[9 TH] Bitparking Pool, DGM 0%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining - page 24.

Littleshop

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1004

Quote from: Lucko on September 06, 2013, 05:42:35 PM

It is probably still done manually... So this is why...

This is the primary reason this is a secondary pool for me. I don't need fancy stats or pages but really hate knowing that my payment is just waiting and has to be manually released well after it is known good.

Lucko

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

It is probably still done manually... So this is why...

purelithium

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Why have payments been "pending" for so long?

This block was solved almost 8 hours ago, there's no way it needs that many confirms...

Code:

2013-09-06 15:09 04:51:01 0.02785993 35,210 pending

EDIT: All pending blocks just confirmed.

Apheration

member

Activity: 88

Merit: 10

I was mining with 6 block erupters at 1 difficulty, now I have a total of 18 which is like 6 GH/s. Should keep the difficulty at 1?

Lucko

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Quote from: doublec on September 05, 2013, 05:34:39 PM

Quote from: Lucko on September 05, 2013, 05:30:59 PM

And we missed it? Wow that was unlucky...

I haven't looked at that specific case, I'm commenting on the 'should have gotten X shares in a block' remark. I'll take a look at the block in question and see if there's anything unusual about it.

I think we found "same" block 2 times...

JuenoMT

member

Activity: 101

Merit: 10

Founder of The Bit Bit Forum

Quote from: rj98942 on August 26, 2013, 10:58:16 AM

I have to come up with some kind of faceroll for a name. I think that as this pool grows, you will have more faceroll names that make no sense to anybody and they will be fairly hard to remember.

I just add a version #, for example--> MixedMiner, MixedMiner2, ect,..

Easy Peasy

doublec

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1005

Quote from: Lucko on September 05, 2013, 05:30:59 PM

And we missed it? Wow that was unlucky...

I haven't looked at that specific case, I'm commenting on the 'should have gotten X shares in a block' remark. I'll take a look at the block in question and see if there's anything unusual about it.

Lucko

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Quote from: doublec on September 05, 2013, 05:18:48 PM

Quote from: Lucko on September 05, 2013, 12:43:19 PM

Whole pool 358 shares in 1:10... Not normal... 7TH should give out much more... That is less then 20GH

I produce more then that in 1 minute...

The duration times shown on the website are actually the times the website got notification of the solved block, not the time the actual block was solved. It can be off by up to 60 seconds depending due to caching in the services that notify the database of shares and blocks found. That block duration was probably more like 10 seconds.

And we missed it? Wow that was unlucky...

doublec

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1005

Quote from: Lucko on September 05, 2013, 12:43:19 PM

Whole pool 358 shares in 1:10... Not normal... 7TH should give out much more... That is less then 20GH

I produce more then that in 1 minute...

The duration times shown on the website are actually the times the website got notification of the solved block, not the time the actual block was solved. It can be off by up to 60 seconds depending due to caching in the services that notify the database of shares and blocks found. That block duration was probably more like 10 seconds.

alwayzgame

full member

Activity: 161

Merit: 100

waste of time

Lucko

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Lucko on September 05, 2013, 12:43:19 PM

I produce more then that in 1 minute...

Then you should probably ask for a higher difficulty Wink

I have d=20 so OK it not that many it is "only" 17+ per minute but that is not only 17 in pool statistic but 340...

Lucko

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Whole pool 358 shares in 1:10... Not normal... 7TH should give out much more... That is less then 20GH

I produce more then that in 1 minute...

Lucko

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Quote from: SirMintALot on September 05, 2013, 11:05:40 AM

2013-09-04 23:44 00:01:10 0.00282520 0 orphaned

Şo you also have 0 shares... There was something wrong...

SirMintALot

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

In POS we trust

Quote from: Lucko on September 05, 2013, 02:34:33 AM

Was that server error?

2013-09-04 23:44 00:01:10 0.04824664 0 orphaned

Since I have over 340 shares per minute it looks imposible

Another pool was a tiny bit faster and solved the same block quicker. That happens from time to time. Its the displayed numbers are probably a bug, IMHO Amount should be 0 and Shares should be the amout of submitted shares. It looks the same for me (just my DGM payout is lower):

2013-09-04 23:44 00:01:10 0.00282520 0 orphaned

Lucko

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Was that server error?

2013-09-04 23:44 00:01:10 0.04824664 0 orphaned

Since I have over 340 shares per minute it looks imposible

purelithium

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Holy bad luck!

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: osoverflow on August 26, 2013, 10:35:25 PM

Hi! May I ask you if it is normal to have about 15% discarded work? I'm mining with a little single of 30gh/s (stratum, cgminer 3.4, d=16) and from 749 getworks I got 9928 accepted and 1496 discarded.

If it is not normal, what I should do to improve that number? Thanks!

Discarded work is meaningless in the stratum era and that's why it's no longer shown in the regular stats, only debugging. Ignore it.

osoverflow

full member

Activity: 547

Merit: 105

Bitcoin ya no es el futuro, es el presente

Hi! May I ask you if it is normal to have about 15% discarded work? I'm mining with a little single of 30gh/s (stratum, cgminer 3.4, d=16) and from 749 getworks I got 9928 accepted and 1496 discarded.

If it is not normal, what I should do to improve that number? Thanks!

rj98942

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

I was wondering if there were plans to remove old inactive accounts. I know that I've had a couple accounts on bitparking and that I haven't mined on those for a couple months. But when I go to register a new account because of the additional coins (which I'm not complaining about other than the 2 new ones, I can't find an exchange I like for them) I have to come up with some kind of faceroll for a name. I think that as this pool grows, you will have more faceroll names that make no sense to anybody and they will be fairly hard to remember. Just my little thoughts.

smoothie

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1473

LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper

Quote from: Littleshop on August 24, 2013, 08:30:06 AM

Quote from: doublec on August 22, 2013, 09:53:26 PM

Quote from: Lucko on August 21, 2013, 07:34:25 AM

Something wrong with international lines???

I can temporarily disable i0coin and groupcoin generation which I added around August 6 and see if that makes a difference. If you can confirm that you're still mining and can check if disconnections still occur I'll make the change and see if it affects it.

How about you finish refunding people who had money I your exchange?

I would say the same thing. All i am aware of is the exchange crashed, he said he was trying to recover data and to refund accounts and never finished. 4 months and counting? or was it 3 months?

Topic: [9 TH] Bitparking Pool, DGM 0%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining - page 24. (Read 163898 times)