46% of last year's ICOs have failed already - page 7.

FLHippy

full member

Activity: 784

Merit: 101

Quote from: [ProTrader] on August 16, 2018, 03:17:46 PM

Quote from: kenzawak on February 23, 2018, 10:08:44 AM

https://news.bitcoin.com/46-last-years-icos-failed-already/

46% of them are effectively dead already – despite raising over $104 million.
902 crowdsales... 142 failed at the funding stage and a further 276 have since failed

I am not surprise with the statistics because I know that ma you scam ICO will appear later. Since ICO gave no regulation, ICO is now the favorite strategy of scammers to collect money from investors.

What is 104 million dollars in two hnudreds billion dollars market? Nothing. 104 million dollars could be one cryptocurrency ranked in top 100. So do not care about it. It is not a lot of money Cool

.

Krezi777

newbie

Activity: 140

Merit: 0

Where such statistics are 46% why not 40%. I think companies do not depend on the market decline. It depends on the organization and the team that this project has created and continues to work.

slightmoon

member

Activity: 224

Merit: 10

diceroll.xyz

Many factors for any business fail. Team fail in good execution or idea fail. I believe mostly team fail to deliver more. If you invest in something, you must investigate about team, market, business model, competitors and so on. So many people invested in 2017 after first look on the projects, many project created good hype that why so many shitty startups and scammers got the money.

[ProTrader]

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 250

Quote from: kenzawak on February 23, 2018, 10:08:44 AM

https://news.bitcoin.com/46-last-years-icos-failed-already/

46% of them are effectively dead already – despite raising over $104 million.
902 crowdsales... 142 failed at the funding stage and a further 276 have since failed

I am not surprise with the statistics because I know that ma you scam ICO will appear later. Since ICO gave no regulation, ICO is now the favorite strategy of scammers to collect money from investors.

Teraboy

hero member

Activity: 2282

Merit: 505

Quote from: burakdat on August 12, 2018, 04:54:39 AM

Quote from: kenzawak on February 23, 2018, 10:08:44 AM

https://news.bitcoin.com/46-last-years-icos-failed-already/

46% of them are effectively dead already – despite raising over $104 million.
902 crowdsales... 142 failed at the funding stage and a further 276 have since failed

Maybe it is not only 46% of failing ICO projects? Well if it is really 46% then i guess those ICO who failed should conduct a study on how they can get a project successfully or they should know their weakness and strengths on promoting ICO projects. I do believe that it is also the team who market the project will going to determine its success. The more connections the team has with prospect investors the greater chance that the project will going to succeed.

It's more than 46% if we have seen about the fact that there was a lot of died project right now. The very strict competition gives a very difficult situation to the ico without a proper development to survive.
I guess it's not having high accuracy and then we should see from the another view.

Natalim

hero member

Activity: 3038

Merit: 592

BTC to the MOON in 2019

Quote from: Opnsrc on August 16, 2018, 06:13:56 AM

Quote from: trash321 on August 12, 2018, 04:53:39 AM

46% is a very large amount, probably the figure is overestimated, it seems to me that this is so, because if it were not so, it would be possible to assume that every second project is a scum. It's not like that. So I do not think that's true.

I am not surprised at all - 46% is even not so much in comparison with 2017 when the majority of ICOs turned out to be the scam. Now, these projects are under control, and fewer fakes appear. I hope, further, the number of good ICOs will grow.

We can expect that it will grow because more institutional money are entering in the market.
Though it cannot be seen in the price but I believe they are just out there waiting for some good news and then bitcoin will moon.

Opnsrc

hero member

Activity: 1064

Merit: 500

Quote from: trash321 on August 12, 2018, 04:53:39 AM

46% is a very large amount, probably the figure is overestimated, it seems to me that this is so, because if it were not so, it would be possible to assume that every second project is a scum. It's not like that. So I do not think that's true.

