Topic: A good investment option? ICO's pitched on a PRODUCT, not a White Paper - page 7. (Read 2347 times)
September 03, 2018, 11:09:53 AM
I completely agree with your thoughts if we talk about investment so we have to be more and more careful otherwise all of our investment on wealth, money and time will go in vain that is not good. It will be wiser to spend In renowned one rather than a new one. It is better to trust in the one who is already trusted by others.
September 03, 2018, 11:03:14 AM
still we need to see the whitepaper and understand it.
this will give us more security. product maybe in the public but how sure we will have the tokens running in the market?
product are products and they can focus on that as they have no white paper declaring what they will do with the investors token.
this will give us more security. product maybe in the public but how sure we will have the tokens running in the market?
product are products and they can focus on that as they have no white paper declaring what they will do with the investors token.
September 03, 2018, 10:53:56 AM
In my opinion there are many Ico which have no functioning product already. Ico like this having working product can earn a lot of profit and benefits in future.
September 03, 2018, 11:02:42 AM
All ICO projects that are currently present in the crypto market or had been existed in the past, all of them have whitepaper of their own. Without whitepaper no ICO projects are real.
September 03, 2018, 11:01:44 AM
Although there are many good ideas out there, aren't you safer to invest in an ICO which already has a functioning and proven product? ROI is much more likely in this scenario
Yes 1000% now ... people are wising up after 80% of the white papers from 2017 were actually bog roll
that will rise to 99% or greater as time goes on and even those that were serious at the time realise they are not nobel prize worthy and can't pull off the unrealistic fantasy they could dream up for bct members to cling on to
you will not find the 1% that can pull it off before you run out of money
stick to btc or projects that are complete or have completed the vast majority of their project to a functioning standard with a certain use case
In other words stick to btc unless you are an expert in many fields that are required to make an educated gamble
September 03, 2018, 08:32:16 AM
ICO with a product is certainly the best option from my point of view. Because having a ready product make the ICO stronger than other ICOs. Investors will be attracted more with this kind of ICO.
September 03, 2018, 11:01:01 AM
I think it will not be a bad idea investing in a ico already having a functioning product. I think it will bring a large amount of profit in future. Beside that Ico like this are quite safer than others.
September 03, 2018, 08:54:54 AM
I completely agree with you, why risk your own money. It is better to invest them in a reliable, working project. For example, KamaGames, they will soon have a token seil. I want to invest 30% of my bank there.
September 03, 2018, 08:19:17 AM
Some have a product but most with a successful product won't bother having an ICO. I prefer to look for ones with a good idea and a good team.
September 03, 2018, 08:16:56 AM
Having a genuine item is certainly a change on being requested to contribute exclusively on the back of a whitepaper yet I would alert that a considerable lot of those that are fund-raising with an item are ventures that collected their first cash from another source. It is less hazard yet doesn't be tricked into suspecting that implies no hazard.
September 03, 2018, 08:07:48 AM
Putting resources into an ICO that as of now has a working item is a smart thought that can get enormous benefits what's to come. The dangers of losing cash are limited, and the chance to benefit increments. That will be a smart action.
September 03, 2018, 07:57:15 AM
Positively more secure, yet there are none. Undertakings can demonstrate an MVP, which in actuality has no esteem. Financial specialists need to just stop and don't purchase tokens of unusual ventures, and afterward, the circumstance in the market willpower to change the disposition towards ICO.
September 03, 2018, 07:32:05 AM
There are ICOs with products and services launched on the market already but even then there are chances for them to fail. Not calling it a failed ICO but EOS recently faced scrutiniy because of a massive bug that was found on their smart contracts and now their prices are falling again.
September 03, 2018, 06:45:31 AM
Yes, this is true, ICO's with proven track record and a already introduced product or service that up and running is likely to be a good source for getting a lucrative ROI. However, the investment also depend on the feasibility of it, as most of the cases they are not cheap or available to the small investors.
September 03, 2018, 03:38:42 AM
There are very few avenues in the world where you can pitch an idea and be successful in fundraising to give that idea life. But in the world of ICO's it's normal 
September 02, 2018, 09:42:06 PM
Although there are many good ideas out there, aren't you safer to invest in an ICO which already has a functioning and proven product? ROI is much more likely in this scenario
I think so too, if they have a good product that has been used by many people, for what else we invest in ico which is not necessarily certainty, is it successful or not? September 02, 2018, 09:20:29 PM
Although there are many good ideas out there, aren't you safer to invest in an ICO which already has a functioning and proven product? ROI is much more likely in this scenario
I think so too, if they have a good product that has been used by many people, for what else we invest in ico which is not necessarily certainty, is it successful or not? September 02, 2018, 08:55:48 PM
An ICO with a product is far more trustworthy. It's important that product has proof of utility and success pre-ICO. Once investors know about it, the ICO will be extremely successful.
September 02, 2018, 06:05:48 PM
Doesn't really mean that having a product or a working prototype would make huge difference because ICOs that have their products launched into the market are likely to be exclusively available for the big investors. Moreover, prototypes can be copied and showed to investors just to scam them later on. So, the idea is not really feasible.
September 02, 2018, 04:31:43 PM
Yes true.. It's safer to invest in already functioning idea than the one you are not even sure if the idea will materialize.. I prefer that too but it's rare
Jump to: