[ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread - page 91.

zumzero

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

myBitcoin.Garden

Quote from: Mabsark on September 01, 2013, 04:54:09 AM

Quote from: zumzero on September 01, 2013, 04:25:54 AM

Sell ActM

Buy Labcoin

Miss the boat

Erm...?

The ActM boat isn't going anywhere till November at the very earliest. Labcoin's rise in price will be mostly over by then and shares will be at least 0.01 BTC within the next 2 weeks. There's plenty of time to profit from Labcoin before ActM sets sail, then do it all over again with ActM.

I hope you do well out of it. Perhaps leave others to follow their own strategy though?

Mabsark

legendary

Activity: 826

Merit: 1004

Quote from: zumzero on September 01, 2013, 04:25:54 AM

Sell ActM

Buy Labcoin

Miss the boat

Erm...?

The ActM boat isn't going anywhere till November at the very earliest. Labcoin's rise in price will be mostly over by then and shares will be at least 0.01 BTC within the next 2 weeks. There's plenty of time to profit from Labcoin before ActM sets sail, then do it all over again with ActM.

zumzero

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

myBitcoin.Garden

Quote from: bobboooiie on September 01, 2013, 04:42:54 AM

Quote from: zumzero on September 01, 2013, 04:25:54 AM

Sell ActM

Buy Labcoin

Miss the boat

Erm...?

Missing the titanic woudlnt be that bad

There's more than one Titanic in this industry, I can assure you of that. Chosing who to sail with is key. Wink

Take that 7 million tonne immovable iceberg that iCEBREAKER is stearing IceDrill straight into! Grin

bobboooiie

hero member

Activity: 656

Merit: 500

Quote from: zumzero on September 01, 2013, 04:25:54 AM

Sell ActM

Buy Labcoin

Miss the boat

Erm...?

Missing the titanic woudlnt be that bad

zumzero

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

myBitcoin.Garden

Sell ActM

Buy Labcoin

Miss the boat

Erm...?

Mabsark

legendary

Activity: 826

Merit: 1004

So, now ActM's share price has dropped below Labcoin's and it looks like it will drop down to around 0.0025, whereas Labcoin will be heading up to 0.01 BTC when they start hashing within the next 2 weeks. I told you guys this was going to happen when the price was about 0.0045-0.005 BTC. It was blatantly obvious.

It's also blatantly obvious that Labcoin will have their 50TH/s online before ActM even have ASIC samples. Those of you holding ActM at this point are just being sycophantic fanboys and that fanboyism is leading you to ignore a great opportunity to make a hell of a lot of profit.

01. Sell ActM
02. Buy Laboin
03. Wait
04. Sell Labcoin
05. Profit
06. Buy ActM
07. Wait
08. Sell ActM
09. Profit
10. Invest in new IPO or existing successful assets.

bigdude

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 500

Dolphins Finance TRUSTED FINANCE

Quote from: zumzero on September 01, 2013, 02:48:13 AM

I think it may be a good idea that following the soon to be released news announcement, someone collates a pile of questions from shareholders and presents them to Ken for his attention.

It's unclear how much info will be made available and what topics will be covered by this announcement, so I suggest we start the Q & A immediately following.

For people to offer up questions at this stage may not be such a good idea given how little we know about the content of this annoucement.

Also, given this threads ability to mask important information perhaps we should also post the Q & A on the first page?

Cheers.

Now that! is an excellent suggestion my friend *thumbs up*

zumzero

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

myBitcoin.Garden

I think it may be a good idea that following the soon to be released news announcement, someone collates a pile of questions from shareholders and presents them to Ken for his attention.

It's unclear how much info will be made available and what topics will be covered by this announcement, so I suggest we start the Q & A immediately following.

For people to offer up questions at this stage may not be such a good idea given how little we know about the content of this annoucement.

Also, given this threads ability to mask important information perhaps we should also post the Q & A on the first page?

Cheers.

aquarius

sr. member

Activity: 275

Merit: 250

it seems that some people are very good at posting troll posts in the top slots of each page.

that must be good for business for you. how much extra do you get for top posts vs. post lower on the page?

superduh

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

it's kind of weird. they need to be putting out: more real, news etc
their competitors are putting more info about their progress than AMC is and this can't go on forever under "NDA" there must be some kind of progress reporting happening

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: FloatesMcgoates on September 01, 2013, 01:16:26 AM

What activemining needs is some good ol' cheerleading from stuart, come on guy where are you? Kenneth needs you to spam "NDA" every time the share price goes down.

