Pages:
Author

Topic: A potential top @ $12.16: the bearish case (Read 7628 times)

legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003
August 19, 2012, 05:37:43 PM
#90
I think this drop to ~$8 is just opening a buying opportunity to a lot of people.  Although bank transfers to exchanges takes up to three days.  So I expect the price to be going to ~$9 for Friday but a lot of people could sell off their coins they receive back off Pirate so maybe staying around ~$8.50.  I can't see it going below $7 (for long) unless all the buying pressure that caused the rally was based around Pirate.  Even if it was I can't see it going below $6 and staying there.  That's my view on the outlook anyway.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1311
A year from now, ya'll will be complaining about 25 cent price swings on $100 BTC.

That will most definitely not be the case.  I doubt the price will be out of the $2 to $15 range a year from now. 
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1121
Updated the trend analysis here:

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BzdbolIn7zf1dW5IQnpUWTllZHc

In the grip of the red candles, so far.
donator
Activity: 853
Merit: 1000
I'd like a bit more stability like from March 2012 to June 2012.

I would too, but if I'm lucky and my count in the OP is accurate, than we should ultimately see more panic here than we did during the wave A decline from $32 to $2. A waves are generally coupled with a psychological backdrop of disappointment and surprise whereas C waves are when outright fear takes hold. If it does unfold in this manner, I hope to be buying like crazy at the bottom.

But... we'll just have to wait and see what happens I guess. There is no crystal ball, only probabilities.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1003
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BzdbolIn7zf1czhubUR6R2RoQVU

Just wondering if the longer-term trendline holds.
You will find out ... in the longer-term.

I think Pirate may have managed to slow the acceleration down a bit like he has before but the long term trend is definitely up tho maybe after a bit more correction but I'd like a bit more stability like from March 2012 to June 2012.
legendary
Activity: 4466
Merit: 1798
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BzdbolIn7zf1czhubUR6R2RoQVU

Just wondering if the longer-term trendline holds.
You will find out ... in the longer-term.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1121
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BzdbolIn7zf1czhubUR6R2RoQVU

Just wondering if the longer-term trendline holds.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
A year from now, ya'll will be complaining about 25 cent price swings on $100 BTC.
legendary
Activity: 4466
Merit: 1798
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
... and ... meanwhile it's on it's way back up again Smiley

The drop was probably a dump of BTC and the usual jumping around after that, but since the latest rise hasn't been a typical random bubble but is being backed by some sort of demand/support for BTC, it's continued after the dump.

... and if I'm wrong, yep I'll admit it, and the facts will show it too if I am wrong, I don't see any point in pretending I'm psychic Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
Well, now that the price has gone past your $12.16 top, what do your astrological technical analysis charts say?

Elliott Wave Theory is a bunch of useless nonsense. Fibonacci numbers are just numbers. They aren't magic and they are not connected to trading or bitcoins in any way. There I said it.

You might actually want to take the time and learn about something before you completely discredit/insult it. The rise above $12 was obviously unsustainable and the vicious consequences were just as predictable: http://imageshack.us/f/839/389b.png/ (taken from past subscription chart 389)

the wave-4 ended up being a larger running flat which was tricky, but the aftermath of the price surpassing the upper channel trend-line was the same -- an extended 5th (a classic commodity/currency bubble wave) before a plunge.

I actually know quite a lot about the subject. The "wave-4 tricky, blah, blah, blah, surpassing the upper channel trend-line, blah, blah, blah" you wrote is a bunch of nonsense derived from fairy tales dressed up to look like science. It is nonsense because it is just a bunch of pseudo-science built from Elliott's numerical hallucinations. It has as much validity as scientology and homeopathy, and of course, astrology. If someone could come up with a rational theoretical basis, or even some conclusive empirical evidence, then the subject might be transformed from mathematical allegories to a real science. But they can't. So, it remains stuck in the realm of confirmation bias, with the same stature as the science of street light interference (aka SLI to the believers).

As for the $12 mark, there was no top at $12, as your precious fairy tales predicted. The rise above $12 was not obviously unsustainable because the price was sustained well above your magic Fibonacci number. The fact that the price fell a few days after your misprediction was just a coincidence. You can not and should not try to take credit for anything here. Anyway, the fall in prices was caused an unpredictable event, not by crowd psychology or mood swings, which Elliot Wave Principle is purported (without substantiation) to be based on.

Oh btw, your $12.16 top looks more like a support level than a resistance level. Oh, but of course, resistance levels become support levels. What a lucky break -- your Xanadu remains intact. Isn't 20-20 hindsight precious?

/vomit


It's rooted in psychology and the chart he showed was sent out on August 7th.  Somehow he made a pretty accurate description of what happened two weeks later.

If a day and a half is "sustained" in your world, I can understand the confusion.
legendary
Activity: 4298
Merit: 3209
Well, now that the price has gone past your $12.16 top, what do your astrological technical analysis charts say?

Elliott Wave Theory is a bunch of useless nonsense. Fibonacci numbers are just numbers. They aren't magic and they are not connected to trading or bitcoins in any way. There I said it.

You might actually want to take the time and learn about something before you completely discredit/insult it. The rise above $12 was obviously unsustainable and the vicious consequences were just as predictable: http://imageshack.us/f/839/389b.png/ (taken from past subscription chart 389)

the wave-4 ended up being a larger running flat which was tricky, but the aftermath of the price surpassing the upper channel trend-line was the same -- an extended 5th (a classic commodity/currency bubble wave) before a plunge.

I actually know quite a lot about the subject. The "wave-4 tricky, blah, blah, blah, surpassing the upper channel trend-line, blah, blah, blah" you wrote is a bunch of nonsense derived from fairy tales dressed up to look like science. It is nonsense because it is just a bunch of pseudo-science built from Elliott's numerical hallucinations. It has as much validity as scientology and homeopathy, and of course, astrology. If someone could come up with a rational theoretical basis, or even some conclusive empirical evidence, then the subject might be transformed from mathematical allegories to a real science. But they can't. So, it remains stuck in the realm of confirmation bias, with the same stature as the science of street light interference (aka SLI to the believers).

As for the $12 mark, there was no top at $12, as your precious fairy tales predicted. The rise above $12 was not obviously unsustainable because the price was sustained well above your magic Fibonacci number. The fact that the price fell a few days after your misprediction was just a coincidence. You can not and should not try to take credit for anything here. Anyway, the fall in prices was caused an unpredictable event, not by crowd psychology or mood swings, which Elliot Wave Principle is purported (without substantiation) to be based on.

Oh btw, your $12.16 top looks more like a support level than a resistance level. Oh, but of course, resistance levels become support levels. What a lucky break -- your Xanadu remains intact. Isn't 20-20 hindsight precious?

/vomit
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
Are y'all crazy? It jumped $2.40 in one day. Even the biggest bulls could see that was ending badly. And the "correction" has taken us roughly 50c below the start of that spike. If there were any bearish sentiment about the broader rally, stop-losses and fear would have pushed the price a lot lower. Especially given how light the buy side was at that point.

I'm not saying that we've seen the lowest point yet, especially being the weekend, but if you think this is likely to last, I think you're in for a big surprise. A genuine rally has just dipped, after weeks of non-stop growth. This is where the fun really starts.
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1311
Was the drop from $15.40 down to $10.60 part of that prediction ...

Correct. The retracement went a bit higher than I expected, but I think being within 3 days of a major top is pretty damn close Smiley. $12.16 would be the first fib resistance point about 38% whereas $15.40 is about 50% which is the next major resistance point.

I think it's likely that Wave B is over and Wave C of II has begun to the downside. As I said in the OP, I'm still holding long with the coins that I already have, but I'm not buying any more coins until they reach around the $2 level again (unless my outlook changes).

Today's action certainly looks more like a major reversal rather than YANC (yet another normal correction):


Cypher, can I put my dancing bear back up now?
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Well, now that the price has gone past your $12.16 top, what do your astrological technical analysis charts say?

Elliot Wave Theory is a bunch of useless nonsense. Fibonacci numbers are just numbers. They aren't magic and they are not connected to trading or bitcoins in any way. There I said it.

You might actually want to take the time and learn about something before you completely discredit/insult it. The rise above $12 was obviously unsustainable and the vicious consequences were just as predictable: http://imageshack.us/f/839/389b.png/ (taken from past subscription chart 389)

the wave-4 ended up being a larger running flat which was tricky, but the aftermath of the price surpassing the upper channel trend-line was the same -- an extended 5th (a classic commodity/currency bubble wave) before a plunge.

On the upside, if the price more or less holds, it solidifies the fact that the gains prior to that massive jump were solid, not speculative, and the growth we were seeing before should continue Smiley

The daily and weekly underlying indicators say otherwise Wink
jr. member
Activity: 46
Merit: 1
Well, now that the price has gone past your $12.16 top, what do your astrological technical analysis charts say?

Elliot Wave Theory is a bunch of useless nonsense. Fibonacci numbers are just numbers. They aren't magic and they are not connected to trading or bitcoins in any way. There I said it.

You might actually want to take the time and learn about something before you completely discredit/insult it. The rise above $12 was obviously unsustainable and the vicious consequences were just as predictable: http://imageshack.us/f/839/389b.png/ (taken from past subscription chart 389)

the wave-4 ended up being a larger running flat which was tricky, but the aftermath of the price surpassing the upper channel trend-line was the same -- an extended 5th (a classic commodity/currency bubble wave) before a plunge.

On the upside, if the price more or less holds, it solidifies the fact that the gains prior to that massive jump were solid, not speculative, and the growth we were seeing before should continue Smiley

Exactly! What a good opportunity to buy now.
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
Well, now that the price has gone past your $12.16 top, what do your astrological technical analysis charts say?

Elliot Wave Theory is a bunch of useless nonsense. Fibonacci numbers are just numbers. They aren't magic and they are not connected to trading or bitcoins in any way. There I said it.

You might actually want to take the time and learn about something before you completely discredit/insult it. The rise above $12 was obviously unsustainable and the vicious consequences were just as predictable: http://imageshack.us/f/839/389b.png/ (taken from past subscription chart 389)

the wave-4 ended up being a larger running flat which was tricky, but the aftermath of the price surpassing the upper channel trend-line was the same -- an extended 5th (a classic commodity/currency bubble wave) before a plunge.

On the upside, if the price more or less holds, it solidifies the fact that the gains prior to that massive jump were solid, not speculative, and the growth we were seeing before should continue Smiley
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Well, now that the price has gone past your $12.16 top, what do your astrological technical analysis charts say?

Elliot Wave Theory is a bunch of useless nonsense. Fibonacci numbers are just numbers. They aren't magic and they are not connected to trading or bitcoins in any way. There I said it.

You might actually want to take the time and learn about something before you completely discredit/insult it. The rise above $12 was obviously unsustainable and the vicious consequences were just as predictable: http://imageshack.us/f/839/389b.png/ (taken from past subscription chart 389)

the wave-4 ended up being a larger running flat which was tricky, but the aftermath of the price surpassing the upper channel trend-line was the same -- an extended 5th (a classic commodity/currency bubble wave) before a plunge.
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
I think being within 3 days of a major top is pretty damn close Smiley

No. No it's not. There's a 30% difference in price between three days ago and the crash. Don't start believing your own hype and don't quit your day job. Roll Eyes
donator
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
Somewhere between 10.60 and 15.40 it will be 12.16 and the week is not over yet. Hell, I'm waiting for the "I sold everything at 15.40 and bought back at 10.60" threads. Hindsight analysis to verify vague predictions does not science make. TV evangelist prophets get a lot of donations for that kind of scam. Nowhere have I seen a stable 12.16 or anything close in a long time. It will take a prediction of stability at a price before I can believe any type of prediction methodology. But in case you are wondering, 12 is about the break even cost of the average small time bitcoin miner using pools, so that is a good reason to believe 12 can be stable.
Pages:
Jump to: