Topic: 1XBIT.COM ᐉ 7 BTC WB ᐉ Altcoin Betting ᐉ no KYC ᕗ Instant payouts - page 270. (Read 68459 times)

This proves again that 1xbit is just scamming and scamming, and it continues.
I also want to point out to people that 1xcorp n.v. does not exist anymore. According to Wikipedia, 1xcorp is the owner of 1xbit.
Which means that 1xbit is at this moment illegally running their website. I advise people not to deposit here.

What bothers me a lot is that 1xbit_official writes that there are many cases "Solved"
Well, the definition of Solved in their opinion is refund the deposit, and just void all the winnings.
That is not solving situations, that is scamming. There are many examples.
Erdogan can not be taken serious, he get paid every week on the signature campaign, so please just shut up instead of nonsene defending.
This user seems to be another victims as well, as many others.

When you look at the comments, 90% of those who accuse 1xBit of being a scam website have not played on this site even once. Almost everyone who slanders 1xBit is suck puppet that wear an advertisement for a competing casino or bookmaker in their signature. Think for yourself whether such people can be credible.

I won the bets fair, but the problem is that you indicate I didn't.
Accept the fair won bets from my account and credit the funds back.
giving back my deposit is not a solution, its stealing money and scamming.
I did not violate any rules!
here is the screenshot:

Hello kontrakwel,

in pm you mentioned that you don't know the number of your account. Also, if you could post when this issue has occurred, and if you have transactions hashes - that would help.

We will forward this info to the security so we can check if there is such account, and what happened to it.

As you can see in our signature - there are a lot of resolved cases, so if the wins were fair - you don't need to worry about your funds.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

1xbit took 550 mbtc away from my account, and refuses to credit the account. The winnings were 100% fair.
This is just a scam site which dont pay winners.
Account id: 252045431

Premiere League
Chelsea vs Liverpool

A tough game coming up this weekend!

Post predictions for this game and win 1 mBTC! -> post

We can't deny that, but they should clean their reputation in the forum so they will succeed more in the future. Some had said that 1xbit is a scam site and it would really affect the decision of the new gamblers if they see this kind of review, I just hope they would really answer and correct all the active scam accusations against them.

Any business has negative against them.
But when we speak about evidence - we didn't see something more than screenshots of bets placed, or screenshots of deposits - which proves only what is shows.

We don't see a way when a person would get banned, if he has 1 account and just plays at 1xBit, without implementing different kinds of winning schemes.


Due to the same logic - any non-1xBit signature wearer in this thread just tries to get rid of the competitor.


As well as an accusation never requires to be proved to be supported, it seems.
As well as DT always do research and never follow their intentions before putting a trust reply.
This list can be way longer.


After placing a bet on 1xBit, you consent to the ToS. It is said that there is an availability of account closure after player's request, but requests require time to be processed, and this time is not specified.

On this screenshot, you've asked for the account closure during a deposit being processed, which is technically impossible.

Deposit issues are solved by the security and support teams, not the block one.
In addition, this email is not listed on the contact list of 1xBit: https://1xbit.com/information/contacts/

We unsure where did you get it from, but such a request shouldn't be processed by block department, and response time of this email is not regulated.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

Nice development, despite passed impression about 1xbit. 1xbit still growing rapidly

The 1xbit campaign manager has been less lenient in recent times and is only focusing on selecting participants without any negative feedback. Also, it seems like they are carefully paying participants based on their post quality.

Basically, a scam site like 1xbit isn't throwing away their money due to which their shills are working harder to defend them though it's all pointless in my opinion.

Many people don't care if it is the highest paying campaign or not. As long as it is a scam or having a bad reputation then that means they will get red trust no matter how high or low the payment is. They can earn decent money but will they be able to join another campaign once 1xbit campaign ends. Mentioning the 1xbit being the highest won't do good at all because there might be a group of people who will join because of it.

you forgot to mention that This scam site signature campaign is one of the highest paying campaign now so accounts joined care nothing about their reputation as long as they are gaining So Decent money .

they will realize this mistake once this campaign ends and when they cannot join another projects because of their paints .

Even just using up your common sense then you can directly able to find the reason on why people had promoted or joined the signature got painted red into their feedbacks.
Scams on this forum is never been tolerated or highly frown upon on this place and its just normal that DT's would normally have this kind of view and would really give
that feedback which i do see for it to be worth of or it is really just right to do so.

In 1xbit participant's case of getting negative trust have reason why they received a negative trust or negative feedback from DT. First is, 1xbit have many accusations in this forum which is enough to tell everyone one that it is not trusted and having a bad service to their users. Second, signature campaign in this forum is a promotional type. Why did I say that?. You are paid to post in any board wearing their signature which shows what site, product, projects you are advertising or promoting. There you have your answer why participants that wear 1xbit signature have negative trust or feedback.

I do agree with you when it is 1xbit, which is true that they are looking shadier everyday. However, I do not agree that everyone who wears a signature has to defend the place they carry the signature neither, I could like a place and someone else may not, I do not need to defend them though, they should defend themselves as much as they can, we are getting paid as signature carriers to post, and I can post to places that has to nothing to do with my signature and I would say that it would definitely be paid as well, so why go defend them? This guy definitely did that, I am not arguing about that, he is caring their signature and getting paid so he is defending them, not a smart move in the long run of course, but it would seem that he thinks it is good for today.

In any case, I would not defend a bad place, and I would get out of signature as soon as I get paid as well if I believe it is bad, but even if I believe it is good, I am not going to go around defending them, promote? Sure.

Bump!

Of course he will refuse. The only thing some people care about is the money, 1xbit pays him $30 (Member rank) for promoting the casino. Probably, this man is from very poor country and he doesn't care about anything, $30 seems to be a great deal for him.

He got 4 merit from signing a message and 4 from sending encrypted message., ah, shame on you OgNasty, then two from other source and finally collected 10 merit. Then he rolled into 1xbit signature campaign and now it's his duty to protect this casino, seems he has some shame because he is paid $30 for doing nothing but shitposting.

Keep Coming you shill , nothing you can do to clean this scammers name just by doing this action.

return the funds they stole from Players and then start cleaning the gambling they wanted to live.

If 1xbit actually cared about being responsible, they would have resolved all or majority of the scam accusations against them in this forum and other sites, but they didn't which is why they don't care about their reputation.

Money is all that matters to them and they clearly went to great lengths to scam gamblers over the years. This is a fact basically.

Does your defense doesn't have anything to do with the fact that you're using their signature? Because that's hypocritical if you think about it.