look legit by returning their deposits. The messed up part is the fact that some gamblers still continue investing big amounts of money like@kontrakwel in this scam site.

Also, shills like @Erdogan are fools are actively advertising this site in order to lure in more gamblers from this forum. Despicable stuff!

nakamura12

hero member

Activity: 2268

Merit: 669

Bitcoin Casino Est. 2013

Quote from: Haunebu on August 27, 2021, 04:08:53 AM

The 1xbit campaign manager has been less lenient in recent times and is only focusing on selecting participants without any negative feedback. Also, it seems like they are carefully paying participants based on their post quality.

Basically, a scam site like 1xbit isn't throwing away their money due to which their shills are working harder to defend them though it's all pointless in my opinion.

Once that participant accepted by the campaign manager then it is possibly get red tag by a DT. The campaign did mentioned that they only accept those who doesn't have negative trust and it is okay when that participant got red tag after joining the campaign. I would say it so myself that it's pointless to do it. No matter how many times they do it once a site's reputation goes bad it remains bad unless the matter is resolved.

Topic: 1XBIT.COM ᐉ 7 BTC WB ᐉ Altcoin Betting ᐉ no KYC ᕗ Instant payouts - page 269. (Read 68459 times)