I am not surprised at all - 46% is even not so much in comparison with 2017 when the majority of ICOs turned out to be the scam. Now, these projects are under control, and fewer fakes appear. I hope, further, the number of good ICOs will grow.

onyebuchi81

full member

Activity: 308

Merit: 100

Why do people equate drop in prices to failed project. It's true some have lost more than 200% of their ICO value but it doesn't mean it's a failed project. I can remember when eth was trading at 1300 dollars but is hovering somewhere around 300 dollars but we don't call it a failed project. The only time we can call a project a failed project is when that project has been abandoned but as far as there is work going behind the scene no matter how small I think it still has the potential to survive

crypto4earn

copper member

Activity: 280

Merit: 0

its solitary happens on the grounds that in today's situation it's hard to confidence any wander in light of the fact that most the endeavors make an ICO only for gathering of assets. the greater part of the Governments are there to shield their natives from these Scammers.

Dylanbee

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

Check out those projects and you will realise over 70% of them are just built on fancy whitepapers and no real working product for a real life use. I think investors have gotten wiser and won't even put their funds on a project that doesn't have atleast a minium viable product(MVP).

burakdat

jr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 2

"I invest and Doing Bounty Campaign"

Quote from: kenzawak on February 23, 2018, 10:08:44 AM

https://news.bitcoin.com/46-last-years-icos-failed-already/

46% of them are effectively dead already – despite raising over $104 million.
902 crowdsales... 142 failed at the funding stage and a further 276 have since failed

Maybe it is not only 46% of failing ICO projects? Well if it is really 46% then i guess those ICO who failed should conduct a study on how they can get a project successfully or they should know their weakness and strengths on promoting ICO projects. I do believe that it is also the team who market the project will going to determine its success. The more connections the team has with prospect investors the greater chance that the project will going to succeed.

trash321

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 100

46% is a very large amount, probably the figure is overestimated, it seems to me that this is so, because if it were not so, it would be possible to assume that every second project is a scum. It's not like that. So I do not think that's true.

maitexisi

jr. member

Activity: 146

Merit: 1

I agree there are too many useless projects. I often fall into an almost desperate deception.

Investors should now be smart about putting money into an ICO and carefully understanding the basics of the project to reduce risk.

blockchainmarketus

full member

Activity: 448

Merit: 100

Quote from: qazgroup on February 23, 2018, 01:11:21 PM

I do not know what is the definition of failed used here, if it means price dump then we cannot say that the project has failed, while i think only the low quality projects have faded away who have struggled with everything like presenting a product or service or even listing on a decent exchange. So always do your research and invest only in quality projects during ico.

Yeah, I also don't understand the word fail. Fail means not geting invest, yeah some of ICO failed, failed to implement the projects, yes some of them failed. There are too many scams ICos that make the projects failed. I agree with that. In the case, in my opinion, SOMe Icos and projects made succesful investment crowdsale and succes in appy the roadmap. Populus with invoice market, bancor, bat, RLC and other big projects now live, Bankex is too. I think some of ICOs are succesful.

lichnosam

sr. member

Activity: 546

Merit: 252

Quote from: oaks05 on August 05, 2018, 03:19:01 PM

seems like a high number to me alot of these coisn raised a bunch of funds they have enough money to hold them over for much longer than a year.

Yes, seems like the worrying trend with these ICOs and the money they are raising is that not enough of the ICOs will turn out successful. ICOs are not delivering at all on their promised timelines or that their ICO stage of the project is purposely taking longer.

jtbcoins

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 250

Yeah, it's true. I didn't invest in failed ICOs but I invested with losses. And now the number of failed ICOs increasing day by day...

Krezi777

newbie

Activity: 140

Merit: 0

If you participate in the ICO then you certainly have the thought that at least someday there will be generosity normal. The people who participate in the ICO are very much I see patient.

sergey_vass

member

Activity: 308

Merit: 10

This is not a good development in the cryptospace. The statistics is discouraging to investors but I feel is common for most start-ups to fail at the early stage even in the traditional business community.
Wink

It is necessary for investors to be well acquainted with all the information about the ICO project there are supporting and measure the risk before getting in.
Failure is a possibility as most ICOs are start-ups or even ideas.

silverston

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 502

SAPG Pre-Sale Live on Uniswap!

On the bear market in general, most of the ISO fails, and this applies to even the coolest projects, unfortunately! Now many carry the dates of crowdsales

Arrbuzz

newbie

Activity: 64

Merit: 0

This is a very terrible statistics and I think that it is fair, for some projects we still do not know the truth, what they do and how they develop projects today? Maybe they just immigrate the work? I think that this is possible.

Topic: 46% of last year's ICOs have failed already - page 7. (Read 3872 times)