It really does not matter whether this person, the new PR person has a degree in PR, was a PR person for a major music label, worked for the government of Sri Lanka as their PR person, or is a share holder or not. The only thing that is important is that he or she or they provide regular accurate regular information.
What are your qualifications to make such silly demands? Are you a share holder? How many shares do you own?
It seems to me that many people who have a handful of shares, and are worrying about very little come here and then make outrageous demands of Ke, ActM and the other people on here.
Just my .0002 BTC
for qualifications does not imply that they have to have a degree in PR and it certainly doesn't equate to demanding. All I'm asking for (not demanding) is to know more about this person. One example of qualifications could be that the person has been involved since the IPO was first launched. Another is, this could be one of the other Slaughter family members that we have not heard from yet.
I thought it was obvious from my post that I was simply concerned with lack of transparency and that it could lead to FUD. I'm not an extremist and I would never make a demand. I play devils advocate to identify what will allow FUD to make an argument.
And if you recall the PMs that we exchanged a day ago, you know I'm a shareholder, how many shares I have, and what my opinion on how bright the future of ActM is.
Edit: and now that I've made that request for more information, and defended that request against distortion, you won't find me harping on this. My argument is out there. Ken can do what he will with it.