Where is Stuart? Under NDA. Wink

FloatesMcgoates

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

What activemining needs is some good ol' cheerleading from stuart, come on guy where are you? Kenneth needs you to spam "NDA" every time the share price goes down.

somestranger

hero member

Activity: 487

Merit: 500

Are You Shpongled?

Quote from: discobean on August 31, 2013, 08:58:46 PM

To me its eASIC is like .net or Java, vs full custom which is like C or assembler.

Interesting comparison since Java runs nearly as fast (50-105%) as C in many applications. The JVM is very efficient. http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/java.php

Also, assembly is rarely faster than C because the compilers know more optimizations than most programmers.

joele

legendary

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1000

Quote from: afrotec on August 31, 2013, 10:14:24 PM

Quote from: joele on August 31, 2013, 10:08:38 PM

Is Ken waiting for the avalon chips? because Avalon will be receiving 400k chips this Wednesday and will be delivering for orders made in June and later.

http://imgur.com/vcI1PAC

Refund

Read the other news, for those who decided to wait.

afrotec

full member

Activity: 127

Merit: 100

Coinnoisseur

Quote from: joele on August 31, 2013, 10:08:38 PM

Is Ken waiting for the avalon chips? because Avalon will be receiving 400k chips this Wednesday and will be delivering for orders made in June and later.

http://imgur.com/vcI1PAC

Refund

joele

legendary

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1000

Is Ken waiting for the avalon chips? because Avalon will be receiving 400k chips this Wednesday and will be delivering for orders made in June and later.

http://imgur.com/vcI1PAC

Vbs

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: discobean on August 31, 2013, 08:58:46 PM

Quote from: HuLaN on August 31, 2013, 08:47:50 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

28 nm isn't a magical thing.
If your chip is a copy-paste of a FPGA, it's not going to be very good, 28 nm or not.
For example, BitFury's chips, at 55 nm, might be better.
And then there's the cost of production.

Vbs mentions that eAsic's 28 nm is "mature". Yet no one claimed it isn't. Classical fallacy: criticize what isn't the opinion of your opponents, to appear right.

BitFury's 3GH chip at 55nm is going to outperform ActM's 28nm eAsic chip? keep dreaming kiddo Roll Eyes

I wouldn't be so sure about that. My (little) understanding of eASIC tech, and the reason why ActM went for eASIC was fast build (to production) of the ASIC chip, be cheaper and more efficient than FPGA. Its as if eASIC has has 'APIs' built to go from requirements to build fast, unlike full custom. This means they would lack in other areas, such as performance and power usage compared to full custom.

To me its eASIC is like .net or Java, vs full custom which is like C or assembler.

You have to take into consideration that they didn't grow 980% in 2012 out of speculation. Their process is very real and is efficient "enough" to have heavy tech partners wanting to do chips with them. If any of those weren't satisfied they would have jumped ship a long time ago.

It's a semi-custom process more like "C vs ASM" and they are already on their 3rd chip design revision (Nextreme-3@28nm) with several patents on their process.

redbeans2012

hero member

Activity: 887

Merit: 1000

Quote from: FloatesMcgoates on August 31, 2013, 08:54:38 PM

heheheh looks like .004 has been breached and all the support at .0038 has been pulled. In fact there is no support to be seen at all - looks like ActiveMining will continue to tank for the foreseeable future down to IPOv2 levels of .0025

My only hope is to average out somewhere along the way I guess.

discobean

member

Activity: 105

Merit: 11

Quote from: HuLaN on August 31, 2013, 08:47:50 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

28 nm isn't a magical thing.
If your chip is a copy-paste of a FPGA, it's not going to be very good, 28 nm or not.
For example, BitFury's chips, at 55 nm, might be better.
And then there's the cost of production.

Vbs mentions that eAsic's 28 nm is "mature". Yet no one claimed it isn't. Classical fallacy: criticize what isn't the opinion of your opponents, to appear right.

BitFury's 3GH chip at 55nm is going to outperform ActM's 28nm eAsic chip? keep dreaming kiddo Roll Eyes

I wouldn't be so sure about that. My (little) understanding of eASIC tech, and the reason why ActM went for eASIC was fast build (to production) of the ASIC chip, be cheaper and more efficient than FPGA. Its as if eASIC has has 'APIs' built to go from requirements to build fast, unlike full custom. This means they would lack in other areas, such as performance and power usage compared to full custom.

To me its eASIC is like .net or Java, vs full custom which is like C or assembler.

FloatesMcgoates

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

heheheh looks like .004 has been breached and all the support at .0038 has been pulled. In fact there is no support to be seen at all - looks like ActiveMining will continue to tank for the foreseeable future down to IPOv2 levels of .0025

Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread - page 91. (Read 479317 times)