Topic: 50 Hardware Wallets, compared feature by feature - page 5. (Read 2808 times)
New feature added to the website. Now I display the "12/24 Words BIP39 Seed Creation/Import" support for each Hardware Wallet.
Krux wallet was released way before Secux Shield BIO, so please find some time to include it.
It's much more important to spread the word about open source DIY wallets, than about closed source products.
It's much more important to spread the word about open source DIY wallets, than about closed source products.
Finally, I added Krux to the website !!!!
Two new SafePal additions to our hardware wallets comparison:
- SafePal S1 Pro
- SafePal X1
- SafePal S1 Pro
- SafePal X1
Krux wallet was released way before Secux Shield BIO, so please find some time to include it.
It's much more important to spread the word about open source DIY wallets, than about closed source products.
I will try to investigate Krux and see if I can include it in the short term. I try to give priority to the new models of the manufacturers that are already included. It's much more important to spread the word about open source DIY wallets, than about closed source products.
Added new SecuX Shield BIO hardware wallet
Maybe you should add word SecuX in front because it's currently separated from all other SecuX wallets on your website.I always liked design of hardware wallets in form of credit cards, and SecuX Shield BIO has nice additional e-ink display, but I am not a fan of biometric fingerprints for hardware wallets.
PS
One more hardware wallet you can add is new SafePal X1:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-safepal-x1-hardware-wallet-5466619
I added it to my backlog. I need to prioritize because there are lots of things to add to the website.
Krux wallet was released way before Secux Shield BIO, so please find some time to include it.It's much more important to spread the word about open source DIY wallets, than about closed source products.
Added new SecuX Shield BIO hardware wallet !!!!
I wrote my suggestion about adding Krux hardware wallet few months ago, but you probably missed it or forgot about it.
Krux is a good alternative for SeeSigner, and it can be used with QR codes as airgapped device, using M5StickV or Maix Amigo.
Krux is a good alternative for SeeSigner, and it can be used with QR codes as airgapped device, using M5StickV or Maix Amigo.
I added it to my backlog. I need to prioritize because there are lots of things to add to the website.
Added new features to the software & hardware wallets comparison websites
I wrote my suggestion about adding Krux hardware wallet few months ago, but you probably missed it or forgot about it.Krux is a good alternative for SeeSigner, and it can be used with QR codes as airgapped device, using M5StickV or Maix Amigo.
Since you started adding DIY devices, you can consider adding Krux wallet.
This project is smaller than SeedSigner or Specter, but it's very affordable and base device M5StickV looks very similar like Jade wallet and Maix Amigo is amazing.
You can find more information about Krux in my topic:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/krux-diy-hardware-wallet-5350905
This project is smaller than SeedSigner or Specter, but it's very affordable and base device M5StickV looks very similar like Jade wallet and Maix Amigo is amazing.
You can find more information about Krux in my topic:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/krux-diy-hardware-wallet-5350905
Added new features to the software & hardware wallets comparison websites:
- Now you can see the license of each software wallet source code and hardware wallet firmware.
- Added lots of new filters
- Now you can see the license of each software wallet source code and hardware wallet firmware.
- Added lots of new filters
Yes, I would like to add that section. I am starting to research if there are other hardware wallets supporting coinjoin: https://twitter.com/thebitcoinhole/status/1698349710845640934
I am pretty sure Passport hardware wallet is fully supporting Coinjoin with Samourai Wallet Whirlpool implementation.There is even blog article written last year on foundationdevices website with clear instructions how to use it, and they even mentioned Payjoin here:
https://foundationdevices.com/2022/03/passport-coinjoin/
Another article How to Interact with Bitcoin Privately:
https://foundationdevices.com/2022/05/interacting-with-bitcoin-privately/
I am not sure, but I understand that they are teaching how to buy a passport paying with coinjoin (from a software wallet).
Yes, I would like to add that section. I am starting to research if there are other hardware wallets supporting coinjoin: https://twitter.com/thebitcoinhole/status/1698349710845640934
I am pretty sure Passport hardware wallet is fully supporting Coinjoin with Samourai Wallet Whirlpool implementation.There is even blog article written last year on foundationdevices website with clear instructions how to use it, and they even mentioned Payjoin here:
https://foundationdevices.com/2022/03/passport-coinjoin/
Another article How to Interact with Bitcoin Privately:
https://foundationdevices.com/2022/05/interacting-with-bitcoin-privately/
Under the "Privacy" category, you can add "Coinjoin" to the Trezor Model T and Trezor One: https://content.trezor.io/coinjoin
Yes, I would like to add that section. I am starting to research if there are other hardware wallets supporting coinjoin: https://twitter.com/thebitcoinhole/status/1698349710845640934
You are right, Mr. Kruw.
Coinjoins are a good invention. One must make sure to use a respected software, though. Because a privacy tool that looks like one on the surface, but works with companies that deanonymize users and investigates the origins of their UTXOs isn't to be trusted. Don't do coinjoins with Wasabi and its default zkSNACKs coordinator because each of your UTXOs will be sent to blockchain analysis. Your privacy will be invaded to investigate if you deserve to have privacy in the first place.
Coinjoins are a good invention. One must make sure to use a respected software, though. Because a privacy tool that looks like one on the surface, but works with companies that deanonymize users and investigates the origins of their UTXOs isn't to be trusted. Don't do coinjoins with Wasabi and its default zkSNACKs coordinator because each of your UTXOs will be sent to blockchain analysis. Your privacy will be invaded to investigate if you deserve to have privacy in the first place.
Under the "Privacy" category, you can add "Coinjoin" to the Trezor Model T and Trezor One: https://content.trezor.io/coinjoin
Coinjoins allow you to combine your UTXOs with other users into a giant transaction, making it no longer possible to determine which inputs created any output: https://mempool.space/tx/d465033214fd2309dcce5a90c45fcaa788aa4394ee36debe07aad8d8a37907d2
Coinjoins allow you to combine your UTXOs with other users into a giant transaction, making it no longer possible to determine which inputs created any output: https://mempool.space/tx/d465033214fd2309dcce5a90c45fcaa788aa4394ee36debe07aad8d8a37907d2
- People with the old models will probably like to compare their devices with other wallets, to decide if upgrade or not.
You have a point and as much as I hate to give more spotlight to Ledger's products, I think Ledger Nano S should also be listed at the very end [FWIW, I hate it but a lot of users still have/use it in the community].I immediately associated 'discontinued' with no longer working/able to connect to servers, can't be connected with recent software, and those sort of of things.
It's my bad [I should've explained it in a better way] 
Hi. I created a new page on the website where I compare the most popular Bitcoin Software Wallets: https://thebitcoinhole.com/software-wallets
I also opened a new topic about that comparison: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/16-bitcoin-software-wallets-compared-feature-by-feature-5465351
I also opened a new topic about that comparison: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/16-bitcoin-software-wallets-compared-feature-by-feature-5465351
Having said that, I noticed few of their "authorized resellers" still have them in stock, so perhaps placing another button beneath the discontinued and linking it to this exact page wouldn't be a bad idea.
Oh, so when you say they have been discontinued, it's like with Ledger's Nano S model. The company isn't officially selling the device. However, you can still buy it from resellers that have it in stock, and it still works and is supported with the update for the time being. I immediately associated 'discontinued' with no longer working/able to connect to servers, can't be connected with recent software, and those sort of of things. Great addition, but I noticed the size & materials filters didn't have the materials and dimensions options in them... I understand why you excluded the latter, but I think it'd be better if users could also tick the materials of their choice [even if it means adding roughly 10 more options to that section].
In this phase, I decided to support single-option filters and sliders, which cover more than 90% of the features to filter. I plan to add the missing filters in the future.
Yes, the goal is to help users to decide which hardware wallet to buy. So, I decided to put them as discontinued at the end for two reasons:
- As you mentioned, some resellers could still have stock
- People with the old models will probably like to compare their devices with other wallets, to decide if upgrade or not.
In the future, I will see how to handle the increasing amount of wallets to display (including discountinued models). I will probably have to add pagination support, for example.
- As you mentioned, some resellers could still have stock
- People with the old models will probably like to compare their devices with other wallets, to decide if upgrade or not.
In the future, I will see how to handle the increasing amount of wallets to display (including discountinued models). I will probably have to add pagination support, for example.
Jump to: