Pages:
Author

Topic: ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable - page 38. (Read 67732 times)

legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
If I launch all 8 GPUs in one instance, the power usage curve jumps from 30% to 100% each 3 seconds, making miner not PSU-friendly.
I had same issue with other skunk miners, so my own recipe was to run 2 miner instances.

But when I launch 2 instances of miner to make separate process for 3x1080ti and 5x1070 GPUs,
1080tis are working great and very stable, but 1070s doing something weird: after a couple of minutes two last GPUs stop working at all.

Also running 2 instances does not change stratum difficulty, so my hashrate is lost between blocks if they found too quickly.
Since 3-4 SIGT blocks can be found in a row with small steps like 3-5 seconds, sharerate for SIGT should be at 15-30 shares/minute. I understand that it affects pool stability, but miners efficiency is on other side.
Miners will get reward only for 1 block in that cascade with low sharerate.
So actual mining efficiency drops by 75% in those cascades of blocks.





first - have you set the --lodiff option in the parameter list? ... the miner will automatically force the hidiff port if you have more than 4cards in a single machine ...

second - CWIgm not meant to be psu friendly ... its meant to be stable and have continuous hash for the life of the mining session ... if your psu is not of high quality and cannot support the cards - you need either a bigger one or two to support the power consumption your cards will be working with ... you can of course use your oc settings to lower power and oc - but the investment into high end high quality psu units will make the mining a LOT more stable than what you have ...

i have the same issues when i first started mining - and quickly learned that the psu quality - and number of psu - is as important as the cards themselves ...

now if you last two 1070 stop after a few minutes - then you definitely have an issue of some sort ... check their heat / throttling - check the power they are consuming - watch closely to the display CWIgm displays ( you only need ONE session of CWIgm ) - and make sure the cards themselves are not the issue ...

let us know if any of this helps - or any other advice the community may have towards this ...

#crysx
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
@OP

Please be ready. some big guy moving in to this pool.

 Wink

welcome ...

are they testing sigt AND dnr - or just one of the pools / algos ? ...

#crysx

SIGT it seems
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
I'm pretty sure the answer is obvious but just want to check, can CWIgm be used with miningrigrental or will it be supported?

no ...

for the moment the miner is locked to our pool - as explained in one of the earlier posts ...

this may change - it may not - we have yet to decide ... but being a beta - there is a long way to go to get the stability ( and optimization ) that we would like to get to ...

currently - we are focusing on stability and ease of use ... optimization will come later ...

#crysx
member
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
why -502 and not -500? is there are a difference?

I believe thats the lowest you can go with it, probably just going for the lowest clock possible.

Exactly, that's the lowest clock that I can set to.
full member
Activity: 158
Merit: 100
mine safe o/
If I launch all 8 GPUs in one instance, the power usage curve jumps from 30% to 100% each 3 seconds, making miner not PSU-friendly.
I had same issue with other skunk miners, so my own recipe was to run 2 miner instances.



But when I launch 2 instances of miner to make separate process for 3x1080ti and 5x1070 GPUs,
1080tis are working great and very stable, but 1070s doing something weird: after a couple of minutes two last GPUs stop working at all.



Here is example of power usage with ccminer 2.2 or spmod miners:


Also running 2 instances does not change stratum difficulty, so my hashrate is lost between blocks if they found too quickly.
Since 3-4 SIGT blocks can be found in a row with small steps like 3-5 seconds, sharerate for SIGT should be at 15-30 shares/minute. I understand that it affects pool stability, but miners efficiency is on other side.
Miners will get reward only for 1 block in that cascade with low sharerate.
So actual mining efficiency drops by 75% in those cascades of blocks.



sr. member
Activity: 390
Merit: 250
Great, finally got accepted. Cool

So, I have 6x GTX1060 6G with 384.94 driver running on Win10 64. 2x of them are Hynix memory and 4x are Micron's.
So far the hash rate that I got from this miner is far more than what I was getting from the other miners and it is more stable from what I can see. And I also liked the fact that I earn more SIGT on this pool than Suprnova.

If anyone interested to see the results of this miner on my rig and overclock settings, here they are: http://imgur.com/a/AdcNr







What I'd like to see in future development are:
- API for port binding so user can monitor this miner with monitoring service of their choices such as ethmonitoring.com
- Some kind of support to connect to 3rd party pool (maybe charge a service fee of 1% is using 3rd party pool?). I'd love to use this on MinigRigRental.com
why -502 and not -500? is there are a difference?
member
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
Great, finally got accepted. Cool

So, I have 6x GTX1060 6G with 384.94 driver running on Win10 64. 2x of them are Hynix memory and 4x are Micron's.
So far the hash rate that I got from this miner is far more than what I was getting from the other miners and it is more stable from what I can see. And I also liked the fact that I earn more SIGT on this pool than Suprnova.

If anyone interested to see the results of this miner on my rig and overclock settings, here they are: http://imgur.com/a/AdcNr







What I'd like to see in future development are:
- API for port binding so user can monitor this miner with monitoring service of their choices such as ethmonitoring.com
- Some kind of support to connect to 3rd party pool (maybe charge a service fee of 1% is using 3rd party pool?). I'd love to use this on MinigRigRental.com
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
the prevvious post reminds me ...

PLEASE request in pm WITH the details of the gpu / gpus you are using and the windows operating system ...

if you send me a pm to just 'give me the miner' like some of you have - there will no longer be a response ...

admittedly - ther have only been a few like this - but we need to know ...

otherwise the same response will be given ...

---

hi ...

what cards do you have and what operating system? ...

#crysx

---

we are NOT trying to restrict the beta testing in any way shape or form ... what we ARE doing is determining whether your rigs are fit to be in the testing ...

many of you have amd gpus - wont work with CWIgm ...
many of you have 750ti nvidia - wont work with CWIgm ...
many of you have older nvidia 780ti etc - wont work with CWIgm ...

CWIgm is now only supporting nvidia based gpus with compute52 or compute61 level gpu ...

this means that higher end 9xx cards - and 10xx cards are usable - with some of the higher end processing cards ( like the titan x in a few cases ) which are of the compute level calibre ... we wish we could open the test up to everyone - but that would not be feasible with the limited resources for compatibility we have ...

like so with the os ... windows 7 / 10 ... most versions will do ( home / pro / ent ) ...

so please pm me with more than a request to join - but with the specs as well - as we can determine right away whether its worth joining the test ...

this is also the other reason why we tie the test miner to OUR pools ... because we have full control over the pool - and the adjustments that are required to be made to all three - miner / pool / stratum ... if we introduce other factors - such as other pools and stratum / diff systems into the equation - it literally throws a spanner in the works and derails our focus on producing the miner we want to produce - due to the external issue that can arise from these other factors ...

the most important part of all this also - PLEASE take the 2.5minutes it takes to read the README contained in the package ...

it contains VERY important information - such as changes to CWIgm - additions to CWIgm - parameter adjustments - and many other things that need to be known BEFORE you mine ...

ill put this up on the op as a core part of the test ...

tanx ...

#crysx


Sorry I sent the wrong message the first time (without the GPU and OS details). I resent a message with all the information. I hope you can reconsider my appeal. Thanks a lot.

thats no issue - we welcome testers ...

#crysx

is there anything else to do to get the miner? Cheesy

nup ...

just pm me with the details ...

im going through them right this minute ...

#crysx

pm sent ... patiently waiting for your reply Cheesy thank u!
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
the prevvious post reminds me ...

PLEASE request in pm WITH the details of the gpu / gpus you are using and the windows operating system ...

if you send me a pm to just 'give me the miner' like some of you have - there will no longer be a response ...

admittedly - ther have only been a few like this - but we need to know ...

otherwise the same response will be given ...

---

hi ...

what cards do you have and what operating system? ...

#crysx

---

we are NOT trying to restrict the beta testing in any way shape or form ... what we ARE doing is determining whether your rigs are fit to be in the testing ...

many of you have amd gpus - wont work with CWIgm ...
many of you have 750ti nvidia - wont work with CWIgm ...
many of you have older nvidia 780ti etc - wont work with CWIgm ...

CWIgm is now only supporting nvidia based gpus with compute52 or compute61 level gpu ...

this means that higher end 9xx cards - and 10xx cards are usable - with some of the higher end processing cards ( like the titan x in a few cases ) which are of the compute level calibre ... we wish we could open the test up to everyone - but that would not be feasible with the limited resources for compatibility we have ...

like so with the os ... windows 7 / 10 ... most versions will do ( home / pro / ent ) ...

so please pm me with more than a request to join - but with the specs as well - as we can determine right away whether its worth joining the test ...

this is also the other reason why we tie the test miner to OUR pools ... because we have full control over the pool - and the adjustments that are required to be made to all three - miner / pool / stratum ... if we introduce other factors - such as other pools and stratum / diff systems into the equation - it literally throws a spanner in the works and derails our focus on producing the miner we want to produce - due to the external issue that can arise from these other factors ...

the most important part of all this also - PLEASE take the 2.5minutes it takes to read the README contained in the package ...

it contains VERY important information - such as changes to CWIgm - additions to CWIgm - parameter adjustments - and many other things that need to be known BEFORE you mine ...

ill put this up on the op as a core part of the test ...

tanx ...

#crysx


Sorry I sent the wrong message the first time (without the GPU and OS details). I resent a message with all the information. I hope you can reconsider my appeal. Thanks a lot.

thats no issue - we welcome testers ...

#crysx

is there anything else to do to get the miner? Cheesy

nup ...

just pm me with the details ...

im going through them right this minute ...

#crysx
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
the prevvious post reminds me ...

PLEASE request in pm WITH the details of the gpu / gpus you are using and the windows operating system ...

if you send me a pm to just 'give me the miner' like some of you have - there will no longer be a response ...

admittedly - ther have only been a few like this - but we need to know ...

otherwise the same response will be given ...

---

hi ...

what cards do you have and what operating system? ...

#crysx

---

we are NOT trying to restrict the beta testing in any way shape or form ... what we ARE doing is determining whether your rigs are fit to be in the testing ...

many of you have amd gpus - wont work with CWIgm ...
many of you have 750ti nvidia - wont work with CWIgm ...
many of you have older nvidia 780ti etc - wont work with CWIgm ...

CWIgm is now only supporting nvidia based gpus with compute52 or compute61 level gpu ...

this means that higher end 9xx cards - and 10xx cards are usable - with some of the higher end processing cards ( like the titan x in a few cases ) which are of the compute level calibre ... we wish we could open the test up to everyone - but that would not be feasible with the limited resources for compatibility we have ...

like so with the os ... windows 7 / 10 ... most versions will do ( home / pro / ent ) ...

so please pm me with more than a request to join - but with the specs as well - as we can determine right away whether its worth joining the test ...

this is also the other reason why we tie the test miner to OUR pools ... because we have full control over the pool - and the adjustments that are required to be made to all three - miner / pool / stratum ... if we introduce other factors - such as other pools and stratum / diff systems into the equation - it literally throws a spanner in the works and derails our focus on producing the miner we want to produce - due to the external issue that can arise from these other factors ...

the most important part of all this also - PLEASE take the 2.5minutes it takes to read the README contained in the package ...

it contains VERY important information - such as changes to CWIgm - additions to CWIgm - parameter adjustments - and many other things that need to be known BEFORE you mine ...

ill put this up on the op as a core part of the test ...

tanx ...

#crysx


Sorry I sent the wrong message the first time (without the GPU and OS details). I resent a message with all the information. I hope you can reconsider my appeal. Thanks a lot.

thats no issue - we welcome testers ...

#crysx

is there anything else to do to get the miner? Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
@OP

Please be ready. some big guy moving in to this pool.

 Wink

welcome ...

are they testing sigt AND dnr - or just one of the pools / algos ? ...

#crysx
member
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
I'm pretty sure the answer is obvious but just want to check, can CWIgm be used with miningrigrental or will it be supported?
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
the prevvious post reminds me ...

PLEASE request in pm WITH the details of the gpu / gpus you are using and the windows operating system ...

if you send me a pm to just 'give me the miner' like some of you have - there will no longer be a response ...

admittedly - ther have only been a few like this - but we need to know ...

otherwise the same response will be given ...

---

hi ...

what cards do you have and what operating system? ...

#crysx

---

we are NOT trying to restrict the beta testing in any way shape or form ... what we ARE doing is determining whether your rigs are fit to be in the testing ...

many of you have amd gpus - wont work with CWIgm ...
many of you have 750ti nvidia - wont work with CWIgm ...
many of you have older nvidia 780ti etc - wont work with CWIgm ...

CWIgm is now only supporting nvidia based gpus with compute52 or compute61 level gpu ...

this means that higher end 9xx cards - and 10xx cards are usable - with some of the higher end processing cards ( like the titan x in a few cases ) which are of the compute level calibre ... we wish we could open the test up to everyone - but that would not be feasible with the limited resources for compatibility we have ...

like so with the os ... windows 7 / 10 ... most versions will do ( home / pro / ent ) ...

so please pm me with more than a request to join - but with the specs as well - as we can determine right away whether its worth joining the test ...

this is also the other reason why we tie the test miner to OUR pools ... because we have full control over the pool - and the adjustments that are required to be made to all three - miner / pool / stratum ... if we introduce other factors - such as other pools and stratum / diff systems into the equation - it literally throws a spanner in the works and derails our focus on producing the miner we want to produce - due to the external issue that can arise from these other factors ...

the most important part of all this also - PLEASE take the 2.5minutes it takes to read the README contained in the package ...

it contains VERY important information - such as changes to CWIgm - additions to CWIgm - parameter adjustments - and many other things that need to be known BEFORE you mine ...

ill put this up on the op as a core part of the test ...

tanx ...

#crysx


Sorry I sent the wrong message the first time (without the GPU and OS details). I resent a message with all the information. I hope you can reconsider my appeal. Thanks a lot.

thats no issue - we welcome testers ...

#crysx
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
hey mate, can u add api bind option ? much miners to monitor.

api was purposely removed ...

we have been looking at a rebuild for the api - but we are also looking at other options ...

we have yet to decide ...

#crysx
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
@OP

Please be ready. some big guy moving in to this pool.

 Wink
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
the prevvious post reminds me ...

PLEASE request in pm WITH the details of the gpu / gpus you are using and the windows operating system ...

if you send me a pm to just 'give me the miner' like some of you have - there will no longer be a response ...

admittedly - ther have only been a few like this - but we need to know ...

otherwise the same response will be given ...

---

hi ...

what cards do you have and what operating system? ...

#crysx

---

we are NOT trying to restrict the beta testing in any way shape or form ... what we ARE doing is determining whether your rigs are fit to be in the testing ...

many of you have amd gpus - wont work with CWIgm ...
many of you have 750ti nvidia - wont work with CWIgm ...
many of you have older nvidia 780ti etc - wont work with CWIgm ...

CWIgm is now only supporting nvidia based gpus with compute52 or compute61 level gpu ...

this means that higher end 9xx cards - and 10xx cards are usable - with some of the higher end processing cards ( like the titan x in a few cases ) which are of the compute level calibre ... we wish we could open the test up to everyone - but that would not be feasible with the limited resources for compatibility we have ...

like so with the os ... windows 7 / 10 ... most versions will do ( home / pro / ent ) ...

so please pm me with more than a request to join - but with the specs as well - as we can determine right away whether its worth joining the test ...

this is also the other reason why we tie the test miner to OUR pools ... because we have full control over the pool - and the adjustments that are required to be made to all three - miner / pool / stratum ... if we introduce other factors - such as other pools and stratum / diff systems into the equation - it literally throws a spanner in the works and derails our focus on producing the miner we want to produce - due to the external issue that can arise from these other factors ...

the most important part of all this also - PLEASE take the 2.5minutes it takes to read the README contained in the package ...

it contains VERY important information - such as changes to CWIgm - additions to CWIgm - parameter adjustments - and many other things that need to be known BEFORE you mine ...

ill put this up on the op as a core part of the test ...

tanx ...

#crysx


Sorry I sent the wrong message the first time (without the GPU and OS details). I resent a message with all the information. I hope you can reconsider my appeal. Thanks a lot.
legendary
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002
Mine Mine Mine
hey mate, can u add api bind option ? much miners to monitor.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
11 hours running,
I have not encountered any issue yet.
I also noticed that this miner is more efficient compared to other miner software out there.

  • tdp 85%
  • coreclock 130
  • memory -502
  • temp at 61c
  • fan at 68%

Screenshot:
https://i.imgur.com/BJE4QKI.png

                     _________          __  ________
                     \_   ___ \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                   / /    \  \/\ \/ \/ /  /   \  ___ /     \
          _________\ \     \____\     /|  \    \_\  \  Y Y  \  __________
                      \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  / /
                             \/                   \/      \/ /
                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 384.94
CPU:0.62%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [10:30:22]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 14325.5            | Block:      31600 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 232.528                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:      2.5 | Shares: 1511.25 | Rej: 1.08002% | Speed:  162.14M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 473.5   | Rej: 6    | Speed:   53.08MH/s|
1.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 525     | Rej: 7.5  | Speed:   54.35MH/s|
2.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 512.75  | Rej: 3    | Speed:   54.49MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:59C | F:66% | P:238W | I: 24.0 | Core:1932Mhz |
1.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:61C | F:68% | P:228W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
2.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:65C | F:72% | P:222W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[10:26:25]Share: 3aa75b9e              | [02:45:50][GPU1]:Invalid nonce
[10:26:30]Mean netDiff: 18032.2        | [03:50:17][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
[10:26:40]Mean netDiff: 17903.9        | )
[10:27:05]Share: e19d06a6              | [06:35:11][GPU0]:Invalid nonce
[10:27:10]Mean netDiff: 17822.9        | [07:14:05][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
[10:27:40]Mean netDiff: 17752.4        | )
[10:28:20]Mean netDiff: 17690.9        | [08:44:51][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
[10:29:30]Mean netDiff: 17534.8        | )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:-----    | Conn:0d 11:16:23 | Latency:287ms
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
0.9.8 is even better than previous.  Rock solid for about 2 days now.

2 Systems, 11x1070, 1x1080 Win 10 x64

Clocks:
1080 @ 75% power, core +145, mem -502
1070's @ 90% power, core +185, mem -502

Could push higher on the clocks, but due to physical setup the temps are a little high on a few of the cards and I'd rather wait to play around with the setup a bit first.  As has been said by others, great miner and great support!


                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 384.94
CPU:0.16%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [20:19:36]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 18533.8            | Block:      31477 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 336.334                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:      2.5 | Shares: 6861.5  | Rej: 0.334084% | Speed:  182.25
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1080           : Shares: 1225.75 | Rej: 0    | Speed:   34.33MH/s|
1.Zotac GTX 1070             : Shares: 1175.75 | Rej: 5.25 | Speed:   29.51MH/s|
2.Zotac GTX 1070             : Shares: 1080.75 | Rej: 7.5  | Speed:   29.42MH/s|
3.Zotac GTX 1070             : Shares: 1154.25 | Rej: 5.25 | Speed:   29.84MH/s|
4.Zotac GTX 1070             : Shares: 1089.5  | Rej: 5    | Speed:   29.46MH/s|
5.Zotac GTX 1070             : Shares: 1135.5  | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.01MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1080           : T:67C | F:85% | P:126W | I: 24.0 | Core:1778Mhz |
1.Zotac GTX 1070             : T:58C | F:80% | P:130W | I: 24.0 | Core:1906Mhz |
2.Zotac GTX 1070             : T:61C | F:80% | P:131W | I: 24.0 | Core:1912Mhz |
3.Zotac GTX 1070             : T:58C | F:80% | P:132W | I: 24.0 | Core:1934Mhz |
4.Zotac GTX 1070             : T:58C | F:80% | P:131W | I: 24.0 | Core:1911Mhz |
5.Zotac GTX 1070             : T:68C | F:80% | P:131W | I: 24.0 | Core:1884Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[20:17:05]Mean netDiff: 13220.4        | [03:31:04][GPU5]:Invalid nonce
[20:17:43]Mean netDiff: 13332.7        | [10:03:45][GPU2]:Invalid nonce
[20:18:11]Share: 832a390d              | [14:11:41][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
[20:18:13]Mean netDiff: 13447.2        | )
[20:18:26]Share: d12a81c1              | [14:11:41][GPU3]:Job not found (=stale
[20:18:41]Share: 26fccd0c              | )
[20:19:03]Mean netDiff: 13625.6        | [16:12:44][GPU4]:Job not found (=stale
[20:19:25]Share: dafdd2a6              | )

                     _________          __  ________
                     \_   ___ \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                   / /    \  \/\ \/ \/ /  /   \  ___ /     \
          _________\ \     \____\     /|  \    \_\  \  Y Y  \  __________
                      \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  / /
                             \/                   \/      \/ /
                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 382.33
CPU:1.72%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [20:25:29]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 23351.2            | Block:      31484 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 280.099                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:      2.5 | Shares: 6590.25 | Rej: 0.603296% | Speed:  171.67
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Zotac GTX 1070             : Shares: 1067.75 | Rej: 0    | Speed:   23.67MH/s|
1.Zotac GTX 1070             : Shares: 1048.25 | Rej: 5    | Speed:   28.39MH/s|
2.Zotac GTX 1070             : Shares: 1059.5  | Rej: 12.5 | Speed:   28.37MH/s|
3.Zotac GTX 1070             : Shares: 1135.5  | Rej: 2.5  | Speed:   28.59MH/s|
4.Zotac GTX 1070             : Shares: 1219.25 | Rej: 15   | Speed:   28.56MH/s|
5.Zotac GTX 1070             : Shares: 1060    | Rej: 5    | Speed:   28.42MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.Zotac GTX 1070             : T:52C | F:79% | P: 74W | I: 24.0 | Core:1518Mhz |
1.Zotac GTX 1070             : T:66C | F:79% | P:123W | I: 24.0 | Core:1842Mhz |
2.Zotac GTX 1070             : T:66C | F:79% | P:124W | I: 24.0 | Core:1862Mhz |
3.Zotac GTX 1070             : T:68C | F:79% | P:125W | I: 24.0 | Core:1871Mhz |
4.Zotac GTX 1070             : T:63C | F:79% | P:124W | I: 24.0 | Core:1863Mhz |
5.Zotac GTX 1070             : T:65C | F:79% | P:126W | I: 24.0 | Core:1849Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[20:20:28]Share: 40799d3c              | [08:54:21][GPU0]:Invalid nonce
[20:20:35]Mean netDiff: 14152.2        | [09:36:36][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
[20:21:25]Share: 8429fed5              | )
[20:22:37]Share: abe9f0a8              | [14:05:32][GPU0]:Invalid nonce
[20:23:15]Mean netDiff: 15079.1        | [14:39:07][GPU2]:Job not found (=stale
[20:23:25]Mean netDiff: 15139.9        | )
[20:23:45]Mean netDiff: 15276.7        | [19:22:33][GPU2]:Job not found (=stale
[20:24:07]Mean netDiff: 15411.8        | )
legendary
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
Just find out, that you're working on the new mining software.
I really like the interface, and all those useful infos.
Keep up the good work chrys!
Pages:
Jump to